User talk:MasterOfHisOwnDomain/Archive 2

Request for help concerning energy...
Hi,

I noticed you listed yourself as a participant of the Energy WikiProject.

There are 2 new outlines in this area that attempt to consolidate Wikipedia's coverage of their respective subjects, gathering and organizing the articles about them into one place and including descriptions for convenience. The purposes of these outlines are to make it easier for readers to survey or review a whole subject, and to choose from Wikipedia's many articles about it.

The new energy outlines are:


 * Outline of solar energy
 * Outline of wind energy

Please take a look at them, and....


 * if you spot missing topics, add them in.


 * if you can, improve the descriptions.


 * add missing descriptions.


 * show parent-offspring relationships (with indents).


 * fix errors.

For more information about the format and functions of outlines, see Outlines.

Building outlines of existing material (such as Wikipedia) is called "reverse outlining". Reverse outlines are useful as a revision tool, for identifying gaps in coverage and for spotting poor structuring.

Revising a work with multiple articles (such as Wikipedia) is a little different than revising a paper. But the general principles are the same...

As you develop these outlines, you may notice things about the articles they organize. Like what topics are not adequately covered, better ways to structure and present the material, awkward titles, articles that need splitting, article sections lacking Main links, etc.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Outlines.

Thank you. Sincerely, The Transhumanist 00:48, 2 June 2012 (UTC) P.S.: see also Outline of energy

Cave Story FAC again
Sorry, I just wanted to follow up on this. Did you get a chance to look over the full article? Thanks, Axem Titanium (talk) 17:51, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

GOCE July 2012 Copy Edit Drive
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 19:12, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

WikiCup 2012 June newsletter
Apologies for the lateness of this letter; our usual bot wasn't working. We are now entering round 4, our semi-finals, and have our final 16. A score of 243 was required to reach this round; significantly more than 2011's 76 points, and only a little behind 2010's 250 points. By comparison, last year, 150 points in round 4 secured a place in the final; in 2010, 430 were needed. Commiserations to Pool A's, who scored 242 points, missing out on a place in the round by a whisker. However, congratulations to Pool B's, whose television articles have brought him another round victory. Pool A's came second overall, with an impressive list of biological did you knows, good articles and featured articles. Third overall was Pool D's, with a long list of contibutions, mostly relating to baseball. Of course, with the points resetting every round, the playing field has been levelled. The most successful Pool was Pool D, which saw seven into the final round. Pool B saw four, C saw three and Pool A saw only the two round leaders.

A quick note about other competitions taking place on Wikipedia which may be of interest. There are 13 days remaining in the June-July GAN backlog elimination drive, but it is not too late to take part. August will also see the return of The Core Contest- a one month long competition first run in 2007. While the WikiCup awards points for audited content on any subject, The Core Contest about is raw article improvement, focussing heavily on the most important articles on Wikipedia. As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 11:01, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

You still into kinky sextain?
Hi MOHOD. I hope you're well. I think of Sestina every now and again, but I don't really want to go into it unilaterally, since it's your project. Also, I'm incredibly lazy. But I hope it's still on your radar. I do think it's coming along nicely. But no pressure... Wikipedia will wait... Phil wink (talk) 03:38, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I do, whenever I'm on Wikipedia -- which is rarely as of late. Feel free to add or tweak or whatever; it's not so much my project as simply my desire to see the article in a good state! It will all be seen by me eventually. Thanks Phil. MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 16:04, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXVI, July 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 09:35, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

WikiCup 2012 July newsletter
We're approaching the beginning of 2012's final round. Pool A sees as the leader, with 300 points being awarded for the featured article Bivalvia, and Pool B sees  in the lead, with 10 good articles, and over 35 articles eligible for good topic points. Pool A sees in second place with a number of articles relating to baseball, while Pool B's  follows Grapple X, with a variety of contributions including the high-scoring, high-importance featured article on the 2010 film Pride & Prejudice. Ruby2010, like Grapple X, also claimed a number of good topic points; despite this, not a single point has been claimed for featured topics in the contest so far. The same is true for featured portals.

Currently, the eighth-place competitor (and so the lowest scorer who would reach the final round right now) has scored 332, more than double the 150 needed to reach the final round last year. In 2010, however, 430 was the lowest qualifying score. In this competition, we have generally seen scores closer to those in 2010 than those in 2011. Let's see what kind of benchmark we can set for future competitions! As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 22:28, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

WikiCup 2012 August newsletter
The final is upon us! We are down to our final 8. A massive 573 was our lowest qualifying score; this is higher than the 150 points needed last year and the 430 needed in 2010. Even in 2009, when points were acquired for mainspace edit count in addition to audited content, 417 points secured a place. That leaves this year's WikiCup, by one measure at least, our most competitive ever. Our finalists, ordered by round 4 score, are:
 * 1) once again finishes the round in first place, leading Pool B. Grapple X writes articles about television, and especially The X-Files and Millenium, with good articles making up the bulk of the score.
 * 2) led Pool A this round. Fourth-place finalist last year, Miyagawa writes on a variety of topics, and has reached the final primarily off the back of his massive number of did you knows.
 * 3) was second in Pool B. Ruby2010 writes primarily on television and film, and scores primarily from good articles.
 * 4) finished third in Pool B. Casliber is something of a WikiCup veteran, having finished sixth in 2011 and fourth in 2010. Casliber writes on the natural sciences, including ornithology, botany and astronomy. Over half of Casliber's points this round were bonus points from the high-importance articles he has worked on.
 * 5) came second in Pool A. Also writing on biology, especially marine biology, Cwmhiraeth received 390 points for one featured article (Bivalvia) and one good article (pelican), topping up with a large number of did you knows.
 * 6) was third in Pool A. Muboshgu writes primarily on baseball, and this round saw Muboshgu's first featured article, Derek Jeter, promoted on its fourth attempt at FAC.
 * 7) was fourth in Pool A. She writes on a variety of topics, including horses, but this round also saw the high-importance lettuce reach featured article status.
 * 8) is another WikiCup veteran, having been a finalist in 2009 and 2010. He writes mostly on mycology.

However, we must also say goodbye to the eight who did not make the final, having fallen at the last hurdle:, , , , , , and. We hope to see you all next year.

On the subject of next year, a discussion has been opened here. Come and have your say about the competition, and how you'd like it to run in the future. This brainstorming will go on for some time before more focused discussions/polls are opened. As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 00:18, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXVII, August 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 01:02, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Military history coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 09:29, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

WikiCup 2012 September newsletter


We're over half way through the final, and so it is less than a month until we know for certain our 2012 WikiCup champion. currently leads, followed by, and. However, we have no one resembling a breakaway leader, and so the competition is a long way from over. Next month's newsletter will feature a list of our winners (who are not necessarily only the finalists) and keep your eyes open for an article on the WikiCup in a future edition of The Signpost. The leaders are already on a par with last year's winners, but a long way from the huge scores seen in 2010. That said, a repeat of the competition from 2010 seems unlikely.

It is good to see that three-quarters of our finalists have already scored bonus points this round. This shows that, contrary to criticism that the WikiCup has received in the past, the competition does not merely incentivise the writing of trivial articles; instead, our top competitors are still spending their time contributing to high-importance articles, and bringing them to a high standard. This does a great service to the encyclopedia and its readers. Thank you, and good work!

The planning for next year's WikiCup is ongoing. Some straw polls have been opened concerning the scoring, and you can now sign up for next year's competition. As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) J Milburn (talk) 19:57, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXVIII, September 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project and/or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 20:48, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXIX, October 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Nick-D (talk) and Ian Rose (talk) 02:47, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

WikiCup 2012 October newsletter
The 2012 WikiCup has come to a close; congratulations to, our 2012 champion! Cwmhiraeth joins our exclusive club of previous winners: (2007),  (2008),  (2009),  (2010) and  (2011). Our final standings were as follows:



Prizes for first, second, third and fourth will be awarded, as will prizes for all those who reached the final eight. Every participant who scored in the competition will receive a ribbon of participation. In addition to the prizes based on placement, the following special prizes will be awarded based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, the prize is awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round.


 * The featured article award goes to, for four featured articles in the final round.
 * The good article award also goes to, for 19 good articles in the second round.
 * The list award goes to, for three featured lists in the final round.
 * The topic award goes to, for three good topics (with around 40 articles) in round 4.
 * The did you know award goes to, for well over 100 DYKs in the final round.
 * The news award goes to, for 10 in the news items in round 3.
 * The picture award goes to, for two featured pictures in round 2.
 * The reviewer award goes to both (14 reviews in round 1) and  (14 reviews in round 3).
 * Finally, for achieving an incredible bonus point total in the final round, and for bringing the top-importance article frog to featured status, a biostar has been awarded to.

Awards will be handed out in the coming days; please bear with us! This year's competition also saw fantastic contributions in all rounds, from newer Wikipedians contributing their first good or featured articles, right up to highly experienced Wikipedians chasing high scores and contributing to topics outside of their usual comfort zones. It would be impossible to name all of the participants who have achieved things to be proud of, but well done to all of you, and thanks! Wikipedia has certainly benefited from the work of this year's WikiCup participants.

Next year's WikiCup will begin in January. Currently, discussions and polls are open, and all contributions are welcome. You can also sign up for next year's competition. There will be no further newsletters this year, although brief notes may be sent out in December to remind everyone about the upcoming competition. It's been a pleasure to work with you all, and we hope to see you all in January! J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 00:32, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXX, November 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Poetry project
FWIW, one of the best things that might be possible to do with this project is to find the most highly regarded directly relevant reference sources which deal with poetry, more or less rate the articles according to that (maybe, for instance, rating all articles in a small reference encyclopedia type book with only a few thousand or less articles as "Top" importance), and, maybe, putting together a list of those articles in that source(s) which we don't have yet, which might be among the more immediate concerns. Then, developing lists of other possibly more focused reference sources which can also be used to develop other less central content would definitely help as well. I actually am, in some of my current time, trying to develop lists of reference books, and I can certainly try to give a bit more focused attention to poetry related topics in the immediate future.

Also, if you can perhaps get him involved, I do think that User:Blofeld may be the most effective editor we have in creating significant content not yet here. I'm not sure if this is in his particular field of interest, but it would probably be worthwhile to see if it is. John Carter (talk) 00:30, 13 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Okay I will try that in the near future. I've talked to Blofeld before and I would agree with that assessment of him, so getting him on board would be great. Thank you for the input. MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 12:30, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

The Canterbury Tales category tag
Hello MOHOD. Your new WikiProject seems like a good idea. I happened to notice the categorization of The Canterbury Tales by your new WikiProject, adding. My note here is that I am more used to seeing project tags on article *talk* pages. I see that you already have the tag on Talk:The Canterbury Tales so the one on the article proper seems unnecessary. In my view it is desirable to keep internal coordination categories out of the part of the wiki intended as a repository of content for the public. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 04:43, 14 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Ah, that's an oversight on my part, probably as a result of me editing at a late hour last night. I agree with you on the need to keep the behind-the-scenes operations exactly as that. Thank you for pointing this out to me, and for the note of support to the project as a whole. MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 12:50, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Initial Proposal
The following is a proposed guideline to achieve standardisation in the writing and copyediting of articles pertaining to the individual tales that comprise The Canterbury Tales. (Note: All articles under the task force should use British spelling. See WP:TIES.) Not all headers will be appropriate for every article, and certain headers will be given greater emphasis across certain articles.

...etc...
 * 1) Intro paragraph with graphic to the right (as recommended in the MOS). — The title of the tale should be given in full, bold, modernized spelling, in its most commonly used form. Include the Middle English in the form (Middle English: Title here) if it differs markedly from the Modern English. Follow WP:LEAD.
 * 2) Synopsis — Accuracy and a lucid style.

1. Intro

 * the tale should be given in full, bold, modernized spelling,. Also italicised? MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 00:14, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Include the Middle English in the form (Middle English: Title here) if it differs markedly from the Modern English. Same rationale as the Adaptations decision; some Tales do not differ in the Modern English from the Middle English (e.g. Pardoner's Tale; Sir Thopas). Also, another important point is that the titles come from (only) the Ellesmere Manuscript (as can be seen here). Should we thus include them? Provide a note that explains this? MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 00:14, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm skeptical about the utility of the Middle English title, as surely manuscript variants are legion; wouldn't picking one be arbitrary and give an... inauthentic air of authenticity? Phil wink (talk) 04:18, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Quite, it's the same point you made about the use of the succession boxes really; it masks the complexity of the different manuscript sources. I would be willing to have them removed. MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk)

2. Synopsis
...and so on... exactly mirroring the main bullets of your initial proposal. This way, we can leave the initial proposal pristine, and refer to it with big clear headers instead of my wimpy bullets (also making it easier to edit a little 1-topic section rather than the single monster that's developing). I'd move your top discussion points to the appropriate sub-headings (and add individual signatures for each piece, of course). Thoughts? Phil wink (talk) 17:33, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Probably a good idea. I'll start to transfer the appropriate discussions shortly. MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 18:15, 14 December 2012 (UTC)


 * My thought (which I did not make very clear) is that your initial proposal should remain intact. I think it's valuable for people to be able to get the whole gist of it as a unit. (You could add an "===Initial Proposal===" header right below Standardisation....) So my proposed Discussion header would replace the line above MOHOD's comments and everything BELOW that line would be reorganized as I suggested. Also, since the new headers will take the place of my old "bullet headers" I give you full permission to delete those (now repetitive) words. Far from falsifying, you will be clarifying the discussion. I've made some example changes above. You'll see I've reduplicated your signature in the 2 bullet points, just to make sure it's clear who's contributing once we start cutting things up. Make sense? Of course, this is merely my opinion of how the discussion could be made clearer... no stronger authority than that. Phil wink (talk) 18:11, 15 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Okay, I see. I thought you meant actually transfering the discussion to this talk page because of our involvement in it. If you don't mind I'm going to retain the original layout in an Extended Comment box for posterity; it's not going to interfere with the reorganising effort. MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 16:19, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXI, December 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:35, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 starting soon
Hi there; you're receiving this message because you have previously shown interest in the WikiCup. This is just to remind you that the 2013 WikiCup will be starting on 1 January, and that signups will remain open throughout January. Old and new Wikipedians and WikiCup participants are warmly invited to take part in this year's competition. (Though, as a note to the more experienced participants, there have been a few small rules changes in the last few months.) If you have already signed up, let this be a reminder; you will receive a message with your submissions' page soon. Please direct any questions to the WikiCup talk page. Thanks! J Milburn 19:36, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2013 WikiCup!
Hello, MasterOfHisOwnDomain, and welcome to the 2013 WikiCup! Your submissions' page is here. The competition begins at midnight UTC. The first round will last until the end of February, at which point the top 64 scorers will advance to the second round. We will be in touch at the end of every month, and signups are going to remain open until the end of January; if you know of anyone else who may like to take part, please let them know! A few reminders:
 * The rules can be found here. There have been a few changes from last year, which are listed on that page.
 * Anything you submit must have been nominated and promoted in 2013, and you need to have completed significant work upon it in 2013. (The articles you review at good article reviews does not need to have been nominated in 2013, but you do need to have started the review in 2013.) We will be checking.
 * If you feel that another competitor is breaking the rules or abusing the competition in some way, please let a judge know. Please do not remove entries from the submissions' pages of others yourself.
 * Don't worry about calculating precisely how many points everything is worth. The bot will do that. The bot may occasionally get something wrong- let a judge know, or post on the WikiCup talk page if that happens.
 * Please try to be prompt in updating submissions' pages so that they can be double-checked.

Overall, however, don't worry, and have fun. It doesn't matter if you make the odd mistake; these things happen. Questions can be asked on the WikiCup talk page. Good luck! J Milburn and The ed17 22:29, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
—Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:46, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXII, January 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:33, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

File:RoyalRobertson.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RoyalRobertson.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:06, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

DYK for The Hunter (1999 novel)
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:03, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 January newsletter
Signups are now closed; we have our final 127 contestants for this year's competition. 64 contestants will make it to the next round at the end of February, but we're already seeing strong scoring compared to previous years. currently leads, with 358 points. At this stage in 2012, the leader had 342 points, while in 2011, the leader had 228 points. We also have a large number of scorers when compared with this stage in previous years. was the first competitor to score this year, as he was last year, with a detailed good article review. Some other firsts:
 * was also the first to score for an article, with the good article Hurricane Gordon (2000). Again, this is a repeat of last year!
 * was the first to score for a did you know, with Marquis Flowers.
 * was the first to score for an in the news, with 2013 Houphouët-Boigny stampede.
 * was the first to score for a featured list, with list of Billboard Social 50 number-one artists.
 * was the first to score for a featured picture, with File:Thure de Thulstrup - L. Prang and Co. - Battle of Gettysburg - Restoration by Adam Cuerden.jpg.

Featured articles, portals and topics, as well as good topics, are yet to feature in the competition.

This year, the bonus points system has been reworked, with bonus points on offer for old articles prepared for did you know, and "multiplier" points reworked to become more linear. For details, please see WikiCup/Scoring. There have been some teething problems as the bot has worked its way around the new system, but issues should mostly be ironed out- please report any problems to the WikiCup talk page. Here are some participants worthy of note with regards to the bonus points:


 * was the first to score bonus points, with Portland-class cruiser, a good article.
 * has the highest overall bonus points, as well as the highest scoring article, thanks to his work on Enrico Fermi, now a good article. The biography of such a significant figure to the history of science warrants nearly five times the normal score.
 * claimed bonus points for René Vautier and Nicolas de Fer, articles that did not exist on the English Wikipedia at the start of the year; a first for the WikiCup. The articles were eligible for bonus points because of fact they were both covered on a number of other Wikipedias.

Also, a quick mention of, who may well have already written the oddest article of the WikiCup this year: did you know that the Fucking mayor objected to Fucking Hell on the grounds that there was no Fucking brewery? The gauntlet has been thrown down; can anyone beat it?

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 00:52, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Betsy Blackwell
Hello! Your submission of Betsy Blackwell at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! PM800 (talk) 23:13, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Premastication GA
I've made modifications in regards to your recommandations stated in Talk:Premastication:
 * 1) (Response to 1B)The bullets are removed and the text is now in paragraph form.
 * 2) (Response to 3A)Two new sections have been included to address the lack of info on animal origins/participation in premastication and also information on the human history of the practice. Note, for the latter there is very sparse information regarding this practice in reliable sources. Jeanpetr (talk) 21:19, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

More modifications:
 * 1) Kiss Precursor has now been moved into "Behavioural Roots" and modified accordingly
 * 2) Culture has been renamed "Popular culture" and 4 additional citations have been provided. I think the A. Silverstone's mention is sufficient as is. The 2 sentences in the section has been "extensively negotiated" to it's present form with another person. Jeanpetr (talk) 23:50, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Tell me what you think Jeanpetr (talk) 00:36, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I've reformated several of the citations, the names of the journals were put as "publisher", which made them non-italisized.
 * Ref 27 and 22 have been fixed
 * For the punctuation at the end, I'm not sure I see any of the problems. Some of the citations end in a DOI ref, which makes it seem like it's ending in a comma. Is this what you mean?
 * For the book pages references. I'm doing it not from a literature citation background but rather from the engineering side which do not require page in citations. I will correct any that you point out.
 * The cavity inducing claim citation has been changed to not point to the correct article.
 * I have included the citation for of Aggett in the Health section, stating that this still an areas of active research and that there appears to be benefit, at least nutritionally, to the practice.

I've made the modifications to the article per your suggestions. Pleas take a peek. Jeanpetr (talk) 15:24, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for all the help! Jeanpetr (talk) 17:31, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Tornada
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:03, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

GA Review: Tornada (Occitan literary term)
I began a GA review of Tornada on 23FEB13. I have a few initial comments for your perusal. --ColonelHenry (talk) 07:24, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I've heavily revised and expanded the article (the content size has almost doubled since the changes, phew!). If you would be so kind as to take another look that would help me to determine what is left to do. Thanks. MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 19:59, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I will take a detailed look at it momentarily, and give it a pass for a quick copyedit.--ColonelHenry (talk) 22:25, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
 * 1853h (EST), I performed a second pass and a full copyedit (moving a copy things around, rephrases, etc.). Please review. After the last handful of comments are addressed, I am confident this can be promoted to GA and I will complete the review.  If you have any questions regarding my copyedit, feel free to ask.--ColonelHenry (talk) 23:54, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

translation of quotebox
title: my heart is now so full of joy

the tornada: Go, messengers, and run, / and tell the people of / the pain and sorrow that it brings / and final martyrdom.--ColonelHenry (talk) 22:25, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIII, February 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:50, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 February newsletter
Round 1 is now over. The top 64 scorers have progressed to round 2, where they have been randomly split into eight pools of eight. At the end of April, the top two from each pool, as well as the 16 highest scorers from those remaining, will progress to round 3. Commiserations to those eliminated; if you're interested in still being involved in the WikiCup, able and willing reviewers will always be needed, and if you're interested in getting involved with other collaborative projects, take a look at the WikiWomen's Month discussed below.

Round 1 saw 21 competitors with over 100 points, which is fantastic; that suggests that this year's competition is going to be highly competative. Our lower scores indicate this, too: A score of 19 was required to reach round 2, which was significantly higher than the 11 points required in 2012 and 8 points required in 2011. The score needed to reach round 3 will be higher, and may depend on pool groupings. In 2011, 41 points secured a round 3 place, while in 2012, 65 was needed. Our top three scorers in round 1 were:
 * , primarily for an array of warship GAs.
 * , primarily for an array of did you knows and good articles, some of which were awarded bonus points.
 * , due in no small part to Canis Minor, a featured article awarded a total of 340 points. A joint submission with, this is the highest scoring single article yet submitted in this year's competition.

Other contributors of note include:
 * , whose Portal:Massachusetts is the first featured portal this year. The featured portal process is one of the less well-known featured processes, and featured portals have traditionally had little impact on WikiCup scores.
 * , whose Mycena aurantiomarginata was the first featured article this year.
 * and, who both claimed points for articles in the Major League Baseball tie-breakers topic, the first topic points in the competition.
 * , who claimed for the first full good topic with the Casting Crowns studio albums topic.

Featured topics have still played no part in this year's competition, but once again, a curious contribution has been offered by : did you know that there is a Shit Brook in Shropshire? With April Fools' Day during the next round, there will probably be a good chance of more unusual articles...

March sees the WikiWomen's History Month, a series of collaborative efforts to aid the women's history WikiProject to coincide with Women's History Month and International Women's Day. A number of WikiCup participants have already started to take part. The project has a to-do list of articles needing work on the topic of women's history. Those interested in helping out with the project can find articles in need of attention there, or, alternatively, add articles to the list. Those interested in collaborating on articles on women's history are also welcome to use the WikiCup talk page to find others willing to lend a helping hand. Another collaboration currently running is an an effort from WikiCup participants to coordinate a number of Easter-themed did you know articles. Contributions are welcome!

A few final administrative issues. From now on, submission pages will need only a link to the article and a link to the nomination page, or, in the case of good article reviews, a link to the review only. See your submissions' page for details. This will hopefully make updating submission pages a little less tedious. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) J Milburn (talk) 11:47, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Letters from an American Farmer
I've begun the GA review for Letters from an American Farmer. Thanks in advance for your work on this one; I feel like it's developing brilliantly. -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:13, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Betsy Blackwell
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:02, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Mere Nature Delineated
Orlady (talk) 00:03, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you very much! MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 12:43, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Hubbard
Would you mind looking at the Bernard R. Hubbard nom (2/27) at DYK again?  Acroterion   (talk)   15:51, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks!  Acroterion   (talk)   21:53, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Colonel Jack
Chamal T •C 17:23, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

DYK for The Shortest Way with the Dissenters
The DYK project (nominate) 08:53, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback deployment
Hey MasterOfHisOwnDomain; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:49, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:FareshareOrg.png)
Thanks for uploading File:FareshareOrg.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:02, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Man of Mode, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:08, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Hengles
hello Master, thanks for tidying up my mistakes on the Hengistbury Head article, my brain is frazzled after a 14 hour plus edit session. I wouldn't normally go so nuts, but believe it or not, our house was burgled in the middle of the night and I had to chase the rascal off with my wussy-basher! ..Which was nice.

Unsurprisingly, I couldn't get to sleep, and used wikipedia to take my mind off it. If I told you I live in Bos Vegas maybe it wouldn't sound so unusual? Hillbillyholiday talk 19:25, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks
Cheers for your input Re. Hengistbury Head - I don't know what possessed me to nominate it for F.A. - but I got some good feedback. I found a relatively obscure book on the archaeology so that helps. I plan on creating a page for each of the main habitats at the Head, I've done Warren Hill already, what would be nice is to have a map of the Head where you click on different shaded areas to take you to that specific habitat page (is that even possible?). Anyway I'm gradually figuring fings out step by step, people here are really rather lovely! Hillbillyholiday talk 17:35, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Just noticed the novels banner up there. I thought book article I just wrote my interest you, as it purports to be a true travel tale but is likely make-believe. It's up for DYK nomination atm, and it's called In Secret Tibet Hillbillyholiday talk 17:38, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Dorset
Many thanks for the recent revert you made to the Dorset article, which I totally agree with. You might be interested to look at my contribution to the Bermicourt Talk Page, as there was at least one error in his reverted list of hills - Win Green, which is in Wiltshire. I have respectfully requested that this editor checks before making his contributions. With best regards, David J Johnson (talk) 21:28, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Ferndown Common
Hello! Your submission of Ferndown Common at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Curly Turkey (gobble) 10:03, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

GANR: Louis Couperus
Thank you for your time and patience for reviewing the article. Yes, I agree it isn't a GA yet. I'll continue to work on it. Maybe, in a few weeks time, it's ready to be renominated. Nevertheless, thank you.Michael! (talk) 18:30, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIV, March 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:22, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 March newsletter
We are halfway through round two. Pool A sees the strongest competition, with five out of eight of its competitors scoring over 100, and Pool H is lagging, with half of its competitors yet to score. WikiCup veterans lead overall; Pool A's (2010's winner) leads overall, with poolmate  (a finalist in 2011 and 2012) not far behind. Pool F's (a finalist in 2010, 2011 and 2012) is in third. The top two scorers in each pool, as well as the next highest 16 scorers overall, will progress to round three at the end of April.

Today has seen a number of Easter-themed did you knows from WikiCup participants, and March has seen collaboration from contestants with WikiWomen's History Month. It's great to see the WikiCup being used as a locus of collaboration; if you know of any collaborative efforts going on, or want to start anything up, please feel free to use the WikiCup talk page to help find interested editors. As well as fostering collaboration, we're also seeing the Cup encouraging the improvement of high-importance articles through the bonus point system. Highlights from the last month include GAs on physicist Niels Bohr, on the European hare , on the constellation Circinus ( and ) and on the Third Epistle of John. All of these subjects were covered on at least 50 Wikipedias at the beginning of the year and, subsequently, each contribution was awarded at least three times as many points as normal.

Wikipedians who enjoy friendly competition may be interested in participating in April's wikification drive. While wikifying an article is typically not considered "significant work" such that it can be claimed for WikiCup points, such gnomish work is often invaluable in keeping articles in shape, and is typically very helpful for new writers who may not be familiar with formatting norms.

A quick reminder: now, submission pages will need only a link to the article and a link to the nomination page, or, in the case of good article reviews, a link to the review only. See your submissions' page for details. This will hopefully make updating submission pages a little less tedious. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) J Milburn (talk) 22:46, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Parley Common
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Appreciated. Not sure what to start on next though, but hopefully it will appear in WP:GAN in good time and inevitably come across your path. Cheers, MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 17:12, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I'll look forward to it! Happy reading in the meantime, -- Khazar2 (talk) 17:29, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Ferndown Common
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 08:33, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Passing (novel)
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:18, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Knight's Tale, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thebes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:51, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Your review at Duino Elegies FAC
You had commented on the FAC for Duino Elegies--found here Featured article candidates/Duino Elegies/archive1--and offered several suggestions for improvements. Would you now be able to offer the article your support?--ColonelHenry (talk) 14:00, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Wareham Forest
Mahalo! Don't suppose you're up for helping get this Dorset wood/heathland article up for DYK readiness? It's already expanded enough, just needs some fleshing out and the addition of something really hookworthy. Hillbillyholiday talk 01:15, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I will see if I can find anything, but it seems as though you've done a really fine job so far; not sure how much I can improve. Appreciate those additions to the Piddles Wood article, incidentally. MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 19:43, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Cheers, and well done on the DYK. I'm getting well stuck into the Dorset woods right now, I hope the DYK people aren't getting fatigued by our forests, as I'm working on an expansion now that may turn out to be a little gem. I could always use your help (or anybody's) in bringing the entry up to scratch. Anyway, the hook would be something like:

Did you know that in Fifehead Wood you might just catch a White Admiral with a Purple Hairstreak frolicking upon a Five-faced Bishop?

Hillbillyholiday talk 03:56, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Piddles Wood
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 07:19, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Fiddleford Manor
The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXV, April 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:46, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Metamorphoses, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Epic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Thomas Hardy's Cottage
The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Wildlife of Rwanda
I have complied to your observations and accepted the Alt hook. Kindly have a look at it for approval, T Thanks.-- Nvvchar . 15:29, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup issue
Hi- just to let you know that I have mentioned you here. If you have anything to say, you're welcome to add to the discussion. J Milburn (talk) 17:10, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Cheers; I don't currently have anything to add, but glad you raised the issue in the interests of fairness. MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 22:46, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 April newsletter
We are a week into Round 3, but it is off to a flying start, with claiming for the high-importance Portal:Sports and Portal:Geography (which are the first portals ever awarded bonus points in the WikiCup) and  claiming for a did you know of sea, the highest scoring individual did you know article ever submitted for the WikiCup. Round 2 saw very impressive scores at close; first place and second place  both scored over 1000 points; a feat not seen in Round 2 since 2010. This, in part, has been made possible by the change in the bonus points rules, but is also testament to the quality of the competition this year. Pool C and Pool G were most competitive, with three quarters of participants making it to Round 3, while Pool D was the least, with only the top two scorers making it through. The lowest qualifying score was 123, significantly higher than last year's 65, 2011's 41 or even 2010's 100.

The next issue of The Signpost is due to include a brief update on the current WikiCup, comparing it to previous years' competitions. This may be of interest to current WikiCup followers, and may help bring some more new faces into the community. We would also like to note that this round includes an extra competitor to the 32 advertised, who has been added to a random pool. This extra inclusion seems to have been the fairest way to deal with a small mistake made before the beginning of this round, but should not affect the competition in a large way. If you have any questions or concerns about this, please feel free to contact one of the judges.

A rules clarification: content promoted between rounds can be claimed in the round after the break, but not the round before. The case in point is content promoted on 29/30 April, which may be claimed in this round. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 16:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Metamorphoses
Hi MasterOfHisOwnDomain, just wanted to make sure you understand that I appreciate the work you've done on the article and to make sure that my suggestions for expansion/reorganization aren't over burdensome. I'll be around to help with bibliography and a classicist's perspective as you continue, as I hope you do, since you've done much service so far and the poem really, really needs a proper article here. (This is not to say I've offered all the comments that I will ... I just probably won't do much more today as I need to read and think some more and also hope to add to the Catalogue a bit.) All best,  davidiad { t } 21:26, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I really appreciate the help, you've done more than enough already. Good luck with the ongoing Catalogue work. MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 22:18, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

DYK for The Paddock and the Mouse
Casliber (talk · contribs) 09:11, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

DYK for The Fox, the Wolf and the Husbandman
Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:52, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Testament of Cresseid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pantheon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:56, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Featured article candidates/Middle Ages/archive1
I think we've hopefully addressed your issues, if you could kindly revisit when you have a chance? Ealdgyth - Talk 16:00, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVI, May 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:40, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Duncliffe Wood
Hello! Your submission of Duncliffe Wood at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! PM800 (talk) 20:37, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Duncliffe Wood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Ash


 * Villanelle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Italian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:05, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Duncliffe Wood
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:04, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Help! Please
Hello,

My name is João Paulo Sacramento. I am a brazilian student of a College. Me and a friend are producing a paper on the influence of Japanese manga and anime in the fashion industry. However, we are finding it difficult to find certain items for the construction of this paper.

After some research, we found the articles published in the journal Mechademia, which perfectly meet our needs. However, there are no nearby universities that have access to the MUSE project.

As I researched, I saw that you were one of the wikipedia users who had access to that database. I would like to ask for your help to get this content, which is essential for the construction of our paper.

Advance thanks,

João Paulo Sacramento — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpsacr (talk • contribs) 00:31, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I would be able to help you gain access to those essays, certainly. If you could send me your email address (my email address is my username +@hotmail.com) and the titles or url of each of the articles you require, then I could forward them to you a .pdf to you. Regards, MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 20:18, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre
{||}

The Shortest Way with the Dissenters
The Shortest Way with the Dissenters passed as GA, nice work overall, though I'd recommend a bit more info filled out, if possible, on those image pages, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 00:36, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The Shortest Way with the Dissenters
 * Thanks, appreciate the review; will get around to looking at those pages in due course. MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 10:51, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Talk:The Fox, the Wolf and the Husbandman/GA1 = GA on Hold
GA on Hold at Talk:The Fox, the Wolf and the Husbandman/GA1.

NOTE: Please respond below the entire GA Review, and not interspersed throughout, thanks! &mdash; Cirt (talk) 00:23, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVII, June 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:17, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Talk:The Fox, the Wolf and the Husbandman/GA1
Please update me re Talk:The Fox, the Wolf and the Husbandman/GA1 in a post at my user talk page and/or at that GA Review subpage when you feel all issues have been successfully addressed. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 18:37, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Talk:The Fox, the Wolf and the Husbandman/GA1

WikiCup 2013 June newsletter
We are down to our final 16: the 2013 semi-finals are upon us. A score of 321 was required to survive round 3, further cementing this as the most competitive WikiCup yet; round 3 was survived in 2012 with 243 points, in 2011 with 76 points and in 2010 with 250 points. The change may in part be to do with the fact that more articles are now awarded bonus points, in addition to more competitive play. Reaching the final has, in the past, required 573 points (2012, a 135% increase on the score needed to reach round 4), 150 points (2011, a 97% increase) and 417 points (2010, a 72% increase). This round has seen over a third of participants claiming points for featured articles (with seven users claiming for multiple featured articles) and most users have also gained bonus points. However, the majority of points continue to come from good articles, followed by did you know articles. In this round, every content type was utilised by at least one user, proving that the WikiCup brings together content contributors from all corners of the project.

Round 3 saw a number of contributions of note. claimed the first featured topic points in this year's competition for her excellent work on topics related to Maya Angelou, the noted American author and poet. We have also continued to see high-importance articles improved as part of the competition: was awarded a thoroughly well-earned 560 points for her featured article Middle Ages and 102 points for her good article Battle of Hastings. Good articles James Chadwick and Stanislaw Ulam netted 102 and 72 points respectively, while 72 points were awarded to  for each of Władysław Sikorski and Emilia Plater, both recently promoted to good article status. Collaborative efforts between WikiCup participants have continued, with, for example, and  being awarded 180 points each for their featured article on Boletus luridus.

A rules reminder: content promoted between rounds can be claimed in the round after the break, but not the round before. The case in point is content promoted on the 29/30 June, which may be claimed in this round. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. We are currently seeing concern about the amount of time people have to wait for reviews, especially at GAC- if you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 10:19, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Sestina
Hi, I wanted to let you know that, as I promised, I reviewed the Sestina page, and made some changes to the part concerning the beginnings of the form. The main source quoted, Davidson, seems to suffer from the problem of most turn-of-the-century English treatises on versification and such, which is being carefully informed about what happened on Anglo-Saxon countries and basing everything not in English on dubious sources. I have corrected that basing the edits on sources that are very recent but, regretfully, mostly in Italian. I have also eliminated some points I found excessively verbose, especially from the introduction, and tried to put some clarity in the whole Provence/Occitania matter. complainer (talk) 20:56, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Appreciate the edits, and the sources you bring to the article. I will say, however, that don't be surprised if you see me make significant additions to the lede; at the moment, while it's very brief, it doesn't seem to adequately cover the topics explored in the article. MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 23:04, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, it's a matter of taste; personally, I see the function of the lead as something which makes the reader understand they have the right article. "The sestina is a closed form used in European poetry" is plenty for me. In any case, the exact origin of Arnaut Daniel, exact date of introduction into England or what the form is called in Catalan are, in spite of the fact that I am responsible for some of it, far excessive. complainer (talk) 14:10, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * It's not really a matter of taste though, the MoS is unambiguous in saying that the point of a lede is to summarise the most important aspects, giving emphasis roughly in accordance with its importance to the topic. I appreciate your work, and your points, but can't agree with you on this one. MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 15:26, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Hartland Moor
Hello! Your submission of Hartland Moor at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Orlady (talk) 03:30, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

My DYK nom
Hi MOHOD, I just addressed your concerns at Mahmoud Badr nomination. --Al Ameer 19:27, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrolled
Hey MasterOfHisOwnDomain. Just a note that I've given you the autopatrolled right to recognise your content work; Piddles Wood, for example, is a lovely article :). Ironholds (talk) 17:17, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much, appreciate the vote of confidence. MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 20:12, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Hartland Moor
Hello! Your submission of Hartland Moor at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 03:17, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Core Contest

 * Congratulations! Good work...Modernist (talk) 11:28, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much, and for the great work on organising the contest, it's a very positive thing for the project. MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 20:44, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVIII, July 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:53, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Hartland Moor
Orlady (talk) 05:48, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Iain Banks bibliography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 July newsletter
We're halfway through this year's penultimate round, and the competition is moving along well. Pool A's currently leads overall, while Pool B's  is second. Both leaders are WikiCup veterans, and both have already scored over 600 points this month. If the round were to end today,, with 274 points, would be the lowest-scoring participant to make it through. This indicates that participants will need a score comparable to last year's (573, the highest ever) to qualify for the final. The high scores this year are a testament both to the quality of participants and to the increased focus on significant content (eligible for bonus points) in this year's competition. So far this round, both Sasata and have made up over half of their score through bonus points, with, for example, high importance FA koala earning Sasata a total of 440 points (from a multiplier of 4.4) and high-importance GA sea earning Cwmhiraeth a total of 216 points (from a multiplier of 7.2). Other articles on important topics submitted this round include a featured article on the Norman conquest of England by, and good articles on Nobel laureate in literature Henryk Sienkiewicz, Nobel laureate in physics Hans Bethe, and the noted Japanese aircraft carrier Hiryū. These articles are by, and Sturmvogel_66 respectively.

Other than that, there is not much to report! If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 23:46, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Email
Hi - could you drop me an email when you get a chance, at richard.symonds@wikimedia.org.uk, or give me a ring on 0207 065 0992? Richard Symonds (WMUK) (talk) 11:14, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Email has been sent from the address associated with this account. MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 16:24, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIX, August 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:30, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 August newsletter
This year's final is upon us. Our final eight, in order of last round's score, are:
 * , a WikiCup newcomer who has contributed on topics of military history and physics, including a number of high-importance topics. Good articles have made up the bulk of his points, but he has also scored a great deal of bonus points. He has the second highest score overall so far, with more than 3000 points accumulated.
 * , another WikiCup veteran who reached the finals in 2012, 2011 and 2010. He writes on a variety of topics including botany, mycology and astronomy, and has claimed the highest or joint highest number of featured articles every round so far this year. He has the third highest score overall, with just under 3000 points accumulated.
 * , 2012 WikiCup champion, who writes mostly on marine biology. She has also contributed to high-importance topics, seeing huge numbers of bonus points for high-importance featured and good articles. Previous rounds have seen her scoring the most bonus points, with scoring spread across did you knows, good articles and featured articles.
 * , a WikiCup veteran who finished in second place in 2012, and competed as early as 2009. He writes articles on biology, especially mycology, and has scored highly for a number of collaborations at featured article candidates.
 * , the winner of the 2010 competition. His contributions mostly concern Naval history, and he has scored a very large number of points for good articles and good article reviews in every round. He is the highest scorer overall this year, with over 3500 points in total.
 * , who is competing in the WikiCup for the second time, though this will be her first time in the final. A regular at FAC, she is mostly interested in British medieval history, and has scored very highly for some top-importance featured articles on the topic.
 * , a finalist in 2012 and 2011. He writes on a broad variety of topics, with many of this year's points coming from good articles about Star Trek. Good articles make up the bulk of his points, and he had the most good articles back in round 2; he was also the highest scorer for DYK in rounds 1 and 2.
 * 1) has previously been involved with the WikiCup, but hasn't participated for a number of years. He scores mostly from restoration work leading to featured picture credits, but has also done some article writing and reviewing.

We say goodbye to eight great participants who did not qualify for the final:, , , , , , ,. Having made it to this stage is still an excellent achievement, and you can leave with your heads held high. We hope to see you all again next year. Signups are now open for the 2014 WikiCup, which will begin on 1 January. All Wikipedians, whatever their interest or level of experience, are warmly invited to participate in next year's competition.

This last month has seen some incredible contributions; for instance, Cwmhiraeth's Starfish and Ealdgyth's Battle of Hastings—two highly important, highly viewed pages—made it to featured article status. It would be all too easy to focus solely on these stunning achievements at the expense of those participants working in lower-scoring areas, when in fact all WikiCup participants are doing excellent work. A mention of everything done is impossible, but here are a few: Last round saw the completion of several good topics (on the 1958, 1959 and 1962 Atlantic hurricane seasons) to which 12george1 had contributed. Calvin999 saw "S&M" (song), on which he has been working for several years, through to featured article status on its tenth try. Figureskatingfan continued towards her goal of a broad featured/good topic on Maya Angelou, with two featured and four good articles. ThaddeusB contributed significantly to over 20 articles which appeared on the main page's "in the news" section. Adam Cuerden continued to restore a large number of historical images, resulting in over a dozen FP credits this round alone. The WikiCup is not just about top-importance featured articles, and the work of all of these users is worthy of commendation.

Finally, the usual notices: If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 05:59, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill [talk] 17:40, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXXX, September 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:25, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 September newsletter
In 30 days, we will know the identity of our 2013 WikiCup champion. currently leads; if that lead is held, she will become the first person to have won the WikiCup twice. , —who has never participated in the competition before—and follow. The majority of points in this round have come from a mix of good articles and bonus points. This final round is seeing contributions to a number of highly important topics; recent submissions include Phoenix (constellation) (FA by Casliber), Ernest Lawrence (GA by Hawkeye7), Pinniped, and red fox (both GAs by Sasata).

The did you know (DYK) eligibility criteria have recently changed, meaning that newly passed good articles are accepted as "new" for did you know purposes. However, in the interests of not changing the WikiCup rules mid-competition, please note that only articles eligible for DYK under the old system (that is, newly created articles or 5x expansions) will be eligible for points in this year's WikiCup. We do, however, have time to discuss how this new system will work for next year's competition; a discussion will be opened in due course. On that note, thoughts are welcome on changes you'd like to see for next year. What worked? What didn't work? What would you like to see more of? What would you like to see less of? All Wikipedians, new or old, are also warmly invited to sign up for the 2014 WikiCup.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 23:19, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Dorset/Map
Hi MasterOfHisOwnDomain, I have added Bournemouth, recently promoted to GA, to the map you created back in April. I don't know whether I've got the button in the right place (had a bit of difficulty converting degrees, minutes and seconds to decimal fractions) or indeed, even if that matters much. When you have a spare moment perhaps you'd check it out. Also, I wasn't sure what size to make it. Is there some criteria for that? Best regards--Ykraps (talk) 07:30, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Seems in the right place. I only changed the size of the icon from 10 to 20, which is partly my fault anyway to be honest—my original thinking was that they would range in increments of 5-10 by importance (5 Low, 10 Mid, 20 High, 30 Top), but apparently I failed to actually implement this! Cheers for letting me know, and the great work on the article, MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 14:18, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

The Core Contest
I believe that like me you have still not received your Amazon voucher. I have mentioned the fact on the Core Contest talk page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:49, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCI, October 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:09, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 October newsletter
The WikiCup is over for another year! Our champion, for the second year running, is. Our final nine were as follows:

All those who reached the final win prizes, and prizes will also be going to the following participants:


 * wins the FA prize, for four featured articles in round 4, worth 400 points.
 * wins the GA prize, for 20 good articles in round 3, worth 600 points.
 * wins the FL prize, for four featured lists in round 2, worth 180 points.
 * wins the FP prize, for 23 featured pictures in round 5, worth 805 point.
 * wins the FPo prize, for 2 featured portals in round 3, worth 70 points.
 * wins the topic prize, for a 23-article featured topic in round 5, worth 230 points.
 * wins the DYK prize, for 79 did you know articles in round 5, worth 570 points.
 * wins the ITN prize, for 23 in the news articles in round 4, worth 270 points.
 * wins the GAR prize, for 24 good article reviews in round 1, worth 96 points.
 * The judges are awarding the Oddball Barnstar to, for some curious contributions in earlier rounds.
 * Finally, the judges are awarding the Geography Barnstar for her work on sea, now a featured article. This top-importance article was the highest-scoring this year; when it was promoted to FA status, Cwmhiraeth could claim 720 points.

Prizes will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!

Congratulations to everyone who has been successful in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and a particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition. While it has been an excellent year, errors have opened up the judges' eyes to the need for a third judge, and it is with pleasure that we announce that experienced WikiCup participant Miyagawa will be acting as a judge from now on. We hope you will all join us in welcoming him to the team.

Next year's competition begins on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; it is open to all Wikipedians, new and old. Brainstorming and discussion remains open for how next year's competition will work, and straw polls will be opened by the judges soon. Those interested in friendly competition may also like to keep an eye on the stub contest, being organised by Casliber. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2014 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 01:02, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Photograph Attribution, Tate Modern, 5.2-1
Hello, I am writing to thank you for making your photograph available for publication through Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. We plan to use the following photograph for inclusion in Harold Kalman, Heritage Planning, to be published in 2014 by Routledge. The image that we plan to use is:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:TateModern.JPG

Could you please tell me who should be credited in the caption. If you have any questions please contact me by email at skicbbc@gmail.com.

Thank you, Susan Skicbbc (talk) 05:23, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi Susan, if I could be credited as "James A. Green" that would be great. Thank you for letting me know. MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 11:21, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCII, November 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 06:16, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Education in the United Kingdom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Nursery


 * Gold Hill, Shaftesbury (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to The Telegraph

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Preventive state
...still has a stub tag on the article page. Good work so far...interesting choice of articles! Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:21, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
 * So it does! Cheers for catching that one and letting me know. Going for a mix of my own neglected articles and some more important ones. Sadly still in a busy period, so not able to do as much as I originally intended. Seems like the contest is going really well though, and many thanks again for all the effort you put/continue to put into these things. MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 14:34, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCIII, December 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:25, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Just checkin'
Enjoyed working with you on the GA review for Tornada (Occitan literary term). Was just wondering if you were working on any other articles in this area--i.e. any GA nominees coming up like this?--ColonelHenry (talk) 15:48, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks, that's nice of you to say. Similar articles are one of my current 'things-to-do', but sadly everything that isn't university-related work is being neglected at the moment (and even that isn't coming along as smoothly as I would like ...). So, unfortunately, no upcoming GA noms in the near-future, but they are in my sights; I'll let you know when I get back in the swing of things. Cheers, MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 18:51, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2014 WikiCup!
Hello MasterOfHisOwnDomain, and welcome to the 2014 WikiCup! Your submission page can be found here. The competition will begin at midnight tonight (UTC). There have been a few small changes from last year; the rules can be read in full at WikiCup/Scoring, and the page also includes a summary of changes. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work, and nominated, in 2014 is eligible for points in the competition- the judges will be checking! As ever, this year's competition includes some younger editors. If you are a younger editor, you are certainly welcome, but we have written an advice page at WikiCup/Advice for younger editors for you. Please do take a look. Any questions should be directed to one of the judges, or left on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! , and  17:32, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCIV, January 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:37, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 January newsletter
The 2014 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with, at time of writing, 138 participants. The is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2010. If you are yet to join the competition, don't worry- the judges have agreed to keep the signups open for a few more days. By a wide margin, our current leader is newcomer, whose set of 14 featured pictures, the first FPs of the competition, was worth 490 points. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:


 * and were the first people to score, for the good article Tropical Storm Bret (1981) and its good article review respectively. 12george1 was also the first person to score in 2012 and 2013.
 * scored the first ITN points for 2014 North American polar vortex.
 * scored points for an early good topic, finishing off Featured topics/She Wolf.
 * scored the first bonus points of the competition, for his work on Typhoon Vera.
 * has scored the highest number of bonus points for a single article, for the high-importance Jurassic Park (film).

Featured articles, featured lists, featured topics and featured portals are yet to play a part in the competition. The judges have removed a number of submissions which were deemed ineligible. Typically, we aim to see work on a project, followed by a nomination, followed by promotion, this year. We apologise for any disappointment caused by our strict enforcement this year; we're aiming to keep the competition as fair as possible.

Wikipedians interested in friendly competition may be interested to take part in The Core Contest; unlike the WikiCup, The Core Contest is not about audited content, but, like the WikiCup, it is about article improvement; specifically, The Core Contest is about contribution to some of Wikipedia's most important article. Of course, any work done for The Core Contest, if it leads to a DYK, GA or FA, can earn WikiCup points.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 19:54, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

The Core Contest/Entries
I just reverted your entry as the contest haven't started yet, you are free to start basic work on the article in the meantime. Thanks Secret account 01:06, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Literature, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Verse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Literature, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prosody (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 21 February 2014 (UTC)