User talk:Talkstosocks

Raja of Panagal
Hi. Just wanted to say that I reverted your obviously good faith edit. But, the edit summary, in part, auto-generated by the tool, doesn't reflect the good faith assumption. -- Sundar \talk \contribs 08:25, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi! Seems you've been absent for a while. I just want to tell you that I've made the changes you recommended. See here- Ravichandar My coffee shop 17:55, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Novopharmlogo.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Novopharmlogo.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:37, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Novopharmlogo.gif)
 Thanks for uploading Image:Novopharmlogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 01:56, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

FPC Nom
Please re!vote on this nom. It was relisted and your previous vote no longer counts. Thanks. ~  ωαdεstεr 16  «talkstalk» 05:22, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Static pressure
Hi Talkstosocks! On 13 April you edited Static pressure to indicate that stagnation pressure is similar to, or a synonym of, total pressure. I have reversed your edits for the following reason. In incompressible flows, (and compressible flows without shock waves) total pressure and stagnation are numerically equal. However, apart from being numerically equal, they are not the same.

Stagnation pressure is a static pressure. It is the name given to the static pressure at a stagnation point. (Static pressure can be measured using an aneroid, Bourdon tube, mercury column etc.) Stagnation pressure is not total pressure. Total pressure has a mathematical definition, but it cannot be measured using an aneroid, Bourdon tube, mercury column etc.

Total pressure is defined and has a value for every point in every fluid flow field. In contrast, stagnation pressure only exists at a stagnation point. In many flow fields there is no stagnation point, and therefore stagnation pressure does not exist anywhere in those flow fields. The static pressure at every point in those flow fields is less than total pressure.

A similar situation exists with Newton's second law, F=ma. Newton's second law tells us that force, and mass times acceleration, are numerically equal. However, they are not the same. Force is one thing. Mass is another thing, and acceleration is a third thing.

I am happy to discuss further if you wish. Dolphin51 (talk) 13:02, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

GA Sweeps invitation
Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am sending you this message since you are a member of the GA WikiProject. I would like to invite you to consider helping with the GA sweeps process. Sweeps helps to ensure that the oldest GAs still meet the criteria, and improve the quality of GAs overall. Unfortunately, last month only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process when 163 articles were reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.

We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you are interested or know of anybody that can assist, please visit the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. Feel free to stop by and only review a few articles, something's better than nothing! Take a look at the list, and see what articles interest you. Let's work to complete Sweeps so that efforts can be fully focused on the backlog at GAN. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 08:48, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of List of Wait Wait... Don't Tell Me! guests (2005)
An editor has nominated List of Wait Wait... Don't Tell Me! guests (2005) for deletion. Opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. In light of the fact that, in previous discussion (see Wait Wait... Don't Tell Me!), editors suggested breaking out a list of WWDTM guests in a separate article, those who view and edit this article might want to weigh in on the proposed deletion. (From my point of view, the reasons for proposing deletion are strange. It's especially strange that that article, in particular, is targeted for deletion, while the other eleven years' pages are apparently notable enough to remain. To remove only the year 2005 would leave a hole in the record for no discernible reason.--HughGRex (talk) 23:33, 26 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: I've added a couple of references to some of the List of Guests pages, by Googling "Wait Wait Don't Tell Me xxxxx," where "xxxxx" denotes the name of a guest. I've refrained from linking to the many NPR Affiliates' sites and blogs, preferring to link to newspapers, magazines, interviews, and etc. I'm sure there are more refs to be found; and if we can link as many such refs as possible, it'll rebut two main reasons given for deleting the articles (that they're not notable, and that there aren't any third-party references).--HughGRex (talk) 21:25, 5 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks so much. It still pisses me off, we shouldn't be having to do this. If people wanted to start this fight, they should have picked it with a more high profile target. I feel like the case is being made, that it's ok for episode pages to exist for shows they know and not for ones they personally don't know --The Talking Sock talk contribs 04:23, 7 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Re . I left a message about the nomination at User_talk:HughGRex (eventho it's not necessary to do so), because the article was started by that user. -- Jeandré (talk), 2009-09-09t11:18z

NowCommons: File:111USHouseStructure.png
File:111USHouseStructure.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:111USHouseStructure.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:53, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

2009 CPI map
Hi Talkstosocks, thanks for your work on the 2009 Corruption Perceptions Index world map. I just finished reordering the CPI table and noticed one omission from your map. The Central African Republic is given a CPI of 2.0, but your map states there is no information for it. I'm not sure if there are any other mistakes. Sorry for the trouble. Arsonal (talk) 10:35, 18 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Hello Arsonal. Thank you for checking the CPI map. Once you have worked on it as long as I did, you lose the ability to see it from a larger perspective. I tried my best to include every number but it was inevitable that I would miss one or two. It is no trouble atall, on the contrary, you have given me the opportunity to improve my work. Cheers, The Talking Sock talk contribs 14:00, 18 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Another question. Would it be possible to get the hexadecimal color codes you used to color the map? If we're to use a coloring system, the map and the table should be synchronized. I may end up removing the colors altogether, but it's useful for future reference. Thanks! Arsonal (talk) 19:50, 18 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I used the same colours as the old map, they are:


 * 0 128  0  9-10
 * 0 198  0  8-8.9
 * 222 222  0  7-7.9
 * 255 206 99  6-6.9
 * 255 165 82  5-5.9
 * 255 107 107 4-4.9
 * 255  0   0  3-3.9
 * 198  0   0  2-2.9
 * 128  0   0  1-1.9
 * 192 192 192 n/a


 * with the format R G B range


 * After seeing the map in the guardian, I kinda liked their colours better with just one hue, blue, at different intensities, the most corrupt being the darkest: http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2009/nov/17/corruption-index-transparency-international


 * I submitted the updated svg file, but the png which is shown on wikipedia pages has not changed. I don't know if this will happen automatically, but if you click through and look at the actual map, the change is there, it's only on the rendered pngs that it doesn't show up... do you know how to fix this at all? - The Talking Sock talk contribs 01:45, 19 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure why it's not updating. We'll wait a bit and see if the server cache purges it. The single color with varying hues is also published on Transparency International's website here. Arsonal (talk) 04:25, 19 November 2009 (UTC)


 * One thing I don't like about the one colour scheme is the fact that it places an emphasis on the corrupt countries. The less corrupt a country is the fainter it is, and with a white background, they almost fade away. With the one I used here, both the corrupt and the non-corrupt are hi-lighted. - The Talking Sock talk contribs 14:17, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jigsaw Killer (disambiguation)


The article Jigsaw Killer (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not a useful disambiguation page, the page for Jigsaw Killer has a disambiguation link at the top so this page is superfluous.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fences &amp;  Windows  02:55, 3 February 2010 (UTC)


 * I believe that this disambiguation page is legitimate because I feel that this murder deserves more than just one line at the top of an article as a pointer. Maybe it should go up for a vote instead of just being summarily deleted..? - The Talking Sock talk 03:15, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Never fear, I just wrote Murder of Jeffrey Howe. There is a disambiguation link at the top of Jigsaw Killer that directs to it. Fences  &amp;  Windows  03:17, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

April 2010 GAN backlog elimination drive
–MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 18:18, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Electoral graph
Hi Talkstosocks,

I'm afraid I've had to remove your average polling graph. You're not User:Ar558a, are you? They added a very similar one quite recently, which was flawed for many of the same reasons - principally in that it assumes that if you average out the polls you'll get closer to the truth, when that's not necessarily the case. I advise you to look at the message I left on their talk page.

There's similarly the question of arbitrariness - why confine yourself to this month, rather than the whole period since the last election? Also, I advise you not to include the date in the filename, but rather to update any graph as necessary.

Finally, can you please tell me where on earth the purple = others thing comes from? Ar558a did the same thing, and I've never seen it before. It's far more usual to use grey. Wereon (talk) 23:11, 19 April 2010 (UTC)


 * I am not User:Ar558a. I think it is wrong that there is a graph of just ICM polling. An average, I agree, is not a perfect solution for polling data, but I was looking for a way to compactly display the info.


 * It is good to have a graph of only the data since the election was called as it is easier to see what's been going on lately. Just take a minute and look at the graph that's there and see if you can tell what's going on lately, it's impossible. This way, people who want to see long term trends can look at the existing graph and those who want to see the recent changes can look at the one I put up


 * Purple is just the colour that came up on excel, no reason for it, I realise it's not the best to use 'cause of UKIP, so I can change it, but I'd also like to put my graph back up for the reasons listed above. I think it is unreasonable for you to have taken the graph down before having this conversation with me, but we can figure it out. - The Talking Sock talk 01:18, 20 April 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm kinda with Talkstosocks on this one - an average, while not infallible, is useful. A concievably *more* useful graph though is to give all the points for all the pollers, as a scatter chart, together with an average line. And secondly, there is a pressing need, given recent events, for a graph to show a shorter period than five years. Otherwise you cannot successful depict the post debate effect, which is pretty darn important and noteworthy, temporary blip or not.--Fangz (talk) 02:29, 20 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes, I understand. The ideal solution would be to have graphs for all of the regular pollsters, but it might be a bit of an information overload.


 * My main concern with this graph is that it is too susceptible to differences in polling methodologies. Angus Reid, for instance, poll Labour lower and Others higher than the other pollsters. Look at the 19th of April, when the last ARPO came out, and you do indeed find a dip in the red line and a bump in the grey one.


 * Apologies for removing it without asking you. I recommend that we take it down for now, and start a debate on one of the talk pages about what ought to go in its place. Wereon (talk) 21:35, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Update. Talkstosocks it really needs to be updated asap especially as this is election day. If you are not able to do so then, Im afraid I'm going to have to take it down pending that update. Thanks - Gallo glass  10:35, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I've now removed it pending your update. - Gallo glass  11:12, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for taking this step. My internet connection was down so I was not able to update the graph until now and it is important that it be up to date especially now. I have now done the latest update. - The Talking Sock talk 11:54, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Cheers :) - Gallo glass  12:06, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Review of closure process 2
Because you've contributed to FPC either recently or in the past, I'm letting you know about the above poll on the basis of which we may develop proposals to change our procedures and criteria. Regards, Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 12:45, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

I have stolen a userbox from you...
User:TFOWR/Userboxes/Kiwi

Apologies for that! Reason I stole it was because I'm an expatriate - a Kiwi living in Scotland - and most Kiwi userboxes add editors to the "Wikipedians in New Zealand" category (and, for a while, my userpage proudly stated that I was simultaneously in both Scotland and New Zealand...)

Hope that's OK. Let me know if not and I can rectify it. Probably by returning to the old state of living in two countries simultaneously...!) TFOW</b><b style="color:#F00">R</b> 10:20, 1 August 2010 (UTC)


 * You have no need to be apologetic, this is great! I too am not in NZ, but canada, and i grew up in massachusetts, and now I can use yours and not be in canada, new zealand and massachusetts all at once!


 * Cheers,


 * <font face="Arial">The Talking Sock talk 12:42, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Invitation to particpate in the December 2010 Wikification Drive
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 18:59, 30 November 2010 (UTC).

File permission problem with File:WorcesterIndianLake.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:WorcesterIndianLake.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 12:04, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Please confirm your membership
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 20:33, 22 December 2010 (UTC).

March 2011 GAN backlog elimination drive a week away
<div style="background-color: #F0FFEC; border: 4px solid #107020; width:100%; -moz-border-radius: 15px; -webkit-border-radius: 15px;" > WikiProject Good Articles will be running a GAN backlog elimination drive for the entire month of March. The goal of this drive is to bring the number of outstanding Good Article nominations down to below 50. This will help editors in restoring confidence to the GAN process as well as actively improving, polishing, and rewarding good content. If you are interested in participating in the drive, please place your name here. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. On behalf of my co-coordinator Wizardman, we hope we can see you in March. MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 23:52, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Connecticut Children's Museum
I removed NPOV after a quick edit. - RoyBoy 03:07, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

=
How can you be a new englander and a kiwi and a citizen of UK\04:44, 5 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skimaniac (talk • contribs)


 * Hi Skimaniac. I was raised in New England by a kiwi family and I inherited UK citizenship. I currently live in NZ so..
 * - <font face="Arial">The Talking Sock talk 08:23, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

You're invited! New England Wikimedia General Meeting
Message delivered by Dominic at 08:59, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.

WikiProject Good articles (Participant Clean-Up)
Hello, you are receiving this message because you are currently a participant of WikiProject Good articles. Since the creation of the WikiProject, over 200 user's have joined to help review good article nominations and contribute to other sections of the WikiProject. Over the years, several of these users have stopped reviewing articles and/or have become inactive with the project but are still listed as participates. In order to improve communications with other participants and get newsletters sent out faster (newsletters will begin to be sent out monthly starting in October) all participants that are no longer active with the WikiProject will be removed from the participants list.

If you are still interested in being a participant for this WikiProject, please sign your user name here and please help review some articles so we can reduce the size of the backlog. If you are no longer interested, you do not need to sign your name anywhere and your name will be removed from the participants list after the deadline. Remember that even if you are not interested at this time, you can always re-add your name to the list whenever you want. The deadline to sign your name on the page above will be November 1, 2012. Thank-you. 13:35, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Update for: WikiProject Good articles (Participant Clean-Up)
Sorry for having to send out a second message but a user has brought to my attention that a point mentioned in the first message should be clarified. If user's don't sign on this page, they will be moved to an "Inactive Participants" list rather then be being removed from the entire WikiProject. Sorry for any confusion.--Dom497 (talk)15:25, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter - October 2012
Delivered October 3, 2012 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive this newsletter any longer, please remove your name from this list. → Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page. → Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 05:48, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles - Participant Clean-up (Second Call)
{||}

WikiProject Good Articles - Participant Clean-up (Final Call)
{||}

The GAN Newsletter (November 2012)
---
 * }
 * Read this newsletter
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 3 November 2012
 * }

The WikiProject: Good Articles Newsletter (December 2012)
---
 * }
 * Read this newsletter
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 3 December 2012
 * }

The WikiProject: Good Articles Newsletter (January 2013)
This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 14:45, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre
{||}

2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting
You are invited to the 2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, on 20 July 2013 in Boston! We will be talking about the future of the chapter, including GLAM, Wiki Loves Monuments, and where we want to take our chapter in the future! EdwardsBot (talk) 10:09, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

DYK RfC

 * As a listed GA participant, you are invited to contribute to a formal Request for Comment on the question of whether Good Articles should be eligible to appear in the Did You Know? slot in future. Please see the proposal on its subpage here, or on the main DYK talk page. To add the discussion to your watchlist, click this link. Thank you in advance. Gilderien Chat&#124;Contributions 03:18, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

GAN December 2013 Backlog Drive
{| |}

New England Wikipedia Day @ MIT: Saturday Jan 18
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

March 2014 GAN Backlog Drive
It's that time again! Starting on March 1, there will be another GAN Backlog Drive! There will be several changes compared to previous drives:


 * This drive will introduce a new component to it; a point system. In a nutshell, older nominations are worth more points than newer nominations. The top 3 participants who have the points will be awarded the Golden, Silver, or Bronze Wikipedia Puzzle Piece Trophy, respectively.
 * Unlike the December 2013 Backlog Drive, earning an additional barnstar if you reached your goal has been removed.
 * The allowance to have insufficient reviews has been lowered to 2 before being disqualified.
 * An exception to the rule that all reviews must be completed before the deadline has been created.

Also, something that I thought I would share with all of you is that we raised $20.88 (USD) for the WMF in the December 2013 drive. It may not sound like a lot but considering that that was raised just because we reviewed articles, I would say that's pretty good! With that success, pledges can be made for the upcoming drive if you wish.

More info regarding the drive and full descriptions regarding the changes to this drive can be found on the the drive page. If you have any questions, feel free to leave a message on the drive talk page.

I look forward to your participation and hope that because of it, some day the backlog will be gone!

--Dom497

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

GAN March 2014 Backlog Drive
The March 2014 GAN Backlog Drive has begun and will end on April 1, 2014! Sent by Dom497 on behalf of MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

You're invited!
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

WikiProject Good articles Future GAN Backlog Drive
Hello everyone! Hope you've all been having a great summer!

TheQ Editor recently proposed the idea of having another Backlog Drive in either September/October or November/December of this year. For those of you who have participated in the past two drives you know I was the one who organized them, however, come September, this will be my most important year in school so I will not be able to coordinate this drive (if it happens). TheQ Editor has volunteered to be a coordinator for the drive. If any of you would like to co-coordinator, please notify TheQ Editor on his talk page.

If you would be interested in participating in a Backlog Drive sometime before the end of this year, please notify TheQ Editor. Also, make sure to specify what month(s) work best for you.

At the time this message was sent out, the backlog was at 520 nominations. Since May, the backlog has been steadily increasing and we are currently near an all time high. Even though the backlog will not disappear over one drive, this drive can lead to several others which will (hopefully) lead to the day where there is no longer a backlog.

As always, the more participants, the better, and everyone is encouraged to participate!

Sent by Dom497 --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

GA Cup
Hello everyone! We hope you have all been having a great summer!

As we all know, the recent GAN Backlog Drives have not had any big impact on the backlog. Because of that, me (Dom497), Figureskatingfan, and TheQ Editor have worked on an idea that could possibly finally put a dent into the massive backlog. Now, I will admit, the idea isn't entirely ours as we have took the general idea of the WikiCup and brought it over to WikiProject Good Articles. But anyways, here's what we have in mind:

For all of you that do not know what the WikiCup is, it is an annual competition between several editors to see who can get the most Good Articles, Featured Article's, Did You Know's, etc. Based of this, we propose to you the GA Cup. This competition will only focus on reviewing Good articles.

For more info on the proposal, click here. As a FYI, the proposal page is not what the final product will look like (if you do go ahead with this idea). It will look very similar to WikiCup's page(s).

The discussion for the proposal will take place here. Please let us know if you are interested, have any concerns, things to consider, etc.

--Dom497, Figureskatingfan, and TheQ Editor

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

This Friday: Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA
You are invited to join the Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA on October 16! (drop-in any time, 6-9pm)--Pharos (talk) 18:27, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Balkans Cup
Can you help adding more seasons in Balkans Cup. I have seen you edit it before. Thanks!--Alexiulian25 (talk) 20:46, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Sunday July 16: New England Wiknic @ Cambridge, MA
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

"The cray twins" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The cray twins. Since you had some involvement with the The cray twins redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. <span style="border:2px ridge #aaf;background-color:#fff;padding:1px 8px;font:normal 10px Verdana,sans-serif;"> B.Rossow ·  talk  22:34, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Good article drive notice
This message has been sent to users signed up for the Good articles newsletter. Add or remove your name from the list to subscribe or unsubscribe from future updates. Alternatively, to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. -- For the drive co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:27, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Jack E. Robinson III for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jack E. Robinson III, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Jack E. Robinson III (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Invitation to an in-person meetup in Mohua / Golden Bay
Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.

Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.

Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics.  Schwede 66  09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)