User talk:Yellow Evan/Archive 2

1946–47 Toronto Huskies season
A couple of things. If you intend to nominate this article for deletion, it should be through WP:Articles for deletion not WP:Miscellany for deletion. An understandable mistake, though you should have read the instructions more clearly.

More importantly, I'd like to urge you to reconsider listing it at all. The 1946–47 Toronto Huskies season was not only the first season of this professional basketball team, it also featured the first ever National Basketball Association game, anywhere. Double Blue (Talk) 01:47, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

WP:POINT is not a good path to go down. Double Blue (Talk) 02:14, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Hurricane Tico (1983)
In the past, the indirect effects of tropical cyclones weren't used to rate the importance of storm articles. Look at Hurricane Stan. It's retired, it caused as many as 2,000 fatalities and over $1.1 billion damage, but the project decided it was Mid-importance because most of that occurred from the non-tropical part of the system. Under the same criteria, Stan's effects dwarf Tico's, and they don't belong in the same category. Potapych (talk) 15:28, 13 November 2008 (UTC)


 * You need to resist the temptation to rate everything higher because you contributed to it. It's just a fact that most storm articles are going to fall into the Low category. The Mid-importance category is populated by articles on storms that are far more significant. Potapych (talk) 15:24, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Warning
Sorry I made them all normal sections and by the way, when making a section with line fully across, put 2 = signs.--Kirk76 1854 Atlantic   Hurricane Season  19:36, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * This page is also extremely long. An archive is desperately needed, a good cut-off point would be the beginning of the month. You should archive everything through November 1 to make this page easier to handle for those with slower computers. The page (as of the edit before this one) is 154,336 bytes in size. That puts this talk page as the 207th (in theory since talk pages aren't included) largest article on the entire english site. Please read Help:Archiving a talk page and archive your talk page as soon as you can. Thanks. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 19:43, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Rating articles
Just a note about rating articles, when doing so, only rate articles in which you are not the main contributer, i.e. for Hurricane Boris (2008), you shouldn't have given it C-class yourself since you are the main contributer. However, I do not disagree on the rating so it will stay C unless other users determine it is not of C-class quality. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 22:19, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: Ekeka's FAC
Sorry for the late response - I've been avoiding Wikipedia the last week. No, I don't see any need to try and get Ekeka featured. There really isn't that much information on the storm, and personally I'm completely content in it being a GA. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 06:47, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Hurricane Ileana (2006) GAN
Your GAN for Hurricane Ileana has failed due to the lack of response over the past 9 days. Please address the issues noted in the review before re-nominating the article. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:19, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Unless someone else claims stake on it, I'll review it in a couple hours. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:23, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: 1992 PHS
You're not going to finish any other projects first? Are you actually serious about working on it, or are you just saying you will be working on it to feel like you are doing more work than you actually are? From what I've seen, all you've done is expand a few paragraphs slightly, but only to a level that doesn't significantly improve the article.

I'll be blunt. You're creating a bit of mess with some of your articles. I think what would be best for you would be to list every project you are working on, maybe on your user page (and in a fancy table). Also be sure to include every article you created in the past that was not fixed by another person. Personally, I think you should focus on the existing articles you've touched (say, getting them up to GA), and if you feel you're ready (or, you could ask your admin coach if he thinks you are ready) then you can continue to a new project. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 15:46, 14 November 2008 (UTC)


 * I moved the article for you. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 16:35, 15 November 2008 (UTC)


 * I think you should fix up all of the articles you have created that were never fixed up by another person. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 17:26, 15 November 2008 (UTC)


 * If you are truly serious about doing 1992 PHS, then you should ask your admin coach for assistance, as season articles are a huge task. It's doable, but it's a very large task. Finishing up Dora would be good. More information is probably needed, so be sure to do a good Google search in English and, if possible, do another in Spanish; there is bound to be plenty of Spanish info on the storm, but probably not as much English. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 17:41, 15 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Do not use the weather.com one for Dora. There are surely more sources than the ones you found. The first one has a lot of good links, but that's just the start. When you're researching an article, you need to comb through the internet. Not just through a simple Google search, but use some different terms. I have something really important to say, and I hope you read it and understand it.


 * The tropical cyclone WikiProject has some great editors. Some users have described the project as being one of the best on Wikipedia. As you are an editor in the project, there is a lot expected from you, such as great writing, great researching, and doing lots of great things. Given your age, do you feel you can live up to that expectation? ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 03:57, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

No, read the rest of my response. The tropical cyclone WikiProject has some great editors. Some users have described the project as being one of the best on Wikipedia. As you are an editor in the project, there is a lot expected from you, such as great writing, great researching, and doing lots of great things. Given your age, do you feel you can live up to that expectation? ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 04:04, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

I don't think you get it. You are expected to make great edits, and you are not. You are annoying on talk pages, you still have trouble spelling and writing, and you haven't improved much since you got here. You've been here for two to three months. I hate to ask, but is Wikipedia really the place for you? ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 04:26, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Maybe it's best for you, but is it best for Wikipedia? Remember, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and we're all here to write for the good of it, not for our pleasure. If you are being disruptive to the project, than no, Wikipedia is not the best for you. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 04:45, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

The problem is that you are being disruptive. Your talk page edits are disruptive, particularly evidenced through your edits on Norbert. You reverted Juliancolton's edit and called it vandalism. That itself is vandalism. And no, I left the symbol that un-indents the discussion. I'll repeat. If you are being disruptive to the project, than no, Wikipedia is not the best for you. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 05:08, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

I have some more advice for you. When you are on break, do not edit at all until your break is over. It doesn't count saying "back to break", especially when your edit was unneeded. There's no need to respond to this. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 20:32, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

You are being disruptive again. There was no need to bring the article discussion back up, and you left an inappropriate template on the WPTC talk page. Furthermore, you changed the noticeboard to add the article discussion, when it had already been reverted before. If you are being disruptive to the project, than no, Wikipedia is not the best for you. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 19:00, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hurricane Boris (2008)
The article Hurricane Boris (2008) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. It hasn't failed because it's basically a good article, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Hurricane Boris (2008) for things needed to be addressed. \ / (⁂) 11:43, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I saty it abd one part well writen was not fair. Many other storms like Hurricane Hernan (2008), a former FAC and failed form something silly at least in my opinion, have these meteorology words. Leave Message ,Yellow Evan home, or User:Yellow Evan/Sandbox 17:20, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Yellow Evan, when you leave a post on a talk page, you need to make sure it is legible, with as few typos as possible. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 19:02, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Firstly, try to keep all discussion on the GA1 page. This helps other editors read the comments and suggestions made for the page. Secondly, I think you are trying to say that you thought my comment about meteorology words was unfair. I'm not saying don't use any meteorology terms, as that would be unfair, just words that aren't necessarily technical such as the low, conductive, intensification, remnant. I almost looks like someone had a thesaurus and wanted to simply make the article sound fancy. Sure, some of these lexemes could not be substituted, but maintaining viewer interest is paramount. Have a read of Hurricane Isis (1998), a Featured Article. it does get technical, but nothing beyond the realms of the standard lexicon. Keep in mind, another user has suggested that I simply fail the GA - I still think this article has a chance.
 * Side Note, do you mind changing your signature? It is very distracting. Hell, I'll make one for you,
 *  Yellow   Evan 
 *  Yellow   Evan 


 * Thanks, \ / (⁂) 19:59, 17 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Then what words are you talking about because shear is in many articles. Leave Message ,Yellow Evan home, User:Yellow Evan/Sandbox 20:06, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

I moved comment here from my talk page to prevent argument breaking up \ / (⁂) 20:10, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Please read my comment above. It gives you four examples. I read Hurricane Hernan (2008), and noticed that all the technical terms it used, convection for example, were linked to another wikipedia page. Great idea, should be employed on Boris. \ / (⁂) 20:10, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * There is nothing a can really replase with. Leave Message ,Yellow Evan home, User:Yellow Evan/Sandbox
 * Ok, Please post all replies here, so the discussion will not get broken up. What words can't you replace? \ / (⁂) 20:18, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, the meteorology words aren't the only complain I have. I can see a typo in the lead, sumer, a lead which needs some serious attention. \ / (⁂) 20:24, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm failing this - there are too many issues with the article at present. \ / (⁂) 20:37, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * sorry for late respone and I will fix the mistakes tomorow. And all the examples we really cannot replace. Leave Message ,Yellow Evan home, User:Yellow Evan/Sandbox 20:37, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Moved again from talk page. I was hoping to get this improved but, taking into consideration Hurricanehinks comments on the talk page, there are too many issues that need to be addressed. Get some other editors working on the article and nominate it again in a few weeks. Sorry. \ / (⁂) 20:39, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Re. Results
Please have confirmations from the users before claiming it. I see no confirmations of support from any of the users you've claimed support this. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 20:25, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: Results
Yes, we have agreed on that for a while, but I think you're missing the point. Every storm can have an article only if the article is reasonably well-written, and contains sufficient information and referencing. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  20:32, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Warning
Consider this a formal warning. If you continue to act disruptive, you will be blocked. I've requested some input on WP:ANI. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 21:46, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Archive
Hi there Yellow. I was just wondering whether you had thought about archiving some of the old discussions on this page as it is getting quite big now and it will be much easier for you to manage if you moved some of the old stuff elsewhere? Kind regards, Nancy  talk  21:34, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Hello again. Well your talk page is now even bigger than before so I have taken the liberty of setting up some automatic archiving for you. I have also added an archive box at the top of this page so that you have a handy quick link to your old discussions. I'll archive the first lot manually but from now on a bot should be along each afternoon to archive threads which have had no activity for seven days. This way your talk page should remain a manageable size. Kind regards, Nancy  talk  13:52, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: Results
I'm really not doing storm articles right now; I'm busy making Atlantic and EPac timelines. --Dylan620 ( Home •  yadda yadda yadda  •  Ooooohh! ) 10:42, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: 2006 PHS
Why is it an issue that the unclassified storm is the same wording? I plan on combing through it once more before I FA nom it this weekend, but is there anything specific you see sub-par about it? ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 15:17, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I told you I'm not worried about that section. You said it needs some work. What other than that section needs work? ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 17:42, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Timeline of the 2001 Atlantic hurricane season
My first B-Class article is currently a featured list candidate. I'm trying to gather reviewers, so all comments are welcome! Please place them on the nomination page. --Dylan620 ( Home •  yadda yadda yadda  •  Ooooohh! ) 00:15, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: ??
I have no idea what you asked me on my talk page. There are still plenty of start class EPAC articles. However, what might be more helpful is working on season articles. I don't mean 1992 PHS (which might be out of your league due to its importance). However, what about writing a summary for each storm of the 1980 Pacific hurricane season? It is currently a stub, and it would be pretty easy to get to Start or C class. You just need to use the Best Track and the Seasonal Summary. Or, if you don't like that season, there is 1981, 1983, or 1984 that are also stubs. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 18:12, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Happy Thanksgiving!
--Dylan620 ( Home •  yadda yadda yadda  •  Ooooohh! ) 01:35, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: 2008 PHS - request denied
I am denying your request. The sandbox is far from finished, and not to mention the season is still technically active. Also, there are more TCR's to come. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 20:34, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I already told you, the season is still technically active and there are still TCR's not written yet. You should compare it to 2006 Pacific hurricane season, which is the best analog for the type of article you are writing. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 21:14, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

2008 PHS
Your Nomination of the 2008 Pacific Hurricane Season was quick failed by myself as the season is still technically active as there is the chance for a Post-season storm. Also not all of the TCRS are out yet nor is the Season up to date.Jason Rees (talk) 15:43, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Yellow Evan, please refrain from unneeded discussions on the project page. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 16:16, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

No content in Category:2005 in Guerrero
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:2005 in Guerrero, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:2005 in Guerrero has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:2005 in Guerrero, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 07:50, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Hey Yellow
Good to see you're (at least partially) returned to Wikipedia. I hope you had a great Christmas and Thanksgiving, and I hope to see you again soon down the line. You and Julian have good luck in WP:CUP; I'd wish the same for Hink, but he has, unfortunately, withdrawn. BTW, if you want to wish Julian a happy birthday, today's his birthday. Cheers, Dylan  620  Contribs Sign! 16:28, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Re: 1996 PHS
That's nice - good luck with the project. Yea, I've stopped writing the newsletter, and I guess others didn't feel like working on it. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 16:57, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


 * BTW, I hope you start focusing more on the more important articles (i.e. ones that affected land). ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 16:58, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Hector of 2006
I have put hurricane hector (2006) up for merging, it is a copy and paste of the TCR. Just because it is in the public domain doesn't mean you can copy and paste it. -- क्षेम्य Tranquility 20:40, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Permission requested
May I please work on this? You haven't even touched it in over two weeks, and I'd like to help you out in making the 1996 Pacific hurricane season a Good Topic. -- Dylan 620  Contribs Sign! 02:31, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Your user page
Could you explain your latest edit to your user page? You said you helped Tropical Storm Erick (2007) get to FA status, but you hardly edited the article. In fact, your only edits to the article were ones that were quickly reverted. Putting that on your page belittles the work Juliancolton did to it. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 03:41, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I was wondering the same thing. If you substantially edited the article, or even picked up the nomination process if Julian had bowed out, I'd have agreed with throwing it on the main page.  This does not appear to be so, however.  Thegreatdr (talk) 03:50, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Well, that's cool it's no longer visible, but how come you didn't just remove it? ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 04:32, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Happy New Year!!
2 00  9

Happy New Year, ! :D

You can spread the joy by putting on the talk pages of your friends! -- Dylan 620  Contribs Sign! 15:35, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #23
Jason Rees (talk) 02:36, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Otis
The article was horrible, and no work had been done to it. There was no reason to keep such a bad article. --♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 01:07, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
 * No, that was a long time ago when it was first written. The article was horrible, and it didn't have any research beyond the TCR. I'm not going to put up with your bad articles any more. Either you can take the time to do research and make the writing at least somewhat decent (like the rest of us do), or you can expect your articles will be merged. --♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 01:26, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

GA credits
I have major problems with your user page. You are taking credit for many articles becoming GAs, when you didn't make a single constructive edit on them. I strongly suggest removing them. Thank you. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  01:40, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

 * Delivered by The  Helpful  One  for Garden  and  iMatthew  at 23:55, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

 * 17:43, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

 * 20:42, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by J Milburn, on behalf of the judges. 20:42, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

 * 23:35, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

 * 21:56, 22 February 2009 (UTC) The  Helpful  Bot  21:56, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Comments needed
You are receiving this message because you are listed as an active participant in WikiProject Meteorology, WikiProject Severe weather, and/or WikiProject Non-tropical storms. I have made a proposal to start an official assessment page for these three projects, under the WP:METEO banner. Since this would need significant participation to work properly, I'd like input from as many interested parties as possible (even those who may not watch the project pages), so please visit the discussion here and leave your thoughts/opinions. Thanks! - Running On  Brains  02:40, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

 * 18:12, 1 March 2009 (UTC) The  Helpful  Bot  18:12, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

 * 17:05, 15 March 2009 (UTC) The  Helpful  Bot  17:05, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Gilma
Check the merging page. As for Olivia, the storm itself did not affect land, and all of its sources are still only from the NHC. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 17:00, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

 * 21:22, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Delivered for the WikiCup by  GARDEN at 21:22, 31 March 2009 (UTC). Queries to my talk.

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #25
Jason Rees (talk) 01:16, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter XI
Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 21:41, 5 April 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.

Re: Drama
Hmm, I'll ask him about it. Thanks for letting me know. – Juliancolton  | Talk 15:23, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Erick FAR
I wish to let the FAR continue its course, as there is just as much drama if the storms do get articles. JC is annoyed by most things I do (JC, if you're reading, ), and I think the FAR would be the best way to get some outside opinions than the people in the hurricane project. --♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 17:58, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter XII
Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 17:10, 13 April 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.

WikiCup Newsletter XIII
Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 09:42, 20 April 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.

FYI
I've userfied your personal barnstar to User:Yellow Evan/Yellow Evan award. cheers, –xeno talk 14:56, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter XIV
Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 14:38, 26 April 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.

Nevada Test Site (Sedan crater, etc.)
I was fortunate to have been given a tour of "crater valley" and have a few photographs which might be of interest to add to the article on the Sedan crater. I do not know how to upload the pictures, nor do I know if they would be appreciated.

John Johnherrick (talk) 22:48, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter XV
Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 08:44, 4 May 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.

WikiCup Newsletter XVI
Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 09:20, 18 May 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.

WikiCup Newsletter XVII
Delivered for the WikiCup by  The  Helpful  Bot  at 20:12, 23 May 2009 (UTC). To report errors leave at message here.

WikiCup newsletter XVII.V
This is just a quick reminder that the round ends this Friday, May 29, 2009. I wanted to let you guys know the current standings. If you are very close, but not close enough, work as hard as possible these next two days. Pool leaders are listed as usual, and under the 10 wildcards, are competitors that are still fighting for a spot. Also, if you currently have any un-reviewed GAN's up and you'd like them to be reviewed and counted for this round, you must place them on the appropriate thread of the WikiCup talk page.


 * Pool A
 * 1) 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 Shoemaker's Holiday (647)


 * Pool B
 * 1) 🇨🇴 ThinkBlue (247)


 * Pool C
 * 1) 🇸🇪 Theleftorium (455)


 * Pool D
 * 1) 🇩🇰 Candlewicke (539)


 * Pool E
 * 1) 🇲🇽 Durova (479)


 * Pool F
 * 1) 🇨🇭 Sasata (961)


 * Current Wildcards
 * 1) 🇺🇸 Useight (393)
 * 2) 🇮🇸 Scorpion0422 (372)
 * 3) 🇹🇭 Rlevse (329)
 * 4) 🇯🇵 Wrestlinglover (307)
 * 5) 🇰🇭 Paxse (285)
 * 6) Ottava Rima (248)
 * 7) Flag of Albany, New York.svg Mitchazenia (226)
 * 8) 🇮🇪 Juliancolton (181)
 * 9) the_ed17 (179)
 * 10) 🇮🇲 J Milburn (168)
 * 11)  Bedford (156)
 * 12)  Gary King (147)
 * 13)  97198 (142)
 * 14) 🇱🇺 Ceranthor (111)
 * 15) 🇮🇳 Tinucherian (106)
 * 16) 🇻🇺 Matthewedwards (98)

 GARDEN, iMatthew : <font style="color:#ffffff;background:#4B0082;"> Chat  , and  The  Helpful  One   The  Helpful  Bot  00:57, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Checking in
Hi ... just checking in to see if there is anything that you believe need be done on the Ian Kinsler page for it to be granted GA status. KillerVogel made some suggestions, which I believe I've addressed. Thank you.--Epeefleche (talk) 04:21, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter XVIII
Delivered for the WikiCup by The  Helpful  Bot  at 14:46, 31 May 2009 (UTC). To report errors leave at message here.

Newsletter
Hi, could you please stop sending out the newsletter until we get a chance to clean it up? Thanks. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:41, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Automatic processing of your editor review
This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 6 June 2009 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding  to the review page will prevent further automated actions. End of line. DustyBot (talk) 10:03, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Boris 96
I passed Hurricane Boris of 1996 and am about to go through final procedures. -- An ' ha ' mi  rak  14:41, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Good article reassessment/Hurricane Boris (1996)/1
Although the article recently passed GAN, I strongly feel that it was not properly reviewed. As such, I have put it up for Reassessment. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:43, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter XIX and XX
Delivered by The  Helpful  Bot  at 22:06, 13 June 2009 (UTC) for the WikiCup. To report errors, please leave a message on the talk page.

Amazing Race Wikipedia
Hello, Yellow Evan. Welcome to the Amazing Race Wikipedia. In your travels, you will encounter two types of tasks. In a Detour, you have a choice between two tasks. Both of you must work together on this. In a Roadblock, one team member must work on a task alone. Your Amazing Race Wikipedia submissions page is located here. Enjoy the competition! Best, and. 20:03, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter XXI
Delivered by The  Helpful  Bot  at 22:38, 22 June 2009 (UTC) for the WikiCup. To report errors, please leave a message on the talk page.

I'm Sorry
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

Darren23 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Darren23 (Contribs) 16:57, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Your GAC 1971–72 NBA season failed
Hello Yellow Evan, I quick-failed your nomination at WP:GAC due to lack of references.--<font style="background:orange;">Crzycheetah 05:52, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, I did notice the note. It doesn't change the fact that there are no reliable sources on that page. You only listed the main page of nba.com and the basketball-reference.com. There should be links to the pages where the info is actually mentioned. Right now, you were basically just saying that the readers need to do the research themselves if they want to verify any info on that page. You are always welcome to re-nominate again, of course, but it's highly unlikely that the result will change unless there are more precise references.--<font style="background:orange;">Crzycheetah 16:37, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter XXII
Delivered for the WikiCup by <font style="color:#006600;"> ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 22:00, 28 June 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.

Amazing Race Wikipedia Starts!
Hello, Shappy. This is a reminder that Amazing Race Wikipedia will start very soon. At 00.00 (or whereabouts), our host Firestorm will place the first Detour on your submissions page. Again, the Detour is a choice between two tasks; both members of the team choose one task and work together to complete it. A Roadblock is a task only one team member must perform; he/she may not have any help from the other team member. Good luck and enjoy the Race! :-)  and  --EdwardsBot (talk) 13:34, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #27
– Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:11, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Cristina 96
I've noticed that you want to get Cristina to a GA, do you mind if I could do that?

Thanks -- An ' ha ' mi  rak  01:35, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter XXIII
Delivered by – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 16:54, 5 July 2009 (UTC).