User talk:Sulfurboy/Archive 27

Draft UArchitects
Dear Sulferboy,

there where some issues with the commercialparts of the Uarchitects page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:UArchitects I have now deleted the awards section. And i hope that this will resolve the problem. I would like to publish this like this,if you can approve

Greatings

Meimaar.93 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meimaar.93 (talk • contribs) 09:08, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Shantal I/sandbox


Hello, Sulfurboy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 13:28, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Timmcarter/sandbox


Hello, Sulfurboy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 13:31, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

DJ Foxx Tha Roc
There were some issues with the article below https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:DJ_Foxx_Tha_Roc I have made a few edits and put in additional information and would like to request it to be published.

Thanks. Francinelumbala (talk) 13:42, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , You would need to resubmit the article for review. I'm currently not very active due to work restraints and don't have the time to look at it right now. Sulfurboy (talk) 15:22, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Markdelisser/sandbox


Hello, Sulfurboy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:49, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Stefano Mancuso
Hi Sulfurboy,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Stefano_Mancuso has been edited and improved since you've last taken a look for it. I request that you take a look at it and if it looks satisfactory to you, approve it. I've never used the AfC tools myself, so I wouldn't know how to approve the article myself. Sincerely, Ethanbas (talk) 10:41, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , looks like you already did the correct thing in resubmitting it :). I'm currently not active as I work in a field correlated with COVID and basically don't have much of a life right now. As such, I do not have the time to review your page. However, a fellow reviewer will take a look at it in time. Cheersv Sulfurboy (talk) 17:27, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks for the quick reply. Have a good day! Ethanbas (talk) 08:42, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Lawrence Cahoone
As to Draft:Lawrence Cahoone, the source for his presidency is the second source. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 11:03, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Request on 09:05:42, 12 November 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by NaneNeu
I have updated references, parts of the text and added links both under new headline but also within previous text chunks. I have also compared my text with similar posts on Wikipedia to adjust refs but I found that many similar databases do not have references to newspapers either, one example is fighshare. Also observed that our content actually fills gaps in Wikipedia. One exampel is this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_archives Diva is specifically mentioned in this post but it is marked red because there is no entrance in Wikipedia. Yet my article gets refused because DiVA has not been mentioned in a newspaper. The question is why it should? We know that journalists use DiVA to find information about research but why should they write ABOUT DiVA per se. It is a large, trusted and trustworthy source of information in times of fake news and it is handled directly by the universities that do not put a lot of marketing in it, so it is definitely nothing that you write about in a newspaper. Likewise we have millions of downloads also from other people (the public!) but why should they mention it? They use it to find and cite the information but that did apparently not count.

NaneNeu (talk) 09:05, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , Glad to hear about the work that you are putting in. However, please note that due to my job in the healthcare industry my life is pretty much dedicated to COVID stuff and I'm temporarily inactive here. I would recommend asking your questions at WP:TEA Sulfurboy (talk) 14:07, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Help me with page you helped with previously
Hi, I was wondering if you could please have a look at the following article Gabriel Kunda Jr, which you helped with previously, but has been nominated for deletion which is befuddling, when all the references meet the criteria of the article of said individual. Thanks (talk) 14:39, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , I'm going to trust the AfD process to make the correct decision here. Sulfurboy (talk) 14:09, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I went to the link provided in the discussion, to see if the article met the criteria which it did. I previously had added official club websites, and news links that the player recently played for. Making it eligible to remain in wikipedia, but okay thank you for the help previously hope they do.Vivalionel (talk) 16:26, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Article nominated for speedy deletion
Hello Sulfurboy,

I'd like to know if there were any special reasons why my articles got nominated for speedy deletion by you. I made sure not to violate any Wikipedia rules – At least those my eyes caught – and I also duly referenced links to official sites where other articles/resources about my subject are published. Being an experienced hand here, I'd need your assistance to navigate the waters to get my articles maintained on Wikipedia.
 * I don't know who you are (since you're an IP editor) nor do I know which article you're talking about. Also, I haven't nominated any article in over six months, so I'm not sure what you're talking about. Sulfurboy (talk) 18:17, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

New Page Patrol December Newsletter
Hello ,



It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to and  who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to, , and who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.
 * Year in review

has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.
 * Reviewer of the Year

As a special recognition and thank you has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.
 * NPP Technical Achievement Award

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here 18:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Season's Greetings
I wish you a Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays! Starzoner (talk) 17:55, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy Christmas....
Hey Sulfurboy, I know you've been busy with real world stuff for months but I hope you get to relax over the Christmas period and you and your family are keeping happy and healthy. So Happy Christmas and fingers crossed for a great 2021 and giving Covid a good kick in the rear. All the best KylieTastic (talk) 16:58, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * , Your well wishes are too kind :). I hope all the same for you and your loved ones in this crazy year. And yes the end is in sight. My job is directly related to the logistics of the vaccine distribution. The last six months has been a spin up to get ready to send it out. So now that it's finally going out it's just a matter of implementing what we prepared for. I'm actually getting a couple holidays off for once in a looong time and hopefully things will get back to normal for all of us in the coming months. Sulfurboy (talk) 15:21, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

I wish you a prosperous 2021! Starzoner (talk) 15:20, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year!


Empire AS  Talk ! — is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2024 and tomorrow will be . Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive . This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Empire AS  Talk ! 18:00, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Help with Data Science and Predictive Analytics (Book page)
Thanks for your review/comments on Draft:Data Science and Predictive Analytics (book page).

You mentioned that the current page draft does not qualify for a a Wikipedia article because:


 * This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject.

I've reviewed the Wikipedia instructions on Common_sourcing_mistakes_(notability), Notability_(books), and Help:Referencing_for_beginners.

I am just trying to get a confirmation from you, and others, if the following 2 types of criteria are insufficient, per Notability_(books) criteria. Or alternatively, if the current references provided in the Draft:Data Science and Predictive Analytics book page may not be clearly and appropriately stated in the article.


 * Notability_(books) Criterion 1: The book has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself. This can include published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books:
 * Independent scholarly reviews by journal editorial staff (independent of the book publisher or author).
 * International Statistical Institute (ISI) Review.
 * Journal of the American Library Association review.
 * Many dozens of citations in scholarly literature that cites this textbook.
 * Note that the above are not really "just passing mentions". Rather these represent dozens of independent published works that provide deep scholarly reviews the textbook and directly cited the work.


 * Notability_(books) Criterion 4: The book is, or has been, the subject of instruction at two or more schools, colleges, universities or post-graduate programs in any particular country.
 * There are at least 2 universities (UM and UCLA) that offer classes using this textbook.
 * The book is used in at least a dozen libraries.

Many thanks your help with this clarification and for your Wikipedia dedication, in general.

Some references cited above:

99.19.71.139 (talk) 02:05, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * You've linked to four different sources of supporting evidence that aren't available in the draft itself. See the problem? There is also an issue of neutrality, the article comes across as an advert for the book chock full of buzzwords like "hands on experience" or " transdisciplinary graduate-level textbook blends mathematical foundations" sounds like something that was written up by the book's publisher and isn't formal or neutral. An article about a book such as this should explain what it is and why it's notable. It shouldn't be attempting to sell something to the reader. Clean that up and incorporate the above sources and it'll likely be approved on the next go around. Sulfurboy (talk) 02:25, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

-

I understand the reason was due to insufficient notability but I would like to clarify that in my country, said person is a singer-songwriter who has received media coverage from our local media news channel and even overseas news platforms. For Notability (music), I believe said artiste has fulfilled the following:

- Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself

- Has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or television network.

- Has won first, second or third place in a major music competition.

Would like to seek some advice as per, what is wiki's standard of 'notability' since I checked that there are 'less notable' figures being approved so would need some help right here on how you think I could improve on the article. Appreciate your kind assistance.
 * So as part of a temper tantrum over your draft getting rejected, you come onto my talk page and try to throw other random wiki pages under the bus? Let me know how that strategy works for you.Sulfurboy (talk) 06:44, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

What? No so sorry don't get it wrong am not throwing tantrum neither am i trying to throw other pages under the bus. I was being polite no? How does "would like to seek some advice", "how you think I could improve" and "appreciate your kind assistance" sound like throwing a tantrum? But nvm it's ok thank you so much — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThatOddEditor (talk • contribs) 08:23, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Re: Erik_Deutsch
Deutsch plays in the dixie chicks which is a multi award winning band. he spent 4 years with leftover salmon which is certainly at the top of the jam band music scene. i don't see why this doesn't qualify him relating to WP:MUS, WP:MUSIC, WP:BAND Mistephake (talk) 02:30, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Playing in a notable band doesn't makes someone notable. They have to have independent notability. Sulfurboy (talk) 02:31, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

thank you for taking the time to clarify. I would site his albums as a leader (7 mostly indie legit labels) and the articles referencing these releases might be prongs of notability? WP notability states: Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself. Cites 2, 3 (NY Times is not a trivial publication) 3. is Denver post. 8. is a feature article on the artist. 10. is a review in jazz times magazine. I see dozens of pages every day on wikipedia with far less to support reasoning for being accepted. I am relatively new at this so i appreciate the process. Mistephake (talk) 18:16, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Cite 2 isn't about the subject. Cite 3 is a basic quip of an upcoming show and would be considered trivial. Denver post is a solid source, but it's mostly quotes from an interview from the artist and would be considered WP:PRIMARY. The Boulder Weekly article looks to come from what's basically a glorified news blog site, I don't see any indication of editorial oversight that it would show it is WP:RELIABLE. If you see other pages with far less support you're welcome to nominate it, see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Throwing other pages under the bus is a terrible strategy for getting your draft approved. Sulfurboy (talk) 18:24, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

I have updated the article with several new cites (4 & 12) are from a notable nationally recognized magazine and 12 is from the boston globe. the reviews are about this artist and one is a feature article Mistephake (talk) 02:18, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Your advice
Hello and seasonal greetings to you. Can you please take a look at Draft:Damien Echols. It is a properly stated WP:COI contribution. I would like to hear your advice on this. I did a full re-write of a declined version. Do you feel that it should be improved or changed somehow? Thanks! --Bbarmadillo (talk) 13:00, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Regarding the MSIWPARB rejection
Link to the draft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Maritime_Space,_Inland_Waterways_and_Ports_Act_of_the_Republic_of_Bulgaria

Hey! I see that the reason to decline is that there are not enough references? The article is about an act regarding the Bulgarian Maritime Law. I myself am a student in a naval academy in Bulgaria, but I'm an international student -not Bulgarian-, thus my study is in English (and I don't speak Bulgarian fluently). The words on the article were entirly taken from my Maritime Law's book. My Maritime Law's book is an absolutely reliable source. Literally, the ONLY English source on it is from my Maritime Law's book. Unfortunately, since I'm not a Bulgarian speaker and I can't simply translate Bulgarian sources on the MSIWPARB, I can't contribute more on the article. What I could do was that. And that was just enough, since it consisted of founded information. I don't see the point of rejecting it. Is it better to have nothing rather than having those few yet true words on this act?

Kindly, "tsiplikov"
 * You clearly didn't read WP:REFB like was suggested.Sulfurboy (talk) 14:07, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Sai Gon Joint Stock Commercial Bank
Hi Sulfurboy It is a large bank based in Vietnam I would like to update its information from the English version Print here https://vi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ng%C3%A2n_h%C3%A0ng_Th%C6%B0%C6%A1ng_m%E1%BA%A1i_c%E1%BB%95_ph%E1%BA%A7n_S%C3%A0i_G%C3%B2n

Some other banks also update similarly

https://vi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ng%C3%A2n_h%C3%A0ng_th%C6%B0%C6%A1ng_m%E1%BA%A1i_c%E1%BB%95_ph%E1%BA%A7n_%C3%81_Ch%C3%A2u https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asia_Commercial_Bank

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kimsunri (talk • contribs) 02:45, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

My article
nvm. thank you very much for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KidBoots (talk • contribs) 07:58, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Why did you reject my draft
I see no problem with the draft plus you have specified no exact words reason Jacques Faix (talk) 14:57, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Ron Huebner draft - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ron_Huebner
Does the lack of external references for this artist mean that we may never be able to publish an article? This would seem to be a larger problem for individuals such as this who did not have careers significant enough to warrant references in a wide range of external sources.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ron_Huebner — Preceding unsigned comment added by Derzak (talk • contribs) 19:40, 19 January 2021 (UTC) In this instance, to denote notability we have to see third party coverage of the subject. See WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. We do not use WP:PRIMARY sources to establish notability. If there is not significant third party coverage of the subject then they are very likely not notable. Sulfurboy (talk) 22:41, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Data Science and Predictive Analytics (book page)
Thanks for your earlier constructive comments in regard to the Draft:Data_Science_and_Predictive_Analytics book page.

Would you please check if this article revision is responsive to the prior comments and in alignment with Notability_(books)? Are there other specific suggestions you can make to improve the article?

Thank you.

2600:1700:E4C0:8C50:913D:2BF6:D9CA:8ED2 (talk) 03:10, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Done. Thank for implementing the changes and taking the time create an article for Wikipedia. Sulfurboy (talk) 09:39, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:LucidLink
Hi. A couple of days ago you reviewed my article and rejected it. Following all the comments and tips, I edited the article and resubmitted. Not even 1 minute has passed and the article was declined. I can't imagine how it is possible to review an article in a few seconds and evaluate if the changes made were sufficient to allow its publication. While I do agree the initial submission you rejected was not in the encylopedic tone of Wikipedia, I have trouble recognizing what you considered an advertisement in the second submission as I used and followed the example of already published articles. I would appreciate it if I could get a direction what was not in compliance with Wikipedia's rules in the latest submission of the article. Here is the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:LucidLink. I appreciate your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leda Lucid (talk • contribs) 10:30, 22 January 2021 (UTC) −
 * It took less than a minute (actually I'd say less than 15 seconds) because it's a blatant press release and has zero encyclopedic value. And no, I have zero interest in volunteering my time to help you get paid for yours, particularly since you felt the need to come to my talk page with a bad attitude. Sulfurboy (talk) 10:33, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Request on 20:23:13, 24 January 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by BettinaGsott
Hi, thank you so much for taking the time to comment on my article. I need a little more help, and was hoping you could make the time. I wrote about an art piece called the New Horizon E3, and the references I used were too weak. I researched more, and found many more independent sources meeting the criteria (I hope). Before I publish the article, I'd like to ask for help with evaluating the references. Also, I'd love to hear feedback on the article itself, and hear from you if the content and the way it is written meets the standards. Thank you so much Bettina

BettinaGsott (talk) 20:23, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * , Please see WP:REFB and WP:IC. If you put in the time and effort to properly format the references on your draft, I will be happy to review it. Sulfurboy (talk) 20:52, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Help with my article
Thanks alot for reviewing my article and highlighting the problem with its citation. Is it possible I can use more of your kind help on this? Rayani (talk) 11:24, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Sulfurboy, you helped me once before move my page to the correct place. I tried to do it myself this time and definitely messed up. Can you please help me move this page to the correct place it should be to be reviewed as an article for creation? I can tell I messed something up because it does not say Draft: Carolyn Pokorny. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Dblu9494/sandbox Thank you for all of your help! Dblu9494 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 20:19, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * , Looks like someone has fixed. Sulfurboy (talk) 20:21, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Wow, Wikipedia is a great place! Thank you so much for all your help anyway, it's much appreciated. Have a great day! Dblu9494 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 20:22, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Sulfurboy, I'm so sorry to keep bothering you. I am trying to submit the page to be reviewed for articles for creation, but I think I just accidentally published the page myself? Am I even able to do that? Please help me I'm so sorry. Can you please help me get the page to the right place? Appreciate all of your help on this! Dblu9494 (talk) 20:51, 26 January 2021 (UTC) -- I think I got it, appreciate all your help anyway! Have a great day! Dblu9494 (talk) 21:37, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Fourtry re-review
The sources provided for draft Fourtry are reliable sources. The show is a Chinese production. Hence, all first-hand reliable sources are in Chinese. Please accept the draft.
 * Came here after declining a separate article and checking the contributions out of curiosity.  Please note that Baidu Baike has been deemed unreliable here: Reliable sources/Perennial sources.  I realize that is not the only source used, but I wanted to point that out for future reference in general.  -2pou (talk) 23:39, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Goatly appreciate it
Thanks for such a speedy approval on my first page upload, I appreciate it a lot, all the best!

Hippie Klingon (talk) 17:30, 31 January 2021 (UTC) 

Hello,can you correct the name of my draft that you have moved to Shkumbin Ismaili? Bailando bana (talk) 00:17, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

International Primary Curriculum
Hi Sulfurboy, I have made a number of amends to the article submission following the recommendations in the original rejection. Any advice on further work this may need would be greatly appreciated. Gcb1gg5 (talk) 11:56, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Karolina Zmarlak Article
Hi Sulfurboy, I have made a number of amends to the article submission following the recommendations in the original rejection. Any advice on further work this may need would be greatly appreciated — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fadare123467 (talk • contribs) 09:29, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

If you can help us with this I will truly be happy Fadare123467 (talk) 13:31, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Request a review: minimum standard for inline citations.
Hello Sulfurboy,

Would greatly appreciable, if you could help reviewing and providing comment on citations as number of citations added and edited for Draft:Sanjay_Govil

Thank you. Monir1975 (talk) 20:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

William Beauchamp page
Hi Sulfurboy, I think I've taken your feedback into account for the draft William Beauchamp article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:William_Beauchamp_(entrepreneur) and added a few sources: now have 3 articles on him as resources as well as 2 profiles on poker databases. This seems more complete than the David Vamplew page so it should be good enough for publication right? Please give more feedback if not :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trialan (talk • contribs) 08:08, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:John William Helton
Hello, Sulfurboy. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:John William Helton, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Hoth (Band)
Why did you decline my draft for Hoth (Band)? You are saying that i did not cite enough independent sources, which makes zero sense because i cited several independent sources. I gave you plenty of them, all of which do not just give passing mention, but are directly about the band, I do not understand why you guys keep on declining it, when i am giving you lots of sources. Please explain to me why it was declined because i am getting very irritated with all of you guys not accepting my work that i feel is properly sourced and notable. Thank You Cboi Sandlin (talk) 17:56, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , As a previous editor already advised you, please see WP:BAND. The subject completely fails that guideline. Sulfurboy (talk) 18:06, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

No it doesnt. It says that to be notable it has to have been written about in multiple independent publications, which i cited in the article. Cboi Sandlin (talk) 19:38, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , You're forgetting the reliable part. None of your sources are reliable. See WP:RELIABLE Sulfurboy (talk) 19:50, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

I cited reliable sources, they were unbiased reputable heavy metal publications. Just because they werent the New York Times or anything like that doesnt mean that they werent reliable. I read through the page about reliability and in my opinion my sources seem to fit the reliablility requirements. If you think that i am wrong in saying that, please explain to me why you have come to that conclusion. Thank You. Cboi Sandlin (talk) 21:00, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Metal blog sites are not reliable sources. User generated sites like that one wiki and discogs are wholly unreliable. Might want to re-read that reliability article again.Sulfurboy (talk)

Oh lol duh. I am sorry man. Idk why I put Discogs in there, or encyclopedia mettallum. Anyways, I got rid of those and added some more sources, then re-submitted it. That was my mistake. Thank you for your help Cboi Sandlin (talk) 22:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Jallerso (Qustodio)
Hi! I just received a rejection of a post I wrote for Qustodio. Your reasoning was that I did not disclose my paid status. I am confused by that because I have had it disclosed since October 21, 2020 using the same disclosure template you just shared with me. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jallerso Honestly not trying to hide anything and understand the Wikipedia rules. Am I missing some other step? User:Jallerso ([[User talk:Jallerso) 11:51, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * (talk page stalker), Yeah, there was no need for the undisclosed pay tag. I removed it. Noah   💬

/* Note on the feedback to the article */
Dear Sulfurboy,

thank you very much for your feedback!

Since I am not from an English-speaking country, I might have had some issues in terms of the style of an article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:State_Technical_Service

Could you please recommend any services that could edit and rewrite this article in an entry-in-an-encyclopedia style? Or maybe you could help with it?

Moreover, I would like to draw your attention to the fact that this article is about a state body of the Republic of Kazakhstan. That is why this organization (State Technical Service) does not need any advertisement at all. And the company does not provide any commercial services. Therefore, we would like to add this article because it is encyclopedic in nature.

I will be waiting for your reply and suggestions!

Thank you in advance!

Sincerely, Symbat Serikova.

Symbatserikova (talk) 11:20, 15 March 2021 (UTC) SymbatSerikova

Misr Capitalhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Signatures
Hello Sulfurboy

I guess I needed the feedback that the article reads more like an ad, not an article. I am having trouble finding English language sources, but I tried my best to get those to correspond to the articles.

The company is Egyptian, works in Egypt (a country with only 2 capital-market-specific newspapers in English: Daily News Egypt and Enterprise). Hope this works fine. Thanks once again

Abdelkader251 (talk) 09:42, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:John William Helton


Hello, Sulfurboy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "John William Helton".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:53, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Schüler-Springorum
Hello, Sulfurboy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Schüler-Springorum, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Sunanda Sharma (singer, born 1969)
Hello, Sulfurboy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sunanda Sharma (singer, born 1969), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:04, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Spiritualist art
Hello, Sulfurboy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Spiritualist art, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Maria Vittoria Cusumano
Hello, Sulfurboy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Maria Vittoria Cusumano, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Schüler-Springorum


Hello, Sulfurboy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Schüler-Springorum".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:09, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Resubmitted Draft:Jane Suiter
I believe the subject has now achieved notability, so I have submitted the draft for another review. Bogger (talk) 09:35, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Sunanda Sharma (singer, born 1969)


Hello, Sulfurboy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sunanda Sharma".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 16:22, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

The Ephemera Society of America
The Ephemera Society of America is a small group of collectors interested in promoting the collecting, study, and preservation of ephemera. It was established in 1980. The society serves as a link between and among collectors, archivists, researchers, and dealers, and encourages interest in all aspects of vintage paper. The Ephemera Society of America followed the lead of Maurice Rickards and his associates of England, who in 1975, had established The Ephemera Society of the United Kingdom.

Since 1980, similar organizations have arisen in Canada, Austria, and Australia.

Shortly after the Ephemera Society of America was form it was granted 501 (c) 3 non-profit tax-exempt status as an educational organization. Since 1980 the society educates its members and the public about the topic of ephemera. The society published the first issue of The Ephemera News newsletter in 1981. This newsletter has been continuously published from 1981 to the present. Originally it was published in an ink-on-paper format. In 2011, the newsletter is now called eNews and sent electronically each month to every member. eNews delivers news, details on conferences and other activities, a calendar of upcoming shows and events, auction notes, new book notices, links to stories of interest, announcements, and other content of interest to ephemerists.

ESA also publishes The Ephemera Journal. This is a highly regarded print publication devoted solely to illustrated scholarly articles on many different topics. Journal authors have included faculty and staff from a long list of distinguished institutions including the American Antiquarian Society, Winterthur, the Huntington Library, the Library Company of Philadelphia, Colonial Williamsburg, the Clements Library, Brown University, and many other distinguished organizations. Many fine articles have come from independent scholars and collectors.

The website of the Ephemera Society of America is www.ephemerasociety.org.

Gphorsman (talk) 21:01, 3 May 2021 (UTC) --Gphorsman (talk) 21:01, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Appeal to Review my Draft:Sanusi Mohammed Ohiare
Hello Sulfurboy, since the last time you reviewed the submission of Draft:Sanusi Mohammed Ohiare the recommended changes have been made and resubmitted but you are yet to acknowledge or review the improvements. Kindly endeavor to do so at your most convenient time. Thanks Bibihans (talk) 10:43, 11 May 2021 (UTC)Bibihans

Concern regarding Draft:Rachel Grange
Hello, Sulfurboy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rachel Grange, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:03, 18 May 2021 (UTC)