User talk:Moe Epsilon/Archive 11

{| align=center style="border:5px solid #D0E7FF; ; background:#FFFFFF; -moz-border-radius:15px; padding:5px;" | width=775px valign=top |

Left
Will you please stop it! You don't have to be an admin to be a good Wikipedian - I certainly will never be an admin, does that make me inherently bad. No one is perfect. If you are going this time, we (at least I) will be missing you :-( --Latinus 19:59, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

See you later Moe Hope you comeback
BionicWilliam 20:52, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Not again.
The title speaks for itself. At the moment, I'll only Sprotect the article, unless a registered user vandalizes it. Something has to be done about these RFAs. You don't deserve this. --LBMixPro&lt;Sp e ak 21:34, 26 March 2006 (UTC)


 * I agree. Please, don't let the comments of a few les miserablés discourage you. Its your choice, but we hope you reconsider. Whatever your choice is, may your future ventures bring you prosperity and happiness. Regards, M    o    P  23:21, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I can agree; the way I deal with people when I'm particularly upset is throw all AGF out the window; that doesn't make me a bad Wikipedian. I hope you come back soon. — [[Image:Flag_of_Ottawa%2C_Ontario.svg|20px]] [[Image:Flag of Ontario.svg|20px]] [[Image:Flag of Canada.svg|20px]] nath a nrdotcom (T • C • W) 02:15, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I'd vote for you on the next one, if you come back and decide to run again. I've seen that you've done some pretty good work all over the place. Just tell me if you do return and go for another RFA, so I can proudly support you. Jfing  e  r s  88  03:25, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry I missed your RfA. I would have strongly supported you if I had the chance. I have been following your contributions very closely since the user-name change, and I've seen absolutely nothing but helpful contributions. In fact, I was seriously thinking about nominating you for adminship myself. I'm not going to beg you to come back. I would probably be discouraged enough to consider leaving the project if I were in your place, so I can't blame you for being upset. I can only hope that your addiction kicks in and makes you start editing again. I'm very sorry that your RfA didn't turn out quite right, for your sake and for Wikipeida's. -- Tantalum T  e  lluride  06:12, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

THIS IS BULL STUFF! I got away and yall treat someone this way! He is right. Don't take this Moe. I'd call you David but, it would be awakard. Fight for your right to do what is right. If I was here, I woulda voted for you EXTREMELY STRONGLY SUPPORT! Good luck and hope you come back soon. I am extremely unpleased.-- Slipknot 2   22   22:03, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

User page
Hey, I'm sorry to hear that this is stressing you out as bad as this. I hope though that you do have a helpful Wikibreak. I'm hoping that when you get back you'll consider removing some of the negative commentary from your User page. I know you have strong feelings about what's happened, but it would probably be more helpful and productive not to make strongly negative comments about other users on your User page. Thanks. &Euml;vilphoenix Burn! 03:52, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

My RfA
My RfA recently closed and it was a success, passing at 84-02-00. I would like to thank you for taking the time to weigh in and on your subsequent support, despite not quite meeting your admin standards yet. And I know it's quite cliche, but if you ever need any assistance and/or want another opinion on something, grab a Pepsi and don't hesitate to drop me a line on my talk page. Thanks again. Pepsidrinka 04:50, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

RfA thanks
, thank you you for voting on my RfA, which passed successfully 49/6/3. I am grateful for your comments, and have taken people's suggestions to heart. I will do my best to live up to people's expectations. If I can ever make any improvements or help out in any way, please feel free to let me know! Although you voted oppose I appreciate your remarks.

¡Dustimagic! ( T / C ) 06:06, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

You are my friend!
Of course, you don't have to accept it. Just leave it on your talk page to rot, if you want.  Sceptr e  ( Talk  ) 17:13, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

I'm back
I feel better now that I am back from my Wiki-break. I had to do so much, I forgot to post it lol. I had to travel and go to places. I'm better now :).-- Slipknot 2   22   21:40, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Welcome back!
Welcome back, and I'm so glad you decided to come back. We would be deeply sad if you left us, for that would just be a waste of a talented editor like you. I'll step back a bit and give you some time to reestablish your "happy bubble", but if you ever need me, I'm just a step away. ^_^! M    o    P  03:54, 29 March 2006 (UTC)


 * :( Aww man, I feel for you. I've been a bit depressed at times, but I know you well from stalking you experience; you'll spring back. If you want, I can blow up some balloons and shape them like death! I mean, smiley faces. M    o    P  04:01, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Welcome back!

—   nath a(?) nrdotcom (T • C • W) 04:04, 29 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The glass is half full Moe, the glass is half full. M    o    P  04:16, 29 March 2006 (UTC)


 * *plays Psycho music* M    o    P  04:39, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Welcome Back
..to the Hotel Californ Wikipedia! You can check out whenever you like, but you can never leave! --LBMixPro&lt;Sp e ak 05:09, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

DaGizza's RfA


Hi, thank you for supporting me in my RfA which passed with a tally of (93/1/2). If you need any help or wish discuss something with me, you are always welcome to talk to me. -- Gizza Chat &#169;  11:45, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Bad RfA, I can see...
I see that you're getting that popularity back (66%, another 10% and you're on the right side of consensus). I'd like to comment that under stress I've also attacked a user, so you're not the only one.  Sceptr e  ( Talk  ) 17:16, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Checking in
Hey Moe,... I feel so stupid for not looking harder, and for causing any stress as a result of my carelessness. I hope everything's ok, and I wanted to let you know that I'll be more than happy to offer my full support (and blocks against McFly) next time you run. Stick around, contribute, and they'll have no choice but to accept you. In the mean time, you're still a great editor, and no one can take that away. - Mysekurity [m!] 20:51, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, as long as you're ok, I guess. Hit me up sometime, I still want to make that notice with you. - Mysekurity [m!] 04:11, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Welcome Back
I need your help, Some users have been adding picture gallerys to the RAW & SD! Articles for the GM's/Belts and adding repitive logo's to the WWE Page, I think It would look better if we redo the articles so the pages are not clutered (especially the RAW pages with the GM's plus readding the Current Rosters to the Smackdown/RAW Page BionicWilliam 23:36, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

mistake You messed up on the current SD! champs table in WWE_Friday_Night_SmackDown! BionicWilliam 01:21, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Reason it's Fuji Cakes and not Fugee Cakes
From the person that has been providing OVW house show results on the internet, from the OVW community on LiveJournal:

"Per a discussion with a wrestler I had yesterday and further evidenced by an internet search I just ran, I need to issue an apology.

For any wrestler's names I have butchered in reports I apologize. I have found that many of my reports have been used to flesh out rosters people are keeping online from just personal sites to even wikipedia. At most live events I only have what I can make out over the PA to use as a wrestler's name. Sometimes it's a simple matter of mis-interpretation on a spelling (see: Fuji-Cakes misspelled as Fugee Cakes). Other times it is a combination of my degraded hearing combined with heavily garbled announcers (see: Aaron LaMotta mis-translated to Aaron LaMonta).

Even though I only do this for fun I still like to take a little more pride in my write ups than to throw incorrect information out there. Please feel free to call me on any screw ups you may catch."

Here's the link to the community: http://community.livejournal.com/ovw_wrestling/

The entry is dated Feb 19, 2006. --JFred 01:47, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

My RfA
Thanks for removing my RfA, not sure why you re-added it though :) I didn't realise I was supposed to write an introductory statement - I would have liked to, but there didn't seem to be a place in the standard formula for that. And I read the nomination instructions carefully too :/ Stevage 09:06, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Tawkerbot2
Well, a few concerns are to be expected while the bot is being debuged / tested. Joshbuddy and I are trying new filters and nothing is exactly perfect (yet!) - we're getting better as we go along and I hate to say it but there are a lot more edits that RC Patrollers do not check. I had the bot on debug mode checking a lot of edits and most of this stuff was not fixed within 12 hours. I admit the bot will have hiccups and we're not all the way down the road but I think I'd get killed if I turned the bot off :o Seriously, I'm following up on every comment the bot / I get and I try to figure out whats going on and I'll get back to you when I have a more meaningful reply :) -- Tawker 05:24, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Vaughan Watch
hi. check out the AfD for Vaughan_Watch. thx —Preceding unsigned comment added by Purelife (talk • contribs)

My (HereToHelp’s) RfA
Thank you for supporting my RfA. I’m proud to inform you that it passed with 75 support to 1 oppose to 2 neutral. I promise to make some great edits in the future (with edit summaries!) and use these powers to do all that I can to help. After all, that’s what I’m here for! (You didn’t think I could send a thank you note without a bad joke, could I?) --HereToHelp 12:14, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Team Russ
Hello, could you please reconsider your vote for the Team Russ article to be deleted. The Team is quickly developing and has a fixture with a university team. I would also like to know your definition of a 'notable dodgeball team'. Thank you for your time. Wright123 12:39, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Hi
Hi, I decided to copy you and change my username: User:Latinus -> User:Edwy. Just thought you might want to update your friends list ;-) --Edwy 13:55, 1 April 2006 (UTC)


 * You think? I was just having second thoughts about it - well, never mind, I'm stuck with it now (Angela's gone offline) ;-) --Edwy 16:26, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

About your RFA, I'm sorry it didn't work out. If you ever want nominating again, let me know... --Edwy 16:32, 1 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Well, you've got nothing to lose - you may have changed your mind in a couple of months. --Edwy 16:37, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

RfA - Slicky
Hi, i second your comment and agree. I have been an wikipedian for well three years or so and sure i haven't always been active. The big difference is that constantly editing some tv show, game etc, article is in huge contrast to scientific ones which often take way more consideration and effort. All i would like to see is that administrators would be confined to like 5-10 sections of their choosing, which they believe are savvy in. Slicky 16:59, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Not yet, haven't achieved what i came for - i'll withdraw in a few hours, so long Slicky 17:08, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Slicky's RfA
Why did you revert my reversion? - Richardcavell 18:46, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Just for my own curiosity....
....is the pro wrestling wiki dead? That would be a big time blow....no pun intended Trosk 02:50, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Double redirects
That's just going to make it harder when this silly business is over and they can be moved to their proper names :\ --SPUI (talk - RFC) 03:08, 2 April 2006 (UTC)


 * It's not that simple - there's massive groupthink keeping them at the wrong names. --SPUI (talk - RFC) 03:11, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

My RfA
Hi. I am sorry to bother you but I wondered if you might be prepared to take another look at my RfA nomination. The main reason that I ask this is because there has previously been some confusion as to my talk count and I also wonder if there might have been some confusion regarding the duration of my contributions. I would also like to comment on some of the concerns raised by others, which I have discussed on the nomination page, but which you may not be aware of.

Firstly with regard to my talk contributions and the duration of my contributions. I just wanted to clarify that I do have substantial numbers of contributions in the user talk namespace although significantly less in the main article and wikipedia talk namespace, so I do have a good history of interactions with other users but primarily on their user page (furthermore I have a good track record of warning vandals - something is often lacking for many vandal fighters both admin and non-admin). Regarding the duration of my contributions, I just wanted to clarify that I have now been contributing for 15 months in total and, although I have had a few "lean" months when my focus have been outside of Wikipedia, I had almost 2000 contributions before February and there have been 9 months when I have made 100+ contributions.

WIth regards to the concerns raised by other, which aren't covered by the above, they seem to relate primarily to my lack of contributions to the article talk and wikipedia talk namespaces and what this says about my community involvement and exposure to process. Firstly I would like to say that I don't think my contributions in this area are particularly low when compared to other current nominees and recently created admins who are/were heavily supported (I have provided some details on this in the comments section of the nomination) - as I said in the comments section this is not to say "they are supported so why aren't I", rather it is just to provide a benchmark to compare how common my contribution pattern is. Secondly I would like to point out that I do not typically revert vandalism in these namespaces which I believe play a significant part in the number of these contributions for vandal-fighter editors (especially in the article talk namespace). Finally I would just like to reiterate my personal opinion that, regarding edits to Wikipedia talk, contributing and understanding are different things (i.e. I do understand the policys and guidelines even though I have not actively contributed to them). With regard to my community involvement, I do have a fair number of edits to the mian Wikipedia namespace and also the user talk namespace as previously mentioned.

I understand that contacting you in this way may well be considered "campaigning" but I want to assure you that I am driven by good practical intentions rather than ego. As you will be aware, I am primarily a vandal fighter and I feel that the admin tools will allow me to far better serve the community in this area. Specifically I come across a lot of situations were there are very few editors on RC patrol and a lot of vandalism is being missed, this is compounded by the fact that AIAV is often not being heavily monitored during the same periods meaning that blocks are delayed and a lot of time is spent reverting vandals who have already received a final warning. This extra time spent reverting known vandals obviously mean that much new vandalism is missed - with the obvious effect on the quality and credibility of Wikipedia.

I would like to sum by saying that I feel I could make good use of the tools and that I have never done anything to raise concerns that I would misuse them. Cheers TigerShark 20:54, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for your vote of confidence in my recent request for bureaucratship. Even though it didn't pass, I greatly appreciate your support and hope I will continue to have your respect. Thank you! Flcelloguy (A note? ) 22:50, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

RFA Thanks
Thank you for your support vote on my RFA. The final result was a successful request based on 111 support and 1 oppose. --CBDunkerson 15:01, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Yu-Gi-Oh! WikiProject
I'll join the Yu-Gi-Oh! WikiProject.

The MOST OBSESSED Wikipedian ever
You really are the MOST OBSESSED Wikipedian ever if you're always watching people like me, waiting for them to screw up so you can revert their changes and send them a new message about it! Dark Magician 18:01, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! You did it again! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dark Magician (talk • contribs)

Thanks
Thanks for correcting a couple of my edits to Current World Wrestling Entertainment roster. --JFred 22:44, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

I need you Table expertise Moe
Can you readd Hogan's riegns to the AWA World Heavyweight Championship page since AWA: Superstars of Wrestling over turned the decission 25 years after the fact but that not unlike WWE revision of the WWE Women's Championship with Moolah just to keep the history pages consistant BionicWilliam 01:39, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

I need you Table expertise Moe Part 2
http://www.awastars.com/title.htm There is the offical Title History, I know the two overturned title reigns were made official nearly 25 years after the fact, by the new owner of the AWA properties, Dale Gagne, and are consider apocryphal but its just as apocryphal to acept WWE revisons of its title history its no problem to disagree with that but its the WWE & AWA :Superstars of Wrestling own right to regconized there own title history,so to keep NPOV I belive both the offical history and actual history have rightful place on Wikipedia with the reasoning to this being done explained BionicWilliam 02:08, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

About AWA: Superstars of Wrestling
I wish someone would split the AWA Articles (Belts/Main AWA Page) into AWA (Classic), AWA: Superstars of Wrestling, and move AWA territories article to AWA: Superstars of Wrestling article as a section,plus update all title histories thr current day. Since the new AWA is an extension of the old AWA but with a totally new concept (It's actual legalitly is up to latter discussion (I will post this on the Wikiproject page too) BionicWilliam 02:25, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Roster Page
I added Harry Smith because numerous news sites have said he has verbally signed a contract.

Why are Vince & Shane listed twice? BionicWilliam 05:34, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

thanks for the support
Hi Moe- thanks a lot for your support on my recent, barely successful rfa. Please feel free to leave me any comments or criticisms on my talk page! --He:ah? 22:14, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Roster Page Part 2
But You said earlier this year when JR was fierd (on screen) we should of only listed him once instead of Inactive & his offical job. 00:44, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Kusma's RfA
Hello, Moe Epsilon! Thank you for your support in my recent successful request for adminship. If you ever have problems that you could use my assistance with or see me doing stupid things with my new buttons, don't hesitate to contact me. Happy editing, Kusma (討論) 02:22, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Category:McMahon wrestling family
On that catagory It list a Rodrick McMahon and a Jess McMahon but the both the same person, so can you help with this? Also shouldn't Vince McMahon be moved to Vincent K. McMahon to with his father Vincent J. McMahon? Thanks Again BionicWilliam 03:03, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

SR 429
You moved State Road 429 (Florida) to Florida State Road 429, claiming that this is the "correct name". This is not true; all the Google results for that name are from Wikipedia mirrors. The third result for "State Road 429" Florida, on the other hand, is to the OOCEA site. The correct name is "State Road 429", and the (Florida) is proper disambiguation. --SPUI (T - C - RFC) 19:01, 9 April 2006 (UTC)


 * You do not understand how disambiguation works. We don't use footballer Jim Smith or spymaster John Jones for instance; we put anything that's not part of the name in parentheses after the name. --SPUI (T - C - RFC) 19:08, 9 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The only reason the article calls it "Florida State Road 429" is that it was written back when the article was there. --SPUI (T - C - RFC) 19:15, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
 * In fact, State Road 429 does not use "Florida State Road X" at all. --SPUI (T - C - RFC) 19:16, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

I think the World Heavyweight Championship should merged with List of Number of World Title Reigns
Since the WHC Page restates the same infomation,the belt factoids should be added to the page under the List of Number of World Title Reigns section BionicWilliam 03:22, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Part 2
The World Heavyweight Championship Article stats nothing on Boxing or MMA exept that there's championship for those sports

To the article you just added to the World Heavyweight Championship page the AWA World Heavyweight Title is now like the NWA World Heavyweight Championship pre-TNA in the it's defended throught out the AWA not just Zero One, also can you be intreasted in helping on the reorganizing of the AWA Pages I list above and on the Wikiproject:Professional Wrestling talk page? BionicWilliam 03:42, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

My RFA
Hi, I was just making a minor fix & noticed your comment. Think I should change my statement or is that bad form? I agree I could have been more descriptive; hoping my work speaks for itself. Thanks for your support either way. Kaisershatner 15:51, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

My RFA
Hi, this is Matt Yeager. I wanted to thank you for your vote on my request for adminship. The count was something like was 14/20/5 when I decided to withdraw the request. My decision was based on the fact that there are enough things wasting people's time on the Internet that doomed RFA's shouldn't be kept up for voters to have to think about. Regardless of the rationale behind your vote, I hope you will read this note for an extended note and discussion on what will happen before I make another try at adminship (I didn't want to clog up your userpage with drivel that you might not be interested in reading). Thank you very, very much for your vote and your time and consideration of my credentials--regardless of whether you voted support, nuetral, or oppose. Happy editing!  Matt Yeager   ♫  ( Talk? ) 01:23, 11 April 2006 (UTC)