User:Zzyzx11/Archive8

Moving pages
Sorry for moving the page Orinda in the way that I did. In the future, how should I go about doing that? Originally Orinda was a disambig page which had a link to Orinda, California, I moved them so O, C was at Orinda, and the disambig page was its own, linked from the O, C page. I copied the irignal 'Orinda' page, and copy/pased it into Orinda (disambiguation), then had Orinda redirect to Orinda, California). How should I do that in the future? Manfrin 22:38, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your help! Manfrin 01:30, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Image CopyRight
Hey, I got an automated message from you about a picture I uploaded months ago... I have no idea where I got it, probably using google image. The thing is that as I just said, I have no idea on where it came from, so I have no copyrights to add to it, what should I do?

Thx!

Ginovives 08:46, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

New article...
I'm writing a new article on Access Linux Plataform right now and I know there is some way to ask to the users to complete a too small article... some kind of footer. But I have no idea on how to add the footer... help

Ginovives 09:05, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Spliting pages
Got it! so the initial page should be left where it was, and when you are done copying over all the content, you delete the original content in place, so the edit history isn't lost. Dullfig 22:11, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

24.17.220.72
Thanks for blocking. ¡Dustimagic! ( T / C ) 07:18, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Some boxes "saved" by vote, others Speedy Deleted?
Hi. Thought I'd check in with you again. As per our nice Feb. 12 discussion re: the status of the Template:User_anti-fascism userbox, I see it just "survived" a keep/delete vote. Fine, but I'm a bit annoyed, not by the content (about which I could care less) but because the "pro" was deleted rather quickly, and the anti-Marxism boxes were deleted quickly. The pro-Marxist boxes...well, they never faced a TfD vote at all and survive intact. I'm detecting a rather one-sided and selective pattern of deletions here. Why is that? You said deletions were rather slow, but not slow enough to "save" selective boxes. I think I need more education on this topic to be better informed. Nhprman 03:00, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I think you're right about this war heating up. It looks like tonight (this morning, really, 3 a.m. here, EST), there was a massacre of the political party boxes.  Nhprman  UserLists  08:09, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Redskins-Cowboys
Thank you for having patience with this article, I will rewrite the story for the rumored background and get that article looking much better! :) Jwalte04 17:57, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Oddly-named Page
In case you're wondering how I found out about that strange page, I saw a certain entry in the millionth topic pool. Ardric47 01:38, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually, I was not concerned about that because it seems that some users are uncovering pages like that every day. What I was wondering is why Talk:Talk:Main Page was created in the first place. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 01:43, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * If I've found more, do you want to know about it, or is there another place to report them? Ardric47 02:35, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Syrnia Deletion
I'm a bit bemused by the deletion of the entry for Syrnia on Wikipedia. Sure if you deem yourself justified to delete a page set up by fans of a game. You should also delete the Runescape Wikipedia entry.

--Steve pd 14:31, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply on my talk page Zzyzx11 and thank you for the helpful links. I hope it's ok that I create a new Syrnia Wikipedia entry and try and flesh it out a bit over time. Is it ok if I steal the layout from another Wikipedia page to see how the tags work?

I thought I had used four tildes to sign this previously, but I'll try again :-)

Steve pd 18:38, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Template:Routeboxca2
SPUI is trying to get Template:Routeboxca2 and Template:Routeboxca deleted because you didn't like his edit.JohnnyBGood 19:15, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * First, let me preface by saying I was not a big fan of those templates anyway. But, of course, I was sort of overruled by the others participating on WikiProject California State Highways who wanted to list every major junction. That said, I still wanted to see a discussion before major changes were implemented on the template. And I am rather not surpised that SPUI decided to put it on TFD instead of on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject California State Highways. So it will be interesting to see what the poor admin processing the TFD will do with it. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 20:34, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Triumph of the Will
There are always exceptions to the rule, and this is probably one of them. I doubt that the penis vandal is going to stop in the next 24 hours. He's probably calling off work for this one. — 0918BRIAN • 2006-03-3 02:26
 * And yes, I'm quite familiar with Raul's statements, I've enforced them myself on numerous occasions. But as I said, there are always exceptions. I think it would hurt us more to show penises to the world for 12 cumulative hours of the day than to temporarily go against the "wiki way"... — 0918BRIAN • 2006-03-3 02:28

Template
Hello, you deleted the talk page and removed the Delete tag, but what about deleting the article page with the template on it ? That is the page that requires speedy deletion not the talk page. If I put the speedy deletion tag on the template page it will show up where ever it is linked. Cordially SirIsaacBrock 00:29, 6 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Hi okay my mistake, it I add {tfd} to template page it is going to show up on every article that is linked to the template article page, what do you suggest ? Cordially SirIsaacBrock 00:36, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Much thanks
I created the "In Memoriam" section of the latest Oscars, but I couldn't really word it well. Thanks for the help. That's what Wiki's all about, eh? Sean (talk || contribs|  esperanza )) 03:37, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 03:38, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Gay oscar citings
I'm confused by this one:


 * On the March 5, 2006 edition of Fox News Channel's Fox News Live, anchor Gregg Jarrett reported the nature of the Best Picture nominees with a dire tone, stating, "homosexuality, homicide bombings, political assassinations...Hollywood, going with a lot of darker themes this year, and they're courting some controversy."[citation needed]

You've got the date (5-mar-2006), author (Gregg Jarrett), and medium (Fox News Live)...what else do you want? I have nothing to do with the quote, but I mean....shessh. Time and timezone to boot? Video clip with notarization? Cburnett 18:53, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

My page?
I am not allowed to create a page without a source? What if there is no published source on the issue? That is my only question because you seem to be an administrator who is deleting my page... thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Frederick Stadler (talk • contribs).


 * Please read our policy page on verifiability. Information on Wikipedia must be reliable. Facts, viewpoints, theories, and arguments may only be included in articles if they have already been published by reliable and reputable sources. Articles should cite these sources whenever possible. Any unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Thank you. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 05:07, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

question
I have no complaints, and I am not trying to bother wikipedia in any way, I'm actually just curious about the intent of wikipedia; why is it wrong to add an entry about an unknown band? I did not make it up, and this isnt a practical joke, i just wanted to recognize a small group. --Mikercool1 05:49, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

My RfA
Hey, how is it going? Thank you for supporting my Request for adminship! It passed with a final vote of 73/1/1, which means that I have been granted adminship! I look forward to using these tools to enhance and maintain this wonderful site. I will continue regular article/project contributions, but I will also allocate a sizable portion of my wikischedule toward administrative duties :) Thanks again, and if you have any questions/comments/tips, please let me know! — Deckiller 05:01, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Terminal Island Freeway
Did you read the new article? It discusses not only the SR 103 portion but also the SR 47 portion. --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates! ) 19:18, 10 March 2006 (UTC)


 * If you feel it would fit better at Terminal Island Freeway than at State Route 103, feel free to move it. There is no reason to have two separate articles. --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates! ) 19:35, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

I've requested a move: Talk:State Route 103 (California). --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates! ) 21:13, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Ted Wilkes's contribution to the Jim Duffy article
Just for your information. To my mind, User:Ted Wilkes is frequently gaming the system. He did this several times in the past. Most people may remember his mud-throwing campaign against arbcom member Fred Bauder. There is much evidence that he is identical with multi-hardbanned User:DW. For a summary of facts supporting this view, see. Wilkes was blocked for one week by administrator Jtdirl. His contribution to the Jim Duffy article seems to be his personal reaction. Onefortyone 04:28, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

TfD
...debates last 7 days rather than AfD's 5, remember. You seem to have closed some of Templates for deletion/Log/2006 March 4 nearly 24 hours early. Thanks. -User:Splashtalk 19:30, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, they were me. I just couldn't stay logged in for some reason. Well, 11 March hasn't finished yet, so the very last TfDs probably still shouldn't be closed. I would think that using the UTC timestamp is the way it's always done, so I think some of them were closed a few hours early, but some of them basically an entire day ahead of schedule. E.g. the one at the top of the list shouldn't have been closed until a time in the vicinity of 23:54 UTC on 11th March - about 50 minutes' from now. A few hours is no big deal, but nearly 24 hours is a little too much probably. -Splash talk 23:10, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for demonstrating the correct way to do that
Thanks for showing me the correct way to do that on the SuperBowl XXXVII page. And improving the syntax. Hokeman 04:57, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I just want you to know how much I appreciated you showing me (in my first two weeks on the job) the correct way to do Notes and References (on the Superbowl XXXVII page). Now, after two months, I have a moderate level of experience. I just saw that photo you added on the Tom Dempsey page. That was a great, great photo. Also I have surfed into some of your California work - clicked into history wondering who did that - the Z man - that guys good.--Hokeman 04:16, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

NCAA Tourneys
These edits represent a first cut at tournament pages, and my main goal in creating them was to get something online before the (presumable) rush of people visiting the 2006 NCAA Men's Division I Basketball Tournament. I'll try to switch over to your templates in the near future, but as I mentioned before, flexibility is the main issue. I don't know if the wiki template syntax supports it, but it would be nice if unspecified cells in a 16 team bracket were just left blank. This would allow for byes. Also, before 1979, there were no seeds.

Which bots remove whitespace that they deem unnecessary? I'm surprised that there are bots like this, as it seems needlessly destructive... --Dantheox 21:03, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

panthers fight song edit
My thought on putting that text back into the article that you removed is that mentioning that other teams having fight songs shows that it's part of a treasured NFL tradition, and that the Panthers wanted to start with something traditional that could become part of the fabric of the team.

Sadly, it was not to be (much to the chagrin of few hard-core Panthers fans). SpikeJones 04:17, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

User: 72.79.6.79
Regarding your message on this user's talk page, I removed it. As I'm sure you're aware, comments like "Nice try bucko" only provides reinforcement that they've annoyed you, and they'll keep vandalizing. Simply revert, and document it with a warning on their talk page so that we can eventually ban this disruptive user. I've been watching this user's sockpuppet User:72.79.3.112 and it seems he came back yesterday to re-insert old edits (see Buffalo Bills, New York Yankees entries). Cheers. 05:26, 15 March 2006 (UTC) —This unsigned comment is by Yankees76 (talk • contribs).
 * Yes, my mistake... I kind of got carried away because I dealt with this user over 2 months before, inserting the same crap... Zzyzx11 (Talk) 05:28, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Wikifying NCAA Tournament Brackets


I've moved the 1998 NCAA Men's Division I Basketball Tournament page to your and  templates, and will be updating the remaining 64 team tournaments (1985-2004) soon. A few thoughts on the brackets:


 * They could easily be more compact vertically. There's a lot of whitespace between the team name and the black line below it. This looks especially funky in the first round. I'm aware that this is probably an issue with the way brackets are implemented using tables, but it should be fixed if at all possible.
 * Would it be possible to implement byes using metatemplates? If it's possible, would it be advisable? My thinking is that if "RD1-team05" and "RD1-team06" are left unspecified, then the gridlines for that game in the bracket would be colored white. Using some combination of metatemplates like Template:Qif, Template:Unless defined and Template:booland would presumably do the trick.
 * Was there any particular reason you chose not to include a line for the bracket winner? There's enough information there to deduce who won, sure, but it's so satisfying to see that one team on a line all their own...

--Dantheox 00:19, 16 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The new tournament brackets are a tremendous improvement. Great work! --Dantheox 17:54, 16 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Perhaps a better way to do byes would be to include a "display" parameter for each first round game. With the default value, it has no effect, but if a value like "display:none" or maybe "#ffffff" is passed in, then it simply blanks out the cell. It looks as though your table layout would be mostly amenable to this -- the only display problem I can see that would be created is with the long vertical strips between each round. In the presence of a bye, these strips would still need to be there, only they would have half their current height (since there would only be one game leading into the next round, not two). This could be achieved by splitting the "rowspan=4" cell into two "rowspan=2" cells. Does this make sense? I'd be willing to make some of these changes, but I have a feeling you'd be able to do it more easily. --Dantheox 18:17, 16 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Sure, that's fine. Out of curiosity, is there a standard way to test templates? By their nature, it seems like they need to be submitted before they can be tested from another page... --Dantheox 22:51, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Moving a page
I noticed that the page Red cedar redirects to Redcedar, which is clearly misspelled (should be two words). I wasnt able to change it since the correct spelling was already a page ( Red cedar, the redirect). Could you fix this? Or if you could tell me how, I will. Thanks MrPMonday 23:55, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways, from comparing articles that need work to other articles you've edited, to choosing articles randomly (ensuring that all articles with cleanup tags get a chance to be cleaned up). It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 13:27, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Sample bracket with byes
I've tweaked your Template:4TeamBracket to allow byes using the "color:white" method I described above. Sample template at User:Dantheox/4TeamBracketByes and a demo at User:Dantheox/Bracket Byes. Basic idea: there are two new parameters, "RD1-game1" and "RD1-game2". If they aren't specified, then it's just your four team bracket. If they're set to "white", then the corresponding game is completely whited out. Let me know what you think... "display:none" may have been a better way to do this, but "color:white" seems to work, too. How difficult would it be to integrate this into Template:16TeamBracket? --Dantheox 05:52, 17 March 2006 (UTC)


 * You certainly are ahead of me -- the three round bracket looks great! Just from an elegance/permanent solution point of view, I think the Template:Qif approach is better, even if it does use a controversial feature of Wikipedia. Tossing in an extra parameter with a strange, implementation-dependent value goes against every bone in my comp-sci body... and plus, if there's ever a less-controversial way to do the template than with Qif, it would be simple to just convert a single template page, rather than changing every tournament page. If you also make a 16-team version of this bracket, I'll get going on automatically updating the historical brackets. --Dantheox 06:36, 17 March 2006 (UTC)


 * My script to generate brackets for each year now works with your 3RoundBracket-Byes and (hopefully soon to be created-) 4RoundBracket-Byes. See 1957 NCAA Men's Division I Basketball Tournament. Thanks for all the great template work. And btw, did you find the new bracket design on some other site or is it original? --Dantheox 07:50, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

The template would only be used in 1979-1984, so it's not that high priority. The three round bracket with byes covered pretty much everything. I noticed that User:Jodel's brackets had a Bronze Medal Match. This would be fantastically useful for the NCAA brackets, both for the two round bracket (a national third place game was played until 1981) and the three round bracket (a regional third place game was played until ~1975). This third place game would be a great candidate for -ing --Dantheox 16:43, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Category:Fox network affiliates
Thank you for helping me redirect the "Category:FOX network affiliates" to its current page.

Raccoon Fox 20:35, 17 March 2006 (UTC)


 * No problem Zzyzx11 (Talk) 20:37, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

"nonsense"
What "nonsense" have I added? --SupaNova 00:04, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Brackets are all wikified
Thanks for Template:4RoundBracket-Byes. I ran my scripts and wikified 1979-1984. With those years down, all the brackets, 1939-2006, have been completely integrated into the new template! --Dantheox 16:55, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Template talk:AcademyAwardBestPicture
I redid the template. It's signficantly smaller than the original, and gives just as much information. Your version was an improvement, but I didn't like how it reduced the font. If you don't like it feel free to change it some more but I'd appreciate some feed back. savidan(talk) (e@) 21:09, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

playoff template
Hi, I was wondering if you could make a template for the page playoff system. It should look something like this:



Thanks! -- Earl Andrew - talk 17:24, 24 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Looks good! Thanks very much! --Curlingstub.png Earl Andrew - talk 20:21, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Todesfaust Picture
Yes it is from my computer, because I did the photo-shoot for the band. I thought I had it under free liscense though...(3/24/06)Dontrushurshot

Catmore
Thanks for picking this one up. I'd be fascinated to learn what's going on when you get to the bottom of it. Best, Gwernol 05:49, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I appreciate it. Gwernol 07:23, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Gwernol beat me here. I saw this activity and was scratching my head about it, but didn't realize that the anon's contributions were so widespread. Thanks for identifying and correcting the vandalism/nonsense. Cheers, -Will Beback 09:12, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

group field in 16TeamBracket
I just adjusted the bracket in the 1951 NCAA Men's Division I Basketball Tournament to reflect the fact that there wasn't a "real" final four that year. I combined the seperate regional brackets (8 team brackets) to make one big 16-team bracket. I used the "group1" and "group2" fields in your template to mark out the East and West regions in this bracket, but I'm not very happy with how the result looks. I'd assumed that these labels would go in the second round column, in the large gap between the first/second and third/fourth games. Any chance you could make this change? I don't know whether any other pages are using those particular fields. Thanks, --Dantheox 23:34, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, I did not explain it carefully that it should be vertical with letters spaced by BR tags. And, yes, now that I think about it, I think it would look better in the second round columns. I made a temporary save on the 1951 article and I'll fix the templates later. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 23:41, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Can you?
Can you please ban this persons ISP 202.182.64.1  Almost all of there edits have been vandalism. —This unsigned comment was added by SportsMasterESPN (talk • contribs).


 * Unfortunately, 202.182.64.1, is registered to SubNet Internet Services, Australia and is shared by multiple users. Therefore it can only be blocked of a short time. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:59, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

2006 Thanksgiving Day Buccaneers game
Hi there, you reverted my edit including the scheduling of the Buc's 2006 Thanksgiving Day game, noting that it wasn't appropriate for the lead section. would you mind relocating it to another section instead of removing the information completely? --Z ee rus (ETC) 16:05, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Please look very closely at the actual changes I made :-) Zzyzx11 (Talk) 16:08, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Oh argh.
Thanks for catching User:Number24165's copy-and-paste jobs. I didn't even think of checking the text. Aargh!!! Best, FreplySpang (talk) 01:45, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Number24165
I understand what you are saying on the copyrights tags. The thing is I am currently a student in college and while I was away, my little brother found out my password and began copying and pasting from the ESPN.com website, but he is only 12 and dosen't know any better. I just got on here for the first time in about a month and could not believe all of the copyrights he did on here. And I just would like some advice on what to do about it, like if I should just start a new acount or something. Thank you. --Number24165 03:07, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Hey, Zzyxx11, got your message about being busy. I'll drop him a note later today. Thanks! FreplySpang (talk) 14:38, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

About Mickey Mantle
Dear Zzyzx, I saw you recently failed the article Mickey Mantle for GA status. If you have reviewed an article (regardless of decision) you should remove it from Good articles/Nominations to prevent confusion.

The main problem with your review was that it wasn't very in-depth, as you only commented on the introduction, and ignored the rest of the article. After having quickly scanned the article, it seems to be okay (if you check my track record I am a hard ass when it comes to GA) and one minor blip is not enough for failure (it is however a main component of denying promotion, often alongside a wealth of grammar issues). I am reviewing this thoroughly, and shall make a decision whether to keep the article or abide your decision.

It's great that you are helping with the GA process, but you need to review the entire article and way the positives and negatives, further helpful reading may be What is a good article. Thanks again, Highway 23:50, 30 March 2006 (UTC)


 * If you have reviewed an article (regardless of decision) you should remove it from Good articles/Nominations to prevent confusion.
 * I thought I did that. But it seems that a non IP user readded it after rewriting the lead section.


 * The main problem with your review was that it wasn't very in-depth, as you only commented on the introduction, and ignored the rest of the article.
 * That was really the only negative I saw on the article. Since it is a main component of denying promotion, shouldn't it still be removed? Or am I too harsh?
 * Zzyzx11 (Talk) 00:03, 31 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Hah! No, that's me XD The anon user is actually got good judgement, I'd trust them, they probably saw your somewhat inadequate review (no offence). Yes, the intro is the most important part, but the rest of articles makes up for it. Like I said, way up the pros and cons, obviously the pros win here. Is it okay that I pass it and I'll drop a note on the nominee's page to expand the intro soonish? Hope that's okay, Highway 00:12, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

template cats header message
Is it a substed template or just untemplated boilerplate text? Circeus 19:20, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

*hisses*
i scowl at you. —This unsigned comment was added by Chunnabee (talk • contribs). in response to an article I speedy deleted for a non-notable bio.

re: Origin of the name California
To be more specific, I removed and added  to areas I think needs some references.

Also, how is the corresponding article in the Spanish-language Wikipedia a reliable published source? Wikipedia articles can't be used as sources, even if it is on the es.wikipedia. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:21, 1 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Translations of Wikipedia articles certainly don't count as adequate citation, but I WP:TIE is clear on acknowledging them when we use them significantly, and has said more or less the same thing for at least a year. So, it's not an adequate source, but it should still be acknowledged, much as we would expect anyone outside of Wikipedia using that as a source to acknowledge it.


 * I'll take a look at your issues and see if I can address any of them. To be honest, though, I mostly translated this, and have not done independent research beyond raising some questions on the talk page. -- Jmabel | Talk 07:04, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Image:Example.png
I was wondering if, in the interests of being consistant with Image:Example.jpg and Image:Example.gif, you could briefly unprotect Image:Example.png so I could upload that and tag it with the appropriate license? Thank you. =) —Locke Cole • t • c 01:56, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Ahh, hmm.. the PNG I have is 24-bit (the GIF is 8-bit, and converting to PNG likely resulted in an 8-bit PNG; converting from the JPEG would result in a 24-bit image, but would also keep whatever compression artifacts were present in it). Seriously, I promise not to vandalize it and will leave a note as soon as I'm finished so you can reprotect. =) (Yes I'm anal retentive, heh). —Locke Cole • t • c 02:10, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
 * All done. =) —Locke Cole • t • c 02:22, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Tommy McCormick
Hi there - you removed the notice from this page (which I added), citing that this person was notable in the edit summary. I was just wondering on what grounds you made this decision: association football is a professional sport in the UK; the player concerned is an amateur and has never played for a professional club, which means he fails the basic test for notability for sportspersons in WP:BIO. Qwghlm 08:42, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Image:Carlingford carlostation.jpg and other images
Instead of just changing the tag you should consider deleting images at Category:Images on Wikimedia Commons. There are only 7425 of these left. This was the reason I used the tag, because nothing ever seems to get done and the category just keeps getting bigger. Someone really should take care of this. Sorry if I'm bothering you. --Voyager 12:39, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Just because there is a backlog is not a good enough reason to speedy delete them. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 19:00, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Image:Mnf2006.jpg
How come Mnf2006.jpg could not be allowed but Mondaynightfootball_240.jpg was allowed?

--Abc123 18:21, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Template talk:OTA
It all happened within my vacation time, but thanks for tipping me. reg.Mion 09:09, 9 April 2006 (UTC) About the fact that the list is not complete, the website is not more complete, if others readers have a better list, they are welcome to make a contribution, leaving it as it is now is fine with me. Mion 09:35, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof
Thanks for your interest in VandalProof! You've been added to the list of authorized users, and feel free to contact me or post a message on VandalProof's talk page if you have any questions. AmiDaniel (Talk) 03:35, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

17 mile drive
The 17 mile drive article had said that I owned the Pebble Beach Company for something like 2 years. I thought you had already edited out, so when I went back to check, I saw that it hadn't. I attempted to change it back, and it rejected me. Sorry for the confusion. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jojoplaut (talk • contribs).

Cent
Hey, thanks for the link to Centralized discussion/Conclusions. I think the way you've linked it in makes it historical, though; do you think it should be kept active as a destination of record for proposals that pass through cent? John Reid 20:27, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Vidiots
You immediately removed my contribution for vidiots, which was well sourced to it's roots. What recourse do I have to challenge the removal. Bobkiger 01:12, 13 April 2006 (UTC)Bob Kiger


 * With all due respect, your version did not include any evidence that had already been published by reliable and reputable sources. All content on Wikipedia must be verifiable. Articles should cite these sources whenever possible. Any unsourced material may be challenged and removed.


 * If you wish to re-create the article again, you may do so. But please cite your sources by following the instructions on Citing sources. Otherwise, your article may get deleted again by myself or another administrator. Thank you. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 01:22, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Tom DeLay image
I asked the author of the fixed up image Image:TomDeLay.jpg to fix the distortion issue you brought up. He did. Would you consider your vote on the IFD page? - Hbdragon88 05:54, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Looking at both side by side, I currently see nothing that would make me change my mind. But then perhaps the original PNG was a little distorted to begin with. Maybe we should look for something else. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 07:22, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, we gotta find something...there are two copies on Wikipedia and three copies on Commons. I'd like to reduce that number to just one.  I've tagged two Commons versions so far... - Hbdragon88 07:47, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

He is Risen
 Jesus Christ is risen today, Alleluia! our triumphant holy day, Alleluia! who did once upon the cross, Alleluia! suffer to redeem our loss. Alleluia! Hymns of praise then let us sing, Alleluia! unto Christ, our heavenly King, Alleluia! who endured the cross and grave, Alleluia! sinners to redeem and save. Alleluia! But the pains which he endured, Alleluia! our salvation have procured, Alleluia! now above the sky he's King, Alleluia! where the angels ever sing. Alleluia! 

-- Psy guy Talk 06:00, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

VandalProof 1.1 is Now Available For Download
Happy Easter to all of you, and I hope that this version may fix your current problems and perhaps provide you with a few useful new tools. You can download version 1.1 at User:AmiDaniel/VandalProof. Let me warn you, however, to please be extremely careful when using the new Rollback All Contributions feature, as, aside from the excessive server lag it would cause if everyone began using it at once, it could seriously aggitate several editors to have their contributions reverted. If you would like to experiment with it, though, I'd be more than happy to use my many sockpuppets to create some "vandalism" for you to revert. If you have any problems downloading, installing, or otherwise, please tell me about them at User:AmiDaniel/VP/Bugs and I will do my best to help you. Thanks. AmiDaniel (Talk) 06:52, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Miami Gardens
thanks for putting this in Miami Gardens, Florida was incorporated in 2003, prior to this game but I think you worded it wrong  the games took place prior to the city being incorpated Smith03 01:13, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for making the change to List of Super Bowl champions, etc. concerning unincorporated Miami-Dade county. I made the correction to Dolphin Stadium but did not have time to get to the other ones. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 01:40, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Re: Template:Browsebar space
Whilst it's fresh in your mind (assuming you read them ;-) i was wondering if you could delete Browsebar space. It's just a lazy-code template-mirror ("template:Browsebar noblank" with a  underneath) and was only on 5 pages, which i've depopulated. Thanks :) --Quiddity 08:46, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirects are quick, easy, and cheap. (plus it gets those "Don't delete pages out of process" people off my back) Zzyzx11 (Talk) 15:21, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Question about formatting in the Sandbox??
On 15:37, 17 April 2006 (UTC) Zzyzx11 (Talk) wrote:

"Because you did not include an edit summary, your recent removal of content from Pittsburgh sports lore was misinterpreted as vandalism and therefore was reverted. Remember to please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes. Thank you."

Thanks Zzyzx11, for noticing that I hadn't vandalized the page. You are perceptive. I HATE vandalism, believe me. I'm a new kid on the block.Good advice though about summarizing the edits. I should have at least mentioned that I left something on the Discussion page regarding why I removed that paragraph about the CATCH II (by the way what is CATCH I???). I removed it because something kept going wrong with the formatting when I tried to give

Catch II
its own heading. I simply removed the piece after much frustration and hid it on the talk page.

SO HERE'S MY QUESTION: WHY WOULDN'T IT FORMAT PROPERLY??? IS THIS WHAT YOU MEAN BY USING THE SANDBOX??? WILL THIS FIX THE FORMATTING PROBLEMS I ENCOUNTER.

If you reverted the article back to its previous version before I edited, you of course noticed the terrible format that occurred. How did you fix the problem? I looked at the history page, and it looks like all you did was add a colon :....

Thanks again. And if you're also a Steeler fan, then you are AWESOME.Christian Roess 18:53, 17 April 2006 (UTC)