Wikipedia talk:WikiProject NATO/Archive 1

Importance Scale?
Should we have an importance scale for the project? Some project, notably WP:MILHIST don't have an importance scale, but I tend to think one would be appropriate given the relatively well defined scope of the project? It's fairly simple to add the parameter to the template. Cool3 (talk) 21:01, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Our banner
I have created the following template for use as our project banner. What do you think?


 * Good start, but the image on the left doesn't seem to clearly show the NATO logo at a small scale. Would any of these images be better (or perhaps others at commons:Category:North Atlantic Treaty Organization)?
 * Location NATO 2009 blue.svg NATOMedals2.jpg NATO-2002-Summit.jpg
 * Dl2000 (talk) 03:26, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, I agree that a better depiction of the logo would be better. Take a look at the flag here  (I'm not sure if that's actually free although it is on a USG site). Also, I like, probably cropped around the banner to remove Hilary Clinton. Cool3 (talk) 03:39, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Merger?
Can we not merge this as a military alliances task force of WP:MILHIST? It would have all the back end support for free there and could bring in the Warsaw Pact, CENTO, SEATO, and others if it did. Buckshot06(prof) 16:15, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, the primary goal of forming this project was to look at more than just the military aspects of NATO. While MILHIST does a good job of covering military matters, it's not really set up to support or coordinate articles like Secretary General of NATO or NATO enlargement.  Simply put, NATO is more than just military. Cool3 (talk) 17:47, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Draft conventions/Manual of Style
A draft style guide for the NATO project is now available at NATO/Conventions. This is a draft; review and discussion on this is encouraged. We probably don't need too many rules, but can discuss further on the Conventions talk page. The goal is to have consensus for a basic set of conventions to use in NATO articles. Dl2000 (talk) 03:09, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

FA Collaboration
I'd like to propose that we begin a Featured Article Collaboration project (perhaps designed to produce one per month). We could start with an article of relatively high quality (at least B-class, preferably GA) and then polish it up to FA class for the end of the month. If you guys agree, then I'd like to propose starting with Operation Deny Flight, which is currently a MILHIST A-Class and only narrowly failed a previously FAC (it's pretty low-hanging fruit). I think working together on an FA would be a big boost for our project here in it's infancy. What do you think? Cool3 (talk) 18:07, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Some bots for you.
See WP:AAlerts (discussion monitoring), User:AlexNewArtBot (to find newly created articles) and User:WolterBot (cleanup). Headbomb {{{sup|ταλκ}}κοντριβς – WP Physics} 07:57, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Ranks
I realize this WikiProject is in its infancy, but I'd just like to suggest that the NATO ranks pages are updated to include the two newest member states. Cheers.--Thewanderer (talk) 01:57, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Presumably, this means adding Albania and Croatia to the various lists specified in NATO ranks. Currently taking a run at those, although the insignia images may not be set up at first. Dl2000 (talk) 16:08, 26 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Yes, exactly. Good job so far!--Thewanderer (talk) 20:31, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

GA Sweeps invitation
This message is being sent to WikiProjects with GAs under their scope. Since August 2007, WikiProject Good Articles has been participating in GA sweeps. The process helps to ensure that articles that have passed a nomination before that date meet the GA criteria. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. Instead of reviewing by topic, editors can consider picking and choosing whichever articles they are interested in.

We are always looking for new members to assist with reviewing the remaining articles, and since this project has GAs under its scope, it would be beneficial if any of its members could review a few articles (perhaps your project's articles). Your project's members are likely to be more knowledgeable about your topic GAs then an outside reviewer. As a result, reviewing your project's articles would improve the quality of the review in ensuring that the article meets your project's concerns on sourcing, content, and guidelines. However, members can also review any other article in the worklist to ensure it meets the GA criteria.

If any members are interested, please visit the GA sweeps page for further details and instructions in initiating a review. If you'd like to join the process, please add your name to the running total page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles from the worklist or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. With ~1,300 articles left to review, we would appreciate any editors that could contribute in helping to uphold the quality of GAs. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:10, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

FAC for Hastings Ismay now open
Hello all, I've nominated the article on Hastings Ismay, NATO's first Secretary General for featured article status. Please join in the discussion at Featured article candidates/Hastings Ismay, 1st Baron Ismay/archive1. Cool3 (talk) 23:31, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Operation Sky Monitor A-Class Review
Operation Sky Monitor is currently undergoing an A-Class Review through WikiProject Military History. Please join in the discussion, here. Cool3 (talk) 22:52, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Post Cold War Global NATO
The current NATO article is extremely weak in explaining the evolution of NATO after the Cold War and in conjunction with the evolution of the EU. NATO during most of the Cold War was an alliance whose sole purpose was to defend Europe against aggression by the USSR/Warsaw Pact.

NATO is a sui generis institution and is not easily catagorized by analogy with other organizations and relationships. Just like the EU, it is unique. Members of NATO are "allies". The EU itself is a de facto member of NATO by virtue of the Berlin Agreements. The six non-NATO EU nations have a sui generis relationship with NATO, while not formal members they are de facto members by virtue of their membership in the EU. After the Cold War, NATO has transformed itself into a global military alliance whose three major operations have taken place outside its boundaries - Bosnia, Kosovo, and Afghanistan. Save Malta and Cyprus which have very small militaries, Sweden, Finland, Austria and Ireland (together the six non-NATO EU nations) have all contributed military forces to all three post Cold War NATO major operations. Ireland has an even more complicated relationship with both the EU and NATO as its constitutional neutrality is recognized as a special case within the structures of the EU itself.

NATO becomes a global alliance by virtue of a series of relationships. These begin with the four "contact countries" - Japan, Korea (Korea means the Republic of Korea), Australia and New Zealand. These get reinforced by bilateral or multilaterial military alliances of these four nations with major nations of NATO. This begins with the Mutual Defense Treaties (MDT) of the USA with Japan and Korea and through ANZUS with Australia and New Zealand. Each of these are nuanced. Japan's constitution precludes it joining any military alliance outside of its MDT with the USA. Japan also has a pacifist constitution which renounces war. But this restriction has evolved and relaxed over time due to the passage of time and necessity. Japan sent naval combat ships into the Indian Ocean as part of the initial US invasion of Taliban control Afghanistan. Australia, New Zealand and Korea sent forces into Afghanistan. Australia sent forces to Europe under NATO command in the Balkins. Japan's self defense zone has never been defined and could today include Taiwan, the Philippines and Korea. Japan is purposefully vague. The USA has extended its nuclear deterent shield over both Japan and Korea. And the US-Canadian NORAD command has now been expanded over the Pacific to cover North Korea specifically and the PRC and Russia in the East practically. With this comes the creation of an allied anti-missile shield over the Pacific and Arctic which loops together the USA, Japan, Korea and Canada. The USA then have other MDTs in the East; the Philippines and the several Pacific island nations in various sui generis associations politically with the USA along with the US Pacific territories.

This American led NATO globalization also occurs through several European states (the UK, France, Netherlands, Spain, Portugal, Denmark, Finland and Norway). Begin with the UK, the UK has territorial possessions all over the world. These territories are theoretically part of NATO. The recent tests of this was the Falklands War and several Moroccan-Spanish incidents. The USA requested that the UK not enact Article 5 and force the NATO alliance into the war. The USA was an ally of both the UK and Argentina. The USA and Argentina are both signators to the Rio Treaty which requires collective defense of the Americas against outside aggressors (the USA argued that it recognized the Falklands as British territory and that Argentina was the aggressor and therefore the Rio Treaty would not apply, Mexico left the Rio Alliance over this conflict). DeGaulle's schism with NATO began with the Algerian Civil War and NATO's reluctance to intervene. While the question of NATO defense of outlining and perhaps colonial possessions of member states remains ambiguous, the emergence of the EU creates a second de facto globalization of NATO. The incorporated territories of the EU globally is complex. But from fully incorporated non-European territories like French Guiana (in South America) and New Caledonia (South Pacific) to expressly excluded such as the the British Crown possessions, the EU has largely formalized these outlining NATO member territories into the EU itself. Under the Berlin Agreements defense of these territories of the EU is first a question of NATO. If NATO declines, the EU would act and be able to use NATO military assets to do so.

The UK then has its set of defense pacts starting with the FPDA which ties the UK, Australia, Malaysia, Singapore and New Zealand to the defense of Malaysia and Singapore. The UK has various obligations to defend the Commonwealth nations against external aggression. Malaysia and Singaopre both have sent forces to Afghanistan under NATO-ISAF.

Several South American nations have their own special relationships with the Allies. Chile, even under its current left-wing social democrat government continues to tighten its military bonds with the Allies. It participates in the massive RIMPAC military exercises and has adopted NATO standards, tactics, training and weapons to its entire military. Next is Columbia which has a de facto MDT with the USA. Columbia is sending forces to Afghanistan this year under NATO-ISAF. Guyana and Surinam have moved towards the allies as Venezuela-Cuba-Nicaragua have sought to morph the ALBA socialist economic block into a communist military alliance. Peru is also wired into the Alliance as a RIMPAC partner and by virtue of its war against foreign backed communist insurgents.

Lastly, NATO has three formal partnership programs - the Partnership for Peace, the Mediterranean Dialogue and the Istanbul Cooperation Initiative which bring into "partnership" with NATO a multitude of nations. Within each of these programs individual nations develop bilateral agreements with NATO which range from membership tracks (Macedonia and Montenegro) to consultation (Russia) to unexpected as is the partnership with Jordan which works with NATO to train forces of the Palestinian Authority.

The project should address these realities which are very relavent in today's world and largely missing from the current wiki NATO article.

7o62x39 (talk) 22:53, 7 July 2009 (UTC)7o62x39

NATO Traning Mission Afghanistan (NTM-A)
I have been tasked with creating a page for NTM-A would you have any sugestions Ed.vasquez (talk) 08:28, 22 November 2009 (UTC)ed.vasquez

WP 1.0 bot announcement
This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. &mdash; Carl (CBM · talk) 03:40, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Macedonia naming
WikiProject NATO/Conventions was updated to reflect the resolution of the Macedonia naming conventions (WP:NCMAC as established through ArbCom). Dl2000 (talk) 04:24, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

NATO articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release
Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the NATO articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:22, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Template for NATO Awards
I was prorposing a template for NATO Awarsd and Decorations (ribbons) awarded to servicemembers. Many countries have that already. I say we should make a template with all the NATO ribbons that link to the articles that describe each one. Then, we can add another row at the bottom of the template with links to military awards decorations of each of the member nation. 161.185.151.150 (talk) 19:33, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Move NATO phonetic alphabet?
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:NATO phonetic alphabet. — Joe Kress (talk) 08:07, 9 November 2010 (UTC) (Using )

Pageview stats
After a recent request, I added WikiProject NATO to the list of projects to compile monthly pageview stats for. The data is the same used by http://stats.grok.se/en/ but the program is different, and includes the aggregate views from all redirects to each page. The stats are at WikiProject NATO/Popular pages.

The page will be updated monthly with new data. The edits aren't marked as bot edits, so they will show up in watchlists. You can view more results, request a new project be added to the list, or request a configuration change for this project using the toolserver tool. If you have any comments or suggestions, please let me know. Thanks! Mr.Z-man 01:32, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Ukraine-NATO image
This image needs to be updated to show the 2009 enlargement: .--138.130.68.60 (talk) 10:22, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

NATO Standardisation Agency
Hmm, any interest in collaboration to write this article? -- A Certain White Cat chi? 19:23, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Major non-NATO ally
has been nominated for deletion -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 00:35, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

GAR
NATO, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 14:05, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Popular pages tool update
As of January, the popular pages tool has moved from the Toolserver to Wikimedia Tool Labs. The code has changed significantly from the Toolserver version, but users should notice few differences. Please take a moment to look over your project's list for any anomalies, such as pages that you expect to see that are missing or pages that seem to have more views than expected. Note that unlike other tools, this tool aggregates all views from redirects, which means it will typically have higher numbers. (For January 2014 specifically, 35 hours of data is missing from the WMF data, which was approximated from other dates. For most articles, this should yield a more accurate number. However, a few articles, like ones featured on the Main Page, may be off).

Web tools, to replace the ones at ~alexz/pop, will become available over the next few weeks at popularpages. All of the historical data (back to July 2009 for some projects) has been copied over. The tool to view historical data is currently partially available (assessment data and a few projects may not be available at the moment). The tool to add new projects to the bot's list is also available now (editing the configuration of current projects coming soon). Unlike the previous tool, all changes will be effective immediately. OAuth is used to authenticate users, allowing only regular users to make changes to prevent abuse. A visible history of configuration additions and changes is coming soon. Once tools become fully available, their toolserver versions will redirect to Labs.

If you have any questions, want to report any bugs, or there are any features you would like to see that aren't currently available on the Toolserver tools, see the updated FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Mr.Z-bot (talk) (for Mr.Z-man ) 05:18, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Comment on the WikiProject X proposal
Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject X is live!


Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

International Radiotelephony Spelling Alphabet listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for International Radiotelephony Spelling Alphabet to be moved to NATO phonetic alphabet. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 23:29, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

NATO phonetic alphabet listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for NATO phonetic alphabet to be moved to NATO phonetic alphabet. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 13:14, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Popular pages report
We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month, will post at /Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of. We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:
 * The pageview data includes both desktop and mobile data.
 * The report will include a link to the pageviews tool for each article, to dig deeper into any surprises or anomalies.
 * The report will include the total pageviews for the entire project (including redirects).

We're grateful to for his original, and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of, and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.

Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

NATO phonetic alphabet listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for NATO phonetic alphabet to be moved to ICAO phonetic alphabet. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 15:29, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

NATO phonetic alphabet listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for NATO phonetic alphabet to be moved to International Radiotelephony Spelling Alphabet. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 22:30, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

WikiProject collaboration notice from the Portals WikiProject
The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.

Portals are being redesigned.

The new design features are being applied to existing portals.

At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template Transclude lead excerpt.

The discussion about this can be found here.

Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.

Background
On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.

There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.

So far, 84 editors have joined.

If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.

If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.

Thank you. &mdash; The Transhumanist  07:49, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

R. Nicholas Burns listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for R. Nicholas Burns to be moved to Nicholas Burns. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 18:30, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

A new newsletter directory is out!
A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
 * – Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

High-level architecture listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for High-level architecture to be moved to High Level Architecture. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 17:31, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Withdrawal from NATO
As the Icelandic prime minister was talking to Jens Stoltenberg, she off-hand remarking about Iceland leaving NATO. I feel that it would be good to do piece about withdrawing from the North Atlantic Alliance, so I have made a start to a piece. Although can you please expand. 159753 (talk) 18:59, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:NATO
Portal:NATO, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:NATO and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Portal:NATO during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:30, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

ACCS listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for ACCS to be moved to Air Command and Control System. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 00:01, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Enlargement of NATO listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Enlargement of NATO to be moved to NATO enlargement. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 18:49, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

FAR for Wesley Clark
I have nominated Wesley Clark for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 16:06, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia coverage of the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Wikipedia coverage of the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine to be moved to Wikipedia and the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 17:52, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

NATO Quint listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for NATO Quint to be moved to Quint (multilateral relations group). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 20:50, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

2022 NATO Madrid summit listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for 2022 NATO Madrid summit to be moved to 2022 Madrid summit. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 22:07, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Finland–NATO relations listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Finland–NATO relations to be moved to Accession of Finland to NATO. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 03:52, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine to be moved to War in Ukraine (2022). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 21:51, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine to be moved to Russian invasion of Ukraine. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 20:18, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine to be moved to 2022-2023 Russian invasion of Ukraine. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 16:35, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine to be moved to 2022–2023 Russian invasion of Ukraine. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 23:19, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine to be moved to Russian invasion of Ukraine (2022–present). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 15:05, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine to be moved to 2022-2023 Russian invasion of Ukraine. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 22:19, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine to be moved to 2022-2023 Russian invasion of Ukraine. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 23:49, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine to be moved to Full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 11:33, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Timeline of the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine: phase 3 listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Timeline of the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine: phase 3 to be moved to Timeline of the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine: phase 3 (early operations). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 02:48, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
 * To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.