User talk:Kevin Nelson

Image tagging for Image:GQLupi b.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:GQLupi b.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:05, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:GQLupi_b.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:GQLupi_b.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 16:16, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:GQLupi b.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:GQLupi b.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Austin Post Office
You removed the Austin Post Office image in this revision here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Austin,_Texas&diff=291119235&oldid=290962947

In a way its a local "landmark" because this is the United States Postal Service's main post office for Austin, Texas. It doesn't look distinctive because the USPS built it rather recently. The USPS's main post office is not located in the central city. Also, there isn't a sign on the post office that says "Austin Post Office" -- but there is a banner that says "APO" - A clue about what it really is. WhisperToMe (talk) 22:46, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Some exoplanets lack water
"The recent discovery that several surveyed exoplanets lacked water showed that there is still much more to be learned about the properties of exoplanets."

Kevin I respectfully believe this sentence from the Extrasolar planet page means that some of the observed exoplanets lack water. So it doesn't mean that water wasn't found yet. I know that water vapor has been found spectroscopically. But according to the predictions of current theories of planet formation some of the planets should have water but they don't so that's why we have much to learn yet. See this link: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=water-mysteriously-absent. I'll add the sentence again with the citation

Best regards Quantanew (talk) 05:38, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Number of stars and planets in the Milky Way
Hi, Since you seem to know the subject, could you have a look at the number of stars and planets in the Milky Way. There are various figures, which do not seem to match. See Milky Way and Extrasolar planet. I have seen the figure of 1012 planets in the Milky Way, but I don't understand how this is computed. Thanks, Yann (talk) 13:27, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Rogue Planet merger proposal
Might pay to tag the other pages you wish to merge, see Merging. SkyMachine (talk) 21:22, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Lists of extrasolar planets
Number of discovered extrasolar planets has reached 707. You can add planets to these articles since they're way outdated:


 * List of exoplanetary host stars
 * List of planetary systems
 * List of extrasolar planets detected by timing
 * List of extrasolar planets directly imaged
 * List of extrasolar planets detected by microlensing
 * List of transiting extrasolar planets
 * List of extrasolar planets detected by radial velocity

--BlueEarth (talk | contribs) 22:12, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Orbitreflex.gif


A tag has been placed on File:Orbitreflex.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 22:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Exoplanet
I have nominated Exoplanet for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. DrKay (talk) 08:29, 26 June 2016 (UTC)