Talk:Chrislam

Adaudo A-O's Peer Review of Chrislam in Nigeria
Hi Shenali,

Thank you for an interesting article on Chrislam in Nigeria.

A few suggestions Lead: This does give a good overview. The first two sentences seem to contradict with plurality. Is it a series of movements or a movement? History: The inclusion of Nigeria's overall population would be better within the context of the religious populations. This is mentioned later in the paragraph. The sentence on the obviousness of ethnic clashes: unclear what this is referring to. The sequence suggests the population is to blame. The paragraph on grievances, life expectancy: Perhaps a new subsection on causes, implications? Within this section on history, there isn't a clear sequence for the reader when included here.

I see that there is still a bit more include in your draft including the first and second waves.

Good luck, AdaudoI am Osigwe (talk) 07:02, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Requested move 25 April 2024

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk &#124; contribs) 14:26, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Nigerian Chrislam → Chrislam – Chrislam is currently a disambiguation page between this and something which doesn't even have an article (a fictional religion in a couple of novels). The article body calls it just "Chrislam", not "Nigerian Chrislam", as do the reliable sources it cites. There doesn't seem to be any clear justification for not having the actual article be primary and relegating that disambiguation page to "(disambiguation)". SomethingForDeletion (talk) 05:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Support per nom. Unnecessary WP:OVERPRECISION. - Station1 (talk) 05:28, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Excessive background when it comes to Muslim–Christian tensions in Nigeria
Does anybody think the section on Muslim–Christian tensions in Nigeria is a bit too lengthy for the article? The primary purpose of the article is to discuss Chrislam. While providing context is important, I don't think the section directly relates much to how Muslim-Christian tensions in Nigeria have impacted or influenced the development and understanding of Chrislam, considering its length. Mooonswimmer 21:50, 12 July 2024 (UTC)