User talk:Sven Manguard/2013 Q1

=January=

Re: Broken Featured Portal
Those portals were promoted back in the day where the portal would pass the featured process by creating sections that require update once a month. However, soon after the promotion, the maintainer often neglects the updating duty. Which is why the random portal component was introduced. The maintainer makes a batch of ~20 selections per section and the portal would show different contents upon each visit. This is to reduce the amount of update work required by the maintainer. You can try contact the person and projects mainly responsible for the portal by checking out the table in Portal/Directory. Alternatively, if you think it's a hopeless cause then you can go to featured portal review that will start the de-listing discussion. OhanaUnitedTalk page 17:23, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2013 WikiCup!
Hello, Sven Manguard, and welcome to the 2013 WikiCup! Your submissions' page is here. The competition begins at midnight UTC. The first round will last until the end of February, at which point the top 64 scorers will advance to the second round. We will be in touch at the end of every month, and signups are going to remain open until the end of January; if you know of anyone else who may like to take part, please let them know! A few reminders:
 * The rules can be found here. There have been a few changes from last year, which are listed on that page.
 * Anything you submit must have been nominated and promoted in 2013, and you need to have completed significant work upon it in 2013. (The articles you review at good article reviews does not need to have been nominated in 2013, but you do need to have started the review in 2013.) We will be checking.
 * If you feel that another competitor is breaking the rules or abusing the competition in some way, please let a judge know. Please do not remove entries from the submissions' pages of others yourself.
 * Don't worry about calculating precisely how many points everything is worth. The bot will do that. The bot may occasionally get something wrong- let a judge know, or post on the WikiCup talk page if that happens.
 * Please try to be prompt in updating submissions' pages so that they can be double-checked.

Overall, however, don't worry, and have fun. It doesn't matter if you make the odd mistake; these things happen. Questions can be asked on the WikiCup talk page. Good luck! J Milburn and The ed17 17:25, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Cup storage

 * Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Massachusetts
 * Template:Did you know nominations/Püssi

Contest
Hey, I noticed your contest at the VG Wikiproject page. It looks like it's been a while since the contest began. Did someone already take the prize? Or is the contest still open? -- FutureTrillionaire (talk) 22:23, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
 * It's still open. I have no idea if anyone has qualified for the prize or not, but no one has come to claim it.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  23:11, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I was planning on entering, but never got around to doing it(I was going to work on Fire Emblem: The Sacred Stones). However, I wanted to let you know that I bought Civ V during the steam winter sale, and its a pretty great game. :) Blake (Talk·Edits) 18:04, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup/History/2013/Submissions/Sven Manguard
Hi. Just a quick note; shorter reviews, including "rubber-stamp" reviews and some quick-fails, are not eligible for points in the WikiCup. Some of your reviews are a little light (which of course does not necessarily make them poor reviews!) and so I thought I'd remind you of this. J Milburn (talk) 20:28, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up. To be honest, I've been deliberately picking GANs from authors who I know do top notch work. I didn't expect the reviews to be so light, but that's a symptom of a) the quality of the starting product, and b) my philosophy that it's simply easier to make minor changes myself than to list them out for the nominator to do. I've got two reviews pending, which both are a bit more substantial, and I think I'll stop there, at least for a while.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  23:19, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * With Talk:The Irascibles/GA1 now done, I've only Talk:Isaac B. Desha/GA1 left.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  23:33, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

The Irascibles
Thanks very much for your time and guidance in making The Irascibles a good article. I think we improved it a lot over my initial effort. Raymond Ellis 09:43, 10 January 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raymond Ellis (talk • contribs)
 * You're welcome. I'm glad to have helped. Keep up the good work.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  23:34, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Hell Yeah! Wrath of the Dead Rabbit
 Harrias  talk 15:59, 12 January 2013 (UTC) 08:03, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

DYK for The Splatters
 Harrias  talk 16:02, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Template:Non-free film poster listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Non-free film poster. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Non-free film poster redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:56, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Scarygirl
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:04, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

DYK submission for Püssi
Hello! Your submission of Püssi at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WP Japan ! 03:31, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Defenders of Ardania
( X! ·  talk )  · @224  · 00:04, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Bath School disaster/GA1
I think I've fixed all the issues you took issue with. Let me know if all is well or if there are other things that need to be fixed. Shearonink (talk) 06:37, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Simple English proposal at the Pump
Hello,

As one of the participants in the original Village Pump discussion about getting the Simple Wiki to the top of the Languages, you are invited to participate in the reopened discussion of the same. Your feedback will be appreciated.

Cheers, TheOriginalSoni (talk) 16:00, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
— Statυs  ( talk,  contribs ) 22:27, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Svenbot
Evening Sven, Hope all is well. I had seen that Svenbot hasn't run in over 5 months since the Fastily rewrite. Did you want me to re-setup the bot to run on Labs on a schedule? Thanks. Piandcompany (talk) 03:57, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * If you can get it to work as it should, by all means go ahead. What you should do is file a BRFA asking for (speedy) approval to take over the tasks for Svenbot, and you can run the tasks from your own bot account after that. I've depreciated Svenbot because for the time being I don't have the time to watch it, and I won't run it if I can't watch it.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  06:11, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * When you mean watch it, did you mean that the script was having issues or was it more so dealing with false-positives? Piandcompany (talk) 12:12, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The scripts ran fine until Fastily left. All of the changes afterwards, both his and yours, have destabilized them, I think. As it was last time I ran Svenbot, some tasks didn't do what they were supposed to. I forget which ones, all I remember is that that's the reason I stopped running Svenbot. You're free to try and fix everything up, but you're going to have to watch to make sure everything is working; it's going to be your sole responsibility to watch over your bot.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  15:54, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Can you send me the code and/or throw it up on a pastebin/file sharing site so i can grab what he rewrote it to do? May be interesting to try to figure out the flaws and get it working again. Piandcompany (talk) 18:47, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Is it not on labs?  S ven M anguard   Wha?  22:15, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I thought he did a rewrite of the code? Piandcompany (talk) 22:33, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Here is the first BRFA. Mind saying you approve in the discussion? Piandcompany (talk) 20:20, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * I saw what you did there.   S ven M anguard   Wha?  01:27, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Too lazy to do another one. —  Statυs  ( talk,  contribs ) 01:31, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

POTD notification
Hi Sven,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Diagram of the Federal Government and American Union edit.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on January 20, 2013. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2013-01-20. — howcheng  {chat} 17:17, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Also a new message on my talk.

P.S. I totally also thought you were an admin... LOL. I'm not sure why exactly... — Statυs  ( talk,  contribs ) 07:56, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * A lot of people do. I dare say that I and a lot of the people I speak with think I should be, but I don't think it's going to happen anytime soon.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  15:46, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Reminder: free copy of Civ 5 for an FA
If any of the games on the list below make it to FA, the nominator can claim a free copy of Civ 5.

This re-post will not be archived.

Featured picture candidates/The Splatters

 * Woooo!  S ven M anguard   Wha?  21:49, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Portal:Games
When you finish splitting Portal:Games into a separate Portal, can you update the table at Portal/Directory? I came across the old name coming off a CSD request and pointed it to Portal:Sports but am not familiar enough with the Portal hierarchy to create a new listing. Thanks. --Michael Greiner 08:50, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Re: FP Question
Hi, In terms of quality, I think it's good enough. I personally would prefer a shadow and higher resolution but it meets the criteria as it is. I am more concerned with the EV. Perhaps you could add it to the pinball article as well; it would have greater value there IMO and is much better than the current lead image File:Theatre_of_magic_pinball.jpg. If that is done, I'd support --Muhammad (talk) 09:17, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Piandcompany (talk) 15:16, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Portal: Singapore review
Hi Sven Manguard,

Thanks for your review. I have addressed your concerns at the review page, and would be grateful if you can have another look at the portal. Happy editing and good luck at the Wikicup.--Lionratz (talk) 03:11, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Template Question
Should ContinuityBot flag files such as File:9.5.07AMCGardenStatePlaza.JPG that have been marked as deleted on commons for re-transfer to commons (Task I) or remove their transfer to commons template (Task II) or do nothing? Piandcompany chat  22:25, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Files with Deleted on Commons should not be tagged for transfer (task 1), and transfer tags should be removed if they are on a page with that template (task 2).  S ven M anguard   Wha?  23:33, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks very much
Thanks much for pitching in at Featured portal candidates/Main Page Featured Portal drive, we'd love the added assistance!!! &mdash; Cirt (talk) 19:48, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'm working on the selected pictures section now.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  19:54, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

So far, so good.
Well, so far, we're managing to be perfectly civil at FP. If we can manage to keep this up, we're probably ready to relaunch FS =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:06, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 *  S ven M anguard  Wha?  23:07, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

The inflatable habitat looks quite feasible. I'll leave it for now, as it's a good project for a budding restorationist, but if it's not done by the time I finish the Cendrillon poster, I'll do it. Then decide if someone like me can claim credit for such a small restoration. (Claiming that many points for something I can likely do in half an hour seems a little wrong, don't you think? I mean, for someone else, learning how to do these sorts of things, it'd be perfectly reasonable to claim it. But if I let myself get too lazy, then all that the Wikicup causes is that someone who could be doing the difficult stuff is instead doing easy stuff that others could do instead, and claiming credits that are a bit too easy to feel right to claim.)

=) Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:23, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Oh, um, one thing: You should probably move the Inflatable habitat/moon colony thread to WT:FPC. Far, far more people watch that talk page. Adam Cuerden (talk)
 * Thanks, I'll move it now. As for the points thing, I built a GA quality article from scratch in about 12 hours, and between the DYK and the GA, that's the same number of points as an FP. How long did it take for you to do the restoration on the Pirate Publisher image?  S ven M anguard   Wha?  23:46, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I've never been particularly good at estimating time, but probably 30-40 hours. But that's not really typical. If you want a rough guide for recent FPCs, check the file information page. If you notice I'm doing almost nothing to claim restoration credit, it probably took between 2 and 4 hours. If I'm doing something to claim it, but not in the license area, probably 6-9; if I do ask for credit in the Licensing area, but say it's "requested", about 12 hours, and if it's Pirate Publisher territory, it won't be a request, as the amount of reconstruction work done in things like that is sufficient for British copyright. [Note that this doesn't include the documentation and upload of files, which can take hours in itself sometimes. =/ ] Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:41, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * And, honestly, I wouldn't be doing that if it weren't for those damn poster sites that grab stuff from Wikipedia, and sell them without telling people they can use the images freely, and can get them from here. It seems immoral to sell someone else's work for $50 or so, without crediting the person who did the work. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:22, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I've brought up to the WMF multiple times that the WMF should be printing and selling posters of Commons images as a fund raiser, like what they do with the PediaPress printed Wikipedia articles. That way 1) proper attribution would actually be followed, 2) more people learn about the existence of Commons, 3) the WMF would get a little bit more cash, which means less Jimbo stare-down banner ad time, and 4) we'd be able to get highly educational material out into the world in a practical manner. Thus far I've given the 'good idea, but not right now' type line.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  00:28, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Aye. But there ye go. I think they've finally made a Wikipedia store; there's a chance they may reconsider now. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:54, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

The fuck people?
We gotta be more on top of this. That's just bad...  S ven M anguard  Wha?  05:19, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * My question is, why did the bot redirect it to Boredom? I can't find any evidence of the double redirect. Ryan Vesey 05:22, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * [//en.wikipedia.org/?diff=534133502] Legoktm (talk) 05:23, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Ahh, usually double redirects come from moves so I just checked the move logs. Ryan Vesey 05:31, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Portal DYK
Hey, Sven, how you find good DYKs for Featured portals, short of grabbing them from other portals? Adam Cuerden (talk) 07:14, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The way I've done it is by grabbing a list of words that are associated with my topic and using the search bar at the top of Recent additions. I got surpremely lucky for Portal:Sports in that there was already a good list there, but I still used that tactic for that one. Portal:Massachusetts and Portal:Games, however, are almost entirely done using the search. One other thing that you should do though is check the related Wikiprojects. Some of them maintain a list of DYKs themselves, such as the one at WikiProject Lacrosse. That's really useful although tragically also really rare.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  15:53, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks much
Thanks for the helpful tracking bar at Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Society, much appreciated! &mdash; Cirt (talk) 16:02, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * No problem. Hey, while you're here could you give me your thoughts on Featured portal candidates (and Portal peer review if you've got the time) please?  S ven M anguard   Wha?  16:05, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * About to grab some food, but I'll try to make some time in a few hours later. :) &mdash; Cirt (talk) 17:15, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Sure. I'm going to be gone for a while. Probably six or eight hours.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  17:17, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Portal:Sports
If you want help pulling stuff over, after my comments, I will, but would appreciate a little help with finishing Portal:European military history once I have =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:59, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you. As much as I would appreciate the help, right now you'd probably be better finishing Portal:European military history first, since it's already in the nomination process. I don't want to turn away the help, but I'd feel guilty since I'm not sure if I am going to have the time to reciprocate. I enjoyed my 2000 edit month (it's going to probably wind up being my third most active ever), but real life commitments are going to leave me with much less time over the next four months, and I don't want you to put your project on hold if I can't pull my weight. Don't get me wrong, I'm still going to be around, but not at the hours at a time level I've been doing lately.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  05:25, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Tracking bar usage
Just a question regarding the tracking bar at Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Society, do you know if there's a way it could be regularly implemented at WP:FAC and WP:FLC and other similar areas of Wikipedia? I think it'd be most helpful! &mdash; Cirt (talk) 17:45, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * No idea. I reused the code for the "Quick Link Bar" I have at the top of this page, which is itself taken from the Video game reviews template. I suppose you could have a bot track things like that and update the bars, but I've no idea how to do so.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  20:41, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Do you think you could suggest it at WT:FAC and see what happens? &mdash; Cirt (talk) 15:47, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * You have my permission to do so if you wish to, not that you needed it.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  23:46, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Discussion on the AFT5 Request for Comment
Hey - this is to notify you that there is a discussion starting on the Article Feedback RfC talkpage that has ramifications for the RfC itself. Your input is much appreciated :). Thanks! and apologies if I've missed anyone Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 16:52, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Grooveshark screenshot at DGM
Please see Discipline Global Mobile, where the screenshot was removed because "we don't need to 'prove' anything with it". IMHO, the screenshot draws the readers' attention and illustrates the article's section well. The section could be expanded to describe the distribution in greater detail, if that is what is needed to restore the screenshot. Kiefer .Wolfowitz  21:27, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I have no interest in getting involved in that mess, sorry. It seems like something for AN/I.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  23:20, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Literature portal
I don't know if you watch the Featured portal review page, but I've just brought the Literature portal there for review. I seem to recall you were the editor who first brought my attention to it being a bit of a red-link sea. Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 18:08, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Portals Massacusetts and Sports
Hey I looked over the WP:FPORTC discussion at Portal:Massachusetts, haven't looked over Portal:Sports yet, anything specifically left to address? &mdash; Cirt (talk) 15:50, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I think Portal:Massachusetts is ready for promotion. I'm holding back on nominating Portal:Sports because Adam Cuerden is right, I need to expand it a bit, and right now I just don't have the time.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  23:49, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay I'll keep that in mind and give Portal:Massachusetts another look in a bit. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 00:50, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I do apologise for pointing that out now. I probably wouldn't have on a smaller portal, but for one of the six or so linked from the main page... Adam Cuerden (talk) 18:44, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Oh, er, speaking of portals, do you know anything about portal topics? I've been asked to redo a section, and I'm not quite sure I know what to do. If you can advise me through it, the portal's likely to promote. Hmm. Or maybe I do have an idea... Adam Cuerden (talk) 18:46, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

=February=

WikiCup 2013 January newsletter
Signups are now closed; we have our final 127 contestants for this year's competition. 64 contestants will make it to the next round at the end of February, but we're already seeing strong scoring compared to previous years. currently leads, with 358 points. At this stage in 2012, the leader had 342 points, while in 2011, the leader had 228 points. We also have a large number of scorers when compared with this stage in previous years. was the first competitor to score this year, as he was last year, with a detailed good article review. Some other firsts:
 * was also the first to score for an article, with the good article Hurricane Gordon (2000). Again, this is a repeat of last year!
 * was the first to score for a did you know, with Marquis Flowers.
 * was the first to score for an in the news, with 2013 Houphouët-Boigny stampede.
 * was the first to score for a featured list, with list of Billboard Social 50 number-one artists.
 * was the first to score for a featured picture, with File:Thure de Thulstrup - L. Prang and Co. - Battle of Gettysburg - Restoration by Adam Cuerden.jpg.

Featured articles, portals and topics, as well as good topics, are yet to feature in the competition.

This year, the bonus points system has been reworked, with bonus points on offer for old articles prepared for did you know, and "multiplier" points reworked to become more linear. For details, please see WikiCup/Scoring. There have been some teething problems as the bot has worked its way around the new system, but issues should mostly be ironed out- please report any problems to the WikiCup talk page. Here are some participants worthy of note with regards to the bonus points:


 * was the first to score bonus points, with Portland-class cruiser, a good article.
 * has the highest overall bonus points, as well as the highest scoring article, thanks to his work on Enrico Fermi, now a good article. The biography of such a significant figure to the history of science warrants nearly five times the normal score.
 * claimed bonus points for René Vautier and Nicolas de Fer, articles that did not exist on the English Wikipedia at the start of the year; a first for the WikiCup. The articles were eligible for bonus points because of fact they were both covered on a number of other Wikipedias.

Also, a quick mention of, who may well have already written the oddest article of the WikiCup this year: did you know that the Fucking mayor objected to Fucking Hell on the grounds that there was no Fucking brewery? The gauntlet has been thrown down; can anyone beat it?

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 00:43, 1 February 2013 (UTC)


 * I'm very sorry- I'd written most of the newsletter before that point. I'll definitely make sure it goes on the next newsletter. J Milburn (talk) 10:04, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  15:55, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

POTD notification
Hi Sven,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Hurricane Bob 19 aug 1991 1226Z.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on February 4, 2013. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2013-02-04. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:15, 2 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Wow. Cool.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  02:43, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Very. Cool image! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:20, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Featured quality at Portal:Technology
Let's try to keep to Featured quality selections where possible at Portal:Technology. It's the Main Page, after all, and it's such a broad topic and subject matter, should be pretty easy to accomplish. Are all the "Selected pictures" also WP:Featured pictures? If so, we can change that label to Featured pictures! :) &mdash; Cirt (talk) 19:51, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * They are all featured either on English Wikipedia and/or on Commons. I find doing that gives us a broader selection without compromising on quality.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  19:53, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Agreed! Now on to the other sections, it appears the Selected articles section has some poor quality selections, IMHO those should all be at the very least WP:GA class or higher. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 19:58, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, definitely. Before I start on that or any other text based section, I'd very much like for you to pick (or do) an entry that is the size you want all entries in that section to be. Left to my own devices, I will make them far too large.
 * The sections that I think are in most dire need of fixing are Selected quote and DKY, so I will be working on those as well.
 * Finally, just so you know, I'm not going to be too active this month because I have other, real life commitments. Don't be surprised if I only show up a few days a week for only an hour or two at night.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  20:03, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh, I did the Selected quote section from scratch, what don't you like about it? &mdash; Cirt (talk) 20:06, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * It's mostly just layout issues. Some of the images are too large vertically. I like to use something like x80px or x100px, which sizes based on the vertical axis, for sections like this. Don't worry about it, I'll get that fixed up.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  20:33, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Ah okay sweet, thank you so much. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 20:46, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Featured_picture_candidates/Cendrillon
Thank you for pointing out the error; I'm not sure of the exact cause - it may have been what you suggested, or just reflections, but since it was isolated to the two points, better to blend it in, regardless. A new version has been uploaded. Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:17, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

re Concern with Portal:Technology
Oh, those were all selections that I added in there myself. Perhaps instead of replacing those selections, we could instead expand the portal's randomness and increase its dynamism by adding more selections on top of those as well, and retain them? I'm open to any suggestions of selected articles that are of WP:FA or WP:GA quality, if you have any recommendations for additions to the portal? &mdash; Cirt (talk) 16:01, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I think I'll start by adding more from the subject of Mathematics, but if you have any other suggestions for additions that are WP:FA or WP:GA quality, I'd love to hear them? :) &mdash; Cirt (talk) 16:04, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I think that what's needed is technology items that aren't from the late 20th or 21st century.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  00:05, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Agreed, I think the next sensible step is to look into relevant WikiProjects and dip into WP:GAs for that sort of thing. But of course if you have any specific WP:FAs or WP:GAs to suggest, we can gladly add those in as additions as well. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 02:28, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

re Portal:Technology selected articles

 * These are really great suggestions, I'll get to adding some of them. Thank you! :) &mdash; Cirt (talk) 03:04, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Technology did you know
I'm going to be reformatting this section - we can still use the hooks you've selected, but it's going to be three per hook subpage, not five, and everything will be standardized with a layout page to improve uniformity throughout. :) &mdash; Cirt (talk) 19:58, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * But of course again thanks for all your help with this, I'm using all of your DYK hook selections for the new formatting! &mdash; Cirt (talk) 20:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * This is all ✅ for now, now you can go and add more DYK entries at your leisure, just it's helpful to also confirm them by adding the DYK archives notes to each subpage. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 20:26, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Technology selected picture
You did something to Selected picture sizing? It's way too big. The pictures are too wide and bleeding over and overlapping into the next section. Can you change it back please? &mdash; Cirt (talk) 20:12, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅, I've added an extra parameter at Portal:Technology/Selected pictures/Layout for sizing, so now each image page can have its own size, depending on whether the picture is moreso horizontal or vertical in nature. (Vertical, smaller sizing; Horizontal, larger sizing, etc.) Then maybe you can go through those pictures and resize some of them to be bigger or smaller, and add that extra parameter to each individual picture page? &mdash; Cirt (talk) 20:25, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I guess the only other option would be to have a really big huge image size, and just move that whole section on the main portal page down at the bottom where it can have its own horizontal scaling of 100%, let me know what you think about that idea. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 20:39, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Nevermind, disregard my above complaints, sorry about all that, feel free to size the images how you feel is best idea &mdash; I've made room for big sizing by moving the pictures sect down to the 100% horizontal scaling section. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 20:43, 8 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Okay. I'll look at it later. I'm in the middle of the Great Blizzard of 2013, so I'm kind of not able to do it now.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  23:38, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

A bunch of recent redirects
Hey Sven, I just noticed a bunch of recent redirects you made and just wanted to make sure there was a discussion somewhere. Can you point me to it? Ryan Vesey 17:29, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * There isn't one, but the articles themselves are poorly sourced forks of the main article that I'm redirecting them back to. Most have been tagged as needing sources since 2009, which was the last time that they were edited.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  17:31, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * There was just a discussion for this at Articles for deletion/1 metre where consensus was not reached. I'm not sure if you were aware of the discussion, but being bold doesn't apply here.  The article, Orders of magnitude (length), also had clickable images which have all been broken now. Ryan Vesey 17:36, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Wow, that recently? No, I was not aware of it. Had I known about that, I would not have done those redirects. That being said, I really don't want to undo them, because I feel that I'd be making the project worse by doing so. I am leaving for lunch now, and will ponder what to do then. If anyone else wants to undo the changes in the mean time, they can.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  17:41, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm busy today, so I won't be reverting them, plus, I'm still not sure where I stand on the issue, but I think leaving it all at the redirected article is better. That said, I think it's fairly likely that someone will come by and revert them. Ryan Vesey 17:45, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * There's also the question of whether or not it's better to redirect them to Orders of magnitude (length) or specific subsections of List of examples of lengths (up until 1 meter when it stops for some reason). Ryan Vesey 17:50, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Alright, thanks for pointing that discussion out to me. I'm going to leave it as is, as I'm off to go help dig a friend's place out of snowpocalypse.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  20:22, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Leviathan Photo
Going by how you said you don't really like the blue on blue, would this photo still be worth nominating?-- Dom497 ( talk ) 21:02, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I am not think that I am the best judge of these things, as I haven't been part of that process for very long and really am not a photographer, however I would oppose that image at FPC because I think that it's not showing anything of any real encyclopedic value (in the article on the roller coaster, this illustrates the roller coaster's sign). Sorry,  S ven M anguard   Wha?  23:13, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Questions about renaming image files of people
I also posted this question on your Wikimedia page, but noticed that you respond more often on this page.

Thanks for your advice on my correcting of file names. I had a question about another thing that I was hoping you could answer. If I come across a photo of a singer or some other person and the filename of the photo either does not have the person's name or it just has their first name with no last name, or just their last name and no first name, should we rename the picture so that it includes both their first and last name? (This would help people figure out who exactly the photo is of without having to click the image and read the file description). Or, would that be considered as another one of those minor changes you had recommended that I avoid making? (Also, I am not talking about people who are known by their first name such as Madonna, Cher, or Rihanna). Thank you for your help.

Examples are: File:200d.jpg - which is of Michelle Shaprow; File:Greta44.jpg - which is of Greta Salpeter; File:Gordonphoto.jpg - which is of Mikalah Gordon.

Dobie80 (talk) 00:06, 10 February 2013 (UTC)


 * I responded over at Commons.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  01:42, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

re Two selected bios ...

 * Good thoughts, if we can find relevant free-use images, great, if not, we could try to look for replacement bios of WP:GA or WP:FA quality with free-use pictures. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 05:42, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Featured sounds
Hope you were serious about wanting to participate,a s I'm reviving it. Adam Cuerden (talk) 07:30, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I quite simply do not have the time to add yet another thing to my current list of Wikipedia projects right now. As it is I feel that I'm not giving some of my commitments the time that they deserve (like, for example, the entirety of Commons). As I have had to tell several people already in the past few weeks, maybe I'll have the time in May.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  23:12, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
 * You have time for one more thing... :P -- Guerillero &#124;  My Talk  07:27, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The scary thing is that I don't. I never thought that I'd be stretched this thin. Usually when RL got busy I'd be able to cut other things before cutting my time on Wikipedia, but I've already cut those things, cut Commons, and cut my Wikipedia time. If I have to cut more, I'm going to sacrifice Wikipedia before I sacrifice Wikidata, so if I disappear for a few weeks, don't be surprised.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  23:45, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Articles for creation
Hi Sven. I noticed you removed a submission from the redirect centre of articles for creation because a submission was not for an article; that is a valid rationale but, generally speaking, the convention is to archive all requests and simply collapse the submission with reasoning. Please do that in the future. TBrandley (what's up) 00:56, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Thank you!
Thank you for the files!--Mr Fink (talk) 02:58, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

re Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Geography
I've responded to all of your suggestions at Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Geography.

Perhaps you could revisit and see if this portal merits your Support at this time?

Thank you, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 19:59, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Lemme know when you get a chance, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 03:55, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Maybe over the weekend? It'd take me a few hours to check over everything with a fine toothed comb, especially since I have the "fix as you go" philosophy towards reviews. I don't have a few hours now, as it's 11:00 PM here.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  03:58, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay, sounds good, keep me posted, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 20:12, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Any chance you'll get a moment to revisit your position at this discussion page? Thank you for your time, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 19:08, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Meta: Steward reconfirmation comments
Hi, Sven. I would appreciate it if you could expand on what areas of my steward activities you find lacking which required you to make the confirmation non-unanimous. Obviously, I have room for improvement. Thank you. -- Avi (talk) 23:40, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Your activity levels for the past three months, as reported by the tools I have available to me as a user with only limited advanced permissions, were troublingly low. That might be in part because I would have no way of seeing your CU activity, but as it stands, you've been, in my view, too absent lately.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  23:44, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. I did say in my reconfirmation statement that I focus on CUs (often the big zh sockfarms) and one "rights change" may encompass tens or hundreds of checks, but you are certainly entitled to hold me to an even higher standard. Thank you for the explanation. -- Avi (talk) 23:50, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * CU-ing is definitely important, and as I said, I do think that you should retain the tools, I just think that the model steward should be a bit more active and a bit more versatile than (as far as I can see) you have been lately.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  23:57, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Notice of discussiont to revamp WP:FS
As a formerly active discussant at WT:FSC, I would like to call your attention to Wikipedia talk:Featured sound candidates.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:09, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Closing discussions
Please remember to close discussions under the level-2 header. Otherwise MiszaBot gets confused and creates mess. — This, that and the other (talk) 08:55, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay. I'm pretty used to putting it over the level-2 header, which is what I've been doing over at Wikidata. I'll keep in mind that it's reversed over here.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  17:13, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata "Conflicts"
This is not a "conflict". Both Portal:Science and Portal:Technology link to the same page on the fy Wiki. Wikidata does not handle one to many relationships at present (and there are no plans to do so in the immediate future), so these types of interwikilinks will have to remain in the wikitext of the page. The rest can be removed though. 86.44.163.139 (talk) 02:12, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
 * No, that's still a conflict. The Wikidata community will sort out which is the correct link.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  02:37, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Whichever it is, please, let's all have more discussion about it, and less reverting and edit warring, please? &mdash; Cirt (talk) 02:42, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I only made one edit, so I don't know what all this talk of edit warring is about.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  02:44, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I only made one change also. There's no edit war. 86.44.163.139 (talk) 02:46, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay, fine, sure, I'm just glad there's all this discussion going on, now. That's constructive and positive collaboration, quite reassuring. :) &mdash; Cirt (talk) 04:27, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Edit summaries about Wikidata
Please would you include a link e.g. WP:Wikidata in your edit summaries when removing interwikis? I had not come across this before, and was confused when I saw "Cleared for wikidata" in a recent diff on my watchlist. – Fayenatic  L ondon 17:46, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The people using the linked edit summary are using a script. I'm doing it manually, and adding in the link will slow me down considerably.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  18:11, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Really? The browsers that I use have auto-complete turned on, so after I have entered certain text in the edit summary, it's quick to bring it up again. That works just as well for complex text which includes links. – Fayenatic  L ondon 22:05, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
 * That sounds mortifying. If I ever had that, I turned it off long ago.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  23:31, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Personal attacks in edit summaries
Hello Sven. I notice you write "Be civil" in the edit intro to your talk page. I agree. So just a note re your edit on Talk:Main page: please try to avoid abusive edit summaries if you could. I'm just an innocent bystander, it popped up in my watchlist as I suspect it did for many others... —Noiratsi (talk) 17:55, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

A whole lot of spam
Hey Sven, I noticed your spambot removal. I took the liberty of re-removing you from the spamlist here. I assume you won't have a problem with that. You might want to talk to who restored your name; although, it was quite a while ago. Ryan Vesey 00:19, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I already removed myself from another list that Mdann52 added me to without asking, I didn't know that there was more than one list.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  00:47, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I have opted-out myself too again, but I doesn't get the messages because I had opted-out Edwards-bot. mabdul 08:55, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

=March=

WikiCup 2013 February newsletter
Round 1 is now over. The top 64 scorers have progressed to round 2, where they have been randomly split into eight pools of eight. At the end of April, the top two from each pool, as well as the 16 highest scorers from those remaining, will progress to round 3. Commiserations to those eliminated; if you're interested in still being involved in the WikiCup, able and willing reviewers will always be needed, and if you're interested in getting involved with other collaborative projects, take a look at the WikiWomen's Month discussed below.

Round 1 saw 21 competitors with over 100 points, which is fantastic; that suggests that this year's competition is going to be highly competative. Our lower scores indicate this, too: A score of 19 was required to reach round 2, which was significantly higher than the 11 points required in 2012 and 8 points required in 2011. The score needed to reach round 3 will be higher, and may depend on pool groupings. In 2011, 41 points secured a round 3 place, while in 2012, 65 was needed. Our top three scorers in round 1 were:
 * , primarily for an array of warship GAs.
 * , primarily for an array of did you knows and good articles, some of which were awarded bonus points.
 * , due in no small part to Canis Minor, a featured article awarded a total of 340 points. A joint submission with, this is the highest scoring single article yet submitted in this year's competition.

Other contributors of note include:
 * , whose Portal:Massachusetts is the first featured portal this year. The featured portal process is one of the less well-known featured processes, and featured portals have traditionally had little impact on WikiCup scores.
 * , whose Mycena aurantiomarginata was the first featured article this year.
 * and, who both claimed points for articles in the Major League Baseball tie-breakers topic, the first topic points in the competition.
 * , who claimed for the first full good topic with the Casting Crowns studio albums topic.

Featured topics have still played no part in this year's competition, but once again, a curious contribution has been offered by : did you know that there is a Shit Brook in Shropshire? With April Fools' Day during the next round, there will probably be a good chance of more unusual articles...

March sees the WikiWomen's History Month, a series of collaborative efforts to aid the women's history WikiProject to coincide with Women's History Month and International Women's Day. A number of WikiCup participants have already started to take part. The project has a to-do list of articles needing work on the topic of women's history. Those interested in helping out with the project can find articles in need of attention there, or, alternatively, add articles to the list. Those interested in collaborating on articles on women's history are also welcome to use the WikiCup talk page to find others willing to lend a helping hand. Another collaboration currently running is an an effort from WikiCup participants to coordinate a number of Easter-themed did you know articles. Contributions are welcome!

A few final administrative issues. From now on, submission pages will need only a link to the article and a link to the nomination page, or, in the case of good article reviews, a link to the review only. See your submissions' page for details. This will hopefully make updating submission pages a little less tedious. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) J Milburn (talk) 11:42, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Branislav Niňaj
Hi! Can you undeleted article about Slovak defender Branislav Niňaj. He made his professional debut for ŠK Slovan Bratislava against FC ViOn Zlaté Moravce on 1 March 2013. Thanks, 18:19, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi there IQual. I am actually not an admin on this project, however several of the people who watch my page are, and one of them might be able to help. That being said, my recommendation would be to go to the page Requests for undeletion and follow the instructions there.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  19:52, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

From User:NickDupree
NickDupree (talk) 06:34, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Admin advice needed
I see the warning at the top of this page about inactivity, but your contributions belie it :-)

In the WD transition, what are we doing about babel links to sections? Caucus has a single remaining babel link — he:הבחירות המקדימות לנשיאות ארצות הברית. It's the caucuses section of their article on the US presidential primary process, rather than discussing all kinds of caucuses, but it's relevant still. Talkback or respond at my talk, please. Nyttend (talk) 14:45, 5 March 2013 (UTC)


 * To me, the difference between inactive and active is the difference between 100 edits in a month and 1000 edits in a month, so yes, this month and next I'm inactive. I will, when I get the chance, track down a Hebrew speaker and try and see what to do about that. Section links aren't allowed on Wikidata itself, but as far as I know we haven't made any decisions about what to do about section links left over on Wikipedias. If I had to guess based on my feeling for where the Wikidata community is at, we're likely to say that that's a decision that needs to be left up to individual Wikipedia communities. As to this specific link, I'd have to think that there's something better that can be done, but as I said, I'm going to need a Hebrew speaker's help for it.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  18:57, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The main article for that section seems to be אסיפות הבחירה באיווה, if that helps you, but it is specific to the Iowa caucus (as is the section linked). There is no article specific to "caucus" that I found in my quick search, and that is because the appropriate Hebrew term is a redirect to that section. -- Avi (talk) 19:08, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks Avi.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  22:11, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
 * My pleasure. -- Avi (talk) 23:10, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Sister links
Hello Sven, at Village pump (proposals) you opposed my proposal for a more visible sister-link to Wikivoyage in some articles, because you do not see why one sister project should be favoured over the others. Do you think you could be supportive of an alternative proposal, in a similar spirit&mdash;the exact details of which have yet to be worked out, but which would cover all our sister projects, so as not to discriminate between them? Cheers, —Ruud 22:58, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Nope. We've got good mechanisms for that already.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  23:19, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Then we seem to make a different estimate on the effectiveness of the current methods (Some thorough A/B testing could settle that empirically, of course, but that seems a bit too time-consuming for me to actually pull off.) Thank you in any case. —Ruud 01:13, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Re: Liao
Moving it to the section should be ok; I don't believe I spotchecked that section so there may still be issues. Wizardman 21:24, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Contest won?
Hey, I think I just won your contest.--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 13:55, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * So you have. Please email me your Steam account name so I can forward the game to you. Congratulations, and I hope you enjoy Civ V.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  18:58, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * By the way, you might want to remove the notice from Reward board. It's possible some people might think the contest is still open.--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 12:48, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

1959 Atlantic hurricane season
Hello Sven Manguard! I have fixed all your issues with the 1959 Atlantic hurricane season and gave you an explanation as to why I removed the "Records" section. If you could check it out again soon that would be great. Regards,--12george1 (talk) 18:44, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Another "video game for an FA" contest is (probably) coming!
Heads up talk page stalkers. More "free" goodies on the way!

So the free copy of Civilization V that I was offering as part of this contest was won a few days ago by user:Futuretrillionaire for bringing The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion to Featured Article status.

Other than that it took a bit longer than I had anticipated, the contest was a success. So I'm doing it again. If enough people preorder Bioshock Infinite everyone that preorders will get a free copy of X-COM: Enemy Unknown. Being that X-COM: Enemy Unknown was the game I preordered to get the extra copy of Civ V for the contest in the first place, it looks very likely that I'm going to have an extra copy of X-COM to give away.

For those of you that are interested in snagging a "free" copy of X-COM (free is in quotes because you still have to bring something to FA), feel free to get started on one of the articles from the old list. Other than Oblivion, everything from that list is going to be on the list for the new contest too. Of course, nothing is finalized until I make an official contest page like the one I did for Civ5, however the only reason I can think of for not running another contest at this point would be Bioshock Infinite not hitting the preorder threshold.

Cheers,  S ven M anguard   Wha?  07:01, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

GP
You collapsed a section which I began with "blessing", and titled it: "This battle was already collapsed once. Enough already." - Should I be thankful that perhaps more people will read it with that label? But I don't see how blessing translates to battle? I go for peace, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:59, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Whatever your intentions when you started it, by the time I ended it, Malleus was on the war path again. That's why I shut it down.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  20:05, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Taken, I didn't even see that, I saw that he kept helping the article ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:15, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
 * That page had really gotten out of hand by that point. I was just trying to calm everything down. I personally would be in favor of making the page read only for a day or two, although it looks like the worst of the fighting is over by now.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  22:48, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Vandalism information
Hi Sir, may I know why you disabled VoxelBot from updating Vandalism Info? Arctic  Kangaroo  13:15, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I did it while Cluebot was down so that I could put a custom message in warning that the bot was down and placing DEFCON at 1. Previous experience with Cluebot being down led me to believe it was a good idea to do so. What I didn't see was that A930913 came along and tweaked it shortly thereafter. Either way, both Vacation9 and Fox Wilson were notified over IRC, and so I figured that once Cluebot was back up, someone would fix the template. Your being here indicates that perhaps that did not go according to plan.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  15:31, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
 * You mean ClueBot NG is down? If so, first time I've heard of it. Arctic   Kangaroo  15:35, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
 * It was when I made the change discussed above, it's not anymore.
 * Cluebot was down briefly between 09:09, 18 March 2013 and 17:45, 18 March 2013, then between 17:45, 18 March 2013 and 20:21, 18 March 2013, and finally between 20:25, 18 March 2013 and 14:16, 19 March 2013. My edit was in 01:07, 19 March 2013, within the third window.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  15:42, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * WOOOOOOOOOO! You have no idea how happy it makes me to have finally hit that milestone with Liao Dynasty. I've been working on it off and on for a year now.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  20:42, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Congrats, it's definitely paid off! -- Khazar2 (talk) 20:48, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Help
Hi there! Guided by your instructions, I worked again on Serbian dish - Gibanica. If it's not a problem could you give your opinion? And for a nutrition... it's very difficult to find nutrition facts about this dish. I found something on the internet and put it in article. Cheers (Nightwolf87 (talk) 17:23, 26 March 2013 (UTC))

Motion to close RFC/U
You have previously commented on Requests_for_comment/Niemti.

As an outside editor, I have moved that this RFC/U be closed. If you wish to comment on the Motion to close, please do so  here. Fladrif (talk) 14:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks!
Heya - Great to see you and thanks again for helping out. Also glad you made some progress on Amanda Clement...I have a friend who is a female umpire and she'll be thrilled that Amanda now has a page :) Cheers! Girona7 (talk) 15:53, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I was glad to attend. Thanks for organizing it.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  17:23, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

DYK help?
Me again... So I submitted my first DKY nomination for the Joan Feynman article I expanded starting at our edit-a-thon (but mostly I worked on today). I saw that someone already approved your Clement article, which is great! Would you mind taking a look at the Feynman article and my nomination? I'd love any feedback or suggestions. Also, it's very last-minute, but the extra hook here is that it's actually her birthday tomorrow, so (unless it's too late) it would be really awesome if it could go up for tomorrow's DYK. Anyhoo, thanks in advance! Girona7 (talk) 19:57, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but the expansion wasn't large enough for DYK. I started a thread here to see if maybe there was something I missed though.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  22:24, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Hey. Thanks for the clarification. FYI, I expanded the article substantially since you filled me in on that requirement, and I put a note to that effect on the nomination page. Hopefully should be long enough now. Girona7 (talk) 19:09, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay, NOW the article should be good. Someone helped me install the DYKcheck tool, and I added more to put it over the minimum. Phew! :) Girona7 (talk) 22:59, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 March newsletter
We are halfway through round two. Pool A sees the strongest competition, with five out of eight of its competitors scoring over 100, and Pool H is lagging, with half of its competitors yet to score. WikiCup veterans lead overall; Pool A's (2010's winner) leads overall, with poolmate  (a finalist in 2011 and 2012) not far behind. Pool F's (a finalist in 2010, 2011 and 2012) is in third. The top two scorers in each pool, as well as the next highest 16 scorers overall, will progress to round three at the end of April.

Today has seen a number of Easter-themed did you knows from WikiCup participants, and March has seen collaboration from contestants with WikiWomen's History Month. It's great to see the WikiCup being used as a locus of collaboration; if you know of any collaborative efforts going on, or want to start anything up, please feel free to use the WikiCup talk page to help find interested editors. As well as fostering collaboration, we're also seeing the Cup encouraging the improvement of high-importance articles through the bonus point system. Highlights from the last month include GAs on physicist Niels Bohr, on the European hare , on the constellation Circinus ( and ) and on the Third Epistle of John. All of these subjects were covered on at least 50 Wikipedias at the beginning of the year and, subsequently, each contribution was awarded at least three times as many points as normal.

Wikipedians who enjoy friendly competition may be interested in participating in April's wikification drive. While wikifying an article is typically not considered "significant work" such that it can be claimed for WikiCup points, such gnomish work is often invaluable in keeping articles in shape, and is typically very helpful for new writers who may not be familiar with formatting norms.

A quick reminder: now, submission pages will need only a link to the article and a link to the nomination page, or, in the case of good article reviews, a link to the review only. See your submissions' page for details. This will hopefully make updating submission pages a little less tedious. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) J Milburn (talk) 22:37, 31 March 2013 (UTC)