User talk:Microglia145

August 2019
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Bik Kwoon Tye, from its old location at User:Microglia145/sandbox/Bik Kwoon Tye. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:03, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicola Allen has been accepted
 Nicola Allen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Thsmi002 (talk) 02:20, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Nicola_Allen help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Julie Law (October 5)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Julie Law and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Julie Law, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Julie_Law Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MurielMary&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Julie_Law reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 03:48, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pamela Cosman (October 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pamela Cosman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pamela Cosman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Pamela_Cosman Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Liance&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Pamela_Cosman reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liancetalk/contribs 11:39, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bik Kwoon Tye has been accepted
 Bik Kwoon Tye, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Theroadislong (talk) 15:17, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Bik_Kwoon_Tye help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Draft:Nancy Hill concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Nancy Hill, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:41, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Julie Law concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Julie Law, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Tatyana Sharpee moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Tatyana Sharpee, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 01:16, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Julie Law has been accepted
 Julie Law, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Atlantic306 (talk) 15:14, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Julie_Law help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your draft article, Draft:Nancy Hill


Hello, Microglia145. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nancy Hill".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Atlantic306 (talk) 02:19, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Ways to improve Mahta Moghaddam
Hello, Microglia145,

Thank you for creating Mahta Moghaddam.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"The page currently has a list of many awards, some which are seemingly not notable enough for inclusion. In addition, many of these awards are not sourced. After you have addressed the issue, feel free to remove the tags"

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MrClog (talk) 00:19, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Cleanup tags
Hi, please try to avoid removing cleanup template tags when the issue referred to in the tag has not yet been dealt with. For example in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ream_Al-Hasani&type=revision&diff=950066531&oldid=950062672&diffmode=source

Thank you for all your work on Wikipedia. :) Kj cheetham (talk) 09:45, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Hey! I am sorry, I just learned how to fix the duplicate refs things, so I will actually go change that. I thought it was a cleanup tag saying that I shouldn't cite the same thing twice but that is kind of impossible for some of these pages, but I will go back and make sure that the references just refer to the original reference when I first cited it. Thank you!!

No worries! Yeah you pretty much need to cite the same thing in multiple places for some of the bios. Keep up the good work! Kj cheetham (talk) 12:43, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Ream Al-Hasani moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Ream Al-Hasani, is over-promotional. It needs to be organized to discuss first the facts of her career, and then her work, without mixing the two together. It needs to concentrate of the major work, and not make claims for significance that cannot be sourced to reliable third paty sources. Normally, thisis doen adequatelly by listing hte 5 or so mostcited papers--the titles usually indicate the work that was done. All medical claims ,or claims for future medical significance, must meet WP:MEDRS. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's guidelines and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  DGG ( talk ) 03:14, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Article formatting
Hi there. Thank you again for all your hard work creating new articles! Two short suggestions though:
 * Please try not to use academic titles such as "Dr" by default, see MOS:DOCTOR.
 * The "References" headings should be level 2 (i.e. primary), which is the same level as the other top level sections, as per MOS:FOOTERS.

Hope that's helpful.


 * Super helpful!! Thank you so so much! Please let me know if there is anything else :)


 * No worries! You might like to know that using a colon in the source lets you indent replies on talk pages (which I took the liberty of doing myself in this section!), and ~ ~ ~ ~ (without spaces) can be used to automatically sign your name on your talk pages at the end of messages. Kj cheetham (talk) 15:13, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Awesomeeee this is great!! Thank you! Let me know if you got the message on ur talk page Microglia145 (talk) 15:23, 28 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Got your other message, and replied there. :) I tend to watch pages (star button top right ish) and the Watchlist page to keep track of talk pages. Kj cheetham (talk) 16:04, 28 April 2020 (UTC)


 * OK perfect, I wrote a message about why the page should not be deleted. Thank you so much. Microglia145 (talk) 17:11, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Carolyn Rodriguez
Hello Microglia145,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Carolyn Rodriguez for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:36, 28 April 2020 (UTC)


 * I would like to contest this deletion and I am requesting more time to write the page. I will make any adjustments that you feel are necessary. Microglia145 (talk) 15:25, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I did not actually delete this, but I did nominate it to be deleted. User:TomStar81 was the person who deleted it. I claimed that it was mostly a copy of  https://med.stanford.edu/profiles/carolyn-rodriguez including a complete copy of awards, and Boards, Advisory Committees, Professional Organizations, and more. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:36, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * In terms of her awards, I did cite them all I believe from the actual source. I can remove the advisory boards (though she is on them all) in the next edition of this page. How do you suggest listing things like this that are facts and already in chronological order? Should I write them in sentence form? and Would you mind helping me get the page back :D Microglia145 (talk) 23:14, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Re:Carolyn Rodriguez
I've restored the material you added and move it to User:Microglia145/Carolyn Rodriguez. I would recommend submitting through Articles for Creation (WP:AFC) to avoid a repeat CSD deletion. TomStar81 (Talk) 06:36, 29 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Thank you so much, how else do you suggest avoiding the same issue I faced? When the person has awards and editorial positions, how do you suggest citing them or listing them so it is not flagged? They were in the same order as the webiste as this is chronological order. Thank you! Microglia145 (talk) 07:36, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Your articles
Welcome and thank you for your work on wikipedia. There are a few things you can do that will help make your article fit with the style, tone, and guidelines requested. Please read some of the manual of style guidelines and ensure your edits are complying with them. Some examples are the use of sentence case rather than Capitalisation in headings; and not including multiple links to the same articles. Other things include lists of awards and publications being in chronological order. More importantly, your articles tend to be overly wordy and include language that is not strictly neutral and encyclopaedic. Try to stick to facts rather than opinion (e.g. avoid words like "prominent" and "very" or talking about what someone "makes sure" to do). Finally, the infobox templates give guidance as to what should be included in various parameters, so for example Alma Mater is just for the names of institutions, not other details, and awards should be for particularly notable awards, not a wall of text with everything that is in the article later in it. Thank you Melcous (talk) 13:09, 6 May 2020 (UTC)


 * This is very helpful. Thank you so much and I will make some changes to previous ones and address these issues in future articles as well. Thank you again!! Microglia145 (talk) 02:11, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi again, regarding how to capitalise section headings, the manual of style recommends "sentance case", as per MOS:HEADINGS and MOS:SECTIONCAPS. Kj cheetham (talk) 09:43, 10 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi, yep I have been trying to do this in my recent pages but I have not yet gone back to adjust headings in the older ones. I can do that though. Thank you again for these comments, I really appreciate them and I do my best to incorporate them. Microglia145 (talk) 17:34, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Sherilynn Black moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Sherilynn Black, has serious WP:NPOV and general pufffery concerns. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's standards for being formal, neutral and dispassionate and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Sulfurboy (talk) 19:03, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Vivian Chu moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Vivian Chu, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  D My Son  09:39, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Style tip
Hi there, Thank you for keeping up the good work creating article. :) Just a small suggestion - watch out for words like "innovative" and "pioneering" when describing people, as they can be seen as promoting rather than just presenting facts. See here for more info: WP:PUFFERY. Kj cheetham (talk) 15:31, 7 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Thank you!! Sorry I get so excited by their accomplishments sometimes ahahah :D those words slip in without me even noticing but I will be more present when I write, I will keep it objective **thumbs up emoji**

Microglia145 (talk) 07:08, 9 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Not to worry, just something to be conscious of. :) Kj cheetham (talk) 10:13, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Chopping
Please note that I chopped out a good quarter of the content of your submission about Dr. James.

Facts only, only facts. Nothing that pertains to things inside Dr. James' head, so nothing about how dedicated she is or what her goals are. Focus on her, not on the organizations she co-founded or what they do. DS (talk) 00:41, 9 June 2020 (UTC)


 * okok sorry about that, I wanted to make sure the mission of the organization was emphasized as I watched her give a talk and understood deeper what she was trying to achieve. I will make sure to keep it about her and not the organization though. Thank you!!
 * Microglia145 (talk) 07:09, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Sharifa Love-Rutledge for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sharifa Love-Rutledge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sharifa Love-Rutledge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ymblanter (talk) 06:59, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Ayana Jordan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ayana Jordan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ayana Jordan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 08:22, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Danielle Hairston for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Danielle Hairston is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Danielle Hairston until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;]) 09:19, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

For your excellent work

 * I am honoured!! Thank you so much :) My contributions to Wikipedia are only just beginning :) Microglia145 (talk) 06:56, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Women in Red
Hi there, Microglia145, and a really warm welcome to Women in Red. A hundred C-class biographies of women scientists in less that a year is a tremendous achievement. I see you have recently been running into deletion problems. If you tag your talk pages with a WiR banner (e.g.  or , the threatened articles will be displayed on the main WiR page where they will certainly attract the attention of our members. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 08:54, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
 * WOW thank you so so much!! I will for sure start doing this! Thank you for your kind words and help :D
 * Microglia145 (talk) 17:51, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

September Women in Red edithons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Your draft article, Draft:Staci Bilbo


Hello, Microglia145. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Staci Bilbo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! — Nnadigoodluck 🇳🇬 00:34, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

October editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

November edit-a-thons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:51, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

December with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

A New Year With Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

December 2020
Hi Microglia145! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Adji Bousso Dieng that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 12:00, 29 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi Kj cheetham! Thank you so much for this note. To be honest, I was not at all following this specific definition, but now that I know I totally will. Thank you for letting me know!
 * Microglia145 (talk) 19:13, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Re-creation of page for Dr. Fatima Cody Stanford that was deleted by Cayabi
@microglia145

I see that you specialize in creating pages for minority and women scientists. I had previously created a page for Dr. Fatima Cody Stanford which was live from December 2018- October 2020. It was taken down by cayabi who stated that it was a copyright violation. This was unfortunate because the material that I developed for this page was later used by other sites and not vice versa.

So, now we have a great physician scientist without a page. Would you consider creating this on her behalf as you have more experience than I.

Here is a link to the content that was included in the initial page: https://wikivisually.com/wiki/Fatima_Cody_Stanford Here is some other information: https://everipedia.org/wiki/lang_en/fatima-cody-stanford

A link to her full CV and site is here: https://scholar.harvard.edu/fatimacodystanford/home CV: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/fatimacodystanford/files/fcs_cv_1.21_revised_0.pdf

Here is her Harvard Catalyst page: https://connects.catalyst.harvard.edu/Profiles/display/Person/110107

Sebdubois77 (talk) 00:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi @Sebdubois77, thank you so much for reaching out. Just searched Dr. Stanford and of course of course she deserves a page and of course I will help. This is so frustrating to hear about her page's deletion. There is a Wiki edit-a-thon being held tomorrow so I will get to work soon. Thank you again for notifying me :)
 * 47.34.91.214 (talk) 00:57, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

April editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

May 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

AfC notification: Draft:Ayana Jordan has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ayana Jordan. Thanks!  DGG ( talk ) 16:14, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

August Editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:26, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Images for your articles
I couldn't help but notice that you created an article about a female scientist nearly every day for much of 2020. (You stopped in 2021; but it's a hard job, understandably.) Anyway, you might want to know I am trying to help by illustrating those of them that I can. Your work is appreciated! --GRuban (talk) 15:06, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
 * One minor thing - I notice you've been creating most of these articles with the subjects' middle initials. That's only needed rarely, either to disambiguate between two or more subjects that otherwise have the same name, or in the very rare cases when they are best known with those initials (George W. Bush; Ulysses S. Grant). In general, most people are known without the middle initial (Carla Rothlin, Lindsay De Biase...) We can always have both forms with one as a Redirect to the other, but we should have the short form where possible. --GRuban (talk) 15:44, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Mandatory ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.TomStar81 (Talk) 22:18, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ayana Jordan
Hello, Microglia145. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ayana Jordan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

January 2022 with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

February with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

March editathons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

April Editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:45, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

May Women in Red events
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:53, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Susan Mackinnon
Hello Microglia145 -- Thanks for contributing the above article; can't believe we didn't have one already! I'd suggest pruning the personal material drastically to focus on her surgical achievements. However, I think you will also need medical project-compliant sources for all medical claims, even in a biographical article; refer to Identifying reliable sources (medicine) for details. Are there any academic journal articles celebrating her achievements? Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 01:15, 29 May 2022 (UTC)


 * These are great suggestions! Thank you so much! I will add some more surgical achievements for sure. I am not sure about academic journal articles celebrating her achievements, but I will look into this as I am sure it exists, though sometimes it doesn't for women sadly :( Microglia145 (talk) 01:51, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Do you have access to the WP:Wikipedia Library? That often has lots of useful content, though it can be a bit hard to find it, and sadly most of the major medical publishers aren't included. Best of luck! Espresso Addict (talk) 02:04, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

June events from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:21, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in July 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:48, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red August 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:59, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in September 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:36, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red October 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:00, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red November 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in December 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:55, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Women in Red January 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in February 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:28, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red March 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:54, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red April 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red May 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:28, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red - June 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red July 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red 8th Anniversary
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red August 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:25, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

September 2023 at Women in Red
--Victuallers (talk) 16:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Proposed deletion of Arghavan Salles


The article Arghavan Salles has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Self promotional vanity article about unremarkable physician"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red October 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Nomination of Arghavan Salles for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arghavan Salles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Arghavan Salles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:11, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red - November 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red December 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red January 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

CS1 error on Torri Metz
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Torri Metz, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Microglia145&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1195058214 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:39, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Torri_Metz&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1195058214%7CTorri%20Metz%5D%5D Ask for help])

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Microglia145. Thank you for your work on Greer Donley. Bastun, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 15:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on Rachel Rebouché
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Rachel Rebouché, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Microglia145&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1196823537 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:53, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rachel_Rebouch%C3%A9&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1196823537%7CRachel%20Rebouché%5D%5D Ask for help])

Women in Red February 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red March 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red April 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red May 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red June 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red August 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging