User talk:NuclearFunk

Welcome!
'''Hello,, Welcome  to Wikipedia! '''I hope you like working here and want to continue. If you need help on how to name new articles, look at Naming Conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the Manual of Style. If you need general help, look at Help and the FAQ, and if you can't find your answer there, check the Village pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions). There's still more help at the Tutorial and the Policy Library. Also, don't forget to visit the Community Portal &mdash; and if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on my New-Users' Talk Page.'''

Additional tips:
 * Here are some extra tips to help you get around Wikipedia:
 * If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
 * If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills, try the Sandbox.
 * Click on the Edit button on a page, and look at how other editors did what they did.
 * You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Always sign comments on Talk pages, never sign Articles.
 * You might want to add yourself to the New User Log
 * If your first language isn't English, try Contributing to articles outside your native language

Happy editing! This is more than a bit late, so you doubtless know all the above &mdash; but welcome anyway. Mel Etitis ( &Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf; ) 18:04, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * thanks g... NuclearFunk

Hey, I noticed we have edited several of the same pages. I was wondering if we could maybe do something more about the Bergen electronic music scene. I have never heard term Bergen Wave, but I think it is a good start page for the scene.Ellipse 10:19, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Drum and bass
Out of curiosity, what well-known tunes have either no drums or no bass? It's not something I've ever heard anybody say before, andd the only tune I can think of without bass is that Grooverider feturing Lifford one.illWill 11:49, 11 July 2005 (UTC)


 * Hi there, perhaps I shouldn't have used the term "well-known", because well... They aren't. Digital made some tunes with only hints of percussion once, and both Polar & Teebee have mase a couple of tunes where drums are absent, but it still qualifies as dnb, because it takes elements we know from the genre that has nothing to do with either drums or bass. My removal of the word "supremely" has more to do that they aren't supremely important, just important... I hope this clarifies my actions! :) Or mayeb you just wanted the name of some tunes, which in that case, I've failed...

Thanks, I did want to hear the tunes. I'd like to hear them as Digital is my favourite producer and I'd be interested in hearing anything similar. I like the way the grime producers have done tracks without percussion. By the way, I'm startiing a Wikiproject to clean up the drum and bass articles, if you're interested. I haven't started a page yet, but there's a preliminary list of tasks on my user page.illWill 17:34, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

Vote on moving Lost (2004 television series) to Lost (TV series)
Hi. Just a quick note that we're voting (again) on renaming/moving the Lost (2004 television series) article, this time to the shorter Lost (TV series). As you were a participant in the previous discussion/vote, please register your support or opposition here: Talk:Lost (2004 television series) Thanks! LeFlyman 05:27, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

Cinema Collaboration of the Week
You supported Andre Bazin. The article has won and is now the new collaboration of the week. Hope you can help! --Fenice 08:44, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Football AID 23 - 29 January
Thank you for participating in the Football AID vote this week. Bobby Charlton has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.

Football AID 29 January - 4 February
Thank you for participating in the Football AID vote this week. List of football (soccer) clubs has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.

Neurofunk origins and artists
There are two different points of view about the neurofunk subgenre of drum'n'bass. The first is that neurofunk was originated by the Audio Blueprint label. According to this point of view, neurofunk artists are Stakka & Skynet, Teebee, Photek, Black Sun Empire, Gridlok, etc. The second is that neurofunk was originated by Ed Rush and Optical (Virus Recordings label), and that other artists are Cause 4 Concern, Mayhem, Noisia, Phace, Matrix, etc. Please cite sources on the neurofunk talk page to support any arguments. — Anrie Nord 2006-01-31 18:07Z

Move discussion at Lost
Hey, NuclearFunk. I thought you might be interested to know that there's yet another Lost-related move discussion underway at Talk:Lost. This one is about whether Lost should be a disambiguation page (as it is currently) or a redirect to Lost (TV series), with the disambiguation content moved to Lost (disambiguation). Since you'd voted in earlier Lost-related move discussions, I thought you might be interested in this one. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 18:50, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Football AID 5 February - 11 February
Thank you for participating in the Football AID vote this week. Bayern Munich has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.

Vote for Bee Season
Bee Season is the Cinema Collaboration of the Week.

Thefourdotelipsis 07:50, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Blårock
Hi, I recently proded Blårock as Non-notable café, since you rewrote the article I thought I give you a notice. Eivindt@c 11:32, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Riise and Alan Smith
Do you really believe that the incident is such a career highlight that is worth mentioning? I decided to delete it because that paragraph talks mainly of the crowd response and hints at the dislike of Man Utd. It talks very little about Riise or what he did, and hence I thought it wasn't really worthy. What's your argument? aLii 16:19, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Alfheim1.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Alfheim1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 12:43, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Haneke_3.jpeg
Thanks for uploading Image:Haneke_3.jpeg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 10:11, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Rasunda3.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rasunda3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:53, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Phace


The article Phace has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:NBAND, reads like promotional material

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 10:37, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Viking Stadium listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Viking Stadium. Since you had some involvement with the Viking Stadium redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mosmof (talk) 22:41, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Op:l Bastards for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Op:l Bastards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Op:l Bastards until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. SL93 (talk) 21:28, 23 May 2024 (UTC)