User talk:Teemu08/archive3

WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for June 2009
SoxBot (talk) 22:43, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of University of Illinois clout scandal
Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible.

WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for July 2009
SoxBot (talk) 08:03, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

GA reassessment for Being There (album)
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns with the article which you can see at Talk:Being There (album)/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. You are being notified as you are a major contributor to the article. Thanks, GaryColemanFan (talk) 06:20, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi, I just wanted to follow up quickly to find out if you (or any other editors you know of) will be able to address the concerns brought up in this review? If it's a matter of bad timing and a few extra days are needed, please let me know. I can be accommodating if the work will be done. GaryColemanFan (talk) 01:48, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Category:Top-importance Chicago articles
For the rest of this month we are looking for more candidates to be promoted to Category:Top-importance Chicago articles. We are hoping to bring the list of category members to a total of 50. Either you have participated in past votes and discussions or you have recently signed up to be a part of WP:CHICAGO. In either case, please come visit Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chicago/Assessment where we are determining who to add to the September 1st ballot. Some candidate debates have lingered, but there are many new ones from the project's top 50 according to the Wikipedia:Release Version 0.7. Help us determine which pages to add to the ballot.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 04:17, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mr. Blotto


The article Mr. Blotto has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not sure this meets the criteria at WP:MUSIC.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Oli Filth(talk&#124;contribs) 16:19, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

WP:CHICAGO voting for Top-importance Chicago articles
Your status has been changed to inactive at WikiProject Chicago/members since you did not respond to our confirmation of active status request. If this is an error please come update your status. Also feel free to come vote at WikiProject_Chicago/Assessment for our next Category:Top-importance Chicago articles. Voting continues until September 10 and nominations/discussions are ongoing for future ballot candidates at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chicago/Assessment.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 02:12, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for August 2009
SoxBot (talk) 15:21, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Ray Lamontagne.jpg
File:Ray Lamontagne.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Ray Lamontagne.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:03, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Teemu08! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is an  Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current  article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:53, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Adam Schmitt -

GAR notification
Letting you know that I've started an individual good article reassessment for Jeff Tweedy, to which you are the main contributor. You can read my review at Talk:Jeff Tweedy/GA1. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 23:42, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I was surprised to see that you did not attempt to respond to this GAR. It will likely get demoted.  You can reapply at WP:GAC if you have time to make changes later and are interested.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:35, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

GA reassessment of Ray LaMontagne
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. You are being notified as you have made a number of contributions to the article. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:Ray LaMontagne/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:17, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

FL reassessment of Smoking Popes discography
nominated Smoking Popes discography for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. --IllaZilla (talk) 03:16, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Partys Over.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Partys Over.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:25, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Born to Quit.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Born to Quit.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:27, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Destination Failure.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Destination Failure.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:49, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Monahan.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Monahan.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  • ɔ   ʃ   →  03:27, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Chicago Blackhawks FT
Have you thought of taking Chicago Blackhawks to WP:GT or WP:FT. I see all the work you have done on List of Chicago Blackhawks players and notice that List of Chicago Blackhawks head coaches is also a WP:FL.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:19, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dell Rhea's Chicken Basket
A tag has been placed on Dell Rhea's Chicken Basket requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 19:44, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Glen Ellyn Main Street Historic District
Nice work developing Glen Ellyn Main Street Historic District. I've found it hard to do good articles on historic districts, relative to narrower topics, but you've found a nice way to develop this one. Thanks! P.S. If you're interested, please consider joining WikiProject NRHP, you're invited. Whether you join or not, you're welcome to comment at the wikiproject talk page (shortcut wt:NRHP) or to post mention of your new articles at the main page of the project (shortcut wp:NRHP)'s section on new articles. --doncram (talk) 04:40, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Dell Rhea's Chicken Basket
 — Rlevse • Talk  • 18:03, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

DYK for America's Historical Roundhouse
 — Rlevse • Talk  • 00:03, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:AEC Inspection.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:AEC Inspection.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:30, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Gregg Museum.JPG missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Gregg Museum.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:54, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Better source request for File:More Familiar.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:More Familiar.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:03, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Hiatt Walk.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Hiatt Walk.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:09, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Better source request for File:The Tiki Bar is Open (cover art).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Tiki Bar is Open (cover art).jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:14, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Hiatt Stolen.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Hiatt Stolen.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:20, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Hiatt Master.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Hiatt Master.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:21, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Hiatt Head.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Hiatt Head.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:21, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Hiatt Guitar.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Hiatt Guitar.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:21, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Hiatt Gruff.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Hiatt Gruff.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:21, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Hiatt Caught.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Hiatt Caught.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:21, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Hiatt Crossing.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Hiatt Crossing.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:21, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Hiatt Austin.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Hiatt Austin.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:21, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Hiatt Alive.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Hiatt Alive.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:21, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Better source request for File:SlugTwoBit.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:SlugTwoBit.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:21, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Pdeliv.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Pdeliv.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:21, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Back in the High Life.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Back in the High Life.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:21, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Mellencamp-humanwheels.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mellencamp-humanwheels.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:21, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Squirrel and G-Man.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Squirrel and G-Man.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:21, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Trouble Single.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Trouble Single.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:21, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Better source request for File:HTSAL.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:HTSAL.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:21, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Morrison Movies.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Morrison Movies.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:21, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Better source request for File:WilcoKickingTelevision.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:WilcoKickingTelevision.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:21, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Wilco.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Wilco.gif. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:21, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Persecution.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Persecution.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:21, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Better sourcing
Bro, I see you've uploaded a lot of images an image with only basic information about the source, not enough information for us to verify with. Can you go back and work on those images? Eventually, the images may need to be deleted if you can't give a more specific source. Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:23, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:United Methodist Church of Batavia.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:United Methodist Church of Batavia.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:23, 11 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:23, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Aurora Elks Lodge No. 705 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Aurora Elks Lodge No. 705. Since you had some involvement with the Aurora Elks Lodge No. 705 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). WikiCopter RadioChecklistFormerly AirplanePro 17:30, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Stolp Woolen Mill Store listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Stolp Woolen Mill Store. Since you had some involvement with the Stolp Woolen Mill Store redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). WikiCopter RadioChecklistFormerly AirplanePro 17:30, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Graham Building listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Graham Building. Since you had some involvement with the Graham Building redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). WikiCopter RadioChecklistFormerly AirplanePro 17:40, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Hotel Aurora listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hotel Aurora. Since you had some involvement with the Hotel Aurora redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). WikiCopter RadioChecklistFormerly AirplanePro 17:40, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Keystone Building (Aurora, Illinois) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Keystone Building (Aurora, Illinois). Since you had some involvement with the Keystone Building (Aurora, Illinois) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). WikiCopter RadioChecklistFormerly AirplanePro 17:52, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Ah-ski-wawa
Looks like you're doing some pretty good stuff at National Register of Historic Places listings in Kane County, Illinois. Any chance you could get some pix in Aurora? I'd love to see Kane County fully illustrated! Smallbones (talk) 03:49, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:John Griffith Store Building.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:John Griffith Store Building.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:08, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

At Folsom Prison
Hi. I have translated the At Folsom prison article into Romanian on ro.wp, and someone there is asking if we're sure about there having been two concerts in the same day (9:40 and 12:40). The information appears to be sourced in Michael Streissguth's Johnny Cash at Folsom Prison: The Making of a Masterpiece, page 63. Could you confirm this, please?- Andrei (talk) 20:06, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Regarding Milk Pail Restaurant DYK nom
Hi. Just to let you know I've suggested an alternate hook for the nomination which I think might be a good April Fools' hook, you might want to have a look. Of course, I totally understand if you want the article on DYK as soon as possible and don't want to wait till April next year. Strange Passerby (talk) 04:15, 5 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the Milk Pail article. Smallbones (talk) 03:08, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Milk Pail Restaurant
The DYK project (nominate) 18:02, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

redirects of NRHP topics
Hi Teemu08. I came across one then more cases of NRHP building article topics which you had redirected to historic district article on Stolp Island Historic District. It turned out the Talk page of the Aurora Elks Lodge one i was looking for indicated an RFD about it, and then that pointed to others. Further i see other new redirects in your contribution history. I am a longterm NRHP editor. I believe that pretty much all the separate places listed on the NRHP are valid article topics, and should not merely be redirected to articles about historic districts or towns or villages or anything else larger which happens to include them. To the contrary, wikilinks from the historic district articles to the same topics should be created. There is usually available extensive documentation about the individually listed places. I am afraid you might be going through NRHP lists creating such redirects, which should all then be reversed, probably. Could you please comment here? I'll watch. I hope there is just a misunderstanding which can be cleared up. Sincerely, --doncram (talk) 18:47, 12 September 2010 (UTC)


 * I do see you have been doing a great job creating articles like Elgin Historic District, with sources and pics. But, I would pretty strongly prefer to have it show a redlink to Gifford-Davidson House, which is separately NRHP-listed, or create a separate article for that building, rather than have "Gifford-Davidson House" be a redirect to the historic district article.  There should be plenty of info available for any separately listed NRHP building for its own article.  And, the historic district article does not show an NRHP infobox or have a separate section for the separate building.  The effect is that the Gifford-Davidson House topic seems to have been partially erased, rather than better established as a valid topic.  There are examples of good historic district articles such as Detroit Financial District which have a separate section for each notable building, each of which links off to a main article about that building.  Could that model work for you? --doncram (talk) 19:09, 12 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Specifically, i'd like to request either articles be created for First Universalist Church (Elgin, Illinois), and Gifford-Davidson House, or an RFD to remove the redirects at those topics be pursued (so that they show as valid redlink topics in the corresponding county NRHP list-article and in the Elgin Historic District article. Likewise for others.  I created some new NRHP stub articles for the Stolp Island-related individual NRHP places. --doncram (talk) 20:30, 12 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Sorry for the delay; as of last week, my classes have started again so I'm busier than I was during the summer. I chose to create the redirects so that a person who was interested in the contributing properties would be able to have some architectural and historical context when they were redirected to the historic district. I intend to make articles on all properties that are both NRHP and in a HD, but I considered these articles to be of lower priority since some information was already available in the HD. Teemu08 (talk) 06:04, 16 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Okay, i see what you mean. However, I think it is a mistake to follow that course, mostly as it is misleading to other editors in seeming to imply that an editor has judged there should not be an article.  I am uncomfortably all too involved in a long-running contention where another editor has systematically created redirects from NRHP redlink topics to other articles, for purpose of preventing the NRHP articles from being created.  The language used in running arguments has sometimes been similar, "trying to direct readers to where there is some information" etc.  Instead, I suggest either that you create minimal stub articles very quickly, that mention the larger historic district in a way that clearly directs readers interested in more to go to the HD article.  Or, to leave them as redlinks, and add mention of the HD article to the NRHP county list-article's description column for the items.  Those ways leave it clear to other local potential editors that pictures would be welcome, that the article topics are apparently valid, acceptably Wikipedia-notable topics, etc.


 * A separate reason against redirecting the NRHP article topics which applies for only some cases, is that redirects would invalidate entries covering the redlink topics in disambiguation pages. For example, the church one is listed in the First Universalist Church disambiguation page, where an entry in the form of "First Universalist Church (Elgin, Illinois), listed on the NRHP in Kane County, Illinois" was a valid disambiguation page entry.  Although the article topic was then a redlink (now it has a stub article i think), the supporting bluelink to the Kane County list-article provided context and ensured the entry met strict rules that are enforced for disambiguation pages.  If a redirect is created, then the entry is invalid by the complicated rules, and disambiguation-focussed editors can and will find and remove such entries.  This is another way that creating a redirect would misdirect other editors and lead to dismantling of good supporting structure.


 * I could probably explain a few dozen other reasons, too, because i have been reluctantly forced to focus on this exact issue for so long elsewhere, but isn't that enough? :)  Anyhow, please say if you don't follow.  Again, i do very much appreciate your building NRHP articles, and I've noticed your new article postings at wp:NRHP.  Keep up the good work and all that!  Cheers, --doncram (talk) 22:18, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:SlugTwoBit.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:SlugTwoBit.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:20, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Uncle Tupelo poster.png
Thank you for uploading File:Uncle Tupelo poster.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:24, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:What light.ogg
Thank you for uploading File:What light.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:41, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DuPage Theatre.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:DuPage Theatre.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:29, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

FLRC
Wilco discography has been nominated for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Novice7 |  Talk  08:02, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrolled
Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:
 * This permission does not give you any special status or authority
 * Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
 * You may wish to display the Autopatrolled top icon and/or the User wikipedia/autopatrolled userbox on your user page
 * If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
 * If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 14:03, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Jimmy Hayes (ice hockey) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jimmy Hayes (ice hockey) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jimmy Hayes (ice hockey) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dkchana (talk) 21:14, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Upper Bluff Historic District
You might be interested in (see box)

I recently finished a trip from Philly to Denver and back, taking snapshots along the way. Joliet and Aurora were along the way - places where you seem to write many articles. I could probably add (or guess) many additional details on the files - but I was thinking more pix is better than more data. There are still a few more pix, but I'm not sure how much more 3-4 pix would add.

Do please let me know if there is more I can do along this line. All the best. Smallbones (talk) 21:02, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Lagrange pic
Congrats on your additions to Cook County lists, etc. But I can find

All the best,

Smallbones (talk) 22:06, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

90% illustrated lists
If you know of any 90%+ completed lists, please add them to the list just below the fully illustrated NRHP lists. Mind if I put up DuPage County for you? Smallbones (talk) 03:21, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

NRHP discussion
Hi, I noticed that you are active in the NRHP WikiProject, and I was hoping that you would like to make a comment on a discussion going on there. You don't have to, but it would be greatly appreciated. The discussion is at WT:NRHP. Thank you.  Theking 17825  16:03, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Research into the user pages of Wikipedians: Invitation to participate
Greetings,

My name is John-Paul and I am a student with the University of Alberta specializing in Communications and Technology.

I would like to include your Wikipedia user page in a study I am doing about how people present themselves online. I am interested in whether people see themselves in different ways, online and offline. One of the things I am looking at is how contributors to Wikipedia present themselves to each other through their user pages. Would you consider letting me include your user page in my study?

With your consent, I will read and analyze your user page, and ask you five short questions about it that will take about ten to fifteen minutes to answer. I am looking at about twenty user pages belonging to twenty different people. I will be looking at all user pages together, looking for common threads in the way people introduce themselves to other Wikipedians.

I hope that my research will help answer questions about how people collaborate, work together, and share knowledge. If you are open to participating in this study, please reply to this message, on your User Talk page or on mine. I will provide you with a complete description of my research, which you can use to decide if you want to participate.

Thank-you,

John-Paul Mcvea

University of Alberta

jmcvea@ualberta.ca

Johnpaulmcvea (talk) 22:12, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Good job
Good job finding the Jewel Tea Company photo.

All the best,

Smallbones (talk) 20:50, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Wilco
Hi I see that you're responsible for featured/good content on almost every core Wilco article up through the last couple of albums... What happened? Also, if I was looking to get into the band, would you have any suggestions? I've heard "War on War", "Jesus, Etc.", "Theologians", "Hate It Here", "Heavy Metal Drummer", and "What Light" and like them all. The new single ("I Might") is good, too. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:55, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Jefftweedy.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Jefftweedy.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 11:50, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Fall 2011 Photo Contest
Teemu08,

I'm helping to organize the WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Fall 2011 Photo Contest. I've also posted a general notice about the contest at WP:CHICAGO and am hoping that you and/or User:TonyTheTiger might sponsor a challenge in the contest related to the remaining 40 or so non-illustrated NRHP sites in Chicago, sites in Evanston, the rest of Cook County, or for the 5 county suburban area.

You might also want to help with the organization of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Fall 2011 Photo Contest Best Photo. The idea is that every photographer will get a chance to show off 1 photo and that his or her peers will !vote in the best one. Due to the clumsiness of the !voting process with a large number of choices, we may have to limit the number of nominations in general, and the nominations of inexperienced editors in particular (but maybe not). I've never organized a process like this, but did manage to put up 10 very WP:Beansy rules for it. Any help here would be appreciated, and you should probably check with User:Ruhrfisch who will likely be the Sponsor/Judge.

Even though I now live near Philly, Chicago is my hometown. I contributed about 20 photos to the NRHP Chicago lists a couple of years ago, and a few more in suburban areas since then. It's a shame that Chicago, the most architecturally important city in the US, does not have a fully-illustrated NRHP list. So I take the Chicago list very seriously, and I'd be very much obliged if you posted a challenge at WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Fall 2011 Photo Contest that reads something like this:

"A barnstar will be awarded to the editor who adds the most photos to the NRHP Chicago lists for previously non-illustrated sites"

The only work involved would be to determine the winner by "counting the diffs" that the participants will provide.

If you wanted to do something similar for the suburbs or the rest of Cook County, or TonyThe Tiger sponsors the Chicago challenge, that would be great too.

Any help on either part of this contest would be greatly appreciated.

Oskee Wow-Wow!

Smallbones (talk) 19:55, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

NRHP table format
Just checking that you are aware of the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_National_Register_of_Historic_Places, concerning changing the format of the NRHP county tables. The underlying format may change, but the output in the county lists looks the same! In any case, your input could be useful. Smallbones (talk) 15:34, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Photo contest
Are you aware of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Fall 2011 Photo Contest. Please post your contributions there.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:40, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Frayatthemetro.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Frayatthemetro.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:39, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Howard van Doren Shaw house at 5615 S. Woodlawn
You uploaded a nice photo of this Howard Van Doren Shaw house which is linked to in the list of his works. I think you have misidentified the house as one built in 1904 for James Henry Breasted. The only source I've been able to find on the subject lists this house as having been built in 1909 for Bertram Welton Sippy. (See The Architecture of Howard Van Doren Shaw by Virginia Greene, p. 51, which has a photograph of the house. The Greene book cites to an April 1915 article in Architectural Record.)  This same source states that the Breasted House is at 5615 S. University (not Woodlawn). Any thoughts? --Sjsilverman (talk) 19:19, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Childtweedy.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:Childtweedy.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 04:11, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Main page appearance: Sky Blue Sky
This is a note to let the main editors of Sky Blue Sky know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on May 15, 2012. You can view the TFA blurb at Today's featured article/May 15, 2012. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director or his delegate, or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions at Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:



Sky Blue Sky is the sixth studio album by Chicago rock band Wilco (pictured), released on May 15, 2007 by Nonesuch Records. Originally announced on January 17, 2007 at a show in Nashville, Tennessee, it was the band's first studio album with guitarist Nels Cline and multi-instrumentalist Pat Sansone. Before its release, the band streamed the entire album on its official website and offered a free download of "What Light". Sky Blue Sky was Wilco's highest debuting album on the Billboard 200 at number four. The self-produced album received mostly favorable reviews by critics. Publications such as PopMatters and Rolling Stone praised its maturity, while PlayLouder and Pitchfork Media criticized its "dad-rock" sound. While some critics praised the direct lyrical approach, others criticised it when compared to previous Wilco albums. The band licensed six songs from the Sky Blue Sky sessions to a Volkswagen advertisement campaign, a move that generated criticism from fans and the media. (more...) UcuchaBot (talk) 23:01, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Main page appearance: Uncle Tupelo
This is a note to let the main editors of Uncle Tupelo know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on July 16, 2012. You can view the TFA blurb at Today's featured article/July 16, 2012. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director or his delegate, or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions at Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:

Uncle Tupelo was an alternative country music group from Belleville, Illinois, active between 1987 and 1994. Jay Farrar, Jeff Tweedy, and Mike Heidorn formed the band after the lead singer of their previous band, The Primitives, left to attend college. The trio recorded three albums for Rockville Records, before signing with Sire Records and expanding to a five-piece. Shortly after the release of the band's major label debut album Anodyne, Farrar announced his decision to leave the band due to a soured relationship with his co-songwriter Tweedy. Uncle Tupelo split on May 1, 1994, after completing a farewell tour. Following the breakup, Farrar formed Son Volt with Heidorn, while the remaining members continued as Wilco. Although Uncle Tupelo broke up before they achieved commercial success, the band is renowned for its impact on the alternative country music scene. The group's first album, No Depression, became a byword for the genre and was widely influential. Uncle Tupelo's sound was unlike popular country music of the time, drawing inspiration from styles as diverse as the hardcore punk of The Minutemen and the country instrumentation and harmony of the Carter Family and Hank Williams. Farrar and Tweedy lyrics frequently referred to Middle America and the working class of Belleville. (more...) UcuchaBot (talk) 23:01, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Unused monuments page
Hi, I was pleased to see you putting my picture into National Register of Historic Places listings in Bergen County, New Jersey. Poor picture, but that's my fault. Amyway, what is this "unused monuments page"? Who fills it; who besides you acts upon it? Does it have description and discussion pages? Have I failed to notice an obvious link from another page? Jim.henderson (talk) 10:58, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Amos Lee EP.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Amos Lee EP.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:01, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Your free 1-year Questia online library account is approved ready
Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email! If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp@cengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia). Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot (talk) 05:14, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
 * 2) Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code.  Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
 * 3) Create your account by entering the requested information.  (This is private and no one from Wikipedia will see it).
 * 4) You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID.  (The account is now active for 1 year).
 * A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
 * Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
 * Show off your Questia access by placing on your userpage
 * When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Your Questia online library codes failed to deliver
We tried to use Wikipedia email to deliver your account access information but you either did not provide an email address in your preferences or had it set up not to receive messages from other editors. You can change both on the first page of Special:Preferences. To fix the situation directly or to let me know you've changed your preferences, just email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers, Ocaasi 05:30, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Comments at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/WLM-US 2013 discussion
Would definitely be appreciated. Smallbones( smalltalk ) 04:49, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

NRHP
after recent changes to the MW software, your subpage (User:Teemu08/NRHP) has landed in Category:Pages with malformed coordinate tags due to the inclusion of more than 500 coord templates. the best way to fix this error, and remove your page from the category, is to split it into two pages. thank you. Frietjes (talk) 20:10, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gifford-Davidson House, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Quoin and Elgin Academy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:36, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hotel Aurora (Aurora, Illinois), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Leland Hotel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:23, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Lola Maverick Lloyd
Hello! Your submission of Lola Maverick Lloyd at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Maile (talk) 22:40, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Lola Maverick Lloyd
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:03, 9 May 2013 (UTC)