User talk:Serafart

Hi, The article which i have created in wiki is not already present here & it seems we have separate page for linux malware but Mac Malware page doesn't exist here that's the reason for my proposal. Please give me a knowledge on this. (WikiGopi (talk) 02:40, 31 May 2016 (UTC))

RE: May 2021
With all due respect, I was not vandalizing wikipedia and I would not have continued to edit and cite sources if I was not acting in good faith and confident that I was correct. I will not edit the article again, but I would ask you to reconsider your position given the extent of Nazi involvement with the airship. It pretty much was built by the Nazi party. They paid for its completion, put their flag on it, and were the only ones to ever fly it. The Nazis even changed its original design to use hydrogen instead of helium. How much more involvement by the nazis is needed for it to be considered a nazi airship?

"Actual construction of LZ-129 began in the Fall of 1931, but progress lagged due to a severe lack of funds during the Depression. At first, the Nazi Party’s assumption of power in January, 1933 had little effect on the fortunes of the Zeppelin Company, partly due to Air Minister Hermann Göring’s dislike of lighter-than-air flight. But Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels was aware of the potential symbolic value of LZ-129 as a showcase for German strength and technology, and in 1934 Goebbels offered Hugo Eckener 2 million marks toward the completion of LZ-129."

https://www.airships.net/hindenburg/lz129-hindenburg-detailed-history/ Renegade0894 (talk) 19:43, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Salvador Dalí and Dance
Hello Serafart. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Salvador Dalí and Dance, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''Decline WP:A10 nomination: WP:AfD would be a better option. Please discuss it on the article's talk page or with the user. .''' Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 11:25, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
Hello, I'm Oshwah. An edit you recently made to Psou (village) seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   02:18, 2 June 2016 (UTC)


 * That was not a test, trying to end potential edit wars. Serafart (talk) 02:22, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi Serafart, you are right i'm not significant enough for a wikipedia page but i made a little easter egg for my facebook followers. I've recently had my column published and told people how i felt famous from all the love they were giving and i would go and create a page about myself. I do not intend to joke around with wikipedia as i see it as one of the best things of the internet. my sincere appologies. If needed you are free to remove my page  (talk) 20:02, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Abkhazia Maps
Hi Serafart, I want to ask you to make some corrections in this map File:Abkhazia_Gulripshi_location_map.svg. First of all I don't see appropriate to put Abkhazia in title, because it's disputed area and to be neutral then we should add Georgia as well or remove that name (Gulripshi location map.svg is quite normal). Second, I don't like region's east border because it shows no difference from border with Russia, but in reality they have big difference. So let's cooperate on these issues, it will be good from both of us.-- g. balaxaZe   ★  10:28, 6 June 2016 (UTC)


 * That would not be a problem to change it to just be Gulripshi location map, but I do not have rights to move files. As for changing the border to a dashed line to show the region is disputed, I have no idea how to do that, as my Inkscape skills are terrible. EDIT: I found out how to do that. Serafart (talk) 19:34, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

January 2017
Hello Serafart. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that there is consensus that we shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1) and/or content (CSD A3) moments after they are created. It is also suggested that pages that might meet CSD A7 criteria not be tagged for deletion immediately after they are created. It's usually best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course still be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:34, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi Serafart. We appreciate your enthusiasm but please refrain from tagging articles for now – some maintenance tasks are not suitable for beginners. New Page Review requires significant experience, which you don't have yet. However, if you have already made at least 200 mainspace edits, you can enroll at the Counter Vandalism Academy to learn about keeping pages free of nonsense. Consider doing recent changes patrol for vandalism instead. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:35, 18 January 2017 (UTC) KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:35, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank You
I appreciate your diligence in monitoring vandalism on Wikipedia. I am a professor at Xavier University of Louisiana and am teaching two courses with Wikipedia. In one of these courses, Freshman Seminar, the students are testing boundaries and decided to contribute fake information to Angela Davis's page in attempt to prove their point that Wikipedia isn't reliable. I am exceptionally grateful for your work and the work of the community members like yourself you immediately corrected their misconception and I am happy to report that buy in for the utility of Wikipedia is already increasing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mosterbur (talk • contribs) 20:01, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Hayyat Tahrir al-Sham logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Hayyat Tahrir al-Sham logo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:30, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Tahrir al-Sham concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Tahrir al-Sham, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:55, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Tahrir al-Sham


Hello, Serafart. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tahrir al-Sham".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:43, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Your use of twinkle
It is appropriate to describe the person's notability in a list of notable persons. Please do not misuse twinkle; the tools are only to be used if used properly. --2604:2000:E016:A700:6DF6:B5FE:A195:58C8 (talk) 22:34, 5 March 2018 (UTC)


 * It was a mistake, am reverting Serafart (talk) (contributions) 22:35, 5 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Understood. Thank you. --2604:2000:E016:A700:6DF6:B5FE:A195:58C8 (talk) 22:37, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

POV-pushing at Aibgha article
You are POV pushing at the article, Abkhazia is not equal to Georgia. That territory is disputed. If you wish changes first discuss.-- Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ   ★  20:55, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (July-September 2018 Iraqi Protests) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating July-September 2018 Iraqi Protests, Serafart!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Please work on this, add references and re-submit when it's finished. Thanks for your work on this."

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 11:51, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Draft:July-September 2018 Iraqi Protests


Hello, Serafart. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:July-September 2018 Iraqi Protests.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 22:17, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

WP:CLAIM
Hi there, I'd like to notify you about a minor Wikipedia rule about words to avoid. "claim" is one of them. For others please see WP:CLAIM. Thanks. Nabu-Kudurri-Usur Yaniv (talk) 15:47, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Reverting my edit
Coronavirus is a global catastrophic risk if it continues spreading at its current rate (not because it will kill everybody, but because it will overburden society), so why wasn't I allowed to add it? Was it because there were no sources? 83.90.182.155 (talk) 23:11, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
 * There is no sources, and because it is highly unliely to be true. The virus will almost certainly be managed before the end of the next year or so, and definetly before the end of the century, which you claimed it would not be. Serafart (talk) (contributions) 23:15, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Armenia/Azerbaijan discretionary sanctions
Cabayi (talk) 20:34, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Your recent reverts and edits
Hi there, your recent edits to the article on the Zimbabwean diaspora have been removed again, as several members of the wiki Zimbabwe project are unhappy with your unwarranted and unsourced edits and suggestions and question your motives. That article was part of a painstaking and well researched project that took months to curate and as someone with no connection to the country or historical insight to add, the authors of the article and wikiZimbabwe project members find your edits completely disingenuine. Zimbabwe is not Cuba and the diaspora has nothing in common with Miami Cubans or whatever narrative of your making. Projecting your personal politics on a place you have never been to makes you look ridiculous. Your past work suggests a history of far right edits and Zimbabwe will not be part of you far right 'meme'. This kind of behaviour is unacceptable on Wikipedia and we will take action against you if you vandalize any sites about a country you know nothing about. Good day to you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leonard skynerd (talk • contribs) 16:11, 20 March 2021 (UTC)


 * I made no edits at all to Zimbabwean diaspora, only proposed a potential split or creation of a new article from it. Please stop vandalizing talk pages. Serafart (talk) (contributions) 16:13, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Problems with editing at Richard Stanley (director)

 * Wikipedia's policy on reporting about living persons does not permit publishing accusations of criminal actions unless the person concerned has been convicted.
 * It is no defence to say that you are referring to the accusations as "allegations", not asserting that they are facts.
 * Nor is it a defence to say that "it is fact that allegations exist"; many things exist that are not suitable for publishing on Wikipedia, for many reasons.
 * The fact that someone has posted an accusation in a blog does not make it acceptable to publicise that accusation on Wikipedia, not matter how many quotation marks you put round it.
 * Posting material in a Wikipedia article because you think "the public need to know" is contrary to the whole purpose of Wikipedia: we do not act as a medium for promoting a campaign or for publicising anything. JBW (talk) 21:43, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
Your recent editing history at 2021 storming of the United States Capitol shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. BusterD (talk) 01:56, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Re: Andrew Clyde
Hi,

Thanks for putting in a semi-protection request for the Andrew Clyde article. I was just getting ready to do that myself. Being as he's been in the headlines recently, hopefully it'll be approved soon. Thanks again! Snickers2686 (talk) 03:53, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Cheburashka (MLRS) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Cheburashka (MLRS), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  scope_creep Talk  17:13, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Changes to Syria map
I have reverted your changes as you have uploaded a map that displays parts of Turkey being disputed or claimed by Syria without citing a source for it. Ecrusized (talk) 20:18, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Cheburashka (MLRS)
Hello, Serafart. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cheburashka (MLRS), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Cheburashka (MLRS)


Hello, Serafart. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cheburashka".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:31, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

August 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to United States dollar. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. USD don't has used subunit except cent.

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

 * You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. 

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)