User talk:Lettherebedarklight/archive 2

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manfred Deix (November 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manfred Deix and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Manfred_Deix Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Onel5969&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Manfred_Deix reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Onel 5969  TT me 20:05, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Boomerang
–– FormalDude  (talk)  15:50, 23 November 2022 (UTC)


 * @formaldude: and you burnt it too. ew. → lettherebedarklight → 晚安 → おやすみ → 15:51, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

FYI EWN posting
I presume you have seen my ping. New posting on EWN: wp:EWN Cheers Adakiko (talk) 13:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Talk:2022 COVID-19 protests in China
Please reread the discussion on Talk:2022 COVID-19 protests in China. What I wrote was not intended as a joke and was not "trolling". 50.230.201.134 (talk) 21:58, 4 December 2022 (UTC)


 * you genuinely think that covid-19 was created by the biden administration? where did you get this information from?? lettherebedarklight晚安 06:57, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, COVID-19 was created by the Biden campaign. I don't think that this is true, I know that it is, and as some of the Wikipedia pages on theories about COVID-19 say, this is a widespread belief in Asia as well.
 * The fact that this is censored by the mainstream media does not mean that it is too controversial to add to Wikipedia. Wikipedia acknowledges for instance that many mass shootings are theorized to be false flag operations set up by Democrats when this is completely off limits in the media. In the case of the Coronavirus, it is even more black and white - there are no Chinese scientists "pulling a trigger" - the federal government oversees the activity of scientists around the world and these are people who were just doing their jobs. There is a long history of the United States doing the exact same thing in the past with both airborne illnesses and train stations in China, with the Hong Kong flu and Asian flu as basic examples.
 * I happen to know for a fact that the Biden campaign created COVID-19, but just from the circumstances it should already be a no-brainer for anyone with any knowledge of history that it was created by the US government. The idea of a "lab leak" - that a virus unexpectedly escaped from a laboratory and then ran amok infecting hundreds of millions of people - is the topic of a science fiction movie. And the idea that the Chinese government deliberately created the virus, which the US government has been desperate to sell in the media, is a complete farce. 50.230.201.134 (talk) 01:06, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia acknowledges for instance that many mass shootings are theorized to be false flag operations set up by Democrats when this is completely off limits in the media.
 * where?
 * The idea of a "lab leak" - that a virus unexpectedly escaped from a laboratory and then ran amok infecting hundreds of millions of people - is the topic of a science fiction movie. And the idea that the Chinese government deliberately created the virus, which the US government has been desperate to sell in the media, is a complete farce.
 * that's not even what the mainstream press is saying, they're saying that it originated when someone was infected in wuhan by an animal carrying the disease.
 * besides, i could come up with a million other possibilities other than created by the US government. it was created by aliens! the village of honeywood! a mad scientist from belarus! lettherebedarklight晚安 05:00, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
 * At one point (before the Uvalde shooting and Biden's "disinformation board" incidentally) the page for the Sandy Hook shooting linked to the page for false flagging or vice-versa. Currently the page for Marjorie Taylor Greene contains a lot of claims made by her about mass shootings as false flag operations. She makes other claims that seem crazy, but this is something that is well-known and she is just the only politician willing to talk about it. This is why Wikipedia even posts things like Bill Clinton's reactions to the Columbine shooting.
 * As another editor pointed out, the Coronavirus has been around for nearly a century. So the idea of it suddenly going from one person being infected by a bat to hundreds of millions of people around the world being infected in a matter of months is obviously fishy. To answer your question of why it should implicate the government and not your other suspects, number one this is something that requires organization and control over the population that only governments have. And number two, none of your suspects made trillions of dollars off of the pandemic, the US government did. 50.230.201.134 (talk) 22:36, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
 * also, the point of wikipedia is to reflect what the mainstream press is saying. lettherebedarklight晚安 05:06, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
 * The biggest story in the news media right now is the attack on the Biden administration's censorship on Twitter. What I have written is at the heart of his multi-trillion dollar scam operation Presidential campaign. 50.230.201.134 (talk) 22:40, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

untitled
you can remove the filter from the sandbox please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.40.40.205 (talk) 19:58, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
 * no, i cannot, i'm not an edit filter manager. lettherebedarklight晚安 05:15, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Help
You replied to User_talk:LEGENDARY_VIP at afchelp and told him that his (incomprehensible) draft was rejected.

I happened to look at his most recent edit, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Espionage&diff=prev&oldid=1130250685 and it's weird. He has removed some ref tags and replaced them with bracketed numbers like [1]. I am not sure if a simple rollback is appropriate, or what.

Wait, he is still editing. Is this a time for AIV? I am still fairly new. Thanks. David10244 (talk) 08:20, 29 December 2022 (UTC)


 * @david10244: i am a horrible judge of these things, but you could definitely take them to aiv as they have a final warning for vandalism. lettherebedarklight晚安 15:34, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I think it's AN or ANI. I'll fo something. David10244 (talk) 08:58, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

What indeed
? --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 10:59, 10 January 2023 (UTC)


 * @tamzin: a broken a2r of a redirect that doesn't exist, removed it lettherebedarklight晚安 11:03, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Well that's because the main redirect was deleted on procedural grounds.  I've recreated it and restored the a2r tag.  --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 11:09, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Aaditya Mangalam
Hello, Lettherebedarklight,

I'd really appreciate if you could be a little more understanding to brand new editors who don't understand how Wikipedia works. I just deleted this page because it was obviously unsuitable for the project. But that doesn't mean that you have to treat the editors rudely. I don't know if you are answering these types of questions all day and are kind of burned out but try to remember that this is a new editor who has come to AFC for help. Just a simple, neutral "This content is unsuitable" is better than "don't give us nonsense". This effort was clearly important to this person even though it only lasted a few minutes before it was deleted. Please remember that AFC Help might be the first encounter a new editor has with an experienced editor and can leave a lasting impression about the culture here. Thanks for all of your contributions on the project! Liz Read! Talk! 06:40, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Article- Chhota Shakeel
I had made edits to the article Chhota Shakeel citing sources that the subject is confirmed as deceased but it was undone and reverted - I do notknow why.Please can someone look into it.Thank You Edwardblakes (talk) 23:15, 24 February 2023 (UTC)


 * @edwardblakes: start a discussion on talk:Chhota Shakeel. lettherebedarklight晚安 01:39, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Article: Liancourt Rocks
Hello, Lettherebedarklight.

I'm concerned that your closing statement in Talk:Liancourt Rocks only contains the result of requested move, and not additional comment on the rationale or explanation. WP:RMCI states that "Non-administrators are reminded that closing a discussion calls for an impartial assessment of consensus or lack of it, although arguments supported by directly relevant policy and guidelines are given more weight (while keeping broader Wikipedia policy, guidelines, and consensus in mind). Any editor wishing to express an opinion on the requested move should join the discussion, not close it." While I'm aware that additional comment is not necessary, but it shows that how the closer reached the result and whether or not the closer impartially assessed the debate among participants.

I'd really appreciate if you could add additional comment on the talk page. 아이서울유 (talk) 07:47, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Nice
This cracks me up. Panini! • 🥪 12:39, 4 April 2023 (UTC)


 * @panini!: i stole it from the fourth bjaodn. lettherebedarklight晚安 00:49, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Manfred Deix
Hello, Lettherebedarklight. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Manfred Deix, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:36, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Denver Fenton Allen v. State of Georgia
Hello, Lettherebedarklight. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Denver Fenton Allen v. State of Georgia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:20, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Teahouse
Was it really necessary to call that user ? That seems pretty WP:BITEy to me. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 03:21, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Permalink

Birth date of Adam Leitman Bailey
Hi, where is this information from? I can't find it in the cited source. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:58, 30 May 2023 (UTC)


 * @tobefree: i just took it from the infobox. didn't bother to check the source. whoops. lettherebedarklight晚安 05:33, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Ah, no worries. I was afraid I had overlooked something in the source. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 05:53, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

DYK nomination of James Farrell (police officer)
Hello! Your submission of James Farrell (police officer) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 19:32, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

June 2023
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Khaled al-Qazzaz, you may be blocked from editing. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 16:12, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

User page
Hi lettherebedarklight. I came across your use page today and noted the altered "semi-retired" notice. Since the word you used is considered a slur by many, any chance you could change it to something else? Thanks. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 18:35, 11 June 2023 (UTC)


 * it is? darn, i saw it, thought it was funny, and stole it. removed now. lettherebedarklight晚安 18:37, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Teahouse
At the Teahouse, you inexplicably wrote. Where did you get that notion? We have three interrelated and mandatory core content policies, which are Verifiability, the Neutral point of view and OR|No original research. We have essential content policies about Biographies of living people and Copyright compliance and other things as well. Please do not answer policy questions when it is clear that you are not conversant with the actual policies. Cullen328 (talk) 08:00, 21 June 2023 (UTC)


 * i meant content policies in the sense that the asker meant it. lettherebedarklight晚安 10:04, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

yeah
I think you're right, not sure whether it's quite enough similarity yet, but I'll keep an eye on it, and thanks! Valereee (talk) 12:14, 15 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Your welcome! I’m glad I feel safe out there. ~ WikiCoverings11111 (message) 14:24, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Citation Archive
Thanks for your good faith non-admin close. I don't think anybody's going to object to this closure, but I'll take a liberty and give critique: normally, we shouldn't close a deletion procedure early in a case where the nominator has withdrawn their nom, but at least one other participant has asserted delete. I would have left the process to run its full seven days. In this instance, I think your keep closure was a correct reading of the discussion and I believe the outcome would have been the same if you'd allowed the process to continue. I encourage you to continue closing in obvious cases to get a feel for the process (and make a few mistakes, frankly). Please accept this call-out as such encouragement, not any sort of warning. If you ever need help, feel free to call on me. Thanks for your efforts. BusterD (talk) 13:21, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for An account abandoned for a clean start cannot be used. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Doug Weller talk 19:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Doug Weller talk 08:35, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

"Doko Demo Issho" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Doko_Demo_Issho&redirect=no Doko Demo Issho] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. ... disco spinster   talk  01:09, 22 December 2023 (UTC)