User talk:Pohick2/Archive/

Robert Girardi
Thanks for the expansion. I thought he was italian because of this article that I'd used as a source. Please add any further comments for me to my talk page instead of my user page. --Onorem♠Dil 00:08, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Great job on expanding Robert Girardi
Thanks again for taking the time to expand this article. It looks so much better than it did as a stub. --Onorem♠Dil 14:12, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of John E. Pike
A tag has been placed on John E. Pike requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. gnfnrf (talk) 18:25, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problem: John E. Pike
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as John E. Pike, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2000/001222-wp.htm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:John E. Pike and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:John E. Pike with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:John E. Pike.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:John E. Pike/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:John E. Pike saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! CultureDrone (talk) 20:59, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

John E. Pike Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, John E. Pike/Temp, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, John E. Pike/Temp appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. John E. Pike/Temp has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:John E. Pike/Temp and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:John E. Pike/Temp with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:John E. Pike/Temp.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Corvus cornix talk  01:47, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

"Hangon" doesn't apply to copyright violations. Please rewrite the article in your own words. Corvus cornix talk  01:52, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry could you be more specific?  pohick203:08, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

I am not an admin, so I can't restore anything. Nor did I delete anything. The copyrighted material was deleted by an admin. The material on the pages I nominated was copied word for word from the source I provided, it was not a matter of quoting Mr. Pike. Corvus cornix talk  02:52, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of copyrighted material is very much policy. If you disagree with the deletions, you can list them at WP:DRV, but copyrighted material is never restored unless you can provide proof that you are the copyright holder. Corvus cornix talk  02:57, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

what don't you understand about fair use? does it exist at all?Pohick2 (talk) 02:59, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Copying word for word from another site is not fair use. See WP:FU. Besides which, you did not indicate where the material came from, that's a severe violation of any fair use claims you might be trying to make. Corvus cornix talk  03:07, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

did you miss the big footnote you deleted? 03:12, 6 September 2008 (UTC) i also noted reference in the talk, but you know we have an impass, if you want me to write the article you will accomodate my method of composition, otherwise fine, write it yourself. Pohick2 (talk) 03:14, 6 September 2008 (UTC)


 * I have no interest in this person, in fact, I don't think he meets our criteria at WP:BIO, but that has nothing to do with the discussion here. I told you to list them at WP:DRV, I don't see any point in rehashing this over and over.  And need I keep reminding you that I didn't delete anything?  And we don't want to accomodate a method of composition which consists of violating copyright.   Corvus cornix  talk  03:17, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 2nd disagreement, left note at []Pohick2 (talk) 03:23, 6 September 2008 (UTC) hmm WP:BITE lol

Stub templates
Hi Pohick - please don't add stub templates to article talk pages - they're meant to go on the articles themselves (see WP:STUB). Cheers, Grutness...wha?  00:53, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Lafayette
Hi Pohick, thanks much for your comments at Lafayette's peer review. As per your notes, I've fleshed out the sections on the Battle of Green Spring (and a litte more about the general prelude to Yorktown), and the skirmish at Barren Hill. I was wondering if you would be able to take a look at those sections and let me know what you think after the augmentations. Regards, Lazulilasher (talk) 23:42, 23 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi, thanks again for your comments. I closed the peer review and opened an A-class review because I didn't think there'd be anymore comments (just to let you know...it's no big deal), but feel free to comment there. Anyway, yes, interesting about thing about the Conway cabal. I wonder what Gates would have done if given command? Lazulilasher (talk) 01:49, 29 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Pohick, sorry I've been a little incognito lately--I'm simultaneously working on my other big project the Louvre. Anyway, I expanded the bits about Adrienne; specifically, I noted that she sold her assets. About Gouverneur Morris, I also added his involvement, especially when he noted that A's execution would severely impair the relationship between the US & France (which was a big deal as France's only real ally then was the US). Let me know what you think; and if you believe it is sufficient. Regards, Lazulilasher (talk) 15:43, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for adding the Barren Hill pic, it helps illustrate the scene. I only wish it were at a higher res. I wonder what the writing says? Lazulilasher (talk) 03:53, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Plan de la retraite de Barren Hill en Pennsylvanie ou un detachment de deux mille deux cent hommes sour le Genl LaFayette sois[?] ensource j[?] l'Armee Anglois source le Genl Howe, Clinton, Gram[?] le 28 may 1778.

Buncha things, checking in
Hey Pohick, haven't seen you in a bit.

Just wanted to let you know what was going on with that "horrid" Lafayette (as Marie Antoinette referred to him, once. Or close. Apparently Lafayette offered aid to protect her and the Queen said she "would rather die than be saved by that horrid Lafayette"...guess she shoulda chose the horrid). Anyway, wanted to let you know I tossed in a bunch of new stuff about his involvement in the French Rev; and made that section adhere closer to a timeline. Let me know what you think, if you get a chance. Lazulilasher (talk) 02:57, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
 * good stuff, although i think you might be at the point of diminishing returns, (i don't see the improvement of U.S. versus Americans), i see you left the maps in, should i put in Monmouth map? Pohick2 (talk) 20:09, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I didn't do the US/American thing; that was another editor. I just changed it because he wrote "US" twice in one sentence. Ya, but try and have one map per section, the article's at FAC now--and they are sticklers about that sort of thing. I think I might be a the point of diminishing returns now, also. That's why I nommed it at FAC. I feel anything added now will be just unnecessary detail. His life has full coverage, with a roughly 50/50 split b/w the US/French revs. Lazulilasher (talk) 22:58, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Belvoir (plantation)
Hi, There were a couple of problems with your substantial article on Belvoir plantation.


 * You'd got the name wrong - WP style takes lower case for disambiguators in brackets like "(plantation)". There was already a link on the disambiguation page to the correct form of name, and links from several articles - which I see you carefully altered to match your "..(P.." title.  I've moved the article to the standard form of name and mended all the links.  Another time, please follow WP style in naming an article.


 * You added a stub tag: the article may need some section headings, perhaps could use a few more links, and probably would benefit from an image or two, but it isn't a stub. Please don't label non-stubs as stubs, it wastes the time of stub-sorting folk at WP:WSS - though having come here from there I then got distracted onto fixing up the article a bit anyway! See WP:STUB: "An article too short to provide more than rudimentary information about a subject should be marked as a stub by adding a stub template ".


 * The article didn't give any context. I've added a standard sort of opening lead sentence - see WP:LEAD, which includes "The first paragraph of the introductory text needs to unambiguously define the topic for the reader. It should establish the context in which the topic is being considered, by supplying the set of circumstances or facts that surround it. If appropriate, give the location and time context.". I had no idea, from your opening paragraph, where this plantation was - I assumed Caribbean at first.  Don't assume that everyone knows what you're talking about - people come to WP articles by all sorts of routes including clicking the "Random article" button!  If my lead sentence isn't right, please fix it, but it gives an idea of the sort of intro the article needs.

PamD (talk) 12:33, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar thanks
I apologize for the rather belated thank you, as I did not notice that you had updated my user page. I wanted to thank you for your Article Rescue Barnstar for meritorious rescue of ruse of war, an article that was fascinating to read and even more intersting to find ample reliable sources for. Thanks again for noticing. Alansohn (talk) 18:12, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

User:pohick2/John E. Pike
Well, we'll see. It's pretty unconventional to focus so much on quotes. BTW, do you preview before saving? I think that once you have the sections laid out, you can open, one at a time, as many secns as you end up working on, and keep the history to one save per section per editing session. --Jerzy•t 01:31, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

The WikiProject Novels Newsletter - October 2008

 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  13:20, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

The WikiProject Novels Newsletter - November 2008
This newsletter was automatically delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 05:26, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Scientific
What will we get from Munger next, the Wim Wam Bam effect? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.41.51.240 (talk) 14:29, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Adrienne...
Good job on that article. Having a separate venue for her exploits allows us to more closely focus on the General in his article. As it were, Lafayette's article was becoming unwieldy large. This is quite a positive development. Keep it up. Lazulilasher (talk) 04:01, 5 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Pohick: As I was reading the article on her husband, I naturally clicked her name & read the article.  There are interesting documents available thru Google.  She is not the subject I would be working on; however, when I read something, I leave traces behind!


 * Bonne année 2009 ! Frania W. (talk) 00:14, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Pohick: In Adrienne's descendants, I found this: ''Maria Rignon married Count Augusto Gazelli di Rossana e di Sebastiano. They had a daughter, Liusa Gazelli (19 May 1896 - 1989).''

As you will notice, there is something wrong in the dates of Liusa Gazelli: 1896-1989 Also, is not the daughter Luisa instead of Liusa?

Cordialement, Frania W. (talk) 16:51, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * yes looks a little fishy, will look into (that's what the wiki articles say) - well Maria had Luisa at the age of 38, and she married the WWI fighter ace. (it will take me some time to get the german language genealogy source at the LOC) but it's the genealogy of the queen of belgium (hopefully the chart clarifies) pohick (talk) 16:59, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

... and George(s)...
Pohick: My comment at Adrienne's discussion page: *Whenever I run into the French text that discusses George vs Georges spelling for LF's son, I shall bring it here. Cordialement, FW*

Frania W. (talk) 11:48, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

... and Gilbert
Pohick: I just went thru the whole LF article, doing some easy editing, and must go thru it again for certain details that I need to check beforehand. Cordialement, Frania W. (talk) 00:39, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * good work, "quibble" as an american, i prefer honor to honour pohick (talk) 02:35, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * *honor vs honour*: to whichever you give allegiance...  je m'en lave les mains:  it's your baby now! except for the details I need to check on.  See you at Adrienne's.  Frania W. (talk) 02:50, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

thanks, now if we could just get it to FA level pohick (talk) 22:23, 9 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Pohick, I saw your note about French nobility. If memory serves, I believe Frania (above) is quite knowledgeable about French nobility. I think he was working on a project. Lazulilasher (talk) 15:04, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
 * yes, i was thinking of the peerage boxes, and lines developed like Lord Fairfax of Cameron, useful for Bryan Fairfax, 8th Lord Fairfax of Cameron, while the List of marquisates in France is undeveloped. lots of work to do. pohick (talk) 15:12, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Annappes
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Annappes, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.speedylook.com/Annappes.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:06, 29 January 2009 (UTC)


 * actually the bot was half correct, the speedy look had a translation of the french wiki, and so did i, lol, tag removed pohick (talk) 02:53, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Anne-Louise-Henriette d'Aguesseau
Why does the article start: "Henriette-Anne-Louise d'Aguesseau,"? Which is right? PamD (talk) 22:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * you are correct, that was an old red link with the names twisted (sigh) pohick (talk) 22:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Charles Laquidara
As one of the recent editors of Charles Laquidara, can you take a look at the discussion on Talk:Charles Laquidara and provide your opinion? Thanks. -- The Red Pen of Doom  16:30, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to the Article Rescue Squadron!
I look forward to working with you in the future. Ikip (talk) 03:50, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to the squadron. :) Hope to see you again soon! Ikip (talk) 03:51, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * }

What did you mean: (and i did award a lifesaver barnstar) ? Ikip (talk) 03:51, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Isaac Newton in popular culture
Thank you for your work on this! Bearian (talk) 22:15, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Duc de La Rochefoucauld
A tag has been placed on Duc de La Rochefoucauld requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Colds7ream (talk) 16:33, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Category:Iowa Writers' Workshop Alumni
Before you tag too many more pages: the category should be moved to Category:Iowa Writers' Workshop alumni (lowercase a on alumni). I didn't want to go changing it myself while you were still tagging.-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  21:55, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

John Murray (short story writer)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of John Murray (short story writer), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.windriverpress.com/critique/murray.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:25, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of John Murray (Australian novelist)
A tag has been placed on John Murray (Australian novelist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. § FreeRangeFrog 05:25, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

The WikiProject Novels Newsletter - March 2009
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:09, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Thomas Swiss
A tag has been placed on Thomas Swiss requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  NeutralHomer •  Talk  • March 8, 2009 @ 22:50 22:50, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Mark Levine (poet)
If you create a new page like this, and have to add a disambiguation in brackets because there's already an article, or a disambiguation page, at the name you want to use, don't forget to provide some navigation so that the reader who searches for the name, here "Mark Levine", will be led to your new page. If it's a disambiguation page, add an entry; if there's just a single article, add a "hatnote" using a template such as otheruses4. In this case, I've added an entry to the dab page at Mark Levine. PamD (talk) 23:00, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

RE: Thomas Swiss
First off, probably a bad idea to start off your post with "what is your problem"....just saying. Second, it is a personal call of whoever reviews the page. I didn't think it was notable. The deleting admin might, ya never know. When you make pages, you should add as much information, references, and sources as you can so it doesn't get marked for deletion. -  NeutralHomer •  Talk  • March 8, 2009 @ 23:25

Speedy deletion of Jane Cooper
A tag has been placed on Jane Cooper requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  NeutralHomer •  Talk  • March 9, 2009 @ 01:05 01:05, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

RE: Jane Cooper
I just don't think a page with 3 paragraphs of information and a couple lists with very little references and some Google Books links makes a page necessary. Again, this is a personal call. -  NeutralHomer •  Talk  • March 9, 2009 @ 01:40
 * Like I said, it is a personal call. When someone is reviewing pages on "New Page" patrol, it is their call on what they think is notable.  That differs from person to person.  What I might think is notable, might be completely different from what the admin reviewing my call thinks is notable....or the person also watching the "New Page" section.  It is a personal call. -  NeutralHomer  •  Talk  • March 9, 2009 @ 01:56
 * I see no "unpleasant pushback". You are upset that your page might be deleted and you are taking it out on the person who has nominated your page for deletion.  If that is "unpleasant pushback", well, I think I have had worse.  I stand by my call and will not be changing it unless there is information added to the page. -  NeutralHomer  •  Talk  • March 9, 2009 @ 02:07
 * Please see The Zax. -  NeutralHomer •  Talk  • March 9, 2009 @ 02:11
 * lol "I stand by my call and will not be changing it" me too pohick (talk) 02:55, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Since that was a little over your head, WP:DICK might be a little easier for you to understand. -  NeutralHomer •  Talk  • March 9, 2009 @ 02:58
 * lol, answering my question, your problem is an idee fixe, and lack of vocabulary pohick (talk) 03:01, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * seems someone knows some French, problem with that is, this is the English Wikipedia. Also, nothing is "dominating" my mind for "especially for a prolonged period" as I have long since moved on to other things here on Wikipedia and you are still talking about the same thing. -  NeutralHomer  •  Talk  • March 9, 2009 @ 03:23

Speedy deletion of Dennis Covington
A tag has been placed on Dennis Covington requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  NeutralHomer •  Talk  • March 9, 2009 @ 02:26 02:26, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Robert Lacy
A tag has been placed on Robert Lacy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  NeutralHomer •  Talk  • March 9, 2009 @ 03:29 03:29, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I have undeleted it and AfD'ed it Articles for deletion/Robert Lacy (2nd nomination). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:28, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Posting Others Comments
You are not allowed, under any circumstances, post any comment of my own on anyone else's talk page like here. This causes confusion and could be considered vandalism. If you want to quote me, by all means, go ahead, but don't post my comments willy-nilly like I posted them there myself. If it happens again, you will be reported to WP:ANI and the correct action taken. -  NeutralHomer •  Talk  • March 9, 2009 @ 22:26
 * why not start now and broadcast your abuse much more widely? pohick (talk) 23:35, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * My "abuse"? Really?  Dude, you are just pissed that someone doesn't think your article is worthy of being on Wikipedia and you want to start trouble.  Well, if you want to start trouble and want to act like the trolls on here, I can treat you like one.  They are called warning templates and I have a crapload of them.  Do it again and you will be warned for vandalism....simple as that. -  NeutralHomer  •  Talk  • March 9, 2009 @ 23:55
 * persistent projection. i'm not upset at all. i just profoundly disagree, with your misuse of speedy delete. if you would spend as much energy writing articles, as blovating on my talk page, wiki would be far better off. would you care to discuss your willful ignorance of the speedy delete criteria, versus the Afd criteria?  or is that "your call"? pohick (talk) 02:26, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Care to look at my userpage, my contribs....talking to you is less than .001% of my contribs. I spend most of my time on articles rather than arguing with trouble making people like you.  So, I am not quite sure about what you are talking about when it comes to "blovating" on your talk page.  You seem to be doing that yourself.  Now, actually create something instead of trouble. -  NeutralHomer  •  Talk  • March 10, 2009 @ 02:33

Proposed deletion of Anna Spencer
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Anna Spencer, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no references, very little content, mostly just a link farm to other pages off wiki.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  NeutralHomer •  Talk  • March 10, 2009 @ 03:34 03:34, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

March 2009
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. --Ericdn (talk) 00:06, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Harold L. Sirkin book reviews
I take your point that the fact that Sirkin is widely reviewed is an indication of his notability. However, I wonder if so many sizable excerpts of reviews belong in the body of the article. It seems to me that the actual audience for those excerpts is the AfD discussion, and that a much briefer treatment would be appropriate for the article itself, e.g. "Sirkin's books have been positively reviewed in The New York Times, Publishers Weekly and The Hindu." The main reason that I removed the section is that having so many excerpts of positive reviews plays into the perception that the article exists to promote rather than to describe the subject. In my experience -- and as Tedder's comment suggests -- that can harm an article's chances of surviving AfD, as it excites a temptation in some AfD reviewers to "punish" the subject that they perceive as having benefited from an abuse of WP:NPOV. -- Shunpiker (talk) 15:17, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Devoucoux
An article that you have been involved in editing, Devoucoux, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Devoucoux (2nd nomination). Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Unionsoap (talk) 22:04, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Curtis Institute of Music people
A tag has been placed on Curtis Institute of Music people requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. –Drilnoth (T • C) 14:59, 23 March 2009 (UTC) Hi. That website links to other copyright violations. In addition, is no valid proof that the copyright was not renewed, and there is other copyrighted works on that website (aside the specific parts we're talking about). - Rjd0060 (talk) 01:25, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Ferris Bueller's Day Off in Popular Culture
I was just looking at your recent edits to the page and wondered why you removed the Veronica Mars mention. Never seen the show or added that tidbit, but just wondered if you accidentally removed it or if it was removed because it didn't exist. Quistisffviii (talk) 01:00, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Category:Iowa Writers' Workshop
For every category you create, you should specify parent categories to which it belongs. You can do this by listing the parents near the bottom of the page, each enclosed in double brackets like so:

I am a human being, not a bot, so you can contact me if you have questions about this. Best regards, --Stepheng3 (talk) 06:11, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Yvon Pesqueux Ève Chiapello

Category:Stonyhurst College alumni
I see that you created this category and later blanked the page. A faster way to delete a category you've created yourself is to place db-author on the page. This tag attracts the attention of an administrator who can perform the deletion for you. Contact me if you have questions about this. Best regards, --Stepheng3 (talk) 04:17, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

The 7th DC Meetup
Please be advised that a proposed Meetup/DC 7 is being discussed here. We need your help to figure out some of the details! You are being sent this notice because you previously expressed interest in such meetups. If you no longer wish to receive such notices, then please leave your user name [ here]. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:05, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Return
Hey, I'm back around. What are you working on? Any momentum still over at Lafayette? Lazulilasher (talk) 20:23, 21 April 2009 (UTC)


 * and...I happily took care of this for you ;) Lazulilasher (talk) 20:43, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

April 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Hackers (film), but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Unless you have a reliable source that points to this scene being inspired by the Monty Python sketch, this falls under original research and has no place in the article. magnius (talk) 08:33, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Hackers
Unfortunately, the two references that you used for the article Hackers are not usable. "Urban Dictionary" is far from reliable, being editable by anyone and crammed full of unchecked original research. The other reference that you used seemed to have nothing more than a quote from the film being used as the title of the article. Please take a look at the page regarding reliable sources to learn more about what can and cannot be used. For the record, I firmly believe that the addition would be valid, but so far we have no source that can back up the claim. magnius (talk) 08:25, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

FYI
Just so you know, Charles A. May just passed as a good article. Thanks for helping to write this article. Strikehold (talk) 02:49, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Friedrich Wilhelm von Reden
Machine translation, I take it? Just checking to see whether you had it in hand - the finishing of the translation off - or whether you could use a little hand with that, in which case I'll tag it. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 17:42, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * redirected to existing article pohick (talk) 17:18, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
I will be honored to go through it and correct the ref formats later this evening in order to keep it from being sent back to AfD for having improper formats or incorrect spelling or grammer.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 03:40, 9 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Okay. I fixed the references and gave it a couple minor tweaks, Glad to be able to chip in.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 07:37, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * more like major additions, finding the FT review may tip the balance pohick (talk) 22:36, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Frank X Walker
A tag has been placed on Frank X Walker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Burhan Ahmed (talk • contribs) 01:06, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * astonishing pohick (talk) 01:35, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Thank you
Dear Pohick2, Thank you for taking an interest and contributing to wiki article Kresimir Chris Kunej. It is my first article and was tagged for notability and citations. I am concerned that someone will in time place it for deletion so any input is welcome. Thanks again! Turqoise127 (talk) 15:04, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Pillar of Fire
Thanks for your concern, but honestly, that review was really for the wrong Judith Tarr book -- compare it to all the other information about PoF.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:39, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Jane Shore
I deleted the version I thought was a copyvio and moved your temp page up to be the article. Thanks for the cleanup!--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:48, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Adrien Stoutenburg
Hi. You corrected the spelling from Stoutenberg in the James Laughlin Award article, and then "uncorrected" it. I think you were right the first time! Do you know something more? Cheers, Easchiff (talk) 04:46, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * You noticed my confusion! i was filling the red link and noticed the article.  the dana gioia california source spells it both ways  pohick (talk) 12:43, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I think Stoutenburg is correct. The reason that it was misspelled on the James Laughlin Award webpage is that the Poetry Foundation misspelled it on their webpage, and I'd just copied that listing blindly. I sent the Poetry Foundation a message to let them know. Cheers, Easchiff (talk) 13:36, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * thanks for the catch, nice article too. (the conundrum of the mispelling in the verifiable source) pohick (talk) 13:57, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * You're actually the one who caught the error! I enjoyed the article you started for Constance Carrier; every time I'd looked at that red link I wondered a bit about her. I read a couple of her poems using the New Yorker link you provided; she was a fine poet. Easchiff (talk) 15:36, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Prizes of the Academy of American Poets
I saw that you've put up a List of winners for the Wallace Stevens Award. In case you missed some of the discussion, Collectonion merged the articles that formerly existed for the prizes of the Academy back into the main article, deleting the lists of winners when she did that. There was some discussion at the WP:Poetry talk page. Editors restored the Laughlin list; I do find these lists to be valuable. For example, you'll find the Lenore Marshall Poetry Prize winners in the history of the article, which is currently just a redirect; see old version. I just wanted to let you know of a possible complication.

I also noted that you've created articles for the "red linked" Laughlin Awardees, which I think is great! Easchiff (talk) 15:37, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Elizabeth Macklin
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Elizabeth Macklin, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.writersartists.net/macklin2.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:50, 1 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi. Thank you for addressing this. While evaluating, though, I discovered that you still retained text copied from the original source. This has been removed, with a note at the article's talk page. It leaves me concerned that you may not be familiar with the scope of copyright protection, and a review of Nancy Byrd Turner confirms that, since that article contains runs of text duplicated from the source or only minimally revised. I've brought up the matter at Talk:Nancy Byrd Turner, including an explanation of why this is a problem. Wikipedia's copyright policy notes that while facts can not be copyrighted, the creative expression of facts (including words and structure) can be. The article Nancy Byrd Turner will need to be revised in original language, as the source is not free but is clearly marked "© 2005 By Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. All rights reserved." I'd like to discuss this matter with you so we can be sure that other text you have placed is fully compliant and does not follow too closely on other sources and also that text you place henceforth conforms to policy. (You can read more about this at C and FAQ/Copyright. There is also a user essay that may be helpful at Close paraphrasing.) Thanks for your contributions, and I hope that we can come to an understanding on this. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:11, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Article sorting
Excellent work creating articles for American poets. A small point: don't forget to sort your articles by the subjects' surnames. You can use Template:Lifetime to help you with that.

Keep up the good work! --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 20:21, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Harry Elmore Hurd
A tag has been placed on Harry Elmore Hurd requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. I dream of horses (talk) 22:18, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * hmm pohick - (talk) 01:00, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of List of winners of the Wallace Stevens Award
I have nominated List of winners of the Wallace Stevens Award, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/List of winners of the Wallace Stevens Award. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 01:51, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of List of winners of the Lenore Marshall Poetry Prize
I have nominated List of winners of the Lenore Marshall Poetry Prize, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/List of winners of the Lenore Marshall Poetry Prize. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 01:53, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

June 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 02:19, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * actually the personal was at Academy of American Poets: regretable that you should write the false statement: The organization is one of many "pay for a feel good award" type places like the "International Library of Photography", but the detailed reasons why i said WP:Vandalism are at pohick - (talk) 20:11, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of List of winners of the Walt Whitman Award
I have nominated List of winners of the Walt Whitman Award, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/List of winners of the Walt Whitman Award. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 02:51, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Rolfe Humphries
If you liked Constance Carrier, check out Rolfe Humphries, cheers Pohick2 (talk) 19:51, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for all your work on those red-linked poets! The couple of Humphries' poems I looked at were fine; he obviously had a fascinating life too. Like Carrier, he's noted as a translator. For someone still active who also works as both a poet and a translator, see Charles Martin. FYI: I've got some more sources on the Academy, and will try to add that information to the article in due course. One is The Virgin of Bennington, which is apparently quite an interesting memoir, but I haven't got my hands on it yet. Best, Easchiff (talk) 02:15, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Novels - Coordinator Election
Hello. To begin, every member of WikiProject Novels will be getting this message (the joy of macros) so if you wish to get in touch with me, please post a message on my talk page. I would encourage anyone who so wishes, to stand in the Coordinator Elections. If you wish to stand, please do so by 23:59pm, June 27. Voting will the continue to 23:59pm, July 21. Can everyone please check-out the Coordinator Elections page. Also, the collaboration of the month is The Tin Drum, so if you have any spare time, please check it out. And I apologise to the seven of you for whom this will be a repeat message. Regards, Alan16 (talk).

The Scorpion’s Dark Dance
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Scorpion’s Dark Dance, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.xenosbooks.com/Anonymous.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:25, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Luigi Fontanella
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Luigi Fontanella, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.sunysb.edu/cistudies/fontanella.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:08, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Coordinator Election
Hello. The Coordiantor Election has begun. All members are encouraged to vote by the deadline, July 28. To vote simply add support to the comments and questions for.. section of the member of your choice.

3 users are standing:

Regards, Alan16 (talk) 19:45, 29 June 2009 (UTC).

Proposed deletion of Charles Harper Webb
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Charles Harper Webb, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:BAND and WP:BIO notability guidelines, lacks significant coverage in 3rd party sources

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RadioFan (talk) 01:15, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
 * astonishing abuse of speedy delete again. Pohick2 (talk) 01:19, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
 * This wasn't a speedy, it was just a prod (proposed deleteion) which takes a minimum of five days to resolve, but also has less stringent requirements. I should know - I've issued my share of speedy-deletes before. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 06:50, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
 * i guess i'm recoiling from the statement no notability. Pohick2 (talk) 14:56, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Duplicating text; The Scorpion’s Dark Dance
I have blanked this article for now, as we need to clarify the copyright of the material it contains. The press releases that are quoted are not the issue. The text that begins "Alfredo De Palchi is a highly regarded poet living in New York" is the problem. Entire sentences are copied from. Also, while you are quite welcome to quote Dickey and Roberts, you can't just minimally alter their presentation at that source: "The celebrated poet James Dickey found that (quote)" is clearly the source of "James Dickey found that (quote)"; "Len Roberts, another noted poet, compares De Palchi with the masters: quote)" has been blatantly truncated to "Len Roberts, compares de Palchi: (quote)" This website does not own the quotes that it has utilized, but it does own the creative structure and order of presentation. The text describing the author, including that "he has been translated into crisp and vibrant English by his longtime friend" is going to need to be completely rewritten in your own words unless you can show that this text is for some reason free for use. There are steps for doing so on the template currently blockign the article. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:47, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
 * check out Anonymous Constellation where i copied it from. Pohick2 (talk) 21:55, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'll deal with it there as well. But that raises another issue. You can't copy content from one Wikipedia article to another without giving credit. Wikipedia's contributors do not release their material into public domain, but license it liberally for reuse and modification. They retain the right to credit, which is typically provided by mention in the edit summary. See, for example, at the bottom of every "edit" screen: "You agree to be credited, at minimum, through a hyperlink or URL when your contributions are reused in any form." If there are other articles into which you've copied text from other Wikipedia articles, please be sure to note the source of that to meet the licensing terms and conform with our copyright policy. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:38, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
 * point taken, this was a rare example, i've gone back, and used the source templates on the translations i've done. (not very user friendly) there is a bunch of copying in wiki, not well sourced. (i don't envy you the task of riding herd) Pohick2 (talk) 15:32, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Elma Mitchell

 * 15:06, 29 October 2005 Brian0918 (talk | contribs) deleted "Elma Mitchell" ‎ (content was: 'another bint who wrote crap poems' (and the only contributor was '82.37.123.167'))

Dorothy Nimmo
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Dorothy Nimmo, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.dgdclynx.plus.com/poetry/poets/nimmo1.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:39, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi
Hi Pohick2! Thank you very much for the expansion at Georges Washington de La Fayette! Best regards Phg (talk) 05:20, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

The WikiProject Novels Newsletter - July 2009
The July 2009 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Alan16(talk)

Planning Discussions Now Ongoing Regarding DC Meetup #8
You are receiving this message either because you received a similar one before and didn't object, or you requested to receive a similar one in the future.

There is a planning discussion taking place here for DC Meetup #8. If you don't wish to receive this message again, please let me know.

--User:Nbahn 04:34, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

S.A. Stepanek
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of S.A. Stepanek, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.webdelsol.com/DIAGRAM/6_5/rev_stepanek.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:01, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Novels - Narnia Task Force
Hi! You would be glad to know that a new wikipedia ad has been created by Srinivas to encourage users to join Chronicles of Narnia Task Force. You can display that ad on your user/talk page too using the following code:

-- Alan16 (talk) 10:42, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Novels - August 2009 Newsletter
The August 2009 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Alan16 (talk) 17:35, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Newsletter this weekend
Please take a minute to sign your name to our list of 270+ members:
 * ARSM

Good news, we are building our first newsletter and should sent out this weekend, keep an eye out for it! Ikip (talk) 21:29, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * thanks for taking the time to sign up. Looking forward to working with you in the future. Ikip (talk) 17:03, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Kelli Russell Agodon
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Kelli Russell Agodon, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.agodon.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:38, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Dear Pohick2,

I have previously contacted you with a question and you were always kind in your response, so I am addressing you again with a question. I had created the page Kresimir Chris Kunej, you contributed to it and had advised me on it. There were citation style problems and notability problems. I worked hard on the article thereafter and corrected many things. I am hoping I did enough to remove the notability and citation style tags. I contacted the editor who placed the tags on there to take a look and advise me if tags can be removed, but the person has not responded in over a month. My question is, do you think the article is now sufficient to remove those tags or not, and if tags were removed would someone be compelled to nominate for AfD? Thank you in advance for your time. Turqoise127 (talk) 17:32, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Jean Ristat
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Jean Ristat. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:13, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * chouette; merde en francais?Pohick2 (talk) 03:16, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Dear Pohick2,

Thank you for removing the notability tag on Kresimir Chris Kunej. Immediately after you did that, the editor who had originally placed the tag on had it nominated for AfD. I saw that it is tagged for rescue, I assume you did that, thank you. I was hoping I could ask you to maybe vote on the issue since when you removed the notability tag you must have seen elements of notability satisfied. The instigator of AfD nomination is I believe an influential editor with many allies, and I am just an individual with none; this is not fair. I have entered a really lengthy argument for keep to try and defend the article. I would appreciate you voting, but if you wish to not be any more involved I understand, thank you for all your help this far!Turqoise127 (talk) 16:46, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Kresimir Chris Kunej
Hi Pohick2

The problem with Kresimir Chris Kunej is not that it's inadequately referenced; it's that there are no claims that even if true would lead to a presumption of notability. I like to encourage newcomers, too, when they are likely to be contributors to the project. The primary author (I should say owner) of this article shows no interest in topics beyond promoting a single topic in respect of he or she is (admittedly, though not necessarily accurately admittedly) conflicted.

Just my $0.02.

As you had been aware of this article and the AfD prior to the canvassing, I can't see any reason for you not to opine at the AfD&mdash;I certainly won't suggest offering your opinion is inappropriate (whatever it might be) should you decide to offer one.

Regards <sup style="color:green;">Bongo  <sub style="margin-left:-4.2ex; color:blue;">matic  23:32, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Paul Zimmer (poet)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Paul Zimmer (poet), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://speccoll.library.kent.edu/literature/poetry/zimmer.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:01, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Lifetime
The trouble with the lifetime template is that the information in it is partially hidden, so it gets duplicated - see for example Herbert Winslow, or any of a couple of thousand other examples where there is (or was) a lifetime and one of the categories it generates or a DEFAULTSORT. This in turn leads to articles with inconsistent categories and conflicting DEFAULTSORTs. The benefit is that it is quicker to type, for setting up new articles, especially many of them. There is a subst only version "ltm" that can be used for this, 1909 of course it is one keystroke longer! Best regards, Rich Farmbrough, 23:24, 15 September 2009 (UTC).

Well as far as it goes I have manually fixed up maybe a couple of thousand articles with duplicated category information in them. And yes that was easier than fixing all the occurrences, in the short term. In the long term a) this level of errors would have re-occurred or increased, b) the number of articles with the template would have grown. And I would strongly expect someone would come up with the bright idea of a similar template for organizations, with the dates of establishment and disestablishment, and the sort-key, and maybe for ships etc... There is a reason that WP:CAT advises against having articles categorised by template, even though the rule is broken extensively (indeed is inverted for the same reasons) with maintenance categories. Best regards, Rich Farmbrough, 00:37, 16 September 2009 (UTC).

George Barlow (American poet)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of George Barlow (American poet), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.grinnell.edu/academic/gil/faculty/georgebarlow. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:02, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Rick DeMarinis
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Rick DeMarinis, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.fantasticfiction.co.uk/d/rick-demarinis. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:19, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

The Century Magazine
I did a little cleanup this evening on the public domain quote block you added to The Century Magazine article in the spring. Just a friendly note: while extended quote blocks from out-of-copyright sources seem to be okay under Wikipedia guidelines (and it really is good info), an in-text mention in the article itself that a source is being quoted is the best way to avoid confusion for both readers and other editors (not to mention NPOV problems). That's in addition to the quoteblock tag. Hope this helps. --Enwilson (talk) 06:28, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Aldon Lynn Nielsen
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Aldon Lynn Nielsen, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://english.la.psu.edu/facultystaff/Bio_Nielsen.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:36, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Alan Chong Lau
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Alan Chong Lau, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.waterbridgereview.org/102007/cnv_lau.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:05, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hilton Obenzinger
A tag has been placed on Hilton Obenzinger requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MuffledThud (talk) 01:35, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
 * no longer stunning. Pohick2 (talk) 02:26, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ruthanne Lum McCunn
A tag has been placed on Ruthanne Lum McCunn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. A8UDI talk  01:55, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Maureen Owen
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Maureen Owen, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.unco.edu/colopoets/poets/owen_maureen/index.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:55, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Frederick Jackson Turner Award
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Frederick Jackson Turner Award, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.oah.org/activities/awards/turner/winners.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:44, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Merle Curti Award
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Merle Curti Award, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.oah.org/activities/awards/curti/winners.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:07, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Vincent Brown (football linebacker)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Vincent Brown (football linebacker), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Vincent Brown. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:27, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

José Emilio González
would you care to use the AfD process, there was an assertion of notability, winner of an award American Book Award. - (perhaps i need to inclue the sentence in the lead: "this person is notable because they won an award.") Pohick2 (talk) 12:33, 16 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I have restored it and will accept that deleting was my mistake, since I didn't notice that little sub-section. However, you should expand the article and try to establish notability in the lead. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  20:47, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Planning Discussions Now Ongoing Regarding DC Meetup #9
You are receiving this message either because you received a similar one before and didn't object, or you requested to receive a similar one in the future.

There is a planning discussion taking place here for DC Meetup #9. If you don't wish to receive this message again, please let me know. --NBahn (talk) 04:57, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Why use template?
I'm just curious if there was a reason you used the "cite book" template on Sarah Josepha Hale - none of those books are being cited; it's just a list. Would you mind if I changed it so it's less clunky? --Midnightdreary (talk) 01:59, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your quick response. It's quite easy (perhaps easier) to add external links without using cite templates. I'm not sure that providing those links is a standard on literary articles, however. I know I've seen requests to have them removed once an article undergoes a featured article candidacy. I'll leave it as is and see what happens. --Midnightdreary (talk) 02:17, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
 * By "external links", I don't mean the section, I just mean something like "Northwood. Again, don't be in too much of a rush to add these to author articles. I'm pretty sure they are frowned upon once an article is at the stage to be reviewed as recognized content. I haven't seen any featured articles on authors that use them (correct me if I'm wrong). I think the preference is for completism at Wikisource. --Midnightdreary (talk) 13:57, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Planning Discussions Now Finished Regarding DC Meetup #9
--NBahn (talk) 02:41, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * You are receiving this message either because you received a similar one before and didn't object, or you requested to receive a similar one in the future. If you don't wish to receive this message again, then please let me know either on my talk page or here.
 * Planning — for the most part, anyway — is now finished (see here) for DC Meetup #9.

Happy Holidays to you and yours Pohick2. Turqoise127 (talk) 17:56, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Myy Page
i do it because i like it to look tidy :D bit OCD like that lol Monsieur le Duc LouisPhilippeCharles (talk) 18:58, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Loves Art
Hm, it looks like you did indeed win at the Smithsonian :) You should talk to User:Swatjester, who was our local contact in DC for this project.--Pharos (talk) 01:36, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * OK then, in that case I've sent you an email with contact information for the guy at the Smithsonian you want to talk to.--Pharos (talk) 02:07, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Jeb Livingood
I'm sorry, but I'm not sure what/if you're asking? MrKIA11 (talk) 19:05, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Editing 2009 DC Snowball Fight Gun Controversy
I have nominated Editing 2009 DC Snowball Fight Gun Controversy, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Editing 2009 DC Snowball Fight Gun Controversy. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Mkdw talk 04:49, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to the Novels WikiProject
Hi, and welcome to the Novels WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to fiction books often referred to as "Novels".

A few features that you might find helpful:


 * Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
 * The announcement and open task box is updated quite regularly. You can watch it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including WikiProject_Novels_announcements there. While you are updating your userpage, don't forget our userbox <tt>  </tt>.
 * The project has a monthly newsletter; it will normally be delivered as a link, but other methods are available.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:


 * Starting some new articles? Our article structure guidelines / template outlines some things to include.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the members, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! – Liveste (talk • edits) 00:11, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Welcome
Better welcome template! {| style="border: 4px solid #CC0000; padding: 6px; width: 80%; min-width: 700px; background: #FFFAF0; line-height: 20px; cellpading=30" align=center Hi,, welcome to the Article Rescue Squadron! We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying and rescuing articles that have been tagged for deletion. Every day hundreds of articles are deleted, many rightfully so. But many concern notable subjects and are poorly written, ergo fixable and should not be deleted. We try to help these articles quickly improve and address the concerns of why they are proposed for deletion. This covers a lot of ground and your help is appreciated!
 * colspan="2" |

Claire Hope Cummings
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Claire Hope Cummings, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.clairehopecummings.com/about.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:45, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
Content


 * News items and announcements
 * Contest


 * Featured editor: Teeninvestor
 * Featured administrator: WereSpielChequers


 * Want ads
 * Feature: FeydHuxtable: Search Techniques

Mary O'Malley (playwright)
Hi Pohick2.

I have just come across your article on the founder of the Belfast’s Lyric Players Theatre, Mary O'Malley, born 1918. In the article, under 'Works', you list a series of plays. These were written by a different Mary O'Malley, born at Harrow near London in the 1940's. I was considering starting a new page for 'Mary O'Malley (playwright)’ to include these works. However, as I am a friend of her brother, Tony O'Malley (musician), I might be considered by Wikipedia as being too close to the subject and therefore not a disinterested party. I am wondering if you would consider starting a new page for this ‘Mary O'Malley (playwright)’. Conversely, as it would be fairly easy for me to contact Mary herself to get bio info, I could build the article myself. I would appreciate your input into this.

Evidence from my video if needed: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s288fD0z-vg

Best wishes, Acabashi.
 * sorry for the confusion Pohick2 (talk) 15:15, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Joseph Marie Servan de Gerbey
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Joseph Marie Servan de Gerbey, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.speedylook.com/Joseph_Servan.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:17, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * stop wasting my time. Pohick2 (talk) 16:23, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Antoine Virgile Schneider
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Antoine Virgile Schneider, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.speedylook.com/Virgile_Schneider.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:16, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Nicolas du Blé, marquis d'Huxelles
Already exists at Nicolas Chalon du Blé - I haven't merged yet, in case you'd like to. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 17:34, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Not in the least - happy to be of help. :-) And you're welcome to the barnstar - you've done a lot of fine work on literary awards, and I only thought it right to recognize it.  As for redirects, I know they can be a bit annoying - it's why I'm sometimes a bit wary of translating an article from another Wiki, as I'm never entirey sure what the title should look like in English... -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 17:55, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah - we need to work on standardization over here. I've got about ten things I want to get to first, but maybe that's a Wikiproject for sometime in the latter part of the year. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 18:26, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Found another: Jean-Marie Claude Alexandre Goujon. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 18:29, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Henri Fauconnier
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Henri Fauconnier, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.speedylook.com/Henri_Falconer.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:00, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * amusing. Pohick2 (talk) 16:37, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your response to articles you are interested in referencing
Thank you for your response to articles you are interested in referencing. 

This first run there were only 3 editors who responded. The next newsletter this form will be more prominent, and we will hopefully get more editors to respond.

Once we get more respondents, then we will try to match articles tagged for rescue, with your specific interest, so you can reference those articles. Okip (the new and improved Ikip) 09:36, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * yeah, the BLP thing has been consuming everyone's time. I am finally finding some time to work on this myself. Okip (formerly Ikip) 12:27, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * just the A's Chris Agee, Michael Abrams, Adrian Alaniz - Pohick2 (talk) 12:56, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * if you don't like the UBLP backlog, then edit more adding references, or tag unsource less. it's simple.  the problem with tech mismanagement of divide and conquer, and goals and slogans, is that it don't increase quality one iota.  Edwards Deming had it right long ago. Pohick2 (talk) 17:42, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Givi Alkhazishvili
Thank you for your efforts to add some sources to the Givi Alkhazishvili article. Unfortunately, the first source claims to have obtained its info from the Givi Alkhazishvili article - I doubt we can use this kind of self reference. The second source only briefly mentions Givi Alkhazishvili's work as one of the subjects of a presentation and therefore does not support the sentence about his lecturing work.

TBH, while I believe his body of work means he is notable, I have really struggled to find infomation about him online. He has an official website with a brief biography (rather poorly translated into English) and he appears to have some fans on social networking sites, but I suspect most sources will be in Georgian and I lack the language skills to do a proper search. We might be able to get some info from the article in Georgian if only we had a means to translate it. I also hope that by adding interwiki links to the English and Georgian articles, it might encourage an editor from the Georgian Wikipedia to come by with some sensible sources. Astronaut (talk) 01:38, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Jeb Livingood
I have nominated Jeb Livingood, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Jeb Livingood. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 21:45, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons/Contest
The rules of the contest have been changed significantly since you signed up. Please check out the new page and its subpages. Any input as to how to improve any part of it would be greatly welcomed. J04n(talk page) 02:37, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Welcome
Glad to see you again. They say there are two types of people in this world, those you are happy to see come, and those you are happy to see go. I am really glad to see your name pop up again :)

Okip  10:53, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Aerica
Aerica what a cool article, thanks for sharing by using that flag! Okip  12:29, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

William H. Durham
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of William H. Durham, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.altruisticlove.org/docs/durham.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:19, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Chris Dearden
An article that you have been involved in editing, Chris Dearden, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:47, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Rochelle Owens
Hi, do you mind if I undo this edit ? The reviewer makes a false assertion that is upsetting to Owens. Kevin (talk) 21:51, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Chris Agee
Thanks for your intervention with Chris Agee. Although there's a fairly sour review of Scar on the Stone from Publishers Weekly reproduced at Habitus (below 1) belowhttp://astore.amazon.com/habadiajou-20/detail/1852244151, Stephen Schwartz, who certainly knows the subject, judges the importance of the anthology by the way it reflects the issues embedded in the conflict (featuring such eminent literary characters as the Shakespeare scholar Nikola Koljevic and the psychiatrist-poet Radovan Karadzic) in the contrast he draws between Abdulah Sidran and Izet Sarajlic http://webdelsol.com/CPR/Schwartz/falconers2.htm (below 2). The Sidran poem he cites goes some way to undermining the Publishers' Weekly cursory dismissal of the poems as "dubby". Schwartz judges the anthology as follows " Global attention to the Bosnian war has brought a number of other useful volumes into print in English. Perhaps the most important among such titles is The Scar On the Stone, edited by Chris Agee, which includes an excellent and representative selection of recent Bosnian poetry, much of it directly influenced by the 1992-95 war.   I would recommend the book, which includes excerpts and commentaries by Mak and by Francis R. Jones, without qualification, and will only indicate two writers I believe deserve special attention, in that they represent two sides of Sarajevo literary life."

I've just had this submission rejected because supposedly it includes a link to a site on a Wikipedia blacklist, so I'll break it up for you to work out for yourself. You appear to have enough of the intelligence and discretion that a lot of Wikipedia seems inimical to to be able to work it out for yourself.

1. http: // astore .amazon .com/ habadiajou-20/ detail/ 1852244151

2. http: // webdelsol .com/ CPR/ Schwartz/ falconers2.htm

(I forgot to delete the original links but even so the loss of a leading space seems to have protected the guilty party, which appears to be the Habitus link) Opbeith (talk) 09:59, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Another thoughtful appraisal is by Angus Calder in his "Poetry and War" review at Eurozine - "One of Hughes's last tasks before he died in 1998 was to translate six poems by Abdulah Sidran for Chris Agee's anthology Scar on the Stone; Contemporary Poetry from Bosnia. This impressive and very readable book gets several things right where they might have gone badly wrong. ..." http://www.eurozine.com/articles/2000-03-09-calder-en.html Opbeith (talk) 10:36, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Hello Pohick2. I've recreated the article. Follow the link above (section title). Thanks for your assistance and support. --Vejvančický (talk) 11:58, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

contentious
The substantive issue underlying Kevin's deletion threats is being discussed at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Biographies_of_living_persons#Proposal:_Restore_.22contentious.22_to_GRAPEVINE_to_clarify_and_maintain_current_status_quo Opbeith (talk) 10:57, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * actually i though Kevin was more equanimitable than most deleting admins. Pohick2 (talk) 13:48, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * It's mad - I think they see Wikipedia as Calvin's Geneva reborn! Opbeith (talk) 14:48, 4 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I have this image of them burning us along with all our humanly imperfect articles until this small core of perfectly crafted, perfectly referenced articles about notable porn stars and Pokemon characters subsists, at which point they'll have disposed of anyone with energy to risk starting any new articles and judgment day can commence - perhaps it's safer if I steer clear of theological subject matter! Opbeith (talk) 20:41, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the signpost - I went along to Slowking and I was struck by it as something really quite beautiful. Then I scrolled up the article and at the top I found "This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be ...." We are all at peril. I'm glad Chris Agee was saved but it's very frustrating glimpsing all these other intriguing articles that I'm never going to have the chance to bump into by accident again. I suppose I ought to resign myself to it as part pf the constant cycle of creation and destruction, just slightly speeded up. Opbeith (talk) 11:20, 7 March 2010 (UTC)


 * most parents can cite you Pokemon, i got good at the card game using psyduck and slowpoke against charizard. (as an inclusionist, it's all good) the problem with the adversial cycle, is that it requires constant monitoring, or the stealth speedy, and stealth vandalism continue. clearly this inline reference quality measure was not handled well. Pohick2 (talk) 22:55, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Kevin's busy defending his World will be destroyed at midday unless you save it beforehand approach at his talk page. He doesn't think other people know what's best for Wikipedia, so he's saving us from ourselves. Copyright is difficult. If you keep to the information available at source you get hit for breach of copyright. If you don't you get hit for original research. Opbeith (talk) 11:20, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Copyright concerns
Your article William H. Durham came up for review at WP:CP today, and I see that when you created it, here, it included the following text:

The source says:

I look back to see that on October 27 2009, you created the article Maureen Owen with content very closely taken from from :

The source said:

Going further back, I see 15 July 2009, close paraphrasing and direct taking from. For example, the article said:

The source says:

15 September 2009, close paraphrasing and direct taking from. The article said:

The source says:

On 21 October 2009, from. The article said:

The source says:

I know that the last time we spoke about Corensearchbot’s tags, you were translating from the French and the suspected source was a Wikipedia mirror, but this does not seem to be the case in these articles. I see other Corensearchbot notices as well, some of which seem to reflect valid concerns (such as the extensive quotation removed by User:CactusWriter) and some of which do not (such as lists of publications which are not copyrightable unless they reflect human selection criteria).

Wikipedia’s copyright policy does not permit importing previously published text unless the content can be verified to be public domain or compatibly licensed. The only exception is that you may use brief excerpts of text provided that you do so in accordance with non-free content policy and guideline, which require that quotations be plainly marked and used for defensible reasons.

While facts are not copyrightable, creative elements of presentation - including both structure and language - are. The essay Close paraphrasing contains some suggestions for rewriting that may help avoid these issues in the future. The article Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches, while about plagiarism rather than copyright concerns, also contains some suggestions for reusing material from sources that may be helpful, beginning under "Avoiding plagiarism".

You need to be careful with this in the future, as this is beginning to look like a pattern of copyright problems. The Wikimedia Foundation takes its copyright policy very seriously. Persistent copyright violators must be blocked to prevent continued issues, and the last thing we need is to lose a prolific and dedicated contributor over a misunderstanding or misapplication of copyright policy.

Please let me know if you have questions about this. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:00, 5 March 2010 (UTC)


 * excellent work, i note that you look at first draft, not the revised edit of the article. after the BLP work i will edit those. as soon as i saw that the bot came up, i edited the article to change the objected material.  since you have no hard and fast rules about word count you have given me a trial and error process, about what is or isn't a copyright vio.  i see 22 copyright bot notices out of 1,100 created articles, a rate of 2%.  on my travels through articles, i see much copying and pasting from outside sources and others wikis, which i add a ref to.  i will try to comply, but not sharing your values, i doubt it will be satisfactory to you. i do kinda object to blocking, it is a prior restraint, rather than a fix of the problem. many blocked websites have useful material, that is not a copyright vio.  the new generation may not share these values:, ... Pohick2 (talk) 23:30, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * i appreciate your consideration of my contributions, but you have lost better editors than me, i'm sure you will adhere to your process more than any individual. Pohick2 (talk) 23:45, 5 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I am not asking you to adhere to my values, but to Wikipedia's copyright policy and the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. These are not optional for any of us; they are the conditions of contributing to the project. I did not set them.


 * The hard and fast rule is that if it isn't in quotation marks and you've copied it from a non-free source, it's a violation of copyright policy. (There are no hard and fast rules about how extensive quotations may be, but in not one of the examples listed above did you quote the material you copied; you just copied it. If you aren't sure how much is "brief" and how much "extensive", which is forbidden, I am happy to offer a second opinion, and I'm sure you could get these from others as well.)


 * I am aware that none of the current versions of these articles constitute copyright problems; if they did, they would be blanked and at the copyright problems board now awaiting fixing. That's not the point. The point is that you are repeatedly violating the copyright policy and fixing it only when the bot catches you. You must stop doing this. Just don't copy and paste content onto Wikipedia, but write it in your own words.


 * Blocks may be necessary to fix the problem if the problem is that a user persists in creating problems in spite of efforts to persuade him to stop. I do not want to block you or to see you blocked. I would much rather see you contributing and not showing up at WP:SCV. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:58, 5 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Joyce: “I am quite content to go down to posterity as a scissors and paste man”. Pohick2 (talk) 01:53, 6 March 2010 (UTC)


 * If you want to go down to posterity as a scissors and paste man, you'll have to do it somewhere that accepts scissors and pasting. On Wikipedia, you cannot "copy and paste from copyrighted websites – only public domain resources can be copied without permission." It says as much on the bottom of every edit screen. You, like everyone else, must abide by the copyright policy here if you wish to participate here. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 02:59, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * you seem to want a confrontation, have i not been attempting to comply? is not a 2% rate small enough? what is the percentage of edits flagged you would consider unblockable?  you seem to want to ignore scholarly sentiment that contradicts your policy.  as i have written elsewhere: "i'm way past the point of caring about the the reputational harm to the total project. the harm does not affect me. if i can carve out a subset of well written articles that rise to the top of a google search, that act as a nexus for study of the references, then i will have done my job. if the wiki is less than it could be, then that is the fault of the failed leaders, and community that has failed to act in responsible ways. but they can't destroy the project in a Götterdämmerung: There'll Always Be an England." Pohick2 (talk) 03:09, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I really don't know if you've been attempting to comply, since at least in this conversation you seem to be hoisting some kind of flag of defiance against copyright oppression. Cleaning up articles that have been identified is great, but it's only a start: you have to stop producing the problems in the first place. 2% is not, I'm afraid, small enough. It opens the question of what percentage Corensearchbot doesn't detect and whether or not there are copyright violations on the project right now that have gone undetected and remain.


 * I'm not interested in confrontation. This is not my policy; this is the Wikimedia Foundation's policy. This is the Wikimedia Foundation's website. My opinion on scholarly sentiment regarding copyright is as immaterial as your own. So, yes, I am ignoring scholarly sentiment contradictory to the policy, because it's completely immaterial. If you continue creating copyright problems, you won't be carving out anymore articles, and, while you seem to think I'm here to fight you, I continue to maintain that this would be a shame.


 * Some kind of confirmation that you intend to comply would be nice, though it's not really essential. After you seemed to express some doubt about your ability to comply, I offered you a basic guideline and offered to provide assistance if you need help determining how much quoting is excessive. Lines from Joyce that sound like you intend to go out in a defiant charge, though, are a bit alarming. :) I'm here to try to address a problem and assuming good faith to the point that I am imagining you'd like to comply. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 03:24, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * actually i'm not anti-copyright, rather anti-black and white copyright policy. copyright and fair use are far more nuanced that you are prepared to admit.  what copyright problem?  initial drafts that were edited away within hours?  if you would care to address the question: if not 2%, what is the number? are you insisting on zero faults, mistakes?  of course the whole idea of management by numbers is questionable: i.e. Edwards Deming
 * what we have here is failure to communicate: the continued shame is the mismanagement of the project by the foundation. increasing the quality of the project requires a new attitude, positive feedback is far superior to negative feedback. eliminate management by numbers, slogans, fear.  how many editors have been driven away by the wikilawyers, and the "lord of the flies" atmosphere. have you not adopted a conform or be blocked attitude?  your time here constitutes mismanagement, the quality of the project is the number one issue, not copyright.  and yes there are thousand of copyright vio's in the project now, so what?  are you going to start flagging suspected copyright vio's and then Prodding them, just like BLP's.  why not institute a contest project to review them?
 * i gave you what confirmation that i will above, and remarked that whatever confirmation i gave would be insufficient; i see i was correct. i see you want yes or no answers that i decline to give. i kinda like the company of joyce; the article in the Sunday nytimes about the award winning "plagiarizing" author is on point, n'est pas?  in your address of the problem, are you not exacerbating the problem?  i find your rules and guidelines confusing, referring me to them is not enlightening. Pohick2 (talk) 03:59, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, 0% is the goal. Sometimes people closely paraphrase because they don't know how to properly rewrite content, but copying & pasting doesn't happen by accident; you should be fairly successful in never copying & pasting content on Wikipedia. If you need help understanding the policies and guidelines, I'm perfectly willing to assist you. Copyright problems are already flagged and deleted and have been flagged and deleted for years, both through speedy deletion and through the copyright problems board. I do indeed take a "conform of be blocked attitude." Everyone has the opportunity to contribute to Wikipedia, but those who choose not to abide by its Terms of Use are not welcome to continue. This is the reality of the project, and if you're interested in improving it, I hope you will choose to comply. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 04:11, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * just to clarify, you went to some time and trouble reviewing history and found no active copyright vio's, but are taking the position that no copyright vio's at any time are acceptable.
 * my position is: zero defects, zero tolerance, zero copyright vio's are an impossible standard, that has never and will never be. my advise is don't even try, the problem of active copyright vio's is hard enough, and i see little progress in tackling that one. certainly, nothing you have shown me, gives me any confidence that you have a process to address the problem. Pohick2 (talk) 13:34, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify: you came up at the suspected copyright violations board again. Having seen you there multiple times before, I checked your history and verified multiple copyright violations within the last few months. That you have rewritten these when they've been pointed out to you doesn't mean that the policy violation did not occur. I debated whether to give you the standard block advisory that if you continue pasting content you will be blocked, but since I presumed you to be a good faith and otherwise valuable contributor thought that instead I would try to engage you in a cordial conversation about it. Evidently, this was the wrong approach in this case. So, here's the official line: "You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing." Please stop. If you continue, I will have no choice but to block you. That said, if you have questions about how to reuse content, you are welcome to come by my talk page. Otherwise, I don't see much value in continuing this conversation unless you again copy content onto Wikipedia. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:14, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * you are an above average admin, and this was a cordial conversation, we just agree to disagree. but now you've stripped away the venire of civility. your WP:SCV, and hectoring are profoundly misguided.  i see no process to find and edit existing copyright vio's, only the mechanical machine alarm of current edits. pure laziness. far better to make non-vio editing and rewriting vio's more fun.  you cannot order volunteers; rather you must coach them or lead them.  it requires more patience than you have exhibited.  the problem with the technical profession and law profession is that their training hones their precision skills, and egos, but not their Emotional intelligence.  my response to stern warnings and Argument from authority will always be:  nullius in verba. Pohick2 (talk) 16:16, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Certainly I intended nothing incivil anywhere in this conversation. Simply, it seems that my approach above has done more to irritate you than to help resolve the problem. I have not perceived myself as impatient in this conversation, at least, though I have been puzzled. I have repeatedly offered to help you with reuse. My intention here from the beginning has been to prevent your being blocked; evidently, I am failing to communicate that somehow.


 * WP:SCV is not mine, anymore than the copyright policy is. Both of these long predate my presence on Wikipedia. If you're interested in the process of finding and editing existing copyright vios, though, I can tell you quite a bit about it, having worked copyright cleanup for almost two years on Wikipedia. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:25, 6 March 2010 (UTC)


 * you're being coy: "Evidently, this was the wrong approach in this case. So, here's the official line..."; WP:SCV is your tool -- it's not mine either, maybe we should not use it, keep it for historical interest like WP:ESPERANZA. how's the copyright vio policing going? is it much fun?  as an inside the beltway person, i'm afraid i have no special reverence for law, and by extention rules to cya copyright.  i take it you would view the Italian google ruling as a vindication of your caution.  i reckon you will get sued regardless.  what is the case history of suits against wiki?  i note that the bot has a hard limit of around 180 words for blockquotes.  however, when hand copying from a printed source, it's unlimited.  i only did that two times when quoting letters of the subject, printed in secondary sources.  is that fair use? author plus 70 years? i've seen a few press releases in articles unattributed, have you?. Pohick2 (talk) 23:28, 6 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes, I have seen a few press releases in articles unattributed, and I have removed them. But evidently I should have stuck with "I don't see much value in continuing this conversation unless you again copy content onto Wikipedia." I'm really far too busy to argue Wikipedia's copyright policies with you, and I suspect you have better things to do as well. I hope not to see you at SCV again. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:50, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

What is fair use?
FAQ/Copyright "Under certain conditions, you may copy a copyrighted work without a license from the original author. One of these limitations on the rights granted to the copyright holder is called "fair use." A more restricted version called fair dealing generally applies outside the United States.

Generally, fair use exceptions are ill-defined, and vary widely from country to country. What is fair use in one country may not be in another country.

Under US copyright law, the primary things to consider when asking if something is fair use (set forth in Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 107) are:[5]


 * 1) . The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
 * 2) . The nature of the copyrighted work;
 * 3) . The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
 * 4) . The effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

Asking yourself these questions might help you determine if something is fair use:


 * 1) . Is it a for profit competitor or not? Is it for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research? Is the use transformative (of a different nature to the original publication)?
 * 2) . Is it a highly original creative work with lots of novel ideas or a relatively unoriginal work or listing of facts? Is the work published (to a non-restricted audience)? If not, fair use is much less likely.
 * 3) . How much of the original work are you copying? Are you copying more or less than the minimum required for your purpose? The more you exceed this minimum, the less likely the use is to be fair. Are you reducing the quality or originality, perhaps by using a reduced size version?
 * 4) . Does this use hurt or help the original author's ability to sell it? Did they intend to or were they trying to make the work widely republished (as with a press release)? Are you making it easy to find and buy the work if a viewer is interested in doing so?

None of these factors alone is sufficient to make a use fair or not fair - all of them must be considered and weighed. It's routine for courts to express degrees of acceptability or unacceptability for each factor and try to come to a summary and conclusion based on the balance.

Quotations are very well known and widely used form of fair use and fair dealing and are explicitly allowed under the Berne convention.

If you produce a derivative work based on fair use, your work is a fair use work. Even if you release your changes into the public domain, the original work and fair use of it remains and the net effect is fair use. To eliminate this you must make the use of the original so insubstantial that the portion used is insufficient to be covered by copyright." Pohick2 (talk) 20:01, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

More quotes
FAQ/Copyright: ":Because the database servers are located in the United States, Wikipedia is subject to US copyright law in this matter and may not host material which infringes US copyright law. Non-free content is an evolving page offering more specific guidance about what is likely to be fair use in the Wikipedia articles and what Wikipedia policy will accept, with examples."

Copyrights "All creative works are copyrighted, by international agreement, unless either they fall into the public domain or their copyright is explicitly disclaimed. Generally, Wikipedia must have permission to use copyrighted works. There are some circumstances under which copyrighted works may be legally utilized without permission; see Non-free content for specific details on when and how to utilize such material."

Non-free content criteria "There is no automatic entitlement to use non-free content in an article or elsewhere on Wikipedia. Articles and other Wikipedia pages may, in accordance with the guideline, use brief verbatim textual excerpts from copyrighted media, properly attributed or cited to its original source or author."

Non-free content "Brief quotations of copyrighted text may be used to illustrate a point, establish context, or attribute a point of view or idea. Copyrighted text that is used verbatim must be attributed with quotation marks or other standard notation, such as block quotes. Any alterations must be clearly marked, i.e. [brackets] for added text, an ellipsis (...) for removed text, and emphasis noted after the quotation as "(emphasis added)" or "(emphasis in the original)". Extensive quotation of copyrighted text is prohibited."

And, while we're at it, Plagiarism "If the external work is under standard copyright, then duplicating its text with little, or no, alteration into a Wikipedia article is usually a copyright violation, unless duplication is limited and clearly indicated in the article by quotation marks, or some other acceptable method (such as block quotations)."

My note, previous section: "Wikipedia’s copyright policy does not permit importing previously published text unless the content can be verified to be public domain or compatibly licensed. The only exception is that you may use brief excerpts of text provided that you do so in accordance with non-free content policy and guideline, which require that quotations be plainly marked and used for defensible reasons."

When you properly quote brief excerpts, you comply with policy, and there's no problem...as I've said all along. Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:16, 16 March 2010 (UTC)


 * i can see that you won't let me have last word on my own talk page.
 * the point being that the "fair use" rubric would say round up on use of biographical facts from a free website, with a reference to that website, driving traffic there, enhancing the value of that website, by a free, not for profit reference work. but i see you're not going to compromise. what do you think of my work here Talk:Beatrix Christian/Temp, would you say that one sentence is a copyright vio? even when in multiple websites? just how would you rewrite the sentence to convey the information with fewer words. is not the banner, without article improvement making the wiki worse? notice a new user whose first talk is copyright vio banner, not hello. Pohick2 (talk) 21:00, 16 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I didn't know you wanted the last word, sorry. I presume you're okay with me answering here, because you're asking questions. As long as our conversation remains cordial, I'm happy to talk about it. Wikipedia is not-for-profit, but Wikipedia has chosen (and no, I am not using the word "Wikipedia" to mean myself; most of the quotes above predate me. The policies certainly do) not to shelter under this in deference to downstream users. This is why we cannot accept material that is licensed for "non-commercial use" only. Images and text imported under such licenses have long been deleted. Without looking at your temp page, I would say that even one sentence copied from another source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy, unless it is used in quotation marks in accordance with WP:NFC. If you let me know to which sentence you're referring, I'll be happy to talk to you about the creative language and how it might be reworked to remain within policy. This is not always fun or easy, but I wind up doing a lot of it anyway. If what you mean to ask next is whether I think vigilance against copyright concerns harms the project, then, no. Most of the people I know who do copyright work also create content, but even if they did not they would have a place in the Wikipedia system just as vandalism fighters do, in maintaining and protecting the project. (Yes, the project needs protecting. Just this week the WMF received a letter that sent us scrambling to address copyright concerns in 40 related articles.) By the same token, with respect to your next question, many a new user has been hit with warnings for non-neutral content or material that violates BLP; it doesn't mean that the policies themselves are problematic or the people who enforce them are. As for me, the last copyright warning I left was this one. I'm sure I've left some terser notes than that, though; unfortunately, we aren't all always at our best. :/ When I leave templates on previously blank pages, I try also to leave a "welcome" template as well when it seems that the copyrighted content may been introduced through error or misunderstanding. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:15, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 * i would love to see the letters, post them and shame them: open source law. copyright is a jobs program for lawyers.  your non-profit status is a shield against suits, that you choose not to use.  the only reason that Down Under (song) got sued, is that there is a residual pot of money.  no pot: empty threats.  and they could recut the record without the riff, and sell a bunch a records from the public goodwill.
 * when it takes me 5 minutes to rewrite the article, is it unreasonable to prefer article improvement to banners, tags, and warnings? could the reason for wiki decline be because the admins are pissing on the editors, and calling it rain (er policy)?  are editors a dime a dozen?  there's always a new crop out there? (i heard that spoken at a wiki meetup)
 * statements of facts are free use, how many words in a row are free use of facts? are lists of information free use? are biographical facts free use? is a boiilerplate sentence that happens to correspond in 4 websites constitute fair use? i.e. "She graduated from the National Institute of Dramatic Art playwright’s studio in 1991." Pohick2 (talk) 21:30, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but I'm not allowed to publish those here; confidentiality agreement. And it's not my choice whether we shield behind non-profit status or not. Those policies were well entrenched long before I arrived. How many words in a row are free use depends entirely on the degree of creativity in the words, which is a very difficult concept to convey. Some people try to set an arbitrary number on the words, but it can't be done. Three strikingly original words may require quotation marks, while an entire idiom would not. Lists of information are free use if they are non-creative; that is, the list of names in a telephone directory is not copyrightable; Rolling Stone's list of the 500 best songs of all time is. The freedom of biographical facts depends on the creativity of their selection. For instance, a list of alphabetical or chronological works cited is non-creative. A sample of the writer's "best" is. It is easier to infringe on highly creative content than barely creative content, but the US courts have deliberately set the threshold for creativity very low. A boilerplate sentence used in 4 websites may be fair use, but care must be taken in that case that the content does not too closely replicate other content. The less tangible aspect of copyright law is that in addition to language it covers the structure of a work, including which facts are covered. Again, the more creativity there is, the more of a problem there is, but even with minimal creativity a court is likely to find substantial similarity if to a lay observer a pattern of copying seems evident. With the sentence you quote, I'd say it depends entirely on surrounding content, but would generally restructure that. You could append it to another sentence as a lead-in: "A 1991 graduate of the National Institute of Dramatic Art playwright’s studio,...." or "After graduating from the National Institute of Dramatic Art playwright’s studio in 1991, she...." The other stuff is rather more philosophical than I care to go. It begins with figuring out whether wiki is on the decline and by the time we've established that and set out our premises, we could have both accomplished many other things. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:02, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * kinda like Forbes list of billionaires (2009), and Forbes Global 2000?, you just got done parsing my sentences, and now you say minor changes are better? i see the blander the better, wring out all the "creative" element. (however, the best parts of the 1911 EB are the creative bits) you seem to be using a subjective standard, that doesn't make much sense to me.  it's a retroactive litigation standard, worrying about what might have been or will be, rather than proscriptive method, that is reproducible.  i understand that wiki might not wish to examine the philosophical problems in their management.  better to not look behind the screen.  principles of management of software projects are pretty cut and dried; why is not the foundation communicating them in a clear fashion? the statistics on slower growth (decline) seem pretty clear to me. what would it take to get management's attention?  i only care in that it distracts me from writing articles.  for example the BLP nonsense.  how many tags or warnings do you want me to heed?  i conclude the best policy is to ignore all the "help" from above and continue on, the communication is most unhelpful. Pohick2 (talk) 01:57, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, you do have to wring out all of the "creative" element of copyrighted content. It belongs to them, and no matter how much you like it, you can't use it except in brief, clearly marked excerpts in accordance with our policy. (Not an issue with the 1911 EB, however, since it has considerately lapsed into public domain.) The US law on copyright which governs the US-based Wikimedia Foundation is subjective; that's the legal reality. When it comes to duplicating previously published content, though, the Wikipedia policies are much more straightforward: duplicating copyrighted content without quotation marks is forbidden. To contact management, see Wikimedia:Contact us. And now, to give you an opportunity to have the last word, I'll take your talk page off of my watchlist. If you have future questions, please feel free to come by my talk page. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:11, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * you are excluding "fair use" which allows "creative" content used under the 4 criteria above. Pohick2 (talk) 15:06, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

BLP sticky PROD
Hi !. Every attempt to rescue a Wikipedia article is a noble gesture. However, there may be occasions when, with the best  will in the world, it  is just  not  possible to accord even a minimum of notability to an article or stub, or find a proper source for it. Most regrettably, even the most  dedicated inclusionists will have to concede that  the article may  have to  go if the creator or major contributors cannot  justify their work. For new and recent unsourced BLPs, some users are now working at  WT:BLP PROD TPL on  the development  of templates that are designed to  encourage contributors to source new BLPs, without  scaring away the newbies who  might  not  be aware of the rules. This template is certainly not  another  a licence to  kill for the deletionists, in  fact  the very idea of it  is to  ensure that  you  are not  fighting a losing  battle. It would be great if you  could look  in  at the prgogress and maybe leave a word of encouragement. The workshop page is essentially a template development taskforce, and is not a place to  engage in a hefty  debate on  incusion/deletion  policy. See you at WT:BLP PROD TPL?--Kudpung (talk) 13:03, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

BLP mess
Or we might sink in the Bermuda Triangle. :) Maurreen (talk) 04:48, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Out-of-process deletions
Did you find those by happenstance, or do you have a system? Maurreen (talk) 05:00, 8 March 2010 (UTC)


 * He seems to have wiped everything twice in succession. I went to look for my exchange of moans with him in order to find the list of articles under threat and found he'd wiped it, so only the current discussion was left.  I came back a bit later to leave a message about putting the list back and found he'd wiped the discussion as well.  It's reassuring to find he's not quite the supreme arbitrator of life and death he made out. Opbeith (talk) 07:00, 8 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Pohick2 Thanks, for the info. Maurreen (talk) 13:46, 8 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Pohick2, I agree, but although there's a lot fo energy there it doubt it would respond well to channelling. Opbeith (talk) 13:50, 8 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Absolutely, but life would be too simple! Opbeith (talk) 15:09, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Howard Barnett (photographer)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Howard Barnett (photographer), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Howard Barnett. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:38, 8 March 2010 (UTC)


 * splitting hijacked article Pohick2 (talk) 16:40, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Howard Barnett


The article Howard Barnett has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no statement of notability, i looked for photography award, couldn't find

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
 * prodding hijacked article Pohick2 (talk) 17:13, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Further Diplomacy
Your idea has potential.

I had a somewhat similar idea, but I'm backed up this week, etc.

Doc could be a candidate on the deleter side.

I had thought about proposing to him that any deletion drive might start with stubs -- as one idea -- I wish people with this kind of concern would or could actually focus on contentious material. But one big point is that *any* deletion should be done with deliberation, which can't be done in a hurry. Maurreen (talk) 02:55, 9 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Just poking my nose in. Well said, Maurreen. Opbeith (talk) 09:17, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Creating a map
Thanks for your contribution. I would like to create a 'Map showing countries that issue their passports in French'. I'm new to Wiki and don't know how to do this. Can you help me? Thanks Seanoconaill (talk) 15:01, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

BLP sticky prod progress
Hi ! The template workshop is losing interest  fast now that  there is very  little left to  argue for or against.Someone said on  the Arbcom that  leaders would emerge, but  the whole issue seems to  already  have too  many  chiefs and not  enough Indians. I have now split off most of the long threads purely on policy to a new discussion page so that any policy on  its implementation can be established while technical  development  of the template can continue  in its own space. When the template functions are finalised, the policy  bits can be merged  into  them. If you intend to continue to  contribute your ideas to  the development  of the template or its policy of use, and I hope you  will, please consider either adding  your name to the list  of workshop members, or joining  in  with  the policy  discussions on the new page. --Kudpung (talk) 07:51, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * John_Doe_avatar.jpg Pohick2 (talk) 12:26, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Arturo Vivante
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Arturo Vivante, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.nd.edu/~ndr/issues/ndr5/vivante/bio.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:18, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Frederick Douglass Prize
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Frederick Douglass Prize, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.yale.edu/glc/events/dpnotice.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:59, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Frederick Douglass Prize
A tag has been placed on Frederick Douglass Prize, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Codf1977 (talk) 13:09, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Frederick Douglass Prize
A tag has been placed on Frederick Douglass Prize requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Codf1977 (talk) 13:10, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Frederick Douglass Prize
I have nominated Frederick Douglass Prize, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Frederick Douglass Prize. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Codf1977 (talk) 13:31, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

A. J. Muste categories
Hi All the categories I removed were redundant. I removed (e.g.) Category:American pacifists and Category:Christian pacifists because he is already in Category:American Christian pacifists. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 14:42, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Sticky prods
Hi '! You participated earlier in the sticky prod workshop. The sticky prods are now in use, but there are still a few points of contention. There are now a few proposals on the table to conclude the process. I encourage your input, whatever it might be. Thanks. --Maurreen (talk) 06:35, 5 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your support! Maurreen (talk) 04:09, 6 April 2010 (UTC)


 * btw, I see you've been systematically adding refs -- as have I . But it's  a good idea to indicate something  at the edit summary that you've removed the tag.   I've looked back and see I frequently forget this also, so I'm here to remind the two of us.  DGG ( talk ) 21:33, 10 April 2010 (UTC)


 * i confess i don't look at edit summary, since the history tells the tale, but i will try to mention pulling down the blp tag, my big numbers are over having proved the point. Pohick2 (talk) 21:17, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Roark Bradford's Pulitzer
Hello,

The source you site stating that Roark Bradford was presented with a Pulitzer Prize jointly with Marc Connelly must be in error. The official Pulitzer Prize website makes no mention of Bradford having won the award. And I did an extensive web search, and could find no other source that lists Bradford as a Pulitzer winner. -- Michael David (talk) 15:07, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Glad to help, that's the real benefit of honest collaboration. What you proposed sounds good to me. I wanted to give you the chance to change it yourself. -- Michael David (talk) 18:31, 11 April 2010 (UTC)