User talk:Voorts/Archive 2

Why was my edit on the Game (rapper) reverted?
Please answer, and see KSI. ErceÇamurOfficial (talk) 10:20, 27 July 2023 (UTC)


 * @ErceÇamurOfficial Because you didn't cite a RS. I'm not sure what you mean by "see KSI". voorts (talk/contributions) 13:07, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
 * KSI's intro has the word JJ that's why I said it. ErceÇamurOfficial (talk) 13:25, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

WSNS-TV FAC
Wanted to remind you that I've responded to all your concerns. Please take a look. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:15, 27 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Apologies; it's been a busy week for me. Will take a look now. voorts (talk/contributions) 19:31, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Qin Gang&#32; on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 15:30, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Meeting the notability threshold
Voorts, firstly, thanks for reviewing my submission on the Humanists and Non-religious in Defence (HAND).

I note you have declined it due to 'not meeting notability guidelines'. I have drawn references from a couple of Defence publications and one major non-religious organisation, itself having a Wiki page but, most notably, from the UK Government's own website which lists HAND as an accepted and legitimate organsation.

As a referenced organisation within a significant public body (the British Army) that is recognised by HMG, does this not qualify as notable enough? If this is a clear no then please offer me some advice as to how I might prove that it is. I don't know where the weakness of the article lies, or if adding a few more references here and there will still fail to allow it to meet the mark.

Thanks. Josh Sleeman (talk) 20:27, 29 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Please review both the organization-specific notability guideline and the general notability guideline (GNG), specifically WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:SIGCOV. It's not enough that the sources are reliable and secondary; there also needs to be significant coverage in those reliable, secondary sources, and to my recollection, none of the sources cited in the draft provided in-depth coverage of HAND. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:05, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 August 2023
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:39, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:MrBeast&#32; on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 17:31, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

3O assistance
Replied here. Best wishes, SergeWoodzing (talk) 19:23, 8 August 2023 (UTC)


 * @SergeWoodzing Thanks for letting me know. I must've forgotten to subscribe to the thread. Very busy IRL but will have time to look tomorrow evening. Best, voorts (talk/contributions) 21:17, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Featured article candidate
Hi, I've nominated a featured article candidate back on 17 July that you've copyedited in May and so far it has attracted little interest. A coordinator has said that they'll archive the nomination if it does not receive any comments in the next few days (10/11 August). So, are you able to give your input so that I could know if there is anything to fix in the article? The nomination in question is Featured article candidates/Democratic Party (Serbia)/archive1. Cheers, Vacant0 (talk) 23:30, 9 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately I'm about to go on vacation and don't really have time. Hopefully you can attract some interest on a second go-around if this nom gets archived. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:42, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Danny Lendich
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Danny Lendich you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tim O'Doherty -- Tim O'Doherty (talk) 17:23, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Danny Lendich
The article Danny Lendich you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Danny Lendich and Talk:Danny Lendich/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tim O'Doherty -- Tim O'Doherty (talk) 18:00, 13 August 2023 (UTC)