User:Zzyzx11/Archive9

Ottawa Senators Page Reverts
User_talk:Eric_Bouliane. Feel free to discuss this with me further if you like. --Maraulth 02:28, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Template:NHLBracket
Thanks for your help. I didn't even know that article on Fair Use existed. I'll make sure to read before I build another template. Z4ns4tsu 20:59, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Template Link open/close
Apologies for creating such silly looking templates without due explanation. Sorry I was a bit in a hurry because I had just noticed that I broke another template and tried an educated guess quick fix, which failed. You were totally right writing to me! I am currently trying to fix a nasty bug with ParserFunctions (see also my contribs, doing replaces of qif with that new #if:). --Ligulem 22:34, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

American football
Thanks for making that box on the top of the talk page. I wish there was a way we could ensure people wouldn't keep muddying the page with arcane stuff like one-point safeties and free kicks after fair catches. -- Mwalcoff 02:45, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Your edits to Squaw Valley
Please read Manual of Style (disambiguation pages). On disambiguation pages, there should only be one link per entry and you should not use piping. --rogerd 03:03, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, I realize that now. But of course, as with all of the MoS pages:
 * The following rules do not claim to be the last word on Wikipedia style... the following quotation from The Chicago Manual of Style deserves notice:
 * Rules and regulations such as these, in the nature of the case, cannot be endowed with the fixity of rock-ribbed law. They are meant for the average case, and must be applied with a certain degree of elasticity.
 * Zzyzx11 (Talk) 03:23, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Chicago Bears
In the case of William Perry, WWE probably stands for "Weight Watchers Escapee". Wahkeenah 10:50, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

A favor please
Hello friend, do you remember me? In the month of September 2005, your vote had made me an administrator. we all know that the life here is exciting and full of challenges. I would request you to please spare fem moments for me, and favor me with your comments and suggestions (here please) on my performance as a wikipedian. Let us continue to build the Better than the Best global encyclopedia. Thank you and regards. --Bhadani 10:16, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

NFL colors
Even some official NFL publication error in the actual colors of teams. Maybe you should check pantones and not what a book claims as books are not always factual. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by JaMikePA (talk • contribs).

NFL on NBC Logo
Will you please stop removing that tag that I've added for the NFL on NBC article. What is so inappropriate about that particular tag anyway? TMC1982 29 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I have asked for verification on Wikipedia talk:Fair use on exactly what it should be tagged with because, again, it is a photo of a sign or banner taken by an uncredited photographer rather than the actual graphical image itself. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:47, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Please Help
There is an unholy mess in the Maryland article regarding a section entitled "cultural identity." Most of the editors agree that the state is a Northern one, and many facts have been posted and adequately cited to prove that fact. A Confederate sympathizer, however, is constantly going onto the article, removing cited information, and replacing it with unsourced "statistics" that steer Maryland into the Southern category. Please read the whole debate, weigh in, and please, PLEASE, help.

History21

my article
i received a message that my article can only be printed on wikipedia if i am a "notable person." i am a notable person: i'm listed on the purchase college web site and i am a reporter for a major daily newspaper (new haven register) and i'm in a band that has several recordings. all the information on the page is accurate, and if any is "not verifiable" i would be happy to take it out. so please print my page.

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Crhatigan (talk • contribs). concerning the article Chris Rhatigan

Bang Cartoon
68.34.73.186 is the creator of bang cartoon, John Tayman —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.6.169.187 (talk • contribs).
 * Do you have proof? If it is him, User:68.34.73.186 (talk • contribs) must cite sources for all those quote and figures or else they might get removed. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 16:50, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 

Hi, I'm John Tayman, and I can completely vouch for the comments I made. In most cases, these comments have been made on radio or TV programs, or in newspaper articles that I mentioned in the reference section of our entry. I doin't know any other way to verify them.

~John Tayman


 * Even though you added some references, you might want to actually add footnotes to the quotes tagged as "citation needed". See Footnotes for more information. Thanks. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 01:49, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:Islamophobiaevil.jpeg
Image has been allowed to be listed, author releases all rights. I can forward E-Mail to you, whats your E-Mail address?--Irishpunktom\talk 15:55, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Please follow the instructions listed on Confirmation of permission Thanks. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 16:02, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Anaheim Hills
I am not being disruptive to the page. I added 8 sources, and then deleted the thing that said the sources were unverifiable. And Mike Dillon will do anything to make me frustrated and irritated (just read the comments he has written to others). I had it approved by Will Beback, and he said that it seemed all verefiable, and all sources were listed. I am sorry if you feel I am being disruptive, but I have added more sources to that page than many other pages have combined!-Ericsaindon2

In regards to User:Guitafreak673
Thank you for reverting his changes, and for the block. --Stephane Charette 01:35, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Post Office/Post Office UK

 * Post office <-> Post offices

There's a problem here. This article needs a disambiguation, so it can't be confused with Post Office UK. I thought changing the title [in little letters] to post officeS would've avoided the need for that. (RM21 22:02, 18 May 2006 (UTC))
 * I fixed it. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 22:09, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Anaheim Hills Addition
The long feud is over, and it seems like the page has finally come to terms with all editors involved! Since it is such a stellar page in its current condition, and looks better than most of the Orange County city pages, could you add it somehow to the Orange County Template (located at bottom of the Anaheim Hills, California page if you dont know what I am referring to) to bring more people to the page, so it seems like this huge debate and edit war had a significant point (since we did spend alot of time editing it) --Ericsaindon2 06:00, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Not until there is at least an answer to User:Will Beback's questions: Is it an association, a neighborhood, a development?  Zzyzx11 (Talk) 15:44, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

I think Will Beback finally is understanding what I have been telling him regarding Anaheim Hills. It does not fit really any category. It is not a census designated place, neighborhood, not yet a city, not a community, not an unincorporated island, so its identity is nameless, although its intentions are understood by Will Beback, myself, and city officials. It is more recognized as an individual "city" than a community and an unincorporated island, but has less status in the government than a city. I think this issue has historically puzzled the Census Bureau about what to call Anaheim Hills (becuase it has been discussed that it will gain cityship soon). So now that its nameless identity that has feuled this debate for so long has been agreed upon, would it now be possible to add it to the Orange County, California city template (example located on Anaheim Hills page)? --Ericsaindon2 05:33, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Please answer the question posted at Talk:Anaheim Hills, California. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 07:37, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Block
You recently blocked me due to a mistake on my part, an explanation of what happened is here if you are intested. Crazynas 16:22, 22 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Indeed, I'm somewhat paranoid about my computer, and I generally keep e-mail, school account and such logged out by default. The thought of someone I loaned my computer to abusing the 'pedia just never crossed my mind.  I guess that's what I get for having it be the first bookmark on my toolbar.  As to who blocked me, I figured since you left a couple of messages on my Talk/Userpage, that I'd fill you in.  Crazynas 16:36, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Gah
I see you removed the I had put on Talk:Gah. Sorry about that: I didn't realize that db-talk shouldn't be used when the article page is tagged as a deleted page. The Gah talk page is completely unrelated to the article which was deleted, so I think it might be appropriate to delete it. What's your opinion? Thanks, Gw e rnol 01:24, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Well that makes sense. Thanks for taking a moment to point out the reasoning. Best, Gw e rnol 01:35, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

re
I'm not vandalizing any page, YOU are vandalizing pages I create by repeatedly trying to delete them. Stop it already. I like to watch BasebaIl 08:39, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * thanks for permanelty trashing my page. what are you trying to do anyway?  I like to watch BasebaIl 08:41, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Re: max speed on BART
I highly doubt any third-party sources that could be considered reliable would care about this information or publish it. How else could I go about "proving" what I saw? I simply sat in the front car of the train and observed through the cab door window the max speed attained by the train as shown on the speedometer. Please let me know. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lensovet (talk • contribs).
 * Another problem is that you only observed that speed for that particular day, time, type of train cars, number of cars, the amount of passengers, etc. How do you know that is THE standard operating speed for that particular segment on that route? Can you guarantee that each and every train that travels on that route reaches that speed? What if a train traveling at 9-10 p.m. on that same route can go higher? How can you verify that it was not an error in the computer-controlled system used in BART's Operations Control Center? Those are some of the questions that pop into my head. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 23:52, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Sorry
I'm sorry for recent mistkaes, i'm still getting used to the wikipedia environment. My apologies Max.pwnage 22:58, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Apology accepted. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 23:52, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

i am sorry for my recent mistakes aswell. i do not know why i was fighting with people. and thank you for blanking my talk page. it's not excatly what i wanted but it works. --acethebunny 06:03, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

User:Nobodynobody
I saw you just blocked him. Can you delete his bad-faith nominations, or end them, either one? D G X  02:50, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I blocked him before I started to delete those bad-faith nominations. Whoever that created that account made the major mistake of created a bunch of them all at once, and actually naming the user he was harassing. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 02:52, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I was going to vote at them all, but when I found out there was many of them, that when I knew they were bad-faith (and the harrassment of the user's name on top of it). Thanks for getting rid of them. ;-) D G  X  02:56, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Norris Trophy page
Thanks for cleaning my attempt up..it looks much better. Cheers. -Rainman71 12:13, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Re: Anaheim Hills as a featured article
Hi Zzyzx11. When I saw your edit summary stating that the Anaheim Hills article has "never, ever" been posted on Featured articles, I remembered these edits from one of User:Ericsaindon2's old IP addresses:,. It made me laugh, a little. Mike Dillon 04:00, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

LDBot
Thanks for the heads up, I've been out of town this weekend, and it's just typical for something to go wrong. Will have a look when my flight gets in (I'm at Midway Airport right now :P) -- light darkness (talk) 11:57, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Sorry
I didn't think I deleted anything...I'm still getting used to Wikipedia. What happened to the Awards section I added to the Pittsburgh Penguins entry? I spent a lot of time on that!SportsEditor 21:12, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Caps
Where did I do that?.. must of been inadvertently.. Did you correct it? -Rainman71 22:36, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Renaming Articles
Wow...things get noticed quickly around here, don't they? The reason I copied the page in order to rename it was because I was unable to find a rename feature. Sorry about that!

Bob the Wikipedian

Thank you!

 * Thanks for the heads-up regarding Game$how Marathon and spoilers. Still, it usually takes me a while to properly recap the episode anyway (at least, it did for TPIR), so in my case, anyway, I'll hold to the self-inflicted deadline. If anyone ELSE posts an evening's summary before I do, so be it. njr75003   04:32, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Blocking Goofhead
Hi, I see that you blocked user Goofhead. The strange thing is that this editor made a useful edit on The Little Mermaid (film). Weird, huh? But you have your reasons for blocking him. Cheers. --Starionwolf 05:41, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Anaheim Hills
Is this the right time for "*sigh*"? It looks like you've corrected the history. I've made a request for move protection. Yes, I think it's time for RfC. I'll have time over the weekend to work on it. -Will Beback 01:42, 3 June 2006 (UTC)


 * One more try.Talk:Anaheim_Hills%2C_Anaheim%2C_California I don't mean to undercut, as I'm all in favor of the naming principle. I just don't want to have a fight about the name of a housing development. Even if it's "wrong", it helps us get past a sticky point. Plus it might get us out of doing an RfC. Cheers, -Will Beback 09:57, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Anaheim Hills, California
Okay, I've now protected the article. I'm not sure if the history needs to be merged back into the main article (I see you've done it before), but if you think they need to be then I'll be glad to do this for you. AmiDaniel (talk) 02:52, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

RE: Orphaned fair use image (Image:Queen Elizabeth II of New Zealand stamps 2001.jpg)
Regarding your tagging of Image:Queen Elizabeth II of New Zealand stamps 2001.jpg

If you checked: User:Brian New Zealand/Temp/HMTQ you would see that I am currently writing the article in my Username space.

I expect to move it to the main space soon Brian | (Talk) 07:42, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Question for you...
First off, I just wanted to says thanks for apologizing for deleting my Awards and Tropies section for the Pittsburgh Penguins. I was able to rebuild the section with minimal work.

Second, since you know more about this forum than I do, I have a question for you. What do you do when someone reverts all the facts you've changed to the previous ones? As an example, I just went through all the NHL team pages to change the players' birthplaces like U.S.S.R., Czechoslovakia, etc. to Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Czech Republic, etc. I work in TV sports and I know that the players are the first ones to say they were born in Russia instead of the U.S.S.R. Granted, some of these were already done and I didn't have to change anything, but there's some guy named Rasputin who is changing them all back. He said "we" use the country that existed at the time of the player's birth. Who is this "we" and why can he do this? He said that's the way it is in the NHL media guide (which I know for a fact that no one has bothered to make those changes over the years).

My point is, if someone's just going to revert my changes, why bother to edit anything?SportsEditor 16:37, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * WP:HOCKEY. RasputinAXP   c  16:42, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Update
Thanks for getting back to me. Doesn't it bother anyone that players are listed under countries that haven't existed for 15 years? Since I left you that last message, I double-checked my references...whereas the NHL media guide lists someone as USSR or Czechoslovakia, the individual team media guides list them as Russia or Czech Republic, etc. I can forward those listings to you if you like.

Half of them were already changed by the time I got to them...why is this such a big issue now? I was just being consistent.SportsEditor 17:23, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Anaheim Hills== ==

Would you vote on the Final Naming Poll on the Anaheim Hills, Anaheim, California page by Monday, June 6th at 11:00 pm pst. This is a collaborative effort to determine where the Anaheim Hills page will rest forever with no disputes. There are currently four choices to choose from, so go and check it out. --Ericsaindon2 21:04, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

wowturkey.com images
Hi, I see that you have deleted Image:Undergroud_stationofBURSA.jpg quite immediately after I tagged it. Probably you deleted a few more such images. Please note that people are asking wowturkey.com to release images under a free licence, so these might become free soon. Can you please discuss at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Turkey before speedily deleting any more such images? Thanks! -- Paddu 23:03, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I only deleted the ones I saw that were tagged and said they were redundant. I have not deleted anything else. Of course, if the issue with wowturkey.com is settled and they agree to release them under a different license, you can always upload them again. The key is that they cannot be "non commerical" because the intent of Jimbo Wales and the Wikimedia Foundation is to enable Wikipedia to be also used for commerical use. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 23:11, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Image:Undergroud_stationofBURSA.jpg was not tagged as redundant. It was only tagged as coming from wowturkey.com. I agree non-commercial images should be deleted, but IMHO in this case there is some rationale at least to consider deleting wowturkey.com images later than the thousands of other non-commercial images lying about here.
 * It is just that we could avoid the hassles of keeping track of what got deleted and reuploading if we could wait for a few more days until wowturkey.com gives a positive response one way or the other. Right now they appear to be confused about our requirements. No harm done by deleting just this one image (& its 2 duplicates) though!
 * Also, from the speed at which it got deleted, I'm afraid I'm not sure you did verify that the image is truly noncommercial. I hope images tagged by a vandal as noncommercial don't get deleted immediately without verification.
 * Thanks! -- Paddu 23:51, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh, yeah I did delete Image:Undergroud_stationofBURSA.jpg for being noncommerical. http://www.worldturkey.com/lang/eng/information.php says "using the photos on a commercial basis...is forbidden". It was the other images that were reundant to that one. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 00:03, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The photo was actually from http://www.wowturkey.com/ (at least claimed to be so) which says something less strict about commercial usage (so I think it might be possible to get freely licenced images from them). I'm just requesting that other noncommercial images are deleted before deleting wowturkey.com photos for the next few days. Thanks! -- Paddu 06:03, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

User:Ericsaindon2 & Anaheim Hills, Anaheim, California
Please see Requests for comment/Ericsaindon2. Blank Verse 08:55, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Contra Costa County, California
RE: "rv: This is the English encyclopedia, it doesn't need a Spanish name" actually it does need the Spanish name, since both English and Spanish are official languges of the County, all materials and signage from the government offices are available in spanish and it is officially a, "Bilingual County" the voter guide comes in english and spanish, same size same lettering all polling sites have bilingual singage in every corner of the county even where there arnt many spanish speakers. Arizona is officially bilingual, and on the article it states "STATE OF ARIZONE/ESTADO DE ARIZONA" the Bolivia article says REPÚBLICA DE BOLIVA/WULIVIA/ULUVIA a showing the trilingual local names (Spanish Quechua Ayamara) of that country, the canada article says it in english and french and so on the Spain article says Spain (España) the local language names are always included on the side bars. Qrc2006 00:22, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Numerous counties in California print their materials, signage, and voter guides in multiple languages – but I do not recall seeing references or official government documents that say that they are "the official languages" of those counties. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 00:27, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

i know for sure, that was just an example.. i got a piece of literature in the mail from the county that was informing everyone that were were now had two official langauges and that we were a quote "Bilingual County" ill try and look it up

User:Acethebunny
I see that you have blanked Acethebunny's talk page for him because he is quote "Leaving Wikipedia". I suspect that it is an untruthful statement, and merely a way to get the warnings removed from his talk page. I will be watching his contribution page, and if he begins to make edits, I will completely restore his talk page. Thanks, W  IKIPEE  DIO  15:08, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * That is primarily one of the reasons why WP:USER says, "As a matter of practice User talk pages are generally not deleted, barring legal threats or other grievous violations that have to be removed for legal reasons." Zzyzx11 (Talk) 15:17, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

New York Rangers
I gave that high school a temporary timeout for the colors thing. RasputinAXP  c  15:44, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Somalia
Hello, do you know why the photo of Mogadishu electricity was deleted? RJII 05:08, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * CSD #9: It was not marked with any image copyright tag for more than 7 days. Since I noticed that you were the original uploader, you may upload the image again, but you should immediately attach a image copyright tag to the image page. Thanks. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 05:14, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Do you have any idea of what the copyright tag would be? These are photos taken by a private individual who has allowed me to post them. RJII 05:34, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

World Jr Hockey Championships, name of article and merge proposal
Talk:World Junior Ice Hockey Championships If you're interested. Thanks. ColtsScore 09:49, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

V Sinizter
I may have acted too soon (the article as written sucked), but V-Sinizter does appear to be somewhat notable (at least sufficiently so to survive a speedy). Lots of hits on google. Just FYI... --EngineerScotty 23:42, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * If you re-create with a bunch of verified, NPOV content (unlike the original creator), be my guest... Zzyzx11 (Talk) 23:48, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

would it have hurted
Mna u ddint have to be so slack i mean come ion its not as if Wikipedi, can live up to Britannica. WTF wouldanyone choose to go on this free crap when something like taht is better and done by officials in their field. I often why i bother with this site. just show some compassion. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Catalyst in Society).
 * The biggest problem with Wikipedia, the English version with Wikipedia, is that is does generate a lot of traffic and a lot of users. Might I suggest you look into http://hr.wikipedia.org or some of the Wikipedias in other languages. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 15:20, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

User:RepChristian07
He appears to be vandalizing the betting lines of a number of Super Bowl articles, which I guess you've noticed by now. Should a block be recommended without further warning? Aplomado talk 17:38, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Looks like he stopped for now. Therefore, if he makes one more vandalism, he should be given a, due to the length between major edits. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 17:42, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Alright, I'll help keep an eye on him. Aplomado  talk 17:44, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

NHL Templates
Hey Zzyzx11, I noticed you merged the Oilers template and the NHL template. That's fine with me. You seem to have good knowledge of template syntax, and I wanted to ask you a question. When an image is added to the infobox, it always seems to be slightly compressed vertically, and for the life of me I can't figure out why. Any ideas? Thanks Jaskaramdeep 17:18, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Your edits to Black Rock Desert
You recently removed an external link that pointed to a personal page of photographs from a trip to the Black Rock Desert that you categorized as spam. However you did not remove the other external links which point to a story about a trip to the Black Rock, a page of commercial photographs, and a rocketry club. Can you please clarify why these links are valid?

You also sent a message saying that any comments about your action should be made on the pages talk page. By this do you mean discussion page? Well, the discussion page for Black Rock doesn't work.

Image:Abc7 la sf.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Abc7 la sf.png, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronald20 03:00, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

71.250.45.4 block
See User_talk:Trosk. That user is suffering collateral damage from your block of 71.250.45.4. If you don't respond within a few minutes I may unblock the IP, I'm thinking it has rotated. Just letting you know.--Commander Keane 13:06, 17 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Ha!
 * You couldn't even keep me blocked for the full 24 hours! 71.250.45.4 20:38, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Shows how weak this place is. 71.250.45.4 21:51, 17 June 2006 (UTC)


 * 24 hours is the standard default time for a block. However, it may be adjusted depending on several factors such as whether the IP is shared, on a public computer, a dynamic IP address, and so forth. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 21:57, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, whatever. This place is still weak, not coming through. BIG mistake. 71.250.45.4 22:00, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

MLB Regular Season 2006
For the individual MLB seasons, I was hoping to eventually get to this. Kingjeff 00:32, 19 June 2006 (UTC)


 * See my reply at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Baseball. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 00:39, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

El Dorado, California
I typed in the ZIP code, here is the link: []

I hope that is right. Let me know! -- Boereck 15:51, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Larry O'Brien trophy.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Larry O'Brien trophy.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 17:11, 20 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Obviously, this bot needs a third explanation besides the summary of "The Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy" and the message on  that says "it is believed that the use of this work in the article 'Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy': To illustrate the object in question" Zzyzx11 (Talk) 18:45, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Ducks name
Hi, i think historical references to the Mighty Ducks of Anaheim should stay. Any mention of the team in the present tense should be Anaheim Ducks but I think it would be correct to say for example:

1)The New Jersey Devils defeated the Mighty Ducks of Anaheim in the Stanley Cup Final.

2)Paul Kariya began his NHL career with the Mighty Ducks of Anaheim.

See my comment at Talk:Anaheim Ducks ccwaters 16:12, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, I already noticed that... that is why I have not really changed many pages. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 16:15, 22 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Sorry: I was reacting this with fully realizing what you doing. I feared you were about to indiscriminately change all references with AWB. My bad. ccwaters 16:25, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

World Cup
I am OK with it being blocked, but is it possible for someone to remove the latest Turkey vandalism? --NThurston 22:19, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Hopefullly, I reverted all of them. It is semi-protected, so you should still be able to edit it. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 22:22, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Semi-protection
There was already a discussion about semi-protection of 2006 FIFA World Cup on the talk page. Most of the opinion seemed to be leaning towards it not being necessary. Yes, there is vandalism of the article, but there are a lot of good changes from anonymous editors too. All in all, I thought the people working on the article were doing a great job of keeping it in good shape. Can you try and keep it protected for the shortest time possible? I'm not about to go and start a wheel war, you protected it, so the length of protection is up to you in the end. --GraemeL (talk) 22:27, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I will reply on the talk page. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 22:28, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Cool thanks. There are a few discussions, the one I was talking about is on my last post to the talk page. --GraemeL (talk) 22:31, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

I went back through the list of IPs involved in the Turkey vandalism. At least 5 of them were open proxies, which I've blocked indefinitely. Depending on how determined our vandal is, short term protection might not be enough. All depends on his patience and how large his list of open proxies is. --GraemeL (talk) 23:10, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Open proxies are easier to deal with in my opinion. If he was using AOL, that would be different. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 23:13, 22 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Looks like the guy's determined enough, he's started again. Maybe the semi-protection was removed too early? └ VodkaJazz / talk ┐ 23:15, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Quit watching me
Could you please stop following me, it's very rude! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.90.48.86 (talk • contribs).
 * Could you please stop vandalising pages and making POV edits? That is also rude! Zzyzx11 (Talk) 15:07, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

CAT:CSD
A discussion on the use of headers for the page Category:Candidates for speedy deletion is currently being discussed at Category_talk:Candidates_for_speedy_deletion. Your input would be welcome. — xaosflux  Talk  01:55, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Kansas City Chiefs
i erased that link because it was not relevant to the chiefs. WillC 01:57, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

World Cup protection
The protection was not meant to last forever (as was made clear in the edit summary) and I assumed it would be lifted at some point. Also, the link you referenced is not entirely on point as the page was only semi-protected, not Protected. Thanks. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 08:23, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Tournament Brackets
See User_talk:Adw2000. Thanks for keeping me right. Adw2000 13:59, 30 June 2006 (UTC)