User talk:Pbritti

Kosovo Air Force again
I just saw this on my watchlist. What do you think, could this be our old friend? - ZLEA  T \ C 18:49, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Looks like classic quacking. ~ Pbritti (talk) 04:42, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I've brought it up here. - ZLEA  T \ C 14:55, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Difference?
What's the difference between one talk page section on missing material, and my own? Usually I sprinkle "The Article would be improved if..." throughout my suggestion but this time I assumed it went without saying. (Article on SBC "Talk" page that you just reverted.)2603:8081:3A00:30DF:64B9:F991:7457:CF8D (talk) 02:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Your contribution read as a question about the denomination's stance. While your comments here on my talk page clarify that you meant to suggest Wikipedia should mention those stances, you didn't indicate that. Often, people post comments wholly unrelated to improving articles to talk pages about religious groups to ask about their beliefs. I encourage you to do some research on the subject of SBC stances towards Judaism and to return to the article or talk page. ~ Pbritti (talk) 02:56, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Licorici of Winchester
Hi, I see you have deleted a couple of references to a new book about the above lady. Not sure why. The book appears to be a reputable publication and is freely available on Amazon. Regards Murgatroyd49 (talk) 14:23, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 * On its face, the book looks reliable. However, the book's author is a creative writer with little to no peer-reviewed history writing. The book itself is not peer-reviewed and was published by a non-academic printing house. The article on the Tower of London is an FA and the one on Westminster Abbey is a GA, so there is a higher standard for sourcing required. If you need further explanation, feel welcome to ask! ~ Pbritti (talk) 14:35, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply, I just wondered as, on the face of it, the reference seemed OK Murgatroyd49 (talk) 14:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Ludwell–Paradise House
Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 29 May 2024 (UTC) GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:29, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

by the way,
you may be interested in the Wikimedia Discord server. it's quite nice ... sawyer * he/they *  talk  02:47, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm aware of it and have actually been on there before! I may have to actually join it. Thanks for the invite. ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Flemish bond
Hello! Your submission of Flemish bond at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 03:07, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted
Hi Pbritti, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:


 * Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
 * If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
 * If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! signed,Rosguill talk 14:55, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you, ! ~ Pbritti (talk) 14:56, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Welcome to the club

 * Thank you! Gladly, not too much blood... ~ Pbritti (talk) 00:39, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Four Award
Well done on your first Four Award! — Bilorv ( talk ) 21:14, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

A pie for you!

 * I am a tad upset, as you beat me to the punch! I had wanted to award you a mark for your incredible research. The admin who formalized my withdrawal moved the page from Piñon, Colorado as a standard bureaucratic move—I'm fully on board with you moving it back! I'm glad a subject-matter expert like you lent your eye to the process! ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:48, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
 * The research was enjoyable and interesting to do. I understood your rationales during the discussion even though we agreed to disagree. In the next day or two I'll look back over the AfD to see if there are others to consult before moving the article. BTW, I was hoping to send a you peach pie since the very best peaches in the world are from Colorado, but it isn't quite that season yet. Netherzone (talk) 03:57, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I am quite a fan of my homestate's produce! If you want, you can open a move discussion on the talk page, as there's no rush. I'll gladly offer my support to whatever your desired next step is. If you ever need any help with Summit County, Denver, or Sangre de Cristo content, I have a lot of experience in those areas! Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 04:06, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Rite of Lyon
Hello, this seems to be up your alley and is in desperate need of more information. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rite_of_Lyon. It was translated from the French article, so there may be some grammatical errors; which, I am trying to clean up. LambdaLover (talk) 02:18, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I'll try to fix it up a bit. Unfortunately, I fear me cleaning it may have to wait until around October, as I've somewhat scheduled through then. If you need access to certain sources, I possess a few that may be relevant and would love to share them as needed. ~ Pbritti (talk) 02:30, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
 * It would be nice if you could share your sources, for both personal interest and the purpose of cleaning up this page. LambdaLover (talk) 16:50, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Some painted tiles for you!
I wish you a good feast of St Alban, St John Fisher, and St Thomas More. Ascensiontide is long past, but I took a beautiful picture of the painted tiles at All Saints, Margaret Street, which also happens to be an article I am working on. Sts Fisher & More are included in the prayers today. So do pray for your anglo-kins; we pray for you! Cheers, -- The Lonely Pather (talk) 14:53, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Lovely tiling! Let me know if you need any help on the article. Happy feast of my patron, St. John the Baptist! ~ Pbritti (talk) 15:07, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Flemish bond
—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:02, 24 June 2024 (UTC) GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:29, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

SCOOCH and the recent edit
Hello there. I had seen your welcome message: thank you! Hope this is the right place to ask this, but may I kindly ask what was the reason for reverting the edit on the Oriental Orthodox Churches page? I noticed that SCOOCH was referred to as the “standing conference” of the OO Communion (while it is merely a regional conference), and that almost the same list of churches are repeated again: hence the edit. Thank you. Hypatiusbrontes (talk) 13:07, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
 * First off, welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for commenting here; the other appropriate place would have been the article's talk page. Upon review of that edit, I think my reversion could probably be undone. Your explanation here is clear and I now agree with your decision to remove that content. Thanks for your politeness! ~ Pbritti (talk) 13:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I am sorry if this was the wrong place: in further instances, I will make sure to discuss such matters in the talk-page of the article itself. Thank you for your re-consideration: I will re-add the edit. Again, thanks, and have a nice day! Hypatiusbrontes (talk) 13:27, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Another possible DYK
"...that four of the twenty-six Chief of Chaplains of the United States Army - Patrick J. Ryan, Francis L. Sampson, Patrick J. Hessian, and Donald W. Shea - were graduates of Saint Paul Seminary in Saint Paul, Minnesota?" ~Darth StabroTalk/Contribs 23:59, 26 June 2024 (UTC)


 * I don't think any of these articles are less than a old, expanded at least five-fold during the last week, or recently promoted as good articles. Sadly, that means they don't qualify for DYK. ~ Pbritti (talk) 00:02, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Ah, shoot. I didn't realize that was a requirement. ~Darth StabroTalk/Contribs 00:15, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
 * No problem. Thanks for the interest—will look into if those articles can get some overhauls. ~ Pbritti (talk) 01:43, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Free and Candid Disquisitions scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 3 August 2024. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Today's featured article/August 2024, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/August 2024. Please keep an eye on that page, as comments regarding the draft blurb may be left there by user:dying, who assists the coordinators by making suggestions on the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! Gog the Mild (talk) 13:59, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 July newsletter
The third round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 June. As with Round 2, this round was competitive: each of the 16 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 256 points.

The following editors all scored more than 400 points in Round 3:


 * with 1,059 points, mostly from 1 featured article on DeLancey W. Gill, 11 good articles, 18 did you know nominations, and dozens of reviews;
 * with 673 points, mostly from 2 featured articles on Worlds (Porter Robinson album) and I'm God, 5 good articles, and 2 did you know nominations;
 * with 557 points, mostly from 1 featured article on KNXV-TV, 5 good articles, and 8 did you know nominations; and
 * with 415 points, mostly from 1 featured article on Great cuckoo-dove, with a high number of bonus points from that article.

The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 28 featured articles, 38 featured lists, 240 good articles, 92 in the news credits, and at least 285 did you know credits. They have conducted 279 featured article reviews, as well as 492 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 22 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed during Round 4, which starts on 1 July at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (,, and ) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Shameful
At Special:Diff/1232130137 you describe my actions as "shameful". I'd remind you of WP:AGF and WP:NPA. TarnishedPathtalk 03:22, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Your actions are shameful. Denialism of arson targeting Indigenous people and their places of worship—even if due to truly righteous rage—has no place on Wikipedia. ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:27, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Please show me exactly where I engaged in "denialism of arson targeting Indigenous people". Tarnished<b style="color:#420000;">Path</b><b style="color:#bd4004;">talk</b> 03:30, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 * . ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:32, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I wrote "seeking to lump together the arsons of a group of churches to particular prior events on the basis of speculation only". Clearly there is no denial of any arsons. I specifically refer to them as arsons. Are you going to withdraw your aspersion casting? <b style="color:#ff0000;">Tar</b><b style="color:#ff7070;">nis</b><b style="color:#ffa0a0;">hed</b><b style="color:#420000;">Path</b><b style="color:#bd4004;">talk</b> 03:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 * TarnishedPath, you engaged in a bad-faith AfD. Much to your credit (indeed, the mark of a very good editor), you very quickly withdrew it upon being challenged on that decision. In the spirit of reconciliation, I retract my statement. ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:52, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Just fyi
Mentioned you here by way of edit summary Moxy 🍁 21:46, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Notification
You are involved in a recently filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Arbitration guide may be of use.

Thanks, Horse Eye&#39;s Back (talk) 03:24, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
 * thanks for bringing in this other discussion. Better for everyone to have a wider grasp of what's being discussed. I (most probably) won't comment, but your diligence in notifying the relevant parties is really appreciated. Let me know if I can help the discussion in any way. ~ Pbritti (talk) 13:28, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Sororate Marriage
You removed information pertaining to the Westminster Confession here for the purpose of removing original research, although it was quoting a published secondary source (The Creeds of the Evangelical Protestant Churches by Philip Schaff, originally published 1877). It was linked to the digital version on the Bible Hub site rather than a regular book reference so that those without the physical book could verify the source. The same edit removed info on the Orthodox church's position which was also not original research, just a self-evident summary of the source, though admittedly a more verified source would have been preferable, so I consider that removal fair, even if not for the reason stated. Did you have some other reason besides original research for removing the section on the WCF, though? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.209.202.1 (talk) 18:48, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * You're correct about the Westminster Confession portion; I must've failed to see to prefatory statements about alterations. I'll reinsert that content. Thanks for the heads up, and my apologies for initially misreading the source and removing that content. ~ Pbritti (talk) 19:17, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Clarification request closed
The Noleander clarification request, in which you may have been involved, has been closed and archived. The request was related to that case's principle 9, which states: "Editors are expected to refrain from making unnecessary references to the actual or perceived racial, religious, or ethnic background of fellow editors. Such references should be made only if they clearly serve a legitimate purpose. In the context of a noticeboard discussion or dispute resolution, it will rarely serve a valid purpose to seek to classify the participants in the discussion on this basis." Among the participating Arbitrators, there was a rough consensus that this principle remains true with current policies and guidelines and that there is not an exemption from this principle for asserting that an editor has a conflict of interest. For the Arbitration Committee, SilverLocust 💬 05:39, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

 * Thanks! It has been weird. Definitely the most charged experience I've ever encountered on the project. Clovermoss has demonstrated that their somewhat recent accession to adminship was well deserved and, once all is said and done there, I hope to pay them back for their commitment to improving editor relationships and maintaining factual accuracy. As an aside, something came across my desk, so to speak, regarding possible disruption on articles related to Catholic BLPs. I may drop a line on your talk to ask for your input on whether intervention is necessary should it continue. ~ Pbritti (talk) 20:07, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
 * You can tell me at any time. Scorpions1325 (talk) 20:21, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Reminder: GA backlog drive
Hello! Just a reminder that, if you have time, you are welcome to join the GA backlog drive; it runs until the end of July. You are receiving this message because you signed up on the drive page but have not yet listed any reviews. We hope to see you there! Either way, happy editing! —Ganesha811 (talk) 05:09, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Wikipediocracy
I no longer have access to the private forums of Wikipediocracy, but I strongly advise you not to engage with them as they have become increasingly vitriolic over the past year. Has your personal information been leaked? Is there anything about you in the private forums that I can't see? Scorpions1325 (talk) 02:26, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I'll communicate about this over private messaging if it comes up further. I've received private advice on best approaches to the issue and wish to adhere to that advice. ~ Pbritti (talk) 02:46, 22 July 2024 (UTC)