Wikipedia:Featured article review/Fourth International/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 1:33, 19 June 2021 (UTC).

Fourth International

 * Notified: Warofdreams, WikiProject Socialism, WikiProject Politics, diff for talk page notification 2021-01-21

Review section
I am nominating this featured article for review because there are issues with FA criteria. As noted back in January the article heavily relies on primary and affiliated sources, lacks citations in places, and does not fully utilize independent scholarship. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  03:41, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Move to FARC - Agree with Buidhe here. There's a lot of sourcing improvement and overhaul needed.  Most of the sources are either primary or affiliated. This needs a good bit of work. Hog Farm Talk 03:07, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Move to FARC – serious sourcing issues; no sign of improvement. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:43, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

FARC section

 * Issues raised in the review section mostly concern sourcing. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:12, 5 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delist - Fairly systematic sourcing issues through overuse of non-independent sources, including spots where historical minority groups disagreeing with the organization are described using the organization's sources. Hog Farm Talk 03:46, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delist – no progress; the issues described above remain unaddressed. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:51, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delist no significant edits since nominated for FAR. Z1720 (talk) 14:47, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Nikkimaria (talk) 01:33, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.