User talk:Sergecross73/Archive 20

Jak sockpuppets
I'll just say it here, to everyone -, , - and anyone else. Let me know if you have any more suspected sockpuppets of Jakandsig - I've spent enough time dealing with him now that I'm comfortable with blocking anyone I believe to be him for block evasion per WP:DUCK. I may not take action on everyone that is suggested, but please don't hesitate to throw it out there to me. Sergecross73  msg me   17:54, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, that did not take long. This fellow just went active mere minutes after John Mayer lost his talk page access. He has already tried to claim the Dreamcast was not the first system with a built in modem something Jak and friends claimed on multiple occasions. Indrian (talk) 02:31, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
 * It looks like he's back! And ready to challenge those Atari 7800 sales figures yet again...TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 19:15, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I thought this one looked suspicious as well when he first appeared last night, and his new focus on the 7800 only serves to reinforce those suspicions. Probably not enough yet for an outright block, but he should at the very least be watched closely. Indrian (talk) 19:22, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Same article/sales concerns, just registered last night, long-winded edit summaries, trouble with wiki-formatting, it does seem similar... Sergecross73   msg me   19:27, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I reverted Golden Cog's edit on Atari 2600. The edit was unsourced and mediocre. IX | (C"&#60;)  00:05, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Also reverted his Sega Game Gear edit, which changed the name of the "End of life" subsection to "Decline". IX | (C"&#60;)  00:08, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I was mistaken. His Game Gear edit changed "Decline" to "End of life". IX | (C"&#60;)  19:08, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
 * An edit to the Super Thunder Blade article by Carrots was reverted. IX | (C"&#60;)  00:15, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I wish I would become an administrator, just because the unlikely Jak creates problematic sockpuppets. I think I could block Jak indefinitely if this sockpuppet situation continually worsens. I hope I can be a nice, content-improving admin. IX | (C"&#60;)  00:24, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Maybe I'm just being paranoid, but I'm starting to wonder if Jakandsig was even his first account.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 00:48, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I think it was. Before Jak, there were anons pushing the same views on the CD-I page and others, but not another named account.  I think Jak was his move from anonymous posting to account posting. Indrian (talk) 00:51, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Jak first used IP 64.134.64.30 back in October 12, 2013, adding unsourced information to Street Fighter II. The Stick Man reverted that edit. IX | (C"&#60;)  00:58, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm happy North American video game crash of 1983 is semi-protected. IX | (C"&#60;)  19:34, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Feel free to contact me if you need extra admin support for the socks; I am always Angry and Willing. OhNo itsJamie Talk 19:45, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
 * , thanks, I appreciate it. I suppose, now that we're on the subject, what's your opinion on what to do with this guy? On one hand, the guy hasn't broken any rules yet, but on the other hand, it really seems like he's another sock. (He became active almost exactly after John Mayor lost talk page access, he keeps advocating that the systems that competed against the Nintendo Entertainment System are under-represented/underappreciated, etc.) I don't want to waste time, but don't want to be overly aggressive either. Thoughts? Sergecross73   msg me   01:24, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I was a little conflicted about that as well. Assuming that it is him, he's certainly changed his tone and approach (at least the interactions I scanned through), but on the other hand, block evasion is block evasion. I noticed when he accidentally got logged out his IP traced to a research network in Greece, which to me smells like proxying.  OhNo itsJamie  Talk 15:06, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
 * He does change his approach every so often. User:leeroyhim, for instance, was very polite and generally non-confrontational.  There are almost as many personalities as accounts, but they are unified by a single agenda on video game history pages that don't tend to receive a lot of attention generally and by their often awkward and grammatically poor edits.  At this point I don't think there is enough info yet to make a determination, but if he keeps editing, the agenda always comes out eventually. Indrian (talk) 15:34, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yeah, his "John Mayor" account was pretty calm in the beginning too. I imagine the same will happen with this account. Things won't go his way, he'll get irritated, make a scene, and then probably either be blocked due to another positive SPI report or quacking too loud. Sergecross73   msg me   15:51, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I've considering putting a site-ban on Jakandsig mainly because of his disruptive edits and sockpuppetry. I can guess that Greek proxy is causing all of this sockpuppetry he has, and maybe that kind of ban can be done to both Jak and the proxy. IX | (C"&#60;)  00:26, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
 * By "Greek proxy", I mean the IP from the Greek research network Jak used. The IP is "2001:648:2FFC:1225:A800:FF:FE2E:B06C". IX | (C"&#60;)  00:30, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, about 48 hours of silence, at least. Let me know if you see anything new that is suspicious... Sergecross73   msg me   02:19, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Golden Cog is back, and promising major overhauls to five separate articles. I urge everyone to watch him carefully.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 02:47, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up. I'll be on close watch. Sergecross73   msg me   03:28, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'll be there too. IX | (C"&#60;)  03:30, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Cog/Jak's obviously feeling a bit discouraged by the suspicion, since he hasn't begun to overhaul the articles he tagged. Could this new account be his reaction? Does he really think any new account editing the same pages is likely to evade our suspicion? Or I am just being paranoid? Stay tuned to Wikipedia for more of When Socks Attack!TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 00:55, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I believe his Holiness is definitely a sock, as his opening statement on the crash page fits Jak and friends to a tee. No doubt his excommunication will follow in short order if he starts making changes. Indrian (talk) 00:58, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I assumed it was a sock. At least that page is protected. Honestly, after Cog inevitably gets blocked, I'll probably go around a protect a bunch of his "underdog console" type articles, so none of his future socks will have immediate access to them. Sergecross73   msg me   01:05, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The IP Jak used to inflate Atari 7800 sales to 10.77 million was just active at Sega Saturn and Nintendo 64.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 02:18, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Blocked. Losing patience for this guy. Sergecross73   msg me   02:27, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The IP that previously admitted to being Golden Cog has struck again. His new attempt to inflate Atari XEGS sales proves the connection between Cog and Jak's other sockpuppets.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 19:45, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I may just file an SPI about this. Jak's block needs to be extended for his continued evasion.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 20:14, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Smoking gun for User:Golden_Cog_Afternoon_Karate_Exit. The IP listed above that Golden admitted was him just attempted to restore bogus information that Jak and friends have tried to add on multiple occasions. Indrian (talk) 20:34, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh, and the IP also vandalized a page. That seems adequate grounds to block the IP, and I think there is a good case to be made for just blocking Golden as well. Indrian (talk) 20:39, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Blocked for block evasion. Sergecross73   msg me   20:55, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
 * SPI filed on Golden Cog/AustralianPope.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 21:48, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Kill it with fire? Indrian (talk) 21:42, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Let's add it to the SPI we're still waiting on Sergecross73   msg me   22:24, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Nevermind. Blocked all 3. Sergecross73   msg me   00:37, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Another one worth keeping an eye on. Indrian (talk) 01:11, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks again for your work on all this. It probably does not matter much now, but it seems this account somehow fell through the cracks. I think it was added to one of the SPIs late in the process and then accidentally overlooked. Indrian (talk) 16:45, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Another new account at Atari XEGS, and I don't know if I trust his story.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 18:12, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Even more obvious sock.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 18:15, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * And another.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 18:20, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'll keep at it. I'll probably start protecting more of these obscure console articles he keeps going after, so he can't even start. Otherwise, keep alerting me of socks, but I'll probably keep discussion on them to a minimum per WP:DENY. Sergecross73   msg me   18:47, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * And another. Indrian (talk) 19:09, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * And now this IP is trying to restore AustralianPope material and claiming that he will log in to his "account" and block me. Indrian (talk) 19:17, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Send him my way when that happens. >_> Oh well, at least he's doing a good job of reminding me of pages that need to be protected. Sergecross73   msg me   19:26, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * And here is a fun little temper tantrum. The edits have already been reverted, but some blocking and semi-protection may be in order. Indrian (talk) 19:58, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I am honestly sorry to have to keep spamming your page in such rapid succession, but here is another IP temper tantrum. Indrian (talk) 20:07, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * No, no problem at all. As long as you are willing to help with this, I'm happy to help.  Sergecross73   msg me   20:10, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I was angry that Jakandsig used this IP to unofficially block me, although he isn't an administrator. He's happily blocked. IX | (C"&#60;)  20:31, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yeah he did that to the 4 of us, which the main purpose of "leaving a mark that can't be undone". Which, of course, can be undone by admin. Working through deleting outright. Sergecross73   msg me   20:34, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Today, we're having a ridiculous string of destructive short-lived sockpuppets by Jak. IX | (C"&#60;)  20:44, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * IP 173.224.219.45 seemed like a climax. Jakandsig started out as a minority, and then he grew worse over time with unravelings of his disruptive edits, sockpuppetry, lies, and incivility. Today we reached the top of the mountain: a hailstorm consisting of around 8 or more Jak sockpuppets with a sense of chaos were blocked within hours. He will be known as one of the worst cases of sockpuppetry. IX | (C"&#60;)  21:06, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Now Jak is continuing his ridiculous campaign on his own talk page. Can his access be revoked, or does it need to be kept open in case he wants to appeal the indefinite block? I would think the personal attacks and delusional ranting would be enough to just shut it down. Indrian (talk) 21:21, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I want Jak to be permanently site-banned so that he wouldn't edit Wikipedia and create sockpuppets/accounts anyway. IX | (C"&#60;)  21:26, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks Sergecross73 for blocking Jakandsig indefinitely! Yay! =D IX | (C"&#60;)  21:38, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I had yesterday, but just took away his talk page access. He'll tire himself out and stop once he gets caught every time. Or he'll have to conform so much to not be caught that he'd be a good editor. He seems incapable of the latter. Just keep reporting socks to me, and don't make a big deal out of it. He probably gets off on the delusion of notoriety.  Sergecross73   msg me   21:42, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * He used IP 117.211.84.218 to block me again. The link to the IP's contributions shows his first edit on February 11, 2011. IX | (C"&#60;)  22:10, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Please indefinitely semi-protect both my userpage and user talk so that Jak can't edit those pages anymore. IX | (C"&#60;)  22:14, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Talk page stalker here, It seems Jaks plan is to get as many Ips blocked as possible. I believe it may be to make it so other people can't edit or create accounts. Everytime I am about to edit, a page gets attacked. I think it's time to treat this as a more serious issue since he's actually damaging multiple pages in a short period of time. 91.184.0.80 (talk) 22:21, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Gonna, if you protect your page only older users can communicate with you. Same goes for this page, which should never be protected since he is an administrative contact. 91.184.0.80 (talk) 22:21, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I asked Sergecross73 to semi-protect my userpage and talk pages. IX | (C"&#60;)  22:26, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I know that, I'm just warning you that only established users can contact you, or if you were to help a new user they would not be able to send you a reply to ask you for any further help. 91.184.0.80 (talk) 22:32, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Okay, I get what you're saying right. IX | (C"&#60;)  22:36, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Protected. Just message or email me when you want it taken away. As for my talk page, I have no intentions of protecting it. It's very quick and easy to rollback, and I've got a bunch of people watching my talk page too. On that note, since IPs don't have watchlists, I'm curious who this IP is. Jak? Or someone randomly signed out of their account? Sergecross73   msg me   22:44, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Don't let this sock slip through the cracks.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 23:28, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Huh, I first started arguing with him due to a request made at WP:VG, so I wasn't thinking of it like that. Seems plausible. Any other thoughts on him? Sergecross73   msg me   23:44, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Look at his generic user page. It's strikingly reminiscent of all of the other Jak socks. I'm sure Jak was hoping his massive tantrum would divert attention away from his serious account.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 23:55, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

I just came across this user, KlausKoenig. Their talk page looks suspicious since 117.211.84.218 was the user who created it. XXX8906 (talk) 23:36, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Interesting, but since the account hasn't been active since 2009 nor edited any video game-related articles, it probably isn't relevant.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 04:47, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

It's probably nothing, but I will be watching this IP just to stay safe.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 01:15, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Good idea. BustaBunny has been largely inactive so far too, FYI. Sergecross73   msg me   13:19, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
 * After a brief respite, Busta Bunny appears to be active again. Let's hope our suspicions were ill-founded.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 17:27, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Hmmm. Now he's editing at the talk page for the Dreamcast too. That's strike two as far as editing at Jak's articles. Sergecross73   msg me   17:50, 23 March 2014 (UTC)


 * And he's back. It was such a nice little holiday. Indrian (talk) 15:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I saw that too. Judging by his edits, he apparently is at least reading over WP:BASC. Good luck with with an SPI log like his. Sergecross73   msg me   16:15, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Arbitrary break
It's happening again....TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 17:41, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Lets keep an eye on these. I do agree that it does appear to be more of the defense of the poorer selling systems stuff going on here. Sergecross73   msg me   17:55, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * And again.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 18:01, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * And again.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 18:12, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Ah, now everything makes complete and total sense. That still is no ground to randomly start fights in my thread though serge. I probably should not have gotten mad tho so I have partial blame. Now I got to clean everything. SuperGangsterRapper95868686 (talk) 18:23, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I didn't start a fight, I merely pointed out how similar your comments were to the last 15 sockpuppets on that same talk page. Then you went off the handle. Sergecross73   msg me   18:44, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

I though you were. Mostly because of your first comment, I was not aware of anything so I figured you were derailing my thread. I suppose I owe you a small apology then. SuperGangsterRapper95868686 (talk) 18:50, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I believe between the personal attacks, the similar behavior patters, and similar editing patterns there is enough here for you to act per WP:DUCK. Why don't we go ahead and put this one out of its misery? Indrian (talk) 19:22, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Agreed. He's editing the same articles, making the same arguments, and now discussing quite aggressively. All Jak traits. Not blocking the other names yet, but I am protecting the relevant Sega articles. Sergecross73   msg me   20:10, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * (EC) SuperGangster's rant at North American video game crash has devolved into sheer raving incoherence and vitriolic personal attacks. It's striking that this supposedly new user already "needs a break from you people".TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 20:13, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yeah, its pretty ridiculous how quickly he tends to break character. Definitely another sock. Blocked. Sergecross73   msg me   20:18, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

So now BustaBunny is at the Intellivision article talk page. Another Jak landmark... Sergecross73  msg me   23:31, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I wasn't aware of this "Arb. break" until shortly after BustaBunny notified me of his edits to Q*bert and Talk:Q*bert which seemed okay. Mr* | (60nna)  23:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I've started an WP:AN/I thread about Jakandsig's sockpuppets here. Mr* | (60nna)  00:22, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Ugh, I'd rather not drag this through the pits of ANI. It'll just lead to more drama. I'm content with monitoring/protecting/blocking. Not sure ANI can offer us anything better.... Sergecross73   msg me   00:59, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * BustaBunny is now openly threatening to vandalize even non-gaming articles if he cannot get his way.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 02:33, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Mark Miller is aware of the disruptive edits of Jakandsig's sockpuppets (including BustaBunny). Were this sockpuppetry to continue with no easy end, then I can say Jakandsig is one of the worst sockpuppeteers ever. Mr* | (60nna)  02:38, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Blocked per WP:DUCK, closed per WP:DENY. He's awful, but lets try to DENY him the recognition. Sergecross73   msg me   02:41, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I agree. Mr* | (60nna)  02:43, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I consider this new account to be highly suspicious.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 19:58, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
 * And this one, too.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 21:55, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yeah, both aren't as bad as most of the instant-block socks, but should probably keep an eye on them. (Coincidence that he's arguing against GameRankings a week after I was involved in defending it? Not sure...) Sergecross73   msg me   23:41, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I thought he was doing it because of the GameRankings links I just added to Sega Saturn. (It's not as though GR is a perfect source, but I'd like to see him propose a superior version of "Game library" rather than just complaining about the fact that it's hard to find sources about old Saturn games.)TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 23:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Today, I reverted some of the edits by inactive/blocked Jak sockpuppets, include one on Mega Man X4. Mr* | (60nna)  23:41, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * And I discovered [this apparent Jak sockpuppet] with almost the exact same name as "Jakandsig", just add a "z" to the end. Mr* | (60nna)  23:44, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * In addition to switching to an IP at Sega Saturn's talk page, it seems likely that Jak has created this new account to defend the honor of the Atari Jaguar. It's a very "Jak" account name, although there haven't been any Jak/Afroman-style meltdowns just yet.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 05:28, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

I think I'm content to just start ignoring his new names who pose complaints on talk pages, as long as the article is protected. Other people can look into his constant POV questioning (or he can just be ignored.) As far as Afroman goes, I'm ready to block him. The irate rant and random logging out is enough to convince me, unless anyone objects. Anyone? Sergecross73  msg me   13:38, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I recommend you block AfroMan, then block this IP. Mr* | (60nna)  22:03, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I can't say I would object, because I have no doubts that he is a sockpuppet, but Afroman has demonstrated that he can be a constructive editor.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 20:28, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * CrimeInvestigation&Patrol reverted my edit of Quake (video game) because it had "influenced by" in it. I added back "Initially", replacing "At the start". I assume he is a Jak sockpuppet, considering his username. }I Mr* &#124; (60nna) I{ 21:24, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I think his username meant "to look at and crack down edits deemed unfair." }I Mr* &#124; (60nna) I{ 21:30, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Now he reverted your most recent edit of Rune Factory 4, which I reverted twice. }I Mr* &#124; (60nna) I{ 21:38, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi there! Wanted to clear up some things in case there was any confusion, especially for Mr.Change.
 * Your edit in Quake damaged part of the paragraph and made it read like "influenced by who wields a giant hammer" which is a broken sentence.
 * You and this users edit in Rune Factory 4 do not contain a source that proves the European version was cancelled, or the dates of that supposed cancellation. If you have a source, simply add it in and restore. I tried looking for one for both of you, but was not able to find a reliable source to edit in.
 * Let me know if you have any more questions. CrimeInvestigation&#38;Patrol (talk) 21:49, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you for putting in a reliable source. CrimeInvestigation&#38;Patrol (talk) 21:52, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Finally, he's actually improving. }I Mr* &#124; (60nna) I{ 21:54, 5 April 2014 (UTC)


 * While I will admit that it is the responsibility of the ones challenged to provide a source, at the same time,, you really should try doing a simple google search rather than challenging it so aggressively. This was a widely reported thing, a few seconds at Google would have cleared this up for you pretty easily. Sergecross73   msg me   21:59, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * AfroMan, like CrimeInvestigation&Patrol, was better than Jakandsig, but he had problems as well. }I Mr* &#124; (60nna) I{ 22:04, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * You're partially right, I only went with one quick search on Bing, and looking back, I probably did not put in the right wording and did not get accurate results. Just "European Rune Factory 4" alone would have given me the correct results. I will be sure to take more time when searching for a source in the future. But luckily, it's all taken care of now.
 * Mr.Change, thanks again for finding that reference. But be careful with your edits so they don't end up like the Quake Article. CrimeInvestigation&#38;Patrol (talk) 22:11, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

If we truly believe they are Jak, then policy says they should be blocked per WP:BLOCKEVASION. There is WP:OFFER, he's nowhere near any of the criteria right now. Sergecross73  msg me   22:09, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * No matter whatever they do, it's obvious that despite some good constructive edits, CrimeInvestigation&Patrol and AfroMan must be blocked because they're Jakandsig sockpuppets sharing Jak's traits like aggression. }I Mr* &#124; (60nna) I{ 22:14, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I am disappointed that even when we attempt to engage Afroman, Jak still feels the need to use alternate accounts/IPs.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 04:19, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I must applaud Mr.Changes flawless logic of me being a sockpuppet because I corrected an edit of his that broke a page (happens all the time looking around many articles, even I did it once). Judging from the above comment no one checked up on that. Which may explain why my Gears of War edit was also reverted without anyone checking the actual link. Come on guys, let's put in a bit more effort in what we're doing instead of taking actions without actually doing fact checks. CrimeInvestigation&#38;Patrol (talk) 18:33, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Says the person who couldn't perform a simple Google search to find out Rune Factory 4 was cancelled in Europe? Taking your lecturing on "putting forth more effort" somewhere else, Mr. "Two-days-of-editing". Sergecross73   msg me   18:42, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Comparing me using Bing with the wrong words quickly, to you not looking at the sources that Wikipedia needs to be accurate for reliability is not a comparison one can actually make. What's even stranger is you act like new users can't use that big help button on the left side of the site and read all the rules and such before posting, so I am not sure why you came to the conclusion I was giving you a lecture like you were new/under me thus the 2 day comment.
 * I wanted to point out that It is important for people to look at the references they are reverting, because references are very important and need to be accurate or an article is pretty much trash. See WP:REF, WP:CITE, and WP:INCITE. You seem to be heated right now looking at your recent edits so I'll just wait for you to be less combative. Let us be more neutral.. CrimeInvestigation&#38;Patrol (talk) 19:03, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Its also up to you to explain your edits. You still haven't explained why you're changing the source, you just keep vague referring to it being "better" and instructing others to research it themselves. Say it yourself if you want the change to stick. Sergecross73   msg me   19:20, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Sergecross73, can you please block indefinitely both CrimeInvestigation&Patrol and TheRealAfroMan so that those two Jak sockpuppets don't bother us anymore? }I Mr* &#124; (60nna) I{ 23:11, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I've been debating what to do here, on whether or not it's easier to babysit Jak with new names all the time, or with the same name. Still not sure. I'll tell you what though: if you file another Jak SPI, and it comes back "likely/confirmed", I'll block them in a second. Sergecross73   msg me   23:16, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Regardless of the nonsense in this conversation about me. I believe when a user straight up lies in an edit summary it's your job to do something. Saturn article is what I am referring to. Apparently I "added" source to troll everyone. I had no idea that I add things but removing it. interesting.

BTW I agree with the above action, which looking it up, may get Mr.Slowga off my back and resolve a few other problems. TheRealAfroMan (talk) 23:33, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Arbitrary break 2
I've started another SPI. Please give input,, , , and/or anyone who's a talk page stalker who has any relevant input. Thanks. Sergecross73  msg me   01:59, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't want to show bad faith, but I think this recently created account should at least be added to the current SPI just in case. 91.184.0.80 (talk) 19:01, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Here's another account that is much more suspicious, editing the Atari 5200 article that was last edited by John Mayor ERS. He also contributed to the N-gage article that contained edits by both Golden Cog and KombatPolice. I would suggest you add this user to the the SPI log as well. 91.184.0.80 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 19:24, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Probably good to keep an eye on, but its too early to add to the SPI report yet. Neither is spending much time on obscure video game articles or POV pushing really. Sergecross73   msg me   19:38, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Agreed, but I would keep a good eye on RedAnt though. 91.184.0.80 (talk) 19:51, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

You should take a look at this IP. He's rapidly reverting Gonna's edits on multiple articles. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 15:55, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * There's nothing to take a look at, I follow this talk page like you do. He knows he can't just revert users that are not confirmed socks because he wants to. The two accounts are not even on the SPI list. I pinged him on the SPI and told him to post any evidence he had found to Sergecross. 178.254.12.221 (talk) 16:06, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Can you please semi-protect Banjo-Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts, because there's an edit war done by JakIIDax against me over the article. }I Mr* &#124; (60nna) I{ 18:51, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I also want that article semi-protected indefinitely because it was edited by a Jak sockpuppet. }I Mr* &#124;.. (60nna) I{ 18:53, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Can you block JakIIDax please because he is disrespectful toward me. }I Mr* &#124; (60nna) I{ 18:57, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Jak is back, editing Sega consoles and returning to one of his earliest loves, Asteroids.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 00:32, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Blocked, along with everyone else at the latest SPI, as far as I can tell. Keep me posted when you find more. Sergecross73   msg me   00:36, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
 * This old suspected Jak sock, inactive for a month, suddenly reappeared less than an hour after Newjeanspotatoe was blocked.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 02:52, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Reverted Wonderworldamusementpark's edit on Dreamcast. }I Mr* &#124; (60nna) I{ 02:57, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Here's the latest Jak attack.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 17:25, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I apologize for not acting on this one. Sorry, I've been short on WP time lately. SPI could be a good venue, since the accounts don't appear to be at the aggressive/confrontational stage yet... Sergecross73   msg me   23:18, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Aaaannnd the socks I listed were all confirmed. Gee whiz, what a surprise!TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 18:14, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it really looks like that "Go ahead and send me to SPI, it'll clear my name" approach Jak uses is pretty much another sign that its Jak. Using the same, weak bluff all the time, and it never works. Go figure. Sergecross73   msg me   14:05, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Arbitrary break 3
Here's another possible sockpuppet. XXX8906 (talk) 11:58, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Not sure if it's a sock or just someone who really struggle with grammar and writing sentences, but I'll keep an eye on it either way. Sergecross73   msg me   14:14, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The person is actually becoming a bit of a problem on both the Mario and Luigi articles... --ThomasO1989 (talk) 05:11, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Left him a warning. Keep me posted... Sergecross73   msg me   10:32, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Here's two possible IP sockpuppets: . The geolocate information for both IPs show the same city, as well as similar latitude and longitude.
 * Nothing too bad yet, but keep me posted. If it persists I can protect the page again... Sergecross73   msg me  16:23, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I just wanted to point out that XXX8906 got a little overzealous on this one. The doteaters site was actually completely redone at some point and all the links changed, so our link to the crash article no longer worked properly.  The anon was just fixing the link to point to the proper place. Indrian (talk) 16:59, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Gotcha, good to know. Thanks. Sergecross73   msg me  17:00, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I suspect this user of being another possible sockpuppet. XXX8906 (talk) 14:00, 1 July 2014 (UTC)