Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 January 23



Template:Modernist composers

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Modernism (music). Reasonable argument, no opposition. Primefac (talk) 14:55, 4 February 2021 (UTC) Propose merging Template:Modernist composers with Template:Modernism (music).
 * Modernist composers
 * Modernism (music)

Merge these two to match the practice at Template:Romantic music, Template:Classical period (music), Template:Baroque music etc. It would be more helpful to have the composers next to the topics they associate with; both "lead" articles of the templates are the same one already. Aza24 (talk) 23:51, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:FideRanking

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Wider discussion may be needed. Primefac (talk) 14:54, 4 February 2021 (UTC) The JSON file this module parsed was converted into a redirect by, so this module is no longer useful. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:09, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * FideRanking
 * FIDE world rankings/women (added 21:12, 24 January 2021 (UTC))
 * It feels like this request for deletion is purposefully misleading. The message above for some reason assumes what Discospinster did was correct and this is the end of story. The discussion should be adjourned until User:Pppery and User:Discospinster justify their edits. I have spent half an hour coding this and I don't even get a reason why my changes got reverted. Dixtosa (talk) 23:27, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * While my original reason for deletion no longer applies, I'm still not convinced this is a useful module, because templates should not generally be used to store data that is used in only one page and, counter the reason for this page's creation, I believe that storing this data in JSON makes it harder for most users to edit, rather than easier. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:12, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * You cannot argue with a clear conscience that JSON is less (1) readable and (2) less prevalent than wiki's own horrible !'s and |-'s. Also (3) the page having JSON content model ensures that the table can not have invalid formatting. (4) JSON is makes it very easy to parse data from original source. I have even provided the JS code that parses official FIDE page and generates JSON. (5) To be technical this data/UI separation is in complete harmony with separation of concerns. (6) If a table does not get updated for a year there is a problem. Dixtosa (talk) 22:00, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * (1-2) I can argue that it is easier for most editors of this wiki to edit wikitext tables (either directly or using VisualEditor) than it is for them to edit JSON, independently of what the rest of this world does (and I disagree that wikitable formatting is "horrible" anyway). (3) is not an issue since, looking at the history, all edits that broke the table (4) You could just as easily have combined the Javascript and Lua code you wrote to produce a script that outputted wikitext. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:15, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I have no broader comment on this discussion, but I don't agree with your points 1-2 . I guess more accurately, I disagree when speaking specifically about WP editors. To us, JSON is less readable and less prevalent than wikitext because it's nigh a pre-requisite that we can use the latter. Basically, what I'm trying to say is that I'd love to not need to learn another one of these dang things (this last comment is a joke). Btw, I'm pretty sure "you cannot argue with a clear conscience that" is an ad hominen attack/appeal to motive; regardless it's rude, you're trying to dismiss an argument before it's even been made. --Xurizuri (talk) 07:16, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Argentine presidential election, 2011

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:09, 31 January 2021 (UTC) Unused; results are presented in a better formatted table at 2011 Argentine general election. Yilku1 (talk) 20:37, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Argentine presidential election, 2011
 * Delete per nom, unused and surplus to requirement. Nigej (talk) 21:45, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/United States/Ohio/Franklin County medical cases chart

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:09, 31 January 2021 (UTC) This template hasn't been update since September (I assume incorrectly??) and is not included on any pages. JayJayWhat did I do? 01:30, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * COVID-19 pandemic data/United States/Ohio/Franklin County medical cases chart
 * I developed this toward the start of the pandemic, with the anticipation that it wouldn't last for the year+ it seems it will now. The data keeps changing; even historical data is changed as ODH officials count or figure where to place illnesses and deaths. I've been hoping maybe to come back to this when the pandemic is over to create a final, unchanging record of covid data here. Is that alright, or should I just stick with the graph in the article (recently devised to overcome the obstacles of changing figures and enormous mass of data)? ɱ  (talk) 01:42, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I was going to edit my reasoning a bit and say that the image in COVID-19 pandemic in Columbus, Ohio is probably a better resource than this template would be and less time consuming to update, even updating the image to include weekly totals might give a better snapshot of the cases in the county. JayJay</b><sup style="color:black">What did I do? 01:47, 16 January 2021 (UTC)


 * I think your approach is fine. I also plan to, in the future, create a category for templates that need updating to maybe bring some other editors to help out. Alexiscoutinho (talk) 21:15, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 13:53, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as unused and no longer practically usable. * Pppery * <sub style="color:#800000">it has begun... 22:09, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Members of the First Legislative Yuan
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 February 16. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 19:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Members_of_the_First_Legislative_Yuan
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).