User talk:ShakespeareFan00/Sfan00 IMG/Archive 22

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Tbl.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Tbl.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 20:45, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Good work!
I appreciate all the good work you do here on Wikipedia! Thanks for working on the Hugh Kirkaldy photo (with the recommendation to move to Commons) and your attention to details with regard to other photos I've recently uploaded. Don't retire just yet! You're an important part of the fabric that makes Wikipedia work so well. Ignore the politics that sometimes can creep in and make things difficult. --EditorExtraordinaire (talk) 01:21, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

b.good logo
Hi, I noticed that you put a wrong tag notice on that I uploaded, however I'm not sure why it is not a non-free image. I'm new to uploading files to Wikipedia, so I'm just looking for some help with it. Thanks. Cepiolot (talk) 02:00, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Japanese gate and garden at Boston Museum of Fine Arts - August 15, 2015.jpg
Hi - I just wanted to let you know that I responded to your potential copyright concern on page. I wasn't sure if you would see my comment there automatically. Also, I see that you are one of the 400 most active Wikipedians of all time. As a new-ish user of and contributor to Wikipedia, I certainly hope that you don't retire. Wikipedia needs people like you, even if sometimes your enforcement of rules means that photos like mine don't get posted. Msact (talk) 23:10, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Question about OTRS
In regards to the Kay Schanllenkamp file: How do I know if an OTRS ticket was sent in for the photo? I sent an email to the webmaster at Emporia State, but I'm unsure if I was able to get permission for it? Do I ask the OTRS team if they've gotten an email for it, or just wait? Thanks, Corkythe   hornetfan  20:52, 24 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Wait a fey days, then chase... have retagged as OTRS-PendingSfan00 IMG (talk) 20:53, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Corkythe   hornetfan  20:54, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Chokma sign
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Chokma_sign.jpg I took this picture. There is nothing like it on the web, because I took it. I literally just got back from Oklahoma, with many pictures like it. Why did you mark it as "possibly unfree" when I took it, as is required for a free work? Neddy1234 (talk) 12:31, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Lieutenant Governor's Aide de camp insignia for BC Québec and NB.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lieutenant Governor's Aide de camp insignia for BC Québec and NB.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:29, 22 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Hello, I have now just notice your concerns about the images of the Shoulder Boards that I had placed on the Aide de camp page. Back in 2013, I had added the following image on the page File:Lieutenant Governor Québec A de C insignia.jpg because it is a photograph of my own shoulder board as a lieutenant of the Royal Canadian Navy with an appointment as an honorary Aide de camp to the Lieutenant-Governor of Québec. Afterwards, a friend who is an honorary Aide de camp to the Lieutenant Governor of New Brunswick allowed me to have a photograph of his shoulder board with his insignia File:AdeC insignias Lieutenant Governors of New Brunswick and Québec.png. Finally, this summer, I meet an Aide de camp to the Lieutenant Governor of British Columbia and took a photograph of his shoulder board to make the current image for Wikipedia. I would like to be able to add an image of every Aide de camp insignia of Canada on the Wikipedia page, by actually meeting people who are aides de camp.

Therefore, if you are able to help me with the licensing of my photograph, please do, because I do not understand why this would not be correct, however there were never any issues with the last two.

Thank you kindly and good day, Ctjj.stevenson (talk) 15:25, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Dear Sir,

what extra information I have to provide to show that I am the owner / creator of the image, which I have taken from my mobile. Photo is of my book. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pradeepabk (talk • contribs) 09:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Good day,

I have noticed that my photo was deleted today. I had added information that I had taken these photographs by current aides de camp to the Lieutenant Governors of Québec, British Columbia and New Brunswick. Myself as an Aide de camp to the Lieutenant Governor of Québec took a picture of my own shoulder board. The photograph of the shoulder board of the Aide de camp of the Lieutenant Governor of New Brunswick was taken by a friend who is an Aide de camp in NB last year. The Shoulder Board of the Aide de camp of British Columbia was taken last August, on the uniform of an Aide de camp to the Lieutenant Governor of BC, while I was serving in that province this summer.

Therefore, once again, I do not understand why, seeing that the first photograph was taken in 2013, and I modified them to add more information on Wikipedia. that you had deleted my photograph.

Have a good day Ctjj.stevenson (talk) 21:04, 4 September 2015 (UTC)


 * You should address your concerns to the deleting admin.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:34, 4 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Are you able to inform me who the deleting admin is? I reposed my original photograph, because once again, I am offering my work to Wikipedia for free. I have taken time to help Wikipedia have these images because I believe that it is important.

Good day. Ctjj.stevenson (talk) 19:18, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Certainly User:Diannaa - Contact them here - User talk: Diannaa Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:21, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

PUF
Hello. This is a courtesy notice to inform you that I have sent two files, File:Paseka Sekese from Bidvest Wits F.C..JPG and File:Team from Thabong in yellow and gold kit.jpeg, which you flagged as Copy to Commons, to WP:PUF. Thanks, BethNaught (talk) 09:15, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Esoteric file tagging
Confused by this edit: why tag it with esoteric file? It had originally been so tagged, but afterward someone added it to the Maltego article, so I removed the tag; it's a language-neutral image that would work equally well on any other Wikipedia's article on the software, were such articles to exist. Nyttend (talk) 15:42, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of List of fictional railway stations for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of fictional railway stations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of fictional railway stations until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:57, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Scots School Albury Frontgate.jpg speedy deletion
200px Will this image be deleted?


 * I can't say, it's at PUF. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:22, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Tallgrass TG-2020 disk-tape.jpg
Thanks for the warning. I posted more details on the file:talk page, but I'm not sure where to go from here.Servolock (talk) 00:18, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Joshua Sullivan's Avatar.jpg
thumb|left|80px I'm not sure why you want this photo transfered to the Commons. It's entirely out of scope. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 04:17, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Re your nominations for deletion after my file moves
Per WP:FILEMOVE, In most cases a file redirect should be left on the original page, except if the original name falls under one of the revision deletion criteria (purely disruptive, grossly insulting, privacy breaching, etc.). BethNaught (talk) 13:11, 6 September 2015 (UTC)


 * OK, Sorry. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:12, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Re Deleted Robert Edward Weaver images
Thanks for your watch dogging of my page that I have created for my late father Robert Edward Weaver (REW). As one of his heirs, my brother being the other heir, I am merely wanting to offer interested parties a correct resource for information on REW. All images are from our family archives and created by me personally. Texts are from my mother's unpublished biography of REW. All the images of the work of REW are owned by myself and my brother. Please inform me on what steps I can take to have the images reinstated to the REW page. Your assistance is greatly appreciated. Best Regards, Markbone1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markbone1 (talk • contribs) 19:26, 7 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Follow the process, detailed in the pages I left on your talk page, or outline what you did above the the "adminstrator" that did the actual deletion... Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:03, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Why are you marking my images for deletion?
I uploaded and I am the copyright holder myself, and specified all of the correct attributes for both of those images:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:FFX_screenshot_from_Play!1.jpg

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Screenshot_of_FFX_on_Play!2.jpg

I have no idea what you want by asking me for permission of my own uploaded and own created content, but I can't comply if you don't clearly tell me what I did wrong in giving the images a re-usable license. You are being ridiculous. What "evidence of permission" do you want?

Other than the fact that I made the images myself and uploaded them here and absolutely nowhere else and gave them the appropriate license, I can't give any more permission/validation than what there is now, under free-use and original content distribution. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BirthOfJesus (talk • contribs) 20:44, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Did you write the software? If, as I suspect you didn't, then you don't own the copyright to the software. Making a screenshot constitutes a derivative work of the software and to distribute those screenshots you need a suitable license from the software's copyright holder. BethNaught (talk) 20:54, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * How then, do you correctly upload an image of a screenshot? Catmando999   Check out his talk page!  22:48, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Hurtworld Logo, Hammer and Text
You said the tag can only be removed when the discussion is closed; How does a discussion op about unfree files close? Catmando999  Check out his talk page!  22:45, 10 September 2015 (UTC)


 * An admin reviews it after the 14 days are up.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:58, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Goodall Cup Replica Cup 2014.png
This image is 100% my image. I took this image myself with my camera and edited it later, myself. Not only that, I am also a member of the media team for the hockey team that won the cup in the year this image was taken and provide media for this hockey league. My wish, as I am the copyright owner of this image, is that it is freely available. I thank you in advance for removing your allegation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orion 2012 (talk • contribs) 01:30, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Also you may wish to read the following:

Artistic craftsmanship

"If a work is not a sculpture, it may still qualify for copyright protection as a work of artistic craftsmanship. The types of product that may fall into this category include "handicrafted jewellery tiles, pots, stained-glass windows, wrought-iron gates, hand-knitted jumpers, and crocheted doilies" (Bentley and Sherman summarising the case law in Intellectual Property Law (Second Edition) p74)."

"Unlike most types of copyright works, the courts must adjudge a product as "artistic" before awarding protection under this heading."

"In the most influential case on the question, Henscher v Restawile Upholstery, a prototype of a chair was found not to be artistic, and was therefore unworthy of protection. However, different judges have different views about what is or is not artistic, and the cases following Henscher are not always helpful."

So the onus is upon you to determine whether a sports trophy that belongs to a league that I provide media for would be classified under "Artistic craftsmanship" and furthermore a court would adjudge this sports trophy "artistic" (which is required before awarding any separate protection). Then and only then can you accurately make your allegation, until then you haven't any premise to make such allegation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orion 2012 (talk • contribs) 02:33, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * If the uploader takes this as an accusation, I don't know what you can/should do to avoid accusing him; it's either that or a full-scale FFD, and isn't PUF meant to be somewhat less formal and somewhat less threatening? Nyttend (talk) 12:18, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Alby Carr 1925.jpg
Thank you for your concern withFile:Alby Carr 1925.jpg. The crop is my own work. The source of the original shot is - http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/nrl/ten-of-the-greatest-seasons-in-rugby-league-history-according-to-historian-david-middleton/story-fni3fbgz-1226729899765

The author is unknown. But regardless of the source or the author, the original is unquestionably in the public domain since having been first published in Australia before 1955, the work has now entered the public domain. The Aust PD rationale is valid.- Sticks  66  14:22, 14 September 2015 (UTC)


 * can you take a look over you other contributions and add information, Also it would be hlpeful if you could add the approximate date of the originals as well the upload?crop. Thanks Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:24, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Better source request for File:CyrilTowers.jpg

 * Here's the source for the Towers shot . I have added attached the source data attached to the image file. I stand by the PD Aus permission, as the photograph was taken in Australia before 1955.-12:42, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Tommy Lawton v England Twickenham 1928-1.jpg

 * Here's the source for the Davis' shot of Lawton in action at Twickenham. I have attached same to the image file. I have amended the PD rationale to a UK PD rationale since the image was taken at Twickenham when Davis accompanied the Waratahs on the 1928 tour. John Corbett Davis died in 1941, we are now 70 years plus since then. -  Sticks  66  12:51, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Renaming
Hi. Since you also have the filemover flag on your account, would you mind doing some renaming yourself as well? As you know, there is currently quite a heavy backlog after your clearing of the shadow category (thanks for doing that, btw). Widr (talk) 19:54, 18 September 2015 (UTC)


 * No worries, will look into it.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:59, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Honorifics in lists of politicians
Hi Sfan00 IMG. Since you've edited one or more of List of current members of the British Privy Council, British Government frontbench and Official Opposition frontbench in the last six months, I'd like to invite you to a discussion about the use of honorifics in those lists. The discussion is happening here, and I look forward to a helpful and robust discussion. DBD 20:58, 18 September 2015 (UTC)


 * I only really do images, and don't recall editing this article recently..Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:02, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of Gillette Stadium 05.jpg photo after Sept. 21, 2015
Hi. I delete the photo of Gillette Stadium 05.jpg because it is very difficult to understand. You may upload a new photo of this file. Thank you. Giocaringal6 (talk) 22:58, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

can you find this user?
File:Hampden.jpg Mike-tango This is the person who uploaded the plane photo. Somehow it was redirected to an actor's photo which I'm now trying to untangle and put back on his article. We hope (talk) 20:32, 19 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Check the move log. There's an effort to remove Commons eclipsing... which is what's happened here.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:33, 19 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Which article? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:35, 19 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Now I see--I was trying to get the actor away from the plane and until now, thought I had succeeded. Walter Hampden We hope (talk) 20:39, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Alf O'Connor 1925.jpg
Can you recall the source? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:51, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Source added - Sticks  66  09:45, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Arthur Patton 1947.jpg
Given URAA this one is technically non-free. Can you add a fair use rationale ( clearly meets criteria as Biogrpahical image).Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:55, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Sfan can you direct me to a template for a robust fair use rationale that works for the kind of images I upload (Australian sportsmen)- Sticks  66  09:54, 20 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Added NFUR. That's basicly what you need to say. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:17, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Question
Hi, I just uploaded a picture and added the necessary info, but for some reason I still get the message I haven't described the article name, purpose or anything else. On closer inspection it turns out that I may have written it in the wrong column, but I can't get it in there no matter what I try. Any idea what went wrong? See, here:. Many thanks already. - User:Kjell Knudde, 7:56, 21 September 2015 (CET).

FNC#9
When you nominate a file tagged with ShadowsCommons for renaming, please check it actually shadows Commons first. Thanks, BethNaught (talk) 21:21, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Similarly, please check that your proposed name does not already exist on Commons (e.g. ). Thanks, BethNaught (talk) 11:22, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Special:Diff/682599723
What's the point in renaming a file which has been tagged with {{subst:ncd}}? --Stefan2 (talk) 21:08, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that. There isn't. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:09, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note that it may be more time-efficient to start with files whose names begin with A, B, C and D as there should be fewer deletion tags in that part of the alphabet. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:32, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Badge of the JDF
2 things here, one if you tag an image please be sure to notify the uploader as a courteously, so they can participate in the discussion. Secondly can you clarify the licsencing problem on the image in question - Thank You FOX 52 (talk) 04:58, 26 September 2015 (UTC)


 * This one had been tagged as a wrong license, because Fry thought it was acceptable for commons, suggesting that it was in fact a free image (possibly an expired crown copyright), whereas the actual license shown was non-free.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 07:25, 26 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Ok Thanks FOX 52 (talk) 16:10, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Booth,-Bill-after-trandem-photoby-NancyDwyer.jpg
I don't understand why a tag was placed on this image. It looks fine (not corrupted) to me. Can you explain? Rklawton (talk) 15:53, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

ISIS style crisis!!
Hi Sfan, forgive me writing to you, but I think this is a battle worth noting you of. Some folk want to delete two useful, I think, articles of mine. Salis-Soglio, and Salis-Seewis. Rodolph (talk) 19:11, 28 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Have you tried looking for confirmatry sources in the older copy of Burkes someone put on Wikisource?

I tend not to get involved with article content issues, but on the first one you mentioned, it's at present mostly a stub with a gallery. The gallery portion should be on Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:56, 28 September 2015 (UTC)


 * In respct of the section "Royal Licence granted to the 4th Count on 4 April 1809, reiterating in English the 1748 Imperial patent" - This is a source text and should be included only by reference (I'm not sure when crown copyright on a document like that would expire.) but as a primary text, it shouldn't be directly in article.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:00, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Zachary Comment: #images
I made the envelope myself about a few years ago. I added it to my User Homepage under comments — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki Zachary (talk • contribs) 14:33, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

File redirects
You nominated a number of file redirects for uncontroversial deletion, e.g. File:...And So It Goes.jpg.

However,, doesn't agree. Can you to work out whether these types of redirects should be deleted or retained. If they should be retained I'll restore the ones I deleted.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  16:39, 1 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Just restore them, I am not going to argue with Stefan2/4 Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:41, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Break
Could it be that you are overreacting just a little bit? I hope you return to do your good work soon. Widr (talk) 18:34, 1 October 2015 (UTC)


 * "Breaking stuff" demands an over-reaction. See previous item, and the comments Stefan2/4 left elsewhere. :( Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:35, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, I did, but it's not that bad or something that would be irreversible. Widr (talk) 18:41, 1 October 2015 (UTC)


 * I think that you are over-reacting. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:14, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but I have high standards. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:15, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Your input in the WP:AN thread appreciated.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:16, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Special:Diff/683670873
What is it that you need? A list of Wikipedia file names which are almost identical to Commons file names? I am slowly going through the ones where the file names are completely identical, which is why CAT:SHADOW is increasing in size. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:36, 1 October 2015 (UTC)


 * What I was wanting was the report I mention to ignore the Redirects, usually because the file concerned has already been renamed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:47, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:EPAM logo.png
A tag has been placed on File:EPAM logo.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BethNaught (talk) 15:23, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:24, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Is it me or can some Wiki delete teams neither count nor read?
Hi dear Sfan, this was deleted recently? I can't for the life of me see why? Can you? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Rodolph_Fane_De_Salis_(1854-1931),_a_photo_of_George_Spencer-Watson%27s_1920%27s_portrait.jpg#Summary Rodolph (talk) 22:56, 3 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately Stefan2 is being on the over cautious side. and sadly an image after 1923 without a clear date can't be conisdered free in the US. Take it a deletion review, as I think you have a good reason for getting this reinstated. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:03, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
 * thank you. (In this case he artist died over 80 years ago, so de-facto, the work has to be certainly defined by that death date, or do Americans believe in posthumous painting?)Rodolph (talk) 10:21, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
 * User:Rodolph: The problem is that the copyright term in the United States is different. For British works published before 1923, it's 75 years from publication. For British works published later, it's normally 95 years from publication. The death year is only relevant in a small number of cases, mainly if the work was first published after 1977. See the long reply I wrote to your message on my talk page. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:51, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
 * thank you very much for your tireless dedication and answer here and on my talk page.Rodolph (talk) 11:04, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Deletion requests on Commons
Please don't propose files for renaming per WP:FNC and please don't nominate redirects for speedy deletion when the file on Commons has been nominated for deletion. The conflict will usually be automatically resolved once the file has been deleted on Commons. Your tagging just causes extra unnecessary work and extra unnecessary moves on enwiki. I have specifically skipped all such files when adding ShadowsCommons to files on Wikipedia. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:53, 4 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the advice, do you have a query that will detail the ones nominated for deletion at Commons? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:55, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Trying to get a list of those. I'm waiting to see the result of query/5509. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:18, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Got a list of those with ShadowsCommons here and a deletion tag on Commons. Did you tag any with "rename media" without adding ShadowsCommons? --Stefan2 (talk) 21:43, 4 October 2015 (UTC)


 * And in reviewing I caught something on Commons that I didn't like the look of.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:20, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Hm? --Stefan2 (talk) 21:46, 4 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Also, do you think that we should rename File:Zachariadis.jpg anyway, but per WP:FNC? --Stefan2 (talk) 21:46, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Possibly, I leave it to your discretion, but I feel that as the new title makes it easier for users to find specific people, I would say yes. I've tried to follow the same convention on other name collisions of deceased persons, for live ones I've tended to put the occupation or notable profession. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:51, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of Nuvvila and Nachavule Images
Hi Sir, Sfan00 IMG my images Nachavule and Nuvvila which were updated on their respective movie pages were removed and are contested for speedy deletion. I don't understand why... the images are non-free content but purely are low resolution files which are used for visual identification purposes only. Right now the pages have different images, which have a huge watermark and are difficult to identify the poster.

Thank you

{{flatlist
You have introduced the wikicode {{flatlist in several FUR templates. The wikicode is broken, so the FUR template doesn't work, and the broken code needs to be removed. Try to see if you can avoid this in the future. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:52, 6 October 2015 (UTC)


 * I don't understand how this happened? Do you have a fuller list of problem edits? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:31, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I found three when going through my watchlist and then tried searching but didn't find any additional errors, but there could be an error in the query. I'll see if I find anything else when going through other entries on my watchlist. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:23, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Question on speedy deletion


Hi Sfan00_IMG

It appears you've tagged a photo I uploaded in 2006 for speedy deletion (See ).

I doubt that photo meets the criteria for speedy as it is not corrupted or empty (see inset photo), has clear provenance and is properly licensed (I took the picture myself and placed it in the public domain in 2006), is not orphaned (used in 9 English Wiki articles and is used in 4 other language articles), & is not identical (or redundant) to other photos in Wikimedia.

Of course the rules have migrated substantially since 2006, so I have things to learn. Could you advise me (my talk page please) why you have a concern about this photo?

Thanks - Williamborg (Bill) 20:21, 7 October 2015 (UTC)


 * It maybe because it was on Commons, and the local description page was thus unnecessary. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:32, 7 October 2015 (UTC)


 * After understanding that you're deleting the En.Wiki version, but not the common version, you have my support. Thanks for the response. - Williamborg (Bill) 23:57, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is IPs substituting file deletion templates. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:12, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I think that you are one of the users who have been reverting these inappropriate substitutions, so maybe you wish to comment at ANI. You have not done anything wrong, of course. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:13, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Just double checking
Hi Stan, thank you for noting missing source material on these two photos: Docks Sprotyak II used in 1963 GRCA photo number 7420816154.JPG and ESMERALDA II 1949 and 1950 GRCA photo number 7420750592.JPG

I have added National Park Service web links for those photos as sources. Does that take care of this? Thank you for your WIKI service sorting all this out. Yours, Tom RRFWTommartin (talk) 14:38, 9 October 2015 (UTC)


 * That works for me, Don't forget to have another look at the sourcing on you other uploads :) I'm udating a few right now :)Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:39, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 9 October
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * On the File:Habitat for Humanity Houses Built 2015.png page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=684926816 your edit] caused a cite error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F684926816%7CFile:Habitat for Humanity Houses Built 2015.png%5D%5D Ask for help])

File source problem with File:Mamiya500DTL.jpg
File:Mamiya500DTL.jpg

Sorry, my english is very poor.

I edited the image description page, and added the needed information.

Thanks!

Ale... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Piero71 (talk • contribs) 03:11, 10 October 2015 (UTC)