Talk:The Many Faces of Jesus

GA todo
-- Tamzin  &#91;cetacean needed&#93; (they&#124;xe&#124;she) 20:15, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Synopsis, more description of the screenplay qua screenplay
 * Conclusion: There really doesn't seem to be RS coverage of it as an artistic work, beyond what's already discussed. Stet. 07:47, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Maybe a bit more background
 * ✅ 08:44, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Impact on Danish attitudes to pornography, blasphemy, and censorship, esp. Muhammad cartoons controversy
 * Muhammad cartoons seems to be the main thing, with rest implied. 09:45, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

The Queen
Is a quote from a Buckingham Palace spokesperson the same thing as the Queen herself publicly commenting? Maybe I'm being too pedantic here, but the Free Lance-Star source is actually her spokesman saying "Her Majesty finds this proposal quite as obnoxious as most of her subjects do" - did she actually use the word "obnoxious" in the letters that were sent out in response to the NVALA complaints? It's also perhaps a little inaccurate to describe it as a "rare public comment" when the spokesman said the Queen "did not intend to make a public statement on the matter." Pawnkingthree (talk) 01:08, 20 January 2024 (UTC)


 * @Pawnkingthree: Sources all treat it as a statement by the queen, even if she wasn't the one to say the words. I think that "public" in the sense the spokesman used refers to just that distinction: that she did not intend to say it with her own mouth. But obviously it was public in the sense most people use that term, in that it was deliberately directed at a wide audience without expectation of privacy. I do agree the spokesman detail is important, though. I've clarified that in body and lede, and also changed out the ambiguous wording "rare public comment". -- Tamzin  &#91;cetacean needed&#93; (they&#124;xe) 02:33, 20 January 2024 (UTC)