User talk:Talleyrand20

Arab or Berber emirate
Why do you think it was Arab-ruled? Or what, rather, do you think "Arab emirate" means in the sources? Our article says "Arab-ruled", but the emirs were probably not Arabs, but Berbers. Srnec (talk) 23:08, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

3RR Warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

--Omar-toons (talk) 15:32, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

January 2017
Your recent editing history at Ottoman Algeria shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Aṭlas (talk) 21:10, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Kleuske (talk) 13:57, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Neil N  talk to me 14:54, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for striving for a balanced and fair view of history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Россиянин2019 (talk • contribs) 18:08, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of busiest container ports, you may be blocked from editing. Citobun (talk) 08:32, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Edit warring and ongoing RfC
You should self-revert your last edit at Adrian Zenz since it’s edit-warring and the material is being discussed at the ongoing Request for Comment. Pitch in at the RfC if you’d like, but please don’t add the material back through edit-warring. — MarkH21talk 09:21, 7 July 2020 (UTC)