Talk:List of Nanjing Metro stations

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Nanjing Metro stations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161007003415/http://www.njmetro.com.cn/service_04_new.aspx?LineNum=2 to http://www.njmetro.com.cn/service_04_new.aspx?LineNum=2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:29, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Total station count issue
This article claims that there are 150 (lead), 159 (table), and 149 (stations sections) stations depending on which paragraph is read. Very confusing. There are 159 stations in the list itself, is that the correct number? Mattximus (talk) 15:38, 12 July 2018 (UTC)


 * I think 159 is the correct number because the list shows the latest stations in operation. --Leiem (talk) 03:51, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Recent changes creates many errors
I noticed that extra stations was added to the line summary table, but this means the total numbers are incorrect, and the stations are missing from the main list. I don't know the source material so I can't make sure the numbers add up, hopefully someone who can read Chinese can help correct this featured list. Mattximus (talk) 16:39, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

I can make the necessary updates in the coming days or week or two. --haha169 (talk) 22:54, 5 January 2022 (UTC)


 * This is great thank you. I do think the total is incorrect however, the list has 175 stations, but the total in the article says 191. I think interchange stations were mistakenly counted several times each for that sum. Mattximus (talk) 15:01, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * There's a footnote (a) that explains the discrepancy as a result of how the numbers are calculated. --haha169 (talk) 03:24, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * There wasn't a discrepancy in the numbers so the footnote made no sense, however I changed it so that the footnote now makes sense, hope this is ok. Mattximus (talk) 16:14, 7 January 2022 (UTC)


 * I think the only issue now is the "under construction" table says that lines will open in the past, so I'm not sure if these lines were delayed or completed... but as is it does not make sense. Thanks again for updating this page so quickly, it's a very well done list! Mattximus (talk) 16:17, 7 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you! Yes, those lines are delayed as they have not opened yet. I'll probably have to go through and update the under construction section at a later time --haha169 (talk) 00:11, 8 January 2022 (UTC)