User talk:Sable232/Archive 4

WP:CIVIL Sadowski and Sable232
I am posting this same message on both of your talk pages. Both of your behaviors are completely unacceptable. Sadowski, this diff is where the incivility started (as far as I can tell). Calling other editors "fake" and trying to pull rank based on outside experience are both not going to work. Neither is pointy editing, like your removal of several generations from the Continental article. Your efforts to push a point of view about older vehicles is also not acceptable, see WP:NPOV. Sable's response is really beyond the pale thou, I can understand how Sadowski's message may have upset you, but he is a new editor who is likely unaware of our community's standards regarding civility and interaction. To respond by calling him a prick (as you did in this edit [ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sadowski&diff=prev&oldid=408310019]) is not the way to explain our standards and is pretty shocking coming from a long time editor such as yourself. You both need to either apologize to each other and work together or you both need to stop editing articles where you might come into contact. I would be happy to help mediate your conflict, but an apology would be needed from both of you. --Leivick (talk) 02:34, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:03, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

About the inline commonscat
I didn't only change the commonscat to inline for Buick articles, I did it for many articles where the commonscat box is not very noticeable. For example, on articles like Buick Rainier and Isuzu i-Series, the commonscat box was located directly below the infobox and was sometimes almost hidden from view. I was just trying to make the commonscats more visible and optimally located. —Reelcheeper (talk) 23:43, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the advice. I agree that it's better to make a commonscat box under an external links section, since a link to Commons isn't really a reference. I will try to fix any commonscats I find that are improperly located (unless you have already done so). —Reelcheeper (talk) 23:23, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Durango file
I work for the company that listed that sale, so how is that failure of copyright? Also I just think it's how the new unibody Explorer has a top spot on the page, while they still use the larger, body-on frame Durango as the main picture for its own page. I don't have any bias of manufacturer, but obviously some others do. FeralLynX (talk) 23:00, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

AIV
Sorry about that, I'm not entirely sure how I managed that, but certainly didn't mean to remove reports. SmackEater (talk) 19:51, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Plymouth Belvedere
Funny, I am not a Wikipedia contributor but I got on here since I am an Ohio State grad and I was looking at the Jim Tressel page and it said I had a message... I guess my stepson (who is a car enthusiast) made the change to the year on that car you were upset about. As for you accusing him of vandalism... he insists that the year on that car is wrong.75.83.138.90 (talk) 00:52, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Here you go!
.

The numbers are hidden away in the file so when you open it in an SVG editor, they will be available to use. –Fredddie™ 03:34, 17 March 2011 (UTC)


 * For what it's worth, I finally made the US 10N and US 10S shields you requested a while ago. –Fredddie™ 19:51, 23 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks! I had actually forgotten that I had requested those. I still keep forgetting to request a bot template be made from the 1920 and 1934 state shields, but my Constitutional Route list has been on the back burner for a while anyway. --Sable232 (talk) 00:16, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Update
Thought you'd like to know I created the first batch of 1920-style shields today. I didn't make very many, only enough to finish the US 55 junction list. –Fredddie™ 23:42, 19 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Great, thanks! I should start moving ahead on the 1920-34 route list once I start getting time to work on it. --Sable232 (talk) 01:48, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:16, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

24.184.230.106 (talk) 23:26, 17 May 2011 (UTC)Sable 232. I do not know where you live or why you keep wiping out the History of Wyandanch. This is the poorest community on Long Island, New York. It has faced numerous problems for over a century both as a white and later African-American community. Federal, State and local governments are spending up to $500 million to revitalize this community. Wiping out the history of this beleagured community-especially at this time is a great and unwarrented disservice. It was decided last September to merge it with Wyandanch, New York, not to remove it. If you tell me how to merge it I will. But, I cannot understand why you are so zealous on this. Also, what purpose is served by threatening removing my editing ability. Please be reasonable.24.184.230.106 (talk)

Talkback
SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:41, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Hello friend. Take a look at this page and let me know what you think. Ford F-150 SVT Raptor --Dana60Cummins (talk) 15:52, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Marque (again…)
Please see here and here. —Scheinwerfermann T&middot;C 02:03, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

False vandalism claims
I just recieved a message today notifying me about vandalism to wikipedia. If anything, I helped reduced vadalism by removing content that wasn't encyclopedic and added descriptive, neutral information. No, I haven't cited sources on these, but considering these aren't additions of major information, it isn't top-priority.Wikimann1234 (talk) 01:14, 1 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I also noticed you undid my edits to the Ford Freestyle/Taurus X Articles. Given that the only charecteristic of an SUV it has is all-wheel drive, I suggest leaving the status as a full-sized station wagon due to the design and car body.  I also thought you were done with automobile articles as well?Wikimann1234 (talk) 01:22, 1 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I'm just following the loose guidelines we have established. The subaru Forester actually has SUV characteristics, whereas the Ford Freestyle doesn't.  At least I'm not making up terms like "crossover wagon" or "CUV"!  CUV? what does that even stand for?Wikimann1234 (talk) 01:33, 1 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Okay, I guess I'll settle for the term crossover for both. Mid-size crossover for the Forester, and Full-size crossover for The Freestyle.  But I'm only settling on crossover for the freestyle because of the height and third row seating.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikimann1234 (talk • contribs) 01:49, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

WT:MNSH
Not sure how frequently you're online, but so you know, I started a discussion there to discuss the Minnesota project. --Rschen7754 07:38, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

USRD WikiProject Newsletter, Winter 2012

 * —  Imzadi 1979  →   22:15, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Manitoba Highway 30.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Manitoba Highway 30.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Manitoba Highway 31.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Manitoba Highway 31.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Manitoba Highway 89.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Manitoba Highway 89.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Manitoba Highway 10.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Manitoba Highway 10.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:20, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Manitoba Highway 18.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Manitoba Highway 18.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Manitoba Highway 34.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Manitoba Highway 34.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Azteca Deportes listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Azteca Deportes. Since you had some involvement with the Azteca Deportes redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Atorres50 (talk) 21:30, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Manitoba Highway 12.png
Thank you for uploading File:Manitoba Highway 12.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:05, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Freightliner Century Class, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freightliner ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Freightliner_Century_Class check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Freightliner_Century_Class?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited AC Brooklands Ace, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roadster ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/AC_Brooklands_Ace check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/AC_Brooklands_Ace?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Chevrolet Celebrity and Hyundai Accent
Why you reverted them? I am redoing what was undone by Ferret in September 2018. Syncro26152XL (talk) 20:27, 20 October 2018 (UTC)


 * In the case of Chevrolet Celebrity, "headlamp" is the correct term per the headlamp article.
 * As for Hyundai Accent, please read this section of the Manual of Style. When an article is written in British English, it should not be changed to American English (or vice versa) except where the topic has intrinsic ties to one region or the other. Since the Accent was a Korean car sold in several English-speaking markets, there are no national ties to any one, so the existing variety of English stands as-is. --Sable232 (talk) 20:57, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I've indef'd this user. I've no idea why they chose to ping me when I've already given them a final warning to stop with ENGVAR changes. -- ferret (talk) 00:50, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Final warnings? Ha, ha, hah! You think you're funny, do you? Your little "warnings" to me were snarky and unnacceptable. 2806:104E:8:4B96:DD6F:2ED0:DDB:B974 (talk) 19:51, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Please don't harass other users, final warnings are serious. - ZLEA Talk\ Contribs 19:53, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Minnesota State Highway 34, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swan River, Minnesota ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Minnesota_State_Highway_34 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Minnesota_State_Highway_34?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

about Kia K9/Quoris/K900
I want someone administrator to protect this page because that vandalizer is giving the car information is wrong! As original the car the rival is tend to be challenge the car such as BMW 5 series, Audi A6, and Mercedes E-Class! (I need your help to request the page protect! Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.239.85.4 (talk) 02:24, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Saturn ip
That IP is nuts. And the edit summaries read like computer speak, circa 2002. Editors ought to be required to sign up before editing.  Mr.choppers &#124;  ✎  22:47, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Indeed. Clearly not someone with a good grasp of English, which seems to be getting more common on Wikipedia.
 * I've noticed that keeping IP disruption at bay is more difficult now, between IPv6 and the availability of mobile editing. Unfortunately, all we can do is revert on sight since there's no use playing whack-a-mole with blocking the IPs. --Sable232 (talk) 22:56, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Ford Fairlane Article
I will leave the picture alone but I am improving the body style and transmission sections as I have added in years and have done my research and know for a fact that there was no 2 door station wagon of the fourth generation ford fairlane from the factory. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bizzleqwertyuiop (talk • contribs) 18:04, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Your Commons account
I don't know if they can/will still do it, but you can ask at Steward requests/Username changes for the "new" Sable232 Commons account to be renamed to something else, and for the old account to be moved in place. --Rschen7754 02:14, 19 December 2018 (UTC)