User talk:Tuanminh01

Slow down a bit
Well done for spotting all these cases of SEO spam. One small request: to avoid over facing us poor admins, could you please keep a watch on CAT:CSD and when it gets to about 200 items, pause your activities for a while. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:02, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Also, instead of replacing the content, please add the speedy tag at the top of the article. Your nominations are probably all correct but it is more re-assuring if the admin can see that at a glance. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:06, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I see, thanks for letting me know. Tuanminh01 (talk) 11:01, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Just to add to RHaworth's suggestions, instead of tagging pages in userspace, there you can try removing the inappropriate content as having blank pages is not an issue in userspace. → AA (talk) — 15:24, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Dead links
Hello, I've undone your edit at Swimming pool. Please don't remove links just because their dead; follow the regular procedure for dead links. While searching your contributions, I found a similar edit you made to Faith (dog); I've gone and [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Faith_(dog)&diff=prev&oldid=711326110 added the Wayback Machine links properly]. Graham 87 06:09, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank You
Thank you so much. Better late than never. At the time when you posted on my talk page, I was totally confused about navigating Wikipedia (What,where,how?). Your welcome guidance helped me a lot even though I didn't even know what talk page was (Duh!), where the message came from. Warm regards Jazze7 (talk) 19:49, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Thank you sir Ravi kumar Ronit (talk) 06:04, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello
Thanks bro for your warm words on my talk page, I am really grateful to ya! Feel free to talk to this Indian Musketeer lol 😂😂!

Regards D&#39;artanian (talk) 15:41, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Thank you
Hello! Thank you for your helpful additions to my Talk page. As a student and brand-new editor, I greatly appreciate the links and suggestions! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jkwannamaker (talk • contribs) 02:11, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Blocking me from changing wiki info
Fucking dare you to ban me u big geek MemerTheDreamer (talk) 20:52, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Test page?
On what basis did you deem Brunelle Tutonda a test page (re: this)? Clearly the article is the beginning of a biography of a Swiss/Angolian basketball player. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:40, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I think that an English wikipedia article should be written in English, not French. Tuanminh01 (talk) 12:41, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * That is true, but being written in a foreign language is explicitly exempted from the criteria for speedy deletion. If you can't translate the page yourself, you should list it at WP:PNT. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:46, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. Feel free to remove the CSD tag, or change it to anything you find appropriate. Regards, Tuanminh01 (talk) 12:50, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Stop reverting the changed on "Milo"
Stop reverting the changes. I gave a reason. Caffeine is not addictiveq Petergstrom (talk) 15:04, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The reference said otherwise. Tuanminh01 (talk) 02:38, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Are you daft? Have you ever studied science ever? Caffeine addiction is not in the DSM or ICD, however caffeine dependence is. This is because there exists a distinction between dependence and addiction, as dependence is a state in which stoppage of a behavior causes a withdrawal syndrome, while addiction is the compulsive doing of a behavior not to avoid withdrawal. It is frequently confused in many articles even on respectable websites. Caffeine dependent only occurs in 15% of users(1). Don't be daft, stop reverting it. (1)Dews, Peter B., Gary L. Curtis, Kathryn J. Hanford, and Charles P. O'brien. "The Frequency of Caffeine Withdrawal in a Population-Based Survey and in a Controlled, Blinded Pilot Experiment." The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 39.12 (1999): 1221-232. Web. 10 Oct. 2016.

Want to help test advanced new tools planned for Recent Changes?
Hi Tuanminh01! I’m reaching out to you because our logs tell us you’re an active Twinkle new user welcomer. The WMF Collaboration team is working on new tools that we hope will be useful to people engaged in reviewing recent changes, fighting vandalism or supporting new users. We want to test them for usability with editors who are experienced with relevant wiki work. If you’re interested in helping to shape this new technology—we’d like to hear from you.

The testing should take about an hour, will be conducted online, and will take place during the next few weeks. To participate, please email dchen[at]wikimedia.org with the subject line Twinkle Welcomer. Include the following information:
 * Username
 * Email where we can reach you
 * Your city or time zone
 * Best time to talk to you
 * Your primary use(s) of Twinkle or Recent Changes (e.g., reviewing recent changes, reviewing with a particular focus (specify), anti-vandalism, new-page review, welcoming new users, etc.)

Thanks! Dchen (WMF) (talk) 22:34, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Please don't revert changes on "Thomas Rid"
Hi — I'm trying to get in touch with you, I'm Thomas Rid (thomas.rid@kcl.ac.uk) — the "living person" on the page you're reverting. I would like to request the deletion of my Wikipedia profile. It contains INCORRECT information and publishing my DATE AND PLACE of birth is a security risk.

Could you perhaps email me or DM me on Twitter @ridt? Ridt (talk) 09:14, 24 October 2016 (UTC)ridt — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ridt (talk • contribs) 09:08, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello!
Thank you for your helpful additions to my Talk page. I'm so glad that you try to help me. Thank you very much, I will try to do my best for Wiki. Best regards (Lusfuz (talk) 16:29, 24 October 2016 (UTC))

Hi. I didn't know how should I add a reliable reference. Its reference for 3 days a week between Vienna and Isfahan is here http://www.bbc.com/persian/iran/2016/09/160906_l12_iran_vienna_isfahan_flight_service Hassanghorbani95 (talk) 13:01, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

thanks for comment on content translation system
Hi there,

Thanks for your content translation comment you made about my post on the Content Translation comments page.

I note that you are a translator from en to vi. You should spend 10 minutes of your life and read about

my gadget, GoogleTrans, and how it can do translation keeping the markup, on the Content Translation system.

Look here for help: []

It will do the language pair, vi-en and en-vi, and do html tables as well (CT doesn't seem to translate these).

Endo999 (talk) 19:18, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, but
Thanks for this, but IP is indeed user, as you can verify on their talk pages and history. So this user had effectively reverted himself. Cheers - DVdm (talk) 12:45, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh, thanks for explaining it. Regards, Tuanminh01 (talk) 12:46, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

I never claimed not to be so, I forgot to log in and my ip address showed up instead. Dvdm seems to try to make this into a personal attack on me instead of defending his non-scientific over aggressive editing. See the talk page on Tests of Special Relativity. I am again asking why Dvdm would prefer the wikipedia page to claim "A series of one-way measurements were undertaken, ALL of them confirming the isotropy of the speed of light" when this evidently is false. I suggested simply to modify this to "A series of one-way measurements were undertaken, MOST of them confirming the isotropy of the speed of light", then I referred to a few of the experiments that are published in highly ranked academic publications that claim they have found ansitropic one-way speed of light either by completely avoiding clock synchronization, or by getting around Einstein-Poincare syntonization. I just stated as these researchers themselves have stated that the experiments should be repeated. It is not good science to sweep under the carpet a handful of serious independent experiments that goes against main stream "consensus". It is fine that main stream consensus dominate the page as it should, what is wrong is to pretend that ALL one-way experiments agree on isotropic one-way seed when this obviously not is the case. TravelAlone (talk) 20:24, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

User:Dvdm now seems try to divert away from a discussion around facts on the topic and try to turn it into a personal attack with all kinds of accusations that not are related to the context on the page of discussion itself. Is this not quite standard suppression techniques ? I am happy to discuss anything around the references and the topic on the talk page. I will ask Dvdm to be specific in his critics and to document that ALL one-way experiments claim isotropic one-way speed of light. How can this be the case when anyone with access to a decent science library evidently can find publications in high ranked academic publications claiming the opposite. ItI find it is sad if wikipedia should get dominated by such editing. TravelAlone (talk) 20:21, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

User talk page blanking
You are probably aware of WP:BLANKING. One is allowed to blank their own talk page which is taken as an indication of having read it. I rather like as it informs the user that blanking the page isn't going to help and sort of avoids edit warring over blanking (which is considered wp:EW on the restoring party's part). Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:05, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Schannel (YouTube channel)
There is enough content in the infobox to understand what the article is about. ~ GB fan 13:16, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks.
Great pointers! The Pudit (talk) 08:43, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Cốc cốc
...mình không vào wiki tiếng Việt được, bạn mở lại cho mình đi. THANH-KIỀU ! Đông Minh (talk) 02:47, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Tài khoản của bạn Đông Minh ko hề bị khóa. Thân mến. Tuanminh01 (talk) 02:51, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Không phải, mình đang sửa bài thì thấy nó hiện lên cảnh báo không lưu sửa được, đọc thấy người bị cấm là Thành viên:Wiki thành viên..., bạn này ở chung khu nhà trọ và nhà trọ này sare mạng với nhau. Ai làm gì nấy chịu. Wiki không có cách nào cấm riêng hả ? Đông Minh (talk) 02:56, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Khi cấm bạn kia thì bạn login với tên người dùng khác vào bình thường và edit bình thường. Ai làm gì nấy chịu. Bạn vào lại viwiki với tên Đông Minh thử xem. Tuanminh01 (talk) 03:04, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Mình thử dùng nhờ máy tính mấy thằng chung phòng cũng không vô được, điện thoại cũng không. Mà thôi không sao, mình lang thang wiki nước khác rồi ngày mai quay về Việt Nam vậy. HAVE A GOOD DAY! Đông Minh (talk) 03:15, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Tôi đã thêm tk của bạn Đông Minh vào danh sách miễn cấm IP trong 1 tuần. Bạn có thể vào lại rồi đấy. Tuanminh01 (talk) 03:36, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
 * mình sửa đổi được rồi, cảm ơn bạn nha ! Đông Minh (talk) 05:01, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Tuanminh01/Temp1
User:Tuanminh01/Temp1, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Tuanminh01/Temp1 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Tuanminh01/Temp1 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 20:40, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Chào bạn (Hello)
Bn giúp mk vs đc ko. Hình như ip của mk trùng vs bn bdanhviwiki, bn có thể làm gì đó để giúp ko?

P.S:Nếu ko cũng đc mai rồi mk on tiếp. Crnoname006 (talk) 14:01, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Đã cấp quyền miễn cấm IP cho bạn Crnoname006. Tuanminh01 (talk) 14:09, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Việc tạo tài khoản từ địa chỉ IP này (Sunandmoonwalk) đã bị khóa tạm thời. Điều này có thể là do hành vi phá hoại liên tục từ địa chỉ IP mà bạn đang dùng để sửa đổi. Địa chỉ IP này có thể đã được nhiều người cùng chia sẻ nếu bạn kết nối Internet thông qua máy chủ proxy (đa số trường học, công ty và một số nhà cung cấp dịch vụ Internet phổ biến dùng cách này) hoặc truy cập quay số.

Bạn có thể nhờ người khác tạo giúp tài khoản này bằng cách gửi yêu cầu đến info-vi@wikimedia.org (vui lòng viết chính xác tên đăng nhập của tài khoản mà bạn muốn tạo, địa chỉ thư điện tử để nhận mật khẩu, và chi tiết thông tin về việc khóa tài khoản như đã cung cấp dưới đây). Nhưng trước hết bạn nên thử tìm trong danh sách toàn bộ thành viên để chắc chắn rằng tài khoản mà bạn muốn tạo chưa có ai sử dụng. Chúng tôi rất tiếc nếu gây ra sự phiền toái nào đối với người dùng vô tình gặp phải tình huống này.

Thông tin về việc khóa tài khoản: Tuanminh01 đã khóa khả năng tạo tài khoản từ địa chỉ IP Sunandmoonwalk, với lý do như sau: Cho thông tin rác vào trang. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:EE0:4BCA:5710:91C9:2BD9:735C:60A7 (talk) 03:42, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Range block
Hello Tuanminh01,

Could you please expand the block of these accounts on viwiki? Thank you. Regards, Wildkatzen (talk) 20:31, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Xin hãy Bỏ cấm tôi
Xin chào tôi là Phượng Hoàng Mặt Trời hôm nay tôi ở đây là để cầu xin bạn gỡ lệnh cấm cho tài khoản Phượng Hoàng Mặt Trời của tôi ở VN.Tôi bay giờ đã nhận ra lỗi của mình và rất ân hận khi chửi JohnsonLee01 và chỉ mong bạn gỡ lệnh cấm cho tôi để tôi có thể tiếp tục sửa đổi và còn rất nhiều việc ở VN như phải nhanh chóng sửa đổi đứa con cưng của mình là The Abyss trước khi nó bị xóa. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phượng Hoàng Mặt Trời (talk • contribs) 06:54, 23 April 2020 (UTC) Phượng Hoàng Mặt Trời (talk) 06:56, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Cấm không lí do chính đáng!
Chào Tuanminh01 tôi là Autumn VN. Mục đích tôi nhắn tin cho bạn là vì chuyện bạn cấm tôi với lí do "Cho thông tin rác vào trang". Thật sự thì tôi không hiểu mình đã làm gì sai để bị cấm như thế. Tôi không thể chấp nhận một lí do cấm như thế này được. Suốt những ngày tháng trên wiki tôi đã đóng góp một cách tích cực cho sự phát triển của wikipedia mà bạn lại cho rằng tôi cho thông tin rác vào trang ư? Tôi muốn bạn giải thích cho tôi rằng tại sao bạn lại cấm tôi một các chính đáng. Nếu bạn vẫn có phong cách làm việc như thế này thì tôi sẽ phải báo cáo lên Meta! Autumn VN (talk) 16:01, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Bạn chưa bị cấm lần nào. Hãy xem kỹ lại. Thân mến. Tuanminh01 (talk) 04:13, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Giúp tôi cái
Chào bạn gì đó bạn khỏe ko cho mình hỏi là tại sao tự dưng mình lại bị cấm vậy. Có thể mình bị trùng IP với ai đó. Bạn có thể giúp mình được ko. PipaChina (talk) 10:40, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Bạn chưa bị cấm lần nào. Hãy xem kỹ lại. Thân mến. Tuanminh01 (talk) 10:50, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Nhưng mình bị trùng IP với Ip này 171.255.125.0/24 PipaChina (talk) 10:51, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Bạn có thể xem kĩ đây PipaChina (talk) 10:53, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Đó là lệnh cấm các IP, tài khoản của bạn khi login với IP bị cấm vẫn có thể sửa đổi bình thường. Tuanminh01 (talk) 10:59, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Cấp quyền miến cấm IP
Chào bạn tôi là Autumn VN. Tôi muốn nhờ bạn cấp quyền miễn cấm IP cho tôi vì những ngày đầu tôi tham gia wiki thì tôi lập khá nhiều tk rối và tất nhiên tất cả đều bị cấm. Vì tính năng "ấn đăng nhập phát là vào luôn tk" hoạt động nhờ IP của người đăng nhập nên rất hay đăng nhập vào tk cấm, làm mất thời gian đợi hết cấm. Mong bạn giúp đỡ. Autumn VN (talk) 02:30, 16 September 2020 (UTC)