A fact from The Greenwood Encyclopedia of Science Fiction and Fantasy appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 August 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Reference works, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Reference worksWikipedia:WikiProject Reference worksTemplate:WikiProject Reference worksReference works articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by The C of E (talk) 07:31, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This hook should be more interesting that the boring, matter-of-fact comments that most reviewers found it not comprehensive enough or overpriced... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:29, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Created by Piotrus (talk). Self-nominated at 12:29, 22 July 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
Interesting:
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Article was recently created and meets requirements for length and sourcing. Hook is interesting, assuming good faith on paywalled sources which require a subscription. No apparent copyvio or neutrality issues. Only issue is that QPQ appears to be pending, once that review is finished this will be ready for approval. BuySomeApples (talk) 20:59, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Courtesy ping for @Piotrus: this nom still needs a qpq and then it will be ready for the front page. BuySomeApples (talk) 04:03, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Piotrus: I guess I could say the same to you, since you could have pinged me or responded to my message on your talk page 2 weeks ago but oh well. Thanks for the update anyway. This looks good enough to pass now, so I'll approve the nom. Good work! BuySomeApples (talk) 06:44, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Re: "expected" who was doing the "expectation"? - reviewers, but it seems common sense to me (not editorializing).
Re: "book is overpriced (at $349.95) and" ah, one review said it was over-priced? Is that really grounds for it to be considered, in general, over-priced? the previous reviewer (O'Sullivan) also commented on this, as quoted ("hefty price"). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:42, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]