User talk:Rebelheartous

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --The TV Boy (talk) 13:47, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Disambiguation link notification for May 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Colin Tilley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Brown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014–15 La Liga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vilareal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Matías Fernández
Can you change the date? The bot moved it to the backlog, assuming it's old. --George Ho (talk) 09:55, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Done. Do I have to undo what the bot moved?--Rebelheartous (talk) 10:20, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * No. Let the bot detect requested moves. --George Ho (talk) 10:22, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
Hello, I'm Qed237. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Lionel Messi, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Qed237&#160;(talk) 16:16, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Okalinov
The standard process for dealing with vandalism is to revert, warn, and report at WP:AIV. I have issued Okalinov with a final warning. GiantSnowman 13:28, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iraqi Civil War. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Roman Polanski
Sorry about that! I completely missed your adding the asterisk in Roman Polanski; I saw only $\langlenowiki\rangle$$\langle/nowiki\rangle$. TJRC (talk) 22:29, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * It's okay.--Rebelheartous (talk) 14:17, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Dispute for Cherno More's history
As one of the parties of the dispute, you are kindly invited to participate in the dedicated discussion at the article's talk page. If I have misrepresented your position or you might want to add something, feel free to do so. If you would like to publish a separate statement, please do not hesitate to do so. If you believe that there are other editors who can help us reach consensus or can provide valuable third opinion, please invite them.

I will revert the article to the state as of 15 July 2017, before the last edit war started. I suggest that we concentrate on the dispute resolution and avoid edit warring. When the dispute is settled we can edit the article accordingly. Thanks! Yavorescu (talk) 01:39, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * You do not aim at edit war, yet you revert to a previous version. One can say this is pure hypocrisy. Nope, this time we will stick to the current version while discussing whatever there is to discuss if anything.--Rebelheartous (talk) 06:33, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I have reverted to the version before your intervention on 16 July. This version is properly sourced according to the discussion at bg wiki (which you seem to ignore) and was intact for a sufficiently long period, almost a year.  It is obvious that there is content dispute which has to be resolved one way or another.  I strongly prefer civilized discussion, therefore I kindly ask you once again to participate.  I just added a "disputed" tag to the article. Yavorescu (talk) 10:16, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Reminding you once again that the dispute is still unresolved and your contribution to the discussion is still missing. Yavorescu (talk) 21:59, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Talkback PFC Cherno More Varna
Yavorescu (talk) 06:10, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Talkback PFC Cherno More Varna (second request)
Yavorescu (talk) 22:43, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Reverting whithout discussion at PFC Cherno More Varna. The discussion is about the topic PFC Cherno More Varna. Yavorescu (talk) 18:12, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Това, че вие сте папагал, не означава, че може да ми махате редакциите. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.83.94.41 (talk) 18:08, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

PFC Cherno More Varna disruptive editing
Since the attempt for discussion in August 2017 you have made nearly 20 edits to that article despite the fact that there's a content dispute and you have completely ignored the discussion so far. Your last edits were [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PFC_Cherno_More_Varna&diff=prev&oldid=813862802 in] [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PFC_Cherno_More_Varna&diff=prev&oldid=817306279 December] and two [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PFC_Cherno_More_Varna&diff=prev&oldid=819276268 from] [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PFC_Cherno_More_Varna&diff=prev&oldid=819316596 today]. You have also [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Bulgarian_football_champions&diff=prev&oldid=817924163 reverted] my edit at List of Bulgarian football champions completely unreasonably as it is not supported by the source given in that article. Could you please stop your disruptive editing of PFC Cherno More Varna and other related articles? Yavorescu (talk) 19:51, 8 January 2018 (UTC) Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.Okalinov (talk) 19:56, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Okalinov (talk • contribs) 20:01, 20 February 2018 (UTC) Okalinov (talk) 20:05, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Ludogorets Foundation
Sir, I see you show interest about Bulgarian Football. However, I noticed that you do not know our football history well enough so please do not edit articles if you are uncertain about important facts and dates. To begin with, Ludogorets Razgrad 1945 was founded in 1945 as you know as per their official website https://ludogorets.com/en/history/, oncoming 75th Anniversary Celebration, https://ludogorets.com/en/news/?i=3575 as well as UEFA's website https://www.uefa.com/teamsandplayers/teams/club=2603104/profile/index.html. You can also check this on the Bulgarian Government and Bulgarian Football Union page. I also noticed that you mostly try to start disputes about your rivalries. I assume that this is vandalism. If I am incorrect and you really look into clearing Wikipedia out of discrepancies, then please inform yourself. Also you can easily see that there are many more wrongful articles around the Bulgarian Football in Wikipedia. For example, take a look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PFC_CSKA_Sofia. This football club bankrupted in 2016 and another club - Litex renamed to CSKA - Sofia. Not only did they steal their name, but they took their history and continue as if they were the same club according to their Wikipedia page. However, in reality they use the license so the history of Litex. You can read more about this and edit their mistaken page instead of trying to alter innocent and righteous football clubs' history such as Ludogorets Razgrad.Seimbru (talk) 14:29, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020–21 Eredivisie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emmen. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

May 2024
Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Pellegrino Matarazzo. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please see MOS:ENGVAR for clarity about the use of the proper variety of English, and thus terminology for a sport, on Wikipedia. Anwegmann (talk) 21:46, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Massimo Taibi. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Anwegmann (talk) 21:49, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.