User talk:Okalinov

Welcome!
Hello, Okalinov, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Egon Tercetta, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! JMHamo (talk) 00:15, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Egon Tercetta


A tag has been placed on Egon Tercetta requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JMHamo (talk) 00:15, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Egon Tercetta


The article Egon Tercetta has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. JMHamo (talk) 01:34, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Egon Terzetta.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Egon Terzetta.jpeg, which you've attributed to Egon Terzetta. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

The same message also applies to File:Stefan Yanev.jpg and File:Ivan Mokanov.jpg. — Diannaa (talk) 15:33, 19 February 2016 (UTC) If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:32, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Stefan Tonchev


The article Stefan Tonchev has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Ochib (talk) 16:07, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stefan Tonchev, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zlatia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Egon Terzetta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Valona. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at PFC Cherno More Varna. GiantSnowman 13:27, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
 * No, you are adding unreferenced content, removing sources, and editing in a disruptive manner. Stop it. GiantSnowman 14:27, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
 * See WP:3RR and WP:EDITWAR for reasons why your editing has been disruptive. If you have a genuine case to make then use the article talk page; do not edit as you have been doing. GiantSnowman 15:23, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Look, you can take my advice, or you can ignore it. If you ignore it and continue to delete referenced content / add unsourced material then you will be blocked, OK? GiantSnowman 15:55, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

July 2017
It looks like you're continuing to made the same edits that prompted the warnings and discussion above in March 2016. Please do not do this, as repeated disruptive editing or addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content can result in blocking. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   14:37, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at PFC Cherno More Varna. --Rebelheartous (talk) 13:42, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Dispute for Cherno More's history
As one of the parties of the dispute, you are kindly invited to participate in the dedicated discussion at the article's talk page. If I have misrepresented your position or you might want to add something, feel free to do so. If you would like to publish a separate statement, please do not hesitate to do so. If you believe that there are other editors who can help us reach consensus or can provide valuable third opinion, please invite them.

I will revert the article to the state as of 15 July 2017, before the last edit war started. I suggest that we concentrate on the dispute resolution and avoid edit warring. When the dispute is settled we can edit the article accordingly. Thanks! Yavorescu (talk) 01:38, 10 August 2017 (UTC)


 * FYI, I took the liberty to move your opinion to a separate subsection Statement by Okalinov as it doesn't seem to be a reply to my statement. I think it will be more visible this way and would avoid possible confusion. Yavorescu (talk) 16:17, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Alert to Okalinov
As I already said, your sources is a joke, Mr Kalinov. Actually, you have no sources to support your claims. My source is an article from the oldest and the most  authoritative and competent Bulgarian football site. So, in my order, I strongly advise you to stop vandalize all the pages of the article with your disruptive editions. Continual disruptive editing may cost you loss of editing privileges. Thank you.78.130.150.123 (talk) 08:37, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't call an article with 34 references and 14 external links "vandalized". On the other hand, an internet site which admits to its personal and unbinding interpretations can hardly be called "authoritative and competent". I also don't agree that sources like the Bulgarian Football Union, the Bulgarian Olympic Committee and the club itself are a joke. There is a talk page to the article, you can say whatever you want to say there. Thank you Okalinov (talk) 20:09, 16 January 2018 (UTC)