User talk:Vertott

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Vertott, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 20:57, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Notability of bands.
It's credible claims of significance. If a band article fails WP:MUS by a large enough margin, I'll tend to apply WP:SNOW and list it for CSD. Usually the admins on New Page patrol agree with me. I've listed both articles at AFD since you disagree with me. Cheers, Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 21:06, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Rescue tagging
I notice you've been tagging some articles for rescue lately. In the future, when tagging articles for rescue, consider following the instructions at WP:ARS. Specifically, I'm referring to this part: "As part of this tag's use, please comment at the deletion discussion on why this item should be rescued and how that could happen." Snotty Wong  confabulate 14:09, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry missed that part; I will do in future, thank you for the heads up. VER  Tott  14:11, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, that's better. You don't even necessarily need to use one of the templates, you can just mention that you've tagged the article in your comments at the deletion discussion if you want.  Thanks.  Snotty Wong   confabulate 19:01, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Schools
Hi, I've noticed you've been removing deletion  templates from  primary  schools. This is just to  let you  know that  we have an accepted standard procedure in  what  to  do  with  primary  school articles. The rule is simple: they are not  notable, and articles can be deleted. What we usually  do is to merge and redirect  them without  a fuss to  the school  district  article (USA), or to  the education  section  in  the UK village, town, or city  article. In the exceptional case where a primary  school  may have done something  really  extraordinary and might  justify  having  a Wikipedia article, we put it through  the AfD process where the community  can decide what  happens to  it. Please take your time getting used to  the many  policies, rules, and guidelines around here, and if you  would like any  help,  please don't  hesitate to  ask  me on  my  talk  page. Happy editing! --Kudpung (talk) 20:45, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

methods of deletion
Hi, you might  like to  take a moment  and check out our policies and guidelines at  WP:AfD, WP:PROD, WP:BLPPROD, WP:CSD, and WP:NOTABILITY before you warn the very  admins who  designed those policies  ;) If you  need any  help, don't  hesitate to  ask  me on  my  talk  page.--Kudpung (talk) 21:23, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Which warning did I get wrong ? VER  Tott  21:24, 19 October 2010 (UTC)


 * I saw that too... WP:DTTR isn't policy, but it's a thought-provoking read. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 23:48, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Isulk'im
Would it save us both time and trouble if I just put all of the related articles up for AfD right now instead of trickling through prods for you to contest later? VernoWhitney (talk) 13:50, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, and please remember to substitute deprod using {{subst:Deprod}} when you place it. VernoWhitney (talk) 13:52, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that VER  Tott  14:13, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Wolven Ancestry
Hello. I have no problem with removing prods but generally I would like to know why you removed it. The article in question only has one source, and it is not an article about the band but a press release the band sent to the Metal Underground publication. As such I think it fails wp:band. An afd is no problem but why remove a prod when no changes were made to the article? Beach drifter (talk) 02:20, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Major Mohit Sharma, AC, SM
You say "Major in the army and medal winner is claim to significance." I beg to differ (and apparently so do the two toher admins who've deleted this page under A7 previously). There are plenty of majors in every army. It's a minor rank in the grand scheme of things and does not confer notability. There are also plenty of military medal winners who are simply not notable. WP:NOTMEMORIAL, we shouldn't have a page on every dead soldier who's won a medal. Strange Passerby (talk • contribs) 11:27, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * posts crossed VER  Tott  11:30, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Notability
There is no rule that NASDAQ listings convey notability; there are some pretty obscure securities listed there. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  17:16, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Sean Carver
I nominated Sean Carver for deletion at Articles for deletion/Sean Carver for a lack of sources to pass WP:GNG. It has recently been revived from that deletion and you declined the A7 nom made by another editor. I'm pretty sure this is a recreation of that article, it still doesn't have the sources, and I think the re-creator is the original editor, who is probably COI'd. Grateful if you could check on the recreation and speedy on that basis if so. I will post a message on the recreating editor's talk. Bigger digger (talk) 10:14, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
 * And then I see the redlink and remember I prodded it. I'll be nomming it now...! Bigger digger (talk) 10:16, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Your reversion
Re this reversion, I believe you are wrong. Only high schools are considered notable. There is no rule that "writing schools" are not eligible under A7. Regards, WWGB (talk) 12:17, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Notability: vzRoom
Thank you very much for letting me know my mistakes and thank you for your time. I am sorry for being too new and too excited when I was making my first contribution to my most favorite website -- Wikipedia.

Receiving your notice, I immediately added back some references and citations and and tried to establish notability of the topic. Now the sources of citations    are from famous TV program, newspaper, magazine, website and neutral organization. They all have online references. Are they useful to the topic? Please correct me again.

Bahamian architects
Hello Vertott. Could you help me find some notable Bahamian architects, please? The only name currently listed there is Jean Albert Vanderpool - the content is unverifiable. The article - as it is - has no value for Wikipedia. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 16:38, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
 * On a side note, despite the name of the article, it was eligible under db-A7, as the article was created for the purpose of inserting this not notable bio to Wikipedia. Just my opinion. It isn't so important. What is important: Are you planning to add some really notable names and improve the article? --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 16:48, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Not English
You can get a fairly good idea of what the text's about by using the Google translation linked on the template. It's not suitable for direct use in an article, but you can get the general picture. Peridon (talk) 17:00, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
 * She's "the deputy managing director of the Privatization Agency" - doesn't look notable to me. I'm putting the bio tag back. Please leave it to an admin to decide on this. Peridon (talk) 17:12, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
 * An admin won't just delete it out of hand - they'll do what I did and what you can do - look at the rough translation. Peridon (talk) 17:14, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Do not delete talk page contributions of other users
Whether by accident or otherwise you deleted my post on the following page: Please be more careful in future. Jammy07 (talk) 01:30, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

RE: In the news/Candidates‎‎
Yeah, uh, please use the one that's already there, and suggest improvements to that effect. This is the standard practice at ITN/C. 狐 Déan rolla bairille!  23:11, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Frankly I couldn't give half a toss if it's listed. That's how we do things. 狐 Déan rolla bairille!   23:23, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, and you should probably read up on our central policies before you go around blindly accusing folk. 狐 Déan rolla bairille!   23:34, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cricket
Hi,

Can I ask you the same question that I have asked Johnlp and Andrew nixon can you be clear, what do you both think the guildlines on club teams should say ? Should they stay as they are ? Should it be clarified that they only apply to English and Australian club teams? should all mention of club teams be removed ? or do you favour another form of words should be used. ? Mtking (talk) 21:29, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Kahn and the maid
Hi - a thread has been opened at the BLP noticeboard about your attempting to name the maid in the two associated wikipedia articles - please don't replace it without consensus again - discussion is here BLPN - thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 11:20, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2011
{| style="border: 2px solid #CC0000; padding: 6px; width: 80%; min-width: 700px; background: #FFFAF0; line-height: 20px; cellpading=30" align=center Hi, Vertott, thank you for using the tag, the main organizing tool for the Article Rescue Squadron! BusterD (talk) 16:35, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * colspan="1" |

DRV
A notification that the Templates for Discussion discussion (oy, repetition) has been taken to a deletion review discussion. The Article Rescue Squadron was notified, and as notifications to previous involved parties isn't normal practise, I and a few ARS members agreed that, in the interests of transparency and fairness, we should let everyone know...hence this talkpage message ;).

If anyone has an issue with me sending these out, do drop me a note on my talkpage. Regards, Ironholds (talk) 10:30, 28 January 2012 (UTC)