User talk:Juzhong

Remember, you people destroyed several hours of my life as "listcruft garbage"  and the admin who endorsed this didn't even bother to read the debate. Don't claim any moral authority.

Sedum lineare
Hi, I added a taxobox (a box on the side containing taxonomy information. I am not 100 percent it is correct; I copied most of the information from Sedum.  Please feel free to improve it any way you see fit.  Welcome.  Jon513 (talk) 09:00, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Shenzhou 7
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. &mdash;Politizer( talk • contribs ) 02:38, 1 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Regarding your edit summary in this edit: This is the second time I've had to ask you to refrain from making personal attacks. Please be civil with other editors and realize that disagreeing with you doesn't make everyone a moron. &mdash;Politizer talk / contribs 00:07, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * In addition: if in your first revert you had explained your real rationale, saying that the "near miss" wording is POV and is not included in the source, I would have taken the time to look into the issue more closely before reverting. But because you misrepresented the issue as merely a question of whether or not the distance counted as "near," other editors had no chance to consider the POV issues that you did not bring up at talk until later.  Before rushing to insult other editors, please take the time to consider having a civil dialogue.  &mdash;Politizer talk / contribs 00:15, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * My first edit wasn't a revert it was a neutralization. I called you a moron because you put back a typo, probably because you were reverting without looking at what you were doing. Please try to pay more attention in future. Juzhong (talk) 01:07, 4 November 2008 (UTC)


 * I was looking at I was doing, and manually went in to re-correct the typo you had previously fixed, but made a mistake because I was hurrying. That still doesn't excuse you for calling another editor a moron.  Please be more polite with others in the future. &mdash;Politizer talk / contribs 06:00, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Fungus and Biodiesel
Thanks for your recent addition to Biodiesel. Your addition discussed a potential fuel similar to, but different from, biodiesel. It was thusly moved to the Talk:Biomass to liquid page, and should find an appropriate publication page shortly. Discuss there if you'd like.--E8 (talk) 03:29, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

RE: Chiharu Matsuyama
You recently removed my proposed deletion for Chiharu Matsuyama, based on the claim that there are Google news hits for the singer. Would you be able to expand the article using some of these sources, so we can get away from using an editable wiki as the source for another editable wiki? Your assistance is appreciated. -- saberwyn 20:40, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks muchly. Your improvements are appreciated. -- saberwyn 23:10, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Your PROD removals
Hi, I wanted to raise my concern about the reasons you're giving for PROD removals. Personal admiration, like "he came all the way from cameroon to play amateur soccer - that's dedication" is not a proper reason for an athlete who may not meet WP:ATHLETE, and "probably just picking on albanians" runs afoul of WP:AGF. The concern seems to be that Albanian Superliga clubs are not fully professional, and if that's the case (it's unclear looking around on Wikipedia), players from the league certainly don't meet WP:N. Please address this concern directly rather than providing a specious reasoning or accusing another editor of an anti-Albanian bias. Thanks. --Mosmof (talk) 14:40, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi, please don't waste my time with logic like "if the Albanian isn't fully professional, its players certainly don't meet WP:N". Juzhong (talk) 17:33, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Did you bother to read WP:ATHLETE and WP:FOOTYN? --Mosmof (talk) 17:48, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

There's a bit which says "A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. "
 * I'm guessing you didn't read WP:FOOTYN, specifically, "Have played for a fully professional club at a national level of the league structure (FPNL club). This must be supported by evidence from a reliable source on a club by club basis for teams playing in leagues that are not recognised as being fully professional." I don't see any evidence that the ALbanian Supeliga is fully professional (emphasis on "fully"). Plus, none of the articles you removed PRODs show "significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject". --Mosmof (talk) 18:24, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * So you don't actually know whether this is a professional league or not. Stop wasting my time. 21:09, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi Juzhong! I second Mosmof's request. "Getting silly now" is not a valid reason to remove a Proposed Deletion. Please provide valid reasons in the future. -- Ynhockey (Talk) 17:50, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * You really can't understand why I would regard that prod tag as silly? Come on, you are supposed to be intelligent people here. Juzhong (talk) 17:55, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * And intelligent people read the relevant policies and guidelines before accusing other people of sinister motives. --Mosmof (talk) 18:04, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Yep :) Juzhong (talk) 18:06, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Civility
While participating in an discussion it is expected that you remain civil and refrain from making personal attacks on other editors. Please refrain from making comments such as this in the future. Thank you. LeaveSleaves talk 02:57, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Blocked
I have blocked you for 24 hours as you have been warned for incivility but continued to make comments such as, , and. Nick-D (talk) 07:32, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * You guys really are morons. Looks at these votes:
 * ...who is to say one is notable and another is not?
 * ''Well wikipedia has WP:N for that doesn't it?
 * Delete Not a meaningful categorisation of these people ...a topic for which a category is much better suited.

Juzhong (talk) 09:56, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Re, help desk
Yeah a column for topic is actually a good idea, Feel free to help out if you want I am currently editing it here. Also if you have any other ideas please post on the related talk page.-- intraining  Jack In  10:44, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Requests for comment/Sandstein
Hi there, if you disagree with the closure of an AfD deletion discussion, a more appropriate way to deal with the issue would be to open a deletion review, rather than start an RFC on the closer. I would recommend that you close the RFC, which is currently malformed ("not sure" is not a good answer to the relevant policies section) and not likely to go anywhere, and start a DRV instead. Glass  Cobra  12:12, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi, you know it started as a very simple question. I'm surprised how many people seem to be trying to weasel out of answering it. Juzhong (talk) 20:25, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I know what the deal is. You are thinking "It doesn't matter that Sandstein misread the discussion, because the article would have been deleted anyway." This is also what Sandstein was thinking when he realized he got it wrong, no? He just didn't have the courage to say so, instead he wanted DRV to save his face. Juzhong (talk) 20:41, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

December 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Whpq (talk) 17:54, 19 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Also please do not call people dumbass (or other names for that matter), in your edit summaries as you did here, thank you--kelapstick (talk) 18:49, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * You people seriously have issues with reading. Juzhong (talk) 22:45, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below.

Hi, that guy confesses right here [ ] to ignoring me. I suspected that had been happened, and it's not just my "attitude" or the color issue, you people don't read anyone else's posts either. Therefore your deletion discussions (and blocks) have no legitimacy. This is not a game. [[User:Juzhong|Juzhong]] (talk) 10:32, 21 December 2008 (UTC)


 * If you disagree with other editors you should remain polite and follow the process described at WP:DR and Articles for deletion. Those posts you just reported look pretty inoffensive to me, especially given the nature of your comments that editor was responding to. Nick-D (talk) 10:37, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Heh, I notice that that guy still hasn't figured out that no-one knows wtf he meant. Take a look at this part of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion#AfD Wikietiquette: "Remember that while AfD may look like a voting process, it does not operate like one. Justification and evidence for a response carries far more weight than the response itself". If that was actually true, you might have some legitimacy. Juzhong (talk) 11:20, 21 December 2008 (UTC)


 * You are a very rude person, Juzhong, and I find it highly disconcerting that despite your two blocks you continue to make repeated attacks on other editors at every opportunity. Please take some time to reflect upon this and I hope you can come back a more cheerful and agreeable person after the holidays.  Take care JBsupreme (talk) 16:30, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I ignored many, many opportunies. This block is the result of intentional provocation. Juzhong (talk) 19:49, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah, and so was the last one. Juzhong (talk) 20:30, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

 To do: Meu Tio Matou Um Cara goes in Brazilian films of 2004

The Cry (film)
I was able to get the admin to return the article when it got deleted in the middle of my/our working on it. I wrote to editors who opined delete at the AfD to see if they feel I/we need to show even more notability than the many reviews. I think we made it a keeper.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 01:58, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009
in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below. To reviewing admin, please see WP:ANI. Regards, EyeSerene talk 10:27, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Cool, I can't take the lazy way out any more. Juzhong (talk) 12:01, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Futaba Channel
Hi there. You were a participant in the discussion for this article, which I closed as delete. I restored and relisted the article at AfD yesterday. I notified most participants, but somehow missed you and a couple of others. Please accept my apologies. The discussion is here. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  04:27, 15 January 2009 (UTC)