Talk:Colossal Order

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: not moved. ' -- Calidum'' 18:18, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Colossal Order (video game developer) → Colossal Order – I feel "Colossal Order" is unambiguous when fully capitalized; it seems unlikely that most people searching for "Colossal Order" rather than "colossal order" would be looking for giant order rather than this page. Menethh (talk) 23:18, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment is this company notable? There are no mentions of notability, and no references in this article. Two of the games also are missing mentions of notability, and are missing independent sourcing. Only "Cities: Skylines" actually is a reasonable article with independent sources and claims to notability. So... three of the articles (company, "Cities in Motion" games) could be deleted for failing WP:GNG, if only one game is notable, WP:NOTINHERITED for the developer. -- 65.94.171.225 (talk) 04:42, 27 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Their games have had quite a bit of coverage; it is just that the articles currently fail to link to that coverage. As an example, Rock Paper Shotgun (considered a reliable source on gaming by Wikipedia) has nearly a dozen articles about Cities in Motion 1 or 2, and Metacritic lists 20 reviews for the first game and 15 for the second. Menethh (talk) 09:30, 27 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Oppose – this obscure company is not significant enough to warrant the unusual scheme of disambiguation by case alone. Dicklyon (talk) 03:42, 29 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Oppose. The redir at Colossal Order should continue to point to giant order for now at least, while issues with these four articles (including but not just notability) are addressed. Revisit if and when this is resolved. Andrewa (talk) 04:58, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Colossal Order (company). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150307191817/http://www.colossalorder.fi/company.html to http://www.colossalorder.fi/company.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:08, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 1 November 2023

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 11:43, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Colossal Order (company) → Colossal Order – Same reason as in the previous requested move above: "I feel "Colossal Order" is unambiguous when fully capitalized; it seems unlikely that most people searching for "Colossal Order" rather than "colossal order" would be looking for giant order rather than this page." Also, all wikilinks now redirect to a wrong article. 2001:14BA:9CE5:8400:9D09:DED6:A987:1FB6 (talk) 07:22, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Comment A large number of people (majority?) do not use capitalization in their searches. Forcing users to do so in order to generate desired results would be the internet equivalent of herding not only cats - but mice as well.Picard&#39;s Facepalm (talk) 13:19, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Support as textbook case of WP:DIFFCAPS. Mdewman6 (talk) 16:02, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Support Per WP:DIFFCAPS. The architectural term is not capitalized. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:40, 2 November 2023 (UTC)