User talk:NewsTeamAssemble

September 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that the username you have chosen, "NewsTeamAssemble", seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of something other than yourself. Please note that you may not edit on behalf of a company, group, institution, product, or website which relates to the entity in question, and Wikipedia does not allow usernames that are promotional or accounts that are shared. If you are willing to use a personal account, please take a moment to create a new account or request a username change that represents only yourself as an individual. You should also read our Conflict of interest guideline and Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, and remember that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Alexf(talk) 11:36, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi Alexf, I have no idea what you are implying about my user name being promotional or my edits being a conflict of interest. If you really need to know, my username is quoted from "Anchorman". I am not sharing my account with anyone. I just started a Wiki account and found some pages that interested me to try out editing on. I wanted to make sure my edits were on subjects that I knew something about, but that doesn't make my account on behalf of someone else. I plan on venturing out with my edits when I have time. I honestly have no idea what could give the impression that my account name/edit history are promotional in any way, so I'd really like to keep this user name. Hope this clears this up. NewsTeamAssemble (talk) 03:35, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The name "NewsTeam" seems to imply a group or shared use, which is forbidden by the Username policy. I'll take your word for it and remove the category from the warning. This takes it out of the Admin board. No guarantees that somebody else may question you again on this, -- Alexf(talk) 01:46, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh I see. Sorry about that, I just thought it was just a tribute to one of my favorite movies. Thanks for letting me know. As a new editor, I guess I'm unfamiliar with a lot of the stuff that goes on around Wikipedia. Are there any particular pages that I could look to improve? NewsTeamAssemble (talk) 02:08, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
 * And was easy enough to find your inspiration once explained.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 13:18, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
 * You can read the Help Pages, or writing Your First Article. You can consult the Manual of Style once you understand the basics. You can ask questions at the TEAHOUSE|The Teahouse, and above all, always remember The Golden Rule. -- Alexf(talk) 09:57, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks Schmidt and Alexf! I'll keep all this in mind as I begin editing and will follow up if I have any questions about my edits. News Team Assemble  [!!!]  00:11, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

I suggest you use that YouTube link on your userpage to explain the source of your name's inspiration. That should help you avoid problems in the future. -- Brangifer (talk) 16:19, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the advice BullRangifer. Will do. News Team   Assemble! [talk?] 03:05, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, NewsTeamAssemble, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

And too, you may find WP:PRIMER and its related tutorials to be helpful in your future contributions.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 11:41, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 01:29, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks Jackmcbarn. I wasn't aware of that rule. Sorry! I'll keep that in mind in the future. NewsTeamAssemble (talk) 01:35, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Re: Andy Hobsbawm
Thank you for the talk page note. Indeed, UK subjects generally follow Use British English and Use dmy dates per Wikipedia's Manual of Style; these particular tags are unlike other article cleanup request tags and are not removed even when the article fully conforms to spelling and style. Hope this explains this topic. Dl2000 (talk) 05:00, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the information. I'll keep that in mind when I'm editing now. News Team Assemble  [!!!]  16:01, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Grocery Outlet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Washington


 * Kelley Blue Book (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Blue Book


 * MedMen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Consulting

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Daniel Amen/Amen Clinic edits
Wondering why you saw fit to remove merge requests and clear COI markings, as well as the Wired article, when you did your edits to these pages? -- [ UseTheCommandLine  ~/ talk  ]# &#9604; 04:06, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
[ UseTheCommandLine  ~/ talk  ]# &#9604; 04:18, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daniel Ivankovich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MD (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Lydia Loveless Discography
Hi there. Noticed you made edits to the Lydia Loveless page discography. Thank you for your edits but her discography is organized by type of release, and EP (Extended Play) Records and 7" single are not typically grouped together. They are not the same thing, are different formats -- and I think the only exception would be if they were both released as 45 rpm format, which these weren't.

The other reason why the edit was not kept is because of the press Lydia has given to the release of Boy Crazy -- an interim release of an almost full length record that was put out until her most recent full length record came out. Lydia has said this repeatedly in interviews about the EP -- and her label lists her record this way as well.

The singles are one-off, cover-based promo type items -- they are not full releases -- so that was the idea behind listing them the way they are. Also if you look at other discographies, this is a common format.

Again thanks for your efforts editing the page -- it is much appreciated. Don't want to discourage you from editing but also want to make sure the page is in a somewhat standard format that reflects the releases correctly, format-wise. Happy to discuss if this is not clear. BrillLyle (talk) 05:18, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dogtown and Z-Boys, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boffo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fermatta Music Academy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Uncut. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Wayne Hector
 * added links pointing to The Vamps and Rixton


 * Wayne Hector songwriting discography
 * added links pointing to The Vamps and Rixton

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reebok Pump, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jerome Williams. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:30, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reebok Freestyle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nike. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Edit ideas for Josh Flagg's page
Hey!! So I was reviewing some recent stuff on Josh Flagg and then started looking over his page, I saw you were doing some editing on it and I was wondering if you could sort of help me out? I was thinking of adding in his appearances on Watch What Happens Live (I know he has at least a few) but Im pretty new to editing and not really sure where to put that info? I found these references:

http://www.bravotv.com/watch-what-happens-live/season-7/josh-flagg-madison-hildebrand http://www.bravotv.com/watch-what-happens-live/season-11/mdl-la

But are they reliable enough? Or should I find better references/citations...? Let me know if you are interested in helping me out! Im still trying to get the hang of this stuff... — Preceding unsigned comment added by S3venevan (talk • contribs) 04:37, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Hey S3venevan, thanks for reaching out. You could add that to the page if you'd like. In my opinion, it fits best in the introductory paragraph, as there's really no place to list features on this page. See below:
 * He has also been featured on NBC's Today Show, ABC's Good Morning America and Bravo's Watch What Happens: Live.

Great! Thanks, went ahead and made the edit. I was also wondering if you could check out this page for Séraphine (company). I have sort of been following it and Im pretty sure the designer, Cecile Reinaud, can have her own page, right? I might start trying to put one together, but could use some help... — Preceding unsigned comment added by S3venevan (talk • contribs) 06:02, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reebok, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wimbledon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NaturalNews logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:NaturalNews logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:49, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Drew Rosenhaus
Hey, Ive been reading the Jerry Maguire article and read some articles that led me to Drew Rosenhaus (because he was maybe one of the inspirations for the film?). His page is sloppy and Ive already found issues and inaccuracies. But it's kind of lengthy and only has five references. I was thinking of re-writing a lot of it based on some articles I found, but that seems like a bigger task and its a longer Wiki article than Im used to working on... Would you be down to show me where to start? or help me edit a section or so? It needs a lot of new sources and other things S3venevan (talk) 04:11, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Hey S3venevan, thanks for reaching out. Taking a look now. News Team   Assemble! [talk?] 11:52, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Larry Klein, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Billy Child. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Help with Independent Review?
Hi,

I noticed that you previously did a bunch of work on the Williams Sonoma article. I actually just did a re-draft of the stub about its CEO, Laura Alber, turning it into a fuller article. I am an experienced Wikipedia editor. However, I have a conflict of interest as a paid consultant to Williams Sonoma. So, under Wikipedia policy WP:COI, I need someone independent to review the suggested re-draft and approve/edit it, rather than just make the changes myself.

Since you seem to have an interest in Williams Sonoma, I thought you might volunteer yourself? :) I tried to write this article like any other, abiding by all Wikipedia policies, so I think it won't take too much of of your time.

The draft is here: Talk:Laura_J._Alber

If you happen to have time to do a review, I'd be appreciative.

Thanks,

Ed BC1278 (talk) 15:40, 26 May 2017 (UTC)BC1278

Orphaned non-free image File:Qello Logo 2015.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Qello Logo 2015.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of MedMen


A tag has been placed on MedMen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. --- Coffee  and crumbs  15:04, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

spam in draft space
Speedy deletion via G11 is only appropriate for material that is hopelessly promotional and can not be fixed by normal editing. In particular, in draft space, we use it only for the very worst and most unfixable advertisements, because draft space iswhere articles aresupposed to get improved.

As reviewing administrator I have removed a number of your G11 speedy tags. Please do not apply any more until you have more experience here.  DGG ( talk ) 00:35, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
 * @ DGG, got on a kick after seeing a number of unredeemably promotional advertisements that are clearly self-serving the subject. Many of these submissions have been sitting in the draftspace for some time and (in my;xfd]], but the opinion) don't have the quality to be improved to the point where many just won't be meant for Wikipedia. I figure curbing the problem before it's in the mainspace was more suitable than continually rejecting non-notables — let me know how I can help.  News Team   Assemble! [talk?] 00:47, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
 * The way to get rid of drafts that you think will never make articles is WP:XFD, and you might get consensus for a few of them, because that's where judgment can be used. And even there you will not get consensus for all of them. Speedy is for cases so blatantly obvious that no one who knows WP would disagree. I've been working with thie problem of promotional articles for 10 years, and have deleted tens of thousands of them, including at least a thousand Drafts. .  Some of the ones you marked would even make G11s in main space. But the criteria for G11 in user space is much more limited.
 * The problem is made worse because actions like yours discourage good faith editors. I shall now tonight have to go to each of their user page's and apologize for the incorrect tagging, and urge them to improve the articles, but not give up on us. I see another well-justified complaint below, and you must stop this now. It is better to leave the ecision for speedy on drafts to those who qualify as an AfC reviewer.  Judging the possibility of low quality AfC drafts is a tricky business--it is easy to pick out the good ones, but much harderto decide which are truly impossible.  (I have left the tagging on a few of the drafts you tagged for another admin to judge, because those few of them might indeed justify speedy g11 even as drafts.  DGG ( talk ) 01:17, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
 * @ DGG - I'm sorry for going about AfC CSD in that manner. This was a direction during my AfC reviewer request to comb for articles that weren't suitable for Wikipedia and/or would fail a deletion discussion. My nominations were based off what could be considered overt mainspace promotion and I genuinely didn't know there was a significant difference between that and the draftspace, so I will not tag those from here onward. My goal was to ensure those AfCs that are salvageable were able to be reviewed/seen and not fall by the wayside because of advertisements. I apologize if my actions came across bluntly... the growing backlog number was giving me anxiety :( and I made many mistakes instead of being productive. Thank you for the comments and insight, if there's any way to make amends, I'll be here. News Team   Assemble! [talk?] 02:33, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm glad you want to learn, because we certainly do need more people working on this. The way to learn is to go slowly, starting from a1 or 2 of the clearest possible ones, waiting to see what the reaction is, and then trying a few more, of different kinds. In the meantime, you should first listen to a few XfD discussions, and then participate in a few.   Also listen to, and then participate in AfD discussions, because AfD is actually where the real action is here. It's not the way the rules are written that matter,, but how they are interpreted. A great many of our standards for articles are quite ambiguous--for new articles usually about half of the material is clearly keep or delete, but the other half could rationally go either way. For submitted drafts, about 3/4 will never make an article, butt hey need a chance to try.
 * There's another factor, We normally delete unimproved drafts after 6 months of no action, but if you even tag it, or make any change or comment whatsoever, the 6 month period resets--the program we use cannot tell the difference between a substantial and an insubstantial edit. So if it's been more than a few months without editing, it's better just to let it get deleted at the end of the period.  DGG ( talk ) 03:02, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:HappyCo
Hi! Why are you applying CSD to drafts such as Draft:HappyCo? I have also seen other drafts CDSed by you. I am not sure if you understand how and when to use it. For example, HappyCo does not appear to be entirely promotional. This draft, in fact has some reliable sources and since drafts are meant to be improved, speedy delete is not advised. Dial911 (talk) 00:39, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
 * @ Dial911, there were a number of buzzwords but the overarching issue in my opinion was the prevalent use of WP:SPIP. Although reliable publications, much of the content stems from the company's funding rounds, rather than extensive coverage about HappyCo. News Team   Assemble! [talk?]
 * I get your point. However, drafts are not supposed to be speedy deleted. Dial911 (talk) 01:08, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Understood. This was a direction during my AfC reviewer request to comb the draft space for articles that weren't suitable for Wikipedia and/or would fail a deletion discussion. I solely nominated articles that were promotional to prevent those that are salvageable from getting reviewed and moved to the mainspace. I apologize if it came across bluntly.. the backlog number was giving me anxiety :( News Team   Assemble! [talk?] 01:22, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
 * It's okay. I fully understand your point. I came across some of those tagged drafts while reviewing at AFC. So wanted to bring it to your notice. Dial911 (talk) 01:25, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Draft:Shaun B. Coleman
Hello NewsTeamAssemble. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Draft:Shaun B. Coleman, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguous advertising. Thank you. &#x222F; WBG converse 08:54, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy on drafts
I am dubious about whether applying speedy tags to draft articles is a useful activity. With the majority of those that you have tagged recently, I would have no objection to leaving them until they get deleted routinely after six months as stale drafts. The difference being that abandoned draft deletions I can do with a bulk deletion tool. For other deletion reasons, I feel a duty to look (often very briefly, but I do look) at each page separately. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:56, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
Hello, I'm Atlantic306. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Inappropriate csd tagging of articles. Atlantic306 (talk) 13:36, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Workfrontlogo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Workfrontlogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 16 September 2022 (UTC)