Wikipedia:Peer review/Al Gore/archive2

Al Gore

 * Previous peer review
 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for August 2008.
 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for August 2008.

This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because it was recently promoted to WP:GA and I would like to nominate it for WP:FA at a future date. Advice and feedback would be appreciated.

Thanks, Classicfilms (talk) 01:28, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Comments from
 * You said you wanted to know what to work on before taking to FAC, so I looked at the sourcing and referencing with that in mind. I reviewed the article's sources as I would at FAC.
 * You've mixed using the Template:Citation with the templates that start with Cite such as Template:Cite journal or Template:Cite news. They shouldn't be mixed per WP:CITE.
 * Per the MOS, link titles and other information shouldn't be in all capitals.
 * Does The Mass Media and the Political Agenda have an ISBN?
 * Current refs 44, 46, 47, 74, 75, 81, 82, 83, 84, 86, 97, 158, 195, are lacking publisher, last access dates and/or other bibliographical information required.
 * Something is borked on current ref 48, there is a link right behind the p. where logically I expect a page number.
 * Current ref 72 (E-economy) is a book and should be cited as such, not like a webpage.
 * http://www.theleafchronicle.com/Article_not_found deadlinks
 * Please spell out abbreviations in the notes. You don't want your readers to leave your article, they might never return.
 * What makes the following sources reliable?
 * http://amsterdam.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-0009/msg00311.html
 * http://usgovinfo.about.com/library/weekly/aa012201b.htm and http://amsterdam.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-0009/msg00311.html
 * http://epic.org/
 * http://web.archive.org/web/20040603092645/commons.somewhere.com/rre/2000/RRE.Al.Gore.and.the.Inte1.html
 * http://sethf.com/gore/
 * http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue5_10/wiggins/
 * http://www.generationim.com/news/memberships.html
 * http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54528
 * http://www.reasons-for-war-with-iraq.info/gore_speech_9-29-92.html
 * Hope this helps. Please note that I don't watchlist Peer Reviews I've done. If you have a question about something, you'll have to drop a note on my talk page to get my attention. (My watchlist is already WAY too long, adding peer reviews would make things much worse.) 23:19, 22 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks so much! This is a very helpful "to-do" list. -Classicfilms (talk) 04:36, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Break
I have fixed the URLs above and have generally cleaned up the article according to some of the suggestions above. However, at the moment I now need to take a long wikibreak. Thanks to those who have helped and I hope that other editors will continue to improve the article. Regards, -Classicfilms (talk) 05:05, 24 August 2008 (UTC)