Wikipedia:WikiProject District of Columbia/Assessment

Welcome to the assessment department of the District of Columbia WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's District of Columbia related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:District of Columbia articles by quality and Category:District of Columbia articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Frequently asked questions

 * How can I get my article rated? : Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
 * Who can assess articles? : Any member of the District of Columbia WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article.
 * Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? : Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
 * What if I don't agree with a rating? : You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
 * Aren't the ratings subjective? : Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Quality assessments
After assessing an article's quality, any comments on the assessment can be added to the article's talk page.

Requesting an assessment
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.
 * The James Cardinal Gibbons Memorial Statue
 * National Mall
 * Walter Reed Army Medical Center
 * Phi Beta Sigma
 * Maine Avenue Fish Market
 * Hains Point
 * American Legion Freedom Bell
 * Lead contamination in Washington, D.C. drinking water
 * Gail Cobb
 * Edmund Burke School

Assessment log

 * The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.