Talk:Darkstalkers: The Night Warriors

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Darkstalkers: The Night Warriors. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110430182123/http://www.eidolons-inn.net:80/segabase/32X-Darkstalkers.html to http://www.eidolons-inn.net/segabase/32X-Darkstalkers.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130524042405/http://www.craveonline.com/gaming/article/top-ten-2-d-fighters-of-all-time-65021 to http://www.craveonline.com/gaming/article/top-ten-2-d-fighters-of-all-time-65021

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:18, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

32X version
So once again I've removed the claim of a 32X version of this game. There are two problems with the latest sourcing of this claim. First, as per WP:VG/RS, Sega-16 is another unreliable source apart from articles by Ken Horowitz and developer interviews. Second, I'm troubled that the only concrete info Sega-16 has on the 32X version is that it was announced at the 1994 Summer CES, because that CES announcement with no demo (not even an non-playable one) is the only concrete info I've seen on the 32X version anywhere. At best, that suggests that no major progress was made on the 32X port. Scrutinized with a healthy dose of skepticism, it hints that Capcom may have made the announcement for publicity's sake with no serious intention of actually porting the game to 32X, or even as a result of a miscommunication (e.g. someone was told they were working on a PlayStation version of Darkstalkers and said 32X version instead).

A 32X version seems plausible, and it's a matter of record that Capcom were a licensed 32X developer, but solid sourcing that a 32X version actually existed is still missing.--Martin IIIa (talk) 01:29, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I found this pretty recently regarding the fabled 32X version: https://retrocdn.net/index.php?title=File%3AEGM2_US_05.pdf&page=22 Roberth Martinez (talk) 15:49, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Man, you are the king of research. That looks all good to me, so I won't object if you add that to the article (or I can add it myself if you prefer). Martin IIIa (talk) 16:23, 2 April 2022 (UTC)