Talk:SSX 3

Characters and Soundtrack sections
Stop deleting them please.
 * While the soundtrack may be ok (if it's actually been released separately, I'm not sure), the list of characters is total WP:GAMECRUFT. Thanks! Fin©™ 20:00, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Will go halves with you, will axe the characters but the soundtrack is very useful for people. User:Alexcason 23:37, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Em, no. The characters are definitely WP:GAMECRUFT, the soundtrack is probably so. Like I said maybe having a list of songs on the actual released soundtrack (like the Mario Galaxy article) is ok. A list of "songs that are in the game" is not. Thanks! Fin©™ 22:43, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

DJ Atomika
Shouldn't there be a mention about him? and the fact that he mentioned what you were doing in the game? Because now, he's in other games as well.&#91;&#91;User:SonicNiGHT&#124;SonicNiGHT&#93;&#93; (talk) 12:50, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

dnL
Did anyone else think this was a fictional drink and think that the appearance of it in this game was some kind of marketing ploy?Brando26000 (talk) 21:26, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Improvements
I can see various things wrong with this article: BlookerG talk 01:48, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * As pointed out above, the list of characters may be considered WP:GAMECRUFT and could be deleted. The other information in the Characters section could be moved to Gameplay. Decided to delete it; I expect someone will be irritated about this. How I see it, it only benefits fans of the game. This article is meant to also be able to teach people who are new to SSX 3, and a list of names isn't going to be able to further explain how the controls work or how tricks are executed. I have moved useful information from the section into Gameplay.
 * The gameplay section is written in an exaggerated and maybe even opinionated manner, i.e. "The reward system is also revamped and improved." doesn't leave much room for people to have their own opinions on whether it's improved or not. I have now rewritten the gameplay section
 * Reception needs expanding with a general idea of what critics liked and disliked, plus individual reviews Done!
 * A development section should be created Added
 * Came here from the reassessment tag; upgrading this article to B-class. I'd add to your list that gameplay gets a little too detailed in spots, and repetative- you discuss the order of the races in two paragraphs in a row (the one with the image, and the one after it). -- Pres N  18:49, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Welp, I've completed my list. I'm going to go ahead and nominate the article for GA status. BlookerG  talk 01:48, 29 January 2015 (UTC)