User talk:Soman/Archives/2017/September

WikiCup 2017 September newsletter
Round 4 of the WikiCup has ended and we move forward into the final round. In round 4, a total of 12 FAs, 3 FLs, 44 GAs, 3 FLs, 79 DYKs, 1 ITN and 42 GARs was achieved, with no FPs or FTs this time. Congratulations to Peacemaker67 on the Royal Yugoslav Navy Good Topic of 36 items, and the 12 featured articles achieved by Cas Liber (5), Vanamonde93 (3), Peacemaker67 (2), Adityavagarwal (1) and 12george1 (1). With a FA scoring 200 points, and bonus points available on top of this, FAs are likely to feature heavily in the final round. Meanwhile Yellow Evan, a typhoon specialist, was contributing 12 DYKs and 10 GAs, while Adityavagarwal and Freikorp topped the GAR list with 8 reviews each. As we enter the final round, we are down to eight contestants, and we would like to thank those of you who have been eliminated for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. The lowest score needed to reach round 5 was 305, and I think we can expect a highly competitive final round.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best man (or woman) win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 06:26, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Amos Gray
— Maile (talk) 00:04, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 September 2017
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:44, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK
Hello! Your submission of Labor Congress of Liberia at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America1000 15:48, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Umadhar Singh
Hello! Your submission of Umadhar Singh at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:42, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Central Organising Committee, Communist Party of India (Marxist–Leninist)
Alex ShihTalk 00:04, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (CGMI) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating CGMI, Soman!

Wikipedia editor SamHolt6 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Disambiguation page"

To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

SamHolt6 (talk) 21:38, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Labor Congress of Liberia
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

I'm sorry
In retrospect, although I was a bit hurt by your comments, I think my own response was imprudent and probably unnecessary for the purposes of an AfD discussion. You seem to be a devoted and serious editor, and I hope that our first interaction doesn't preclude any cordial cooperation on articles in the future. MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:18, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * No problem, in retrospect I could have worded my comments differently. --Soman (talk) 16:12, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Umadhar Singh
Alex ShihTalk 00:03, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Request quick vote to keep or delete Walter Beer stub
Soman: If you have a moment, could you please take a peek at the bio stub on Walter Beer and then share you vote for or against deletion here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Walter_Beer? While I would prefer you vote to keep the stub, your expertise in Wikipedia far outweighs mine... Gratefully --Aboudaqn (talk) 14:55, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of New Delhi by-election, 1992
Hello! Your submission of New Delhi by-election, 1992 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:04, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 September 2017
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Nagapattinam by-election, 1979
Hello! Your submission of Nagapattinam by-election, 1979 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 06:24, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK for New Delhi by-election, 1992
— Maile (talk) 01:03, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Institute of Party History of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Estonia
Alex ShihTalk 00:48, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion
Hi - what an amazing user page you have!!! Anyway I am working on de-orphaning articles at the moment and I came across one you created in 2005 called Volpianian Independents. The content is minimal, I'm not sure it's notable, and there isn't an independent source. All the best, Mccapra (talk) 16:20, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Samajvadi Kranti Party


A tag has been placed on Samajvadi Kranti Party requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  Dr Strauss   talk   11:32, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Yuzhny Rabochy


A tag has been placed on Yuzhny Rabochy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1903/sep/15a.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Dr Strauss   talk   13:14, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Yuzhny Rabochy


The article Yuzhny Rabochy has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Article is entirely copy-pasted from its main source but is ineligible for G12 as the content is licensed under GNU. However, the group has received little coverage elsewhere with nothing that confers general notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Dr Strauss   talk   13:18, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Yuzhny Rabochy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yuzhny Rabochy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Yuzhny Rabochy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Dr Strauss   talk   18:35, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Samajvadi Kranti Party


The article Samajvadi Kranti Party has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication of notability per WP:GNG or WP:NORG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Dr Strauss   talk   10:06, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Samajvadi Kranti Party for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samajvadi Kranti Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Samajvadi Kranti Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Dr Strauss   talk   14:21, 30 September 2017 (UTC)