User talk:Vcelloho

Welcome!
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Vomiting
Concerning Image:Vomit-67.jpg: you did not indicate whether this is a GFDL, public domain or fair use image. I am also concerned that there is no indication that permission of the vomiting person has been obtained for wide dissemination on electronic media. It is not exactly a complimentary picture. I'd appreciate if you could respond to these queries, otherwise there may be grounds to delete the image from Wikipedia. JFW | T@lk  13:39, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Senior Patrol Leader
I have redirected this to Scouting, but I am sure that if you wanted to split out a separate article on the rank structure within the scout movement this would be welcome. I was a senior patrol leader myself, long ago :-) Sometimes a SPL is not a patrol leader as such, I was the group quartermaster. - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C]  AfD? 19:05, 8 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Your account has never been blocked. However, you may be sharing an IP with another user who has been blocked. Please post the whole block message below. Sasquatch t|c 04:38, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * What Sasquatch said.  We can't actually find the block that's causing you a problem unless you copy and paste the specific message you get when you try to edit.  When you can give that to us, put the  tag back.  Mango juice talk 14:33, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Its no longer blocking now so something must have happened that fixed it but thank you for the time that you spent to help me. Vcelloho 02:25, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

ARHS
Thanks for your work on the article.

Septegram (class of 1979--the Dark Ages to you)

Image copyright problem with Image:ARHSFrontEntrance.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:ARHSFrontEntrance.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:44, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Your report on WP:AIV
Thank you for making a report on Administrator intervention against vandalism. Removing and reporting vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them again to the AIV noticeboard. Thanks. For more information on the available warnings and how to issue them, visit WP:UTM and WP:VAND. —Krellis 20:02, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

70.17.131.121
Sorry I don't know what happened. Thanks for correcting the vandalism that came out of my IP adress. I don't know who did it but thanks for correcting it. I'm really sorry about the trouble this caused. -Vcelloho 20:16, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

No worries....chasing and fixing the electronic graffiti left behind by vandals seems to be a never-ending task. HJ 13:23, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Firefox-tan.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Firefox-tan.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

--Iamunknown 15:34, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Your VandalProof Application
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Vcelloho. As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that:

You do not yet have enough edits in the main namespace (> 250).

Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank again for your interest in VandalProof. A le_Jrb talk 17:24, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Your abuse report on 206.210.84.5
You may want to check the abuse report page. I noticed you inserted your report of 206.210.84.5 inside the heading for a report I had made. It may not get noticed if you leave it there. The usage of that page is pretty complicated -- it took me a couple of tries to get it right -- and the instructions are here. Thanks! -- Gridlock Joe 19:40, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Vcelloho! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. A le_Jrb talk 21:29, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Warning users for vandalizing the Introduction/Sandbox
The introduction text has a link on it encouraging new users to test their editing/formatting skills on it, these types of edits aren't vandalism-- VectorPotential Talk 00:28, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry I'll be more careful. -Vcelloho 00:30, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * A lot of people make that mistake, that's why I keep the Introduction watchlisted, just in case-- VectorPotential Talk 00:33, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

VandalProof list corrupted message
Please make sure you have the latest version (1.36). The list seems to be Ok, and using an old, non supported version will generate that error. Hope this helps, Prodego  talk  23:44, 26 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Hmmmm. I was using version 1.36 my guess is the schools fire wall was blocking it sorry if I caused any problems. It's working for me now from home. -Vcelloho 00:41, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

This needs to be solved
I have taken the "List of Companies" problem (what to do with an entire class of articles that get repeatedly submitted for deletion en mass?) for debate to two different places. This really needs to be solved once and for all (we can't keep debating the same stuff for eternity). Would you take a look at either the discussion on the Village Pump or the relevant wikiproject? Aditya Kabir 15:06, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

WP:CVU status
The Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to and/or  status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 17:52, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Edits
i just gutted Camp Wanocksett. Look at some of the better camp articles to see why. Drop me a line if you have questions. --evrik (talk) 17:06, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Rollback
Hiya. I've granted your request. Please see WP:RBK or feel free to ask me if you need any help with the tool. Pedro : Chat  08:18, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

LOL
You know, while I agree that "LOL" can constitute vandalism, are you sure you weren't missing something a bit more significant? Cheers! Unschool (talk) 00:13, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I realized I had made a mistake in the revert but I lost track of the page in Huggle. I'll try to be more careful in the future. -Vcelloho (talk) 00:16, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, man, don't even think about it. We all have that happen sometimes, where we try to revert vandalism, but because we're not the only one fighting the fight, we end up reverting to a vandalized version.  I just found this one particularly funny, because the net effect was to remove the relatively innocuous letters "LOL" and leaving the really nasty stuff right next to it.  It was hilarious, and I was literally laughing out loud.  No worries, just fun. Unschool (talk) 00:20, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
for reverting the vandalism to my talk page. Double Blue (Talk) 01:54, 28 October 2008 (UTC)


 * No problem. -Vcelloho (talk)


 * Thanks for cleaning up the vandalism at my talk page and at Wysprgr2005's! I have reported that IP. &mdash;Politizer talk / contribs 03:27, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
For reverting the vandalism to my talk Wysprgr2005 (talk) 03:29, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Comment by an IP user
121.208.41.34 (talk) 05:59, 31 October 2008 (UTC)mate she is a lesbian it was in womans day
 * If you can cite it that's fine also don't use the phrasing self confessed. Confessed puts a negative spin on being a lesbian. -Vcelloho (talk) 06:46, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

This is not vandalism
I added some suggestions to a talk page about racial slurs. Some were missing, and I'm trying to help. He asked me about them so I told him. This is not vandalism. IKnowMeSomeSlurs (talk) 21:08, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Vcelloho I jumped the gun on the initial contribution. I'll respond shortly on my talk page. KuyaBriBri Talk 21:09, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks for reverting that vandalism to my talk page (and there was me getting all excited about the new messages *wry grin*). Kind regards, SpitfireTally-ho! 18:34, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you from me, as well. Best, @Kate   (talk)  18:38, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

episcopal logo image
Please do not replace the logo on Episcopal Church (United States) until the discussion at WP:NFR has had a chance to complete. There is a history of people: 1) uploading a nonfree fair use logo from the Episcopal Church's web page; 2) someone uploads a free version they made themselves; 3) someone changes Episcopal Church (United States) to use the free one; 4) the nonfree one is deleted as unused; 5) an admin wanders by and determines (without discussion) that the free version is a copyright violation and deletes it, 6) and we return to step 1. Sometimes in place of step 6, we do a shorter turn of the wheel, and move straight to steps 2 and 4. There is a discussion right now at WP:NFR about a long-term actual solution, but for now, your helpful attempt to do number 3 only pushes this annoying wheel one more step around its inexorable course. Tb (talk) 06:00, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry about this I didn't realize what I was getting into, I was just trying to replace an inferior file type with a file type that is best for representing logos. -Vcelloho (talk) 06:39, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:18, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism of Xinjiang/East Turkestan-related pages
Hi, I noticed that you reverted an edit by 99.23.90.235. He seems to be making a lot of edits to related pages, with a non-neutral agenda (changing neutral names to non-neutral names, and magnifying numbers of people in regions and armies without sourcing). You seem to know what to do about such things, so I thought I'd bring it to your attention in the hope that you can deal with it. Thanks. Duoduoduo (talk) 20:46, 12 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Well, now you've got me puzzled. If you think he's a sneaky vandal, why did you revert my reversion of his numerical change? Duoduoduo (talk) 22:41, 12 July 2011 (UTC)


 * I've undone all his numerical changes, but nothing much else because I wasn't sure. Duoduoduo (talk) 22:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Eric Cantor
You have won the Eric Cantor-match! Congratulations. 1 week for the bad boy!  Night of the Big Wind   talk  01:28, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Excellent. -Vcelloho (talk) 01:44, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Alternate universes and omake theater in Megatokyo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alternate universes and omake theater in Megatokyo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alternate universes and omake theater in Megatokyo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:39, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

James Foley
FYI - doesn't appear to be the same one. The one who was executed was James Wright Foley. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 23:59, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I know. I was reverting it back to June 11. And putting in the information to inform people that they have the wrong person and to not change it to say this particular person is dead. Thanks. -Vcelloho (talk) 00:01, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Odd, because that's not how it showed up for me. It showed with the "recently died" hatnote. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 00:05, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I made an error in my revert, but you fixed it before I had a chance to. Thanks -Vcelloho (talk) 00:06, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Any time. That's the trouble with editing stuff that's in the news - too many clashing edits, no? -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 00:07, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Ecce Romani for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ecce Romani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ecce Romani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Antigng (talk) 13:11, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Featured picture candidates. Since you had some involvement with the Featured picture candidates redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. funplussmart (talk) 21:59, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

"Featured picture candidate" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Featured_picture_candidate&redirect=no Featured picture candidate] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:59, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)