User talk:245CMR

1 · 2

Your GA nomination of Kripa
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kripa you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:20, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kripa
The article Kripa you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kripa for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:21, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jayanti (Hinduism), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Devas.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Indrani
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Indrani you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 20:21, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Ahimsa
(transcluded from GA Reassessment page)
 * If possible, after Indrani, can I try to solve the following problems. I was not aware of this until I saw your user page. Regards, . 245CMR . •👥📜 14:16, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
 * After Indrani, yes, we may take up the Ahimsa reassessment. While Ahimsa is a foundational value of sanathana dharma, the article rightly considers Ahimsa in Jainism, Buddhism and Christian Just War moral theology. So you may encounter some new material. --Whiteguru (talk) 19:10, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Indrani
The article Indrani you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Indrani for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 06:01, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Indrani
The article Indrani you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Indrani for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 07:41, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Asikni (goddess)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Asikni (goddess) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cerebellum -- Cerebellum (talk) 10:01, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Daksha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sati.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Asikni (goddess)
The article Asikni (goddess) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Asikni (goddess) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cerebellum -- Cerebellum (talk) 11:01, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Asikni (goddess)
The article Asikni (goddess) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Asikni (goddess) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cerebellum -- Cerebellum (talk) 13:21, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

About Sage Vyasa
You have undone my previous edit on Vyasa. Please don't mention Britanicca as it can be edited by any person whoever have an administrative access to that page. Sources mentioning Sage Parashar is just a lie spreaded by some people who are hiding the real truth. So, please mention authentic sources with authentic books content on their site. It may be the case that you yourself may be a victim of sources with no authenticity and reality as in original Mahabharat. Thank You. ItWiki97 (talk) 17:50, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Please see WP:RS. You can't push your POV. Which version do you mean by "authentic version", almost all scholars consider it to be the BORI Critical Edition. See to know about different versions of Mahabharata. . 245CMR . •👥📜 17:54, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

. 245CMR . •👥📜 17:52, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Different versions means different stories. Then, how can you only put one version without knowing which one is the true story. I don't know that much about rules and regulations for now of Wikipedia but I guess you don't want the truth. Only version story from one's point of view with unauthentic and unreal story. ItWiki97 (talk) 17:59, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

As per WP:Undue, "If a viewpoint is held by an extremely small minority, it does not belong on Wikipedia, regardless of whether it is true or you can prove it, except perhaps in some ancillary article." Most scholars and versions accept Parashara. . 245CMR . •👥📜 18:05, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Only few scholars accept Sage Parashar but the real father according to real and authentic sources( which is hided from everyone or being taken down from Internet) is being mentioned. Please, change it to original sources and remove aunthentic sources. Sage Vyasa page has unauthentic sources. We need to discuss it on the Wikipedia talk page where Reliable and verified sources links are mentioned from where we can take sources to mention. ItWiki97 (talk) 18:16, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Unreliable sources on Sage Vyasa page is mentioned. It needs to be recrified or the article needs to be deleted. ItWiki97 (talk) 18:18, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * See the article's talk page. . 245CMR . •👥📜 04:03, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Need help with a airtcle
There's a heavily popular airtcle called] Existence of God That Says the Vedas present agruements like the problem of evil Richard dawkins agruements and other ridiculous things can you edit this? I'm asking you to do this because it's a very popular airtcle 950CMR (talk) 22:18, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Nasadiya sukta of the rig Veda presents agnostic statement but it does not denies it or present any type of agruements done by Richard dawkins 950CMR (talk) 22:19, 16 June 2021 (UTC)


 * I could not find any Rischard Dawnkins in the article. . 245CMR . •👥📜 02:17, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

The history section says this stuff A common misconception is that theism is ancient while atheism is modern, but mankind has been making arguments for and against the existence of deities—including, with the rise of monotheism, God—since the dawn of human history. Bronze Age texts such as the Vedas present various arguments against the deities, such as the problem of evil and the Ultimate Boeing 747 gambit, as well that Vedas present These type of agruements which is totally false


 * I have added . . 245CMR . •👥📜 04:42, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Good good Brihaspati sutra is a more atheistic book many scholars would also say That Brihaspati the first atheist 950CMR (talk) 05:07, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Inclusion of Tamil in Shaivasim related articles
As you know Tamil aswell Sanskrit are oldest and holy languages of India. First mention of most gods and godesses are found in Tamil Literature. In top of every page on Shaivasim series, make sure you include Tamil name aswell. Thank You

Please contact Wikipedia talk: Hinduism and wait. . 245CMR . •👥📜 14:11, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Kripa
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 17 June 2021 (UTC) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 01:04, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Asikni (goddess)
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Indrani
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Radha
Though I have provided two references for the Atharva Veda verse, but still if it needs to be discussed, I'll remove it. But what's the reason behind deletion of other puranic references and the content added in culture subsection? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kridha (talk • contribs) 10:36, 20 June 2021 (UTC) Kridha (talk) 10:48, 20 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Sorry for that removal of Puranic scripture. As per, in the Atharvaveda, the word Radha is used to denote the Nakshatra Vishakha, not the gopi-goddess. Similar can be said for Sita (in the Rigveda, an agriculture goddess named Sita is mentioned but she may not be the same as the Rāmāyaṇa's heroine. You may mention that Atharvaveda hymn in the ethno section. . 245CMR . •👥📜 12:32, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

It's ok. I added back the "Puranic" and "Influence" section with reference. As far as the verse of Atharva Veda is concerned, I'll look for some other sources. If I found something more authenticated and distinct, then we will discuss it here before it goes to the Wikipedia page. Kridha (talk) 12:41, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
About your argument, please bring the discussion to WP:RS and no need to do reverts just because you do not agree personally. You need to bring in strong argument to revert otherwise it looks like you are making excuses time and again just to make unnecessary reverts. You have already gone from, "not making sense", to WP:HOS, to unreliable sources to finally unreliable scholar. The reference is by scholars Author, Sri B. G. Ramesh and by Editor: Prof. L. S. Seshagiri Rao.

Twinkle or RedWarn
Hi, have you considered using Twinkle or RedWarn? They make welcoming, warning and counter-vandalism much easier.  Zai talk  16:48, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestion. Right now, I am trying to settle the matter on the talk page. . 245CMR . •👥📜 06:36, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

A barstar for you!
Thank you very much! Never thought that I would get this. . 245CMR . •👥📜 05:51, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

@245CMR: Congratulations for the barstar. You deserve this appreciation :) Kridha (talk) 16:53, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank you very much. . 245CMR . •👥📜 16:58, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Tulsi in Hinduism
I have read in many websites that Vishnu in the form of a Brahmin came to Shankachuda and got his Vishnu kavacha as his alms and went to Vrinda Devi and stayed with her in his form. Shiva decapitated Shankachuda and killed him when his armour was taken. Then Vrinda Devi died after Vishnu told her the truth of the curse of Tulsi Devi's Radha Avatar and her corpse became the gandaki river and her hair became Tulsi plants. Vishnu entered Shaligram stones and he was relieved of the curse. Vishal Kandasamy (talk) 13:13, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

You need reliable sources to support your claims. Please see WP: Citing sources. . 245CMR . •👥📜 13:15, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

article edit related issue Ila
hello I have cited the references related page Ila please check it.Also Ihave edited Page Varuna.I cant upload a photo of flamingo in it .Can you help in that???Unni1999 (talk) 13:37, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Well ok, but please try to convert your citation into the appropriate form. You may see WP: Citing. For images, you can see WP:Images. However, I think it is not required in the article Varuna (as per WP:MOS). . 245CMR . •👥📜 14:30, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi I again modified it by siting THE HYMNS OF RIGVEDA 1920 by Griffith from archives.Is that okay??? Unni1999 (talk) 03:31, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Panchakanya
Hi,

I have reverted your edit. Kanya in Sanskrit means maiden/virgin, not woman.

Woman = Stree.

We need to add the Panchakanya related info from Pradip Bhattacharya's book now. Let me know if you need help.

(Panchalidraupadi (talk) 19:32, 2 July 2021 (UTC))


 * Ok, thank you. I will let you know. . 245CMR . •👥📜 04:09, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Should we write the article in past tense or present?? . 245CMR . •👥📜 07:06, 3 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Present tense. Draupadi is considered as one of the Panchakanyas...

(Panchalidraupadi (talk) 10:10, 3 July 2021 (UTC))

Ok . 245CMR . •👥📜 11:16, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Edit summaries
I left a message for you here, but I want to make sure you receive it so I'm mentioning it on your talk page as well. You recently received the rollback permission, which is to be used for reverting obvious vandalism only, and not for good-faith contributions. Please ensure you use edit summaries whenever you revert an edit that does not meet the criteria listed at WP:ROLLBACKUSE. – bradv 🍁  03:37, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

I have given him instructions on his talk page  . 245CMR . •👥📜 04:22, 5 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Also, there is no option to provide summary while using Rollback . 245CMR . •👥📜 04:23, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Right, which is why rollback is only to be used for obvious vandalism. Please read WP:ROLLBACKUSE. – bradv 🍁  04:27, 5 July 2021 (UTC)


 * I have read it. Ok, I give explaination both on user talkpage and edit summary box. . 245CMR . •👥📜 04:36, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Mahadevi
Please stay off this article for a minute, as I am trying to locate the last good version without any copyright violations. Thanks!!— Diannaa (talk) 14:04, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Sure, I have reverted the unconstructive edits of the blocked user. . 245CMR . •👥📜 14:06, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
 * That's great, but I am getting edit conflicts while trying to perform copyright cleanup. — Diannaa (talk) 14:08, 8 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Ok, sorry for the inconvenience. . 245CMR . •👥📜 14:10, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Finished, thank you.— Diannaa (talk) 14:17, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

A cookie for you!
Thanks a lot, Delicious! . 245CMR . •👥📜 16:11, 8 July 2021 (UTC)


 * 245cmr are you bengali ? 2409:4060:2DC2:4537:68D3:B7A4:F251:D9E7 (talk) 08:53, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

Regarding Vishnu article
What is this statement - "Vasudeva (not Vaasudeva) means lord of Vasus, who are a group of deities. Removed linking as is about historical aspect of Krishna, not Vishnu. Also, Vishnu doesn't have that much importance in Vedic scriptures (Vedas primary praise him as a younger brother of Indra and for taking 3 steps of the world". I think you don't have any knowledge of Lord Vishnu. Go and read Vishnu Sahasranama bhashya of Adi Shankara. In many contexts, Adi Shankara explained what Vaudeva means. Madhvacharya wrote a Bhashya on Rigveda, Vasudeva is explained as the supreme being in Rigveda. Madhvacharya also wrote a work called "Vishnu Tattva Nirnaya" in which he explained everything about Lord Vishnu, go and read it you'll come to know who Lord Vishnu is. Even Srila Prabhupada in his commentary on Bhagavata wrote Vasudeva as the all-pervading supreme being. Vasudeva also means Lord of Vasus I won't deny that but it also means a "pure consciousness" or "all-pervading supreme being". Vasudeva is one of the four Vyuhas of Vishnu. Krishna is the direct Vasudeva Vyuha of Lord Vishnu. I think you need to study more about Vishnu in our Hindusim context rather than the word to word translations of English people. This is even supported by Vaishnava Pancharatra Agamas. But I don't know about Radha-Krishna Section and their interpretations. -  MRRaja001  (talk) 05:42, 10 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks for WP:Personal attack. Names can have multiple interpretations, but I just put literal meaning of the word "Vasudeva". Religion develops and changes with time, but there's no harm in adding all the major interpretations. . 245CMR . •👥📜 06:01, 10 July 2021 (UTC)


 * This is not a Personal Attack, I am just telling you there are many interpretations for a single word and you should not remove the meanings like that. Shaivas think it in one way, Shaktas in another way and among Vaishnavas also there are many interpretations. I don't have any concerns about this. -  MRRaja001  (talk) 06:13, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Literal meaning is required, you may see how this should be incorporated from Krishna article.
 * If you want to know Radha Krishna, then the most common interpretation is that Radha is us—the humans, while Krishna is the Supreme god. She breaks all social limitations for her lord, signifying the supreme devotion towards the lord, which cannot be stopped by others. . 245CMR . •👥📜


 * Okay. But the Radha-Krishna followers whom I consulted are saying that Radha is higher than Lakshmi and Lakshmi came from Radha. But you wrote Radha as an avatar of Lakshmi in the Lakshmi article. I am not much familiar with Radha-Krishna Sections that's why I am asking. May I know the reason for this? And also coming to Vishnu's article, I didn't get you why did you write this -"Also, Vishnu doesn't have that much importance in Vedic scriptures (Vedas primary praise him as a younger brother of Indra". This is the reason why I told you to not believe in word to word interpretation on English people. They literally don't know anything. -  MRRaja001  (talk) 06:33, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

The answer is very simple for Lakshmi-Radha, Radha is considered as an avatar of Lakshmi in many texts (because she is Krishna's lover), but some consider Radha as the "Mahadevi". In this context, Krishna becomes Vishnu to create, preserve and destroy, and Radha accompanies him as his consort, i.e. Lakshmi.

And regarding that Vishnu-Rigveda, I believe in Radha-Krishna and Lakshmi-Narayana, but can you deny the fact that Rigveda—without any later comentaries— mentioned Vishnu like that? . 245CMR . •👥📜 06:58, 10 July 2021 (UTC)


 * I will clarify to you why I said this. First of all our scriptures should not be translated directly like what English people did. There are three types of tones in our ancient scriptures - Guhya basha, Samadhi basha and Darshana basha. So, any scripture should be interpreted only by qualified guru's. Doing word to word translations directly to these scriptures will change the meaning itself. Which leads to more confusion. And also English language doesn't have words to describe what our scriptures are saying. This is the reason why I said that. -  MRRaja001  (talk) 08:17, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

You may see this image for better understanding of the Krishnaism concept -- . 245CMR . •👥📜 07:30, 10 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Okay I'll go through it. -  MRRaja001  (talk) 08:17, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Few clarifications
Sir I think we should have a conversation privately. It's about a pauranic story. Do you mind an email? Abhinav0701 (talk) 08:23, 10 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I don't use email for Wiki. . 245CMR . •👥📜 09:39, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
 * plz help me 2409:4060:2DC2:4537:D997:C5E:BE8C:2A01 (talk) 16:18, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

On Editing the "Wars in Hindu Mythology" Article
As an extended confirmed member and as a member of WikiProject Hinduism, could you please have a look at the article Wars in Hindu mythology? It has several problems, with citations few and far between, filled mostly with uncited and unsourced information. I would edit it myself, but unfortunately it has been placed under Extended Confirmed protection, and I'm not Extended Confirmed yet.

In its talk page, I have added a few suggestions, and it would be great if you could review them. Also, why is the protection level so high on an article that needs a lot of work done? If it was vandalism, surely Semiprotection would have been enough no?

Aathish S &#124; talk &#124; contribs 14:08, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, I have changed it. Extended protection is required as many new users will add biased content (eg. Karna was the most powerful, who could defeat anyone except Krishna.......). Right now, I am busy, but will inform after I become free. . 245CMR . •👥📜 10:02, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Urgent Action required
It is well-known that Tamil Nadu is called land of Temples and Dravidian Architecture(South Indian Shaivite tradition) is famous in it. Also Tamil is liturgical language. But Unforunately Pages like List of Temples in Tamil Nadu, Sangam Literature and Hinduism in Tamil Nadu is completely vandalised by some unbiased people. I have included categories for that. Please include those pages in Hinduism related articles and protect it. There are lots of tresures in Tamil literature similar to that of Sanskrit. But those are being continuesly removed from Wikipedia. Please protect those articles and employ some Tamil scholar or writer to improve it. NamaShivaya!!!


 * The case seems complex, may be an experienced user might help you. You may add this at Help desk. . 245CMR . •👥📜 15:58, 22 July 2021 (UTC)


 * are you bengali 2409:4060:2DC2:4537:C828:669:406D:6E39 (talk) 11:47, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

As of now, Please make it semi-protected and add that to Wikipedia:Hinduism project Anyone from Hinduism project can help in that. Pages are Pongal(festivel), List of Temples in Tamil Nadu, and Hinduism in Tamil Nadu


 * I can't as I am not a WP: Administrator. If you want protection of these pages, then request at WP:RPP. . 245CMR . •👥📜 18:14, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Ayyavazhi
Please keep an eye over the article Ayyavazhi. It is Hindu denomination and dharmic belief system based on South India. Some anti-Hindu elements are trying to potrait it as separate religion. Everything is same as Hindu religion. Hinduism is a umbrella term for all sects, sub-sects and philosophies. It has both Old Tamil and Sanskrit as liturgical languages. Please try to stop disruptive edits.

Regarding article Durga and Vishnu
Hi 245CMR, why are you bringing up the same issues again and again? First, you changed the text in note and Vaishnavism views and now you are removing citations. What's going on in your mind. Parvati may also be called Durga, but Durga is primarily the name of Lakshmi do you know that. Many Puranas are directly saying this. Garuda Purana, Lakshmi Sahasranama of Skanda Purana, Narada Purana, Vishnu Purana and Bhagavata Purana and many Tantric Vaishnava Pancharatra texts are clearly saying Durga is the name of Lakshmi and she got this name after killing Durgama Asura. You are messing up things by adding Durga as a sibling of Vishnu in the Vishnu article. My first question is why did you remove the early note and replaced it with what you want. Nothing to do with Shaivism, Shaktism or Vaishnavism here. Please don't mess up the things my friend. Radha Krishna sect. don't know the power of Goddess Lakshmi this is the main problem of Vaishnavism. My opinion is let's remove both Vishnu as Sibling and Shiva as Consort from the infobox section and let's leave her as Universal Mother. -  MRRaja001  (talk) 02:37, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello buddy
Hey,

Just came across your id and saw that you are stressed and losing motivation.

If you dont mind me asking, is everything ok? You are doing a fascinating job on Wikipedia and someone like you are an asset here.

(Panchalidraupadi (talk) 17:20, 27 August 2021 (UTC))

Hey,

Please come back. You are needed to maintain the Hinduism related pages.

(Panchalidraupadi (talk) 18:00, 2 September 2021 (UTC))

A goat for you!
Hey buddy, sorry to see you are going through a hard time. Please take your rest and hope to see you again when there is a brighter day.

Avindra talk 01:15, 30 September 2021 (UTC) 

Merry Christmas!
Happy Holidays text.png Hello 245CMR: Enjoy the holiday season&#32;and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:04, 22 December 2021 (UTC) Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Happy New Year!




 245CMR , Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! LearnIndology (talk) 17:43, 6 January 2022 (UTC)


 * – Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

Bahulakshi Goddess
Hi, I have created a draft called Draft: Bahulakshi. Please help me to improve it. It has been declined to show as an article. Ayantik Basu (talk) 16:03, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Subhadra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nanda.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wives of Karna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marathi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wives of Karna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Suta.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sahadeva, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kuru.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sahadeva, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chedi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:56, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

hello
245cmr are you bengali? 2409:4060:2DC2:4537:A53E:C5A0:917F:1E3D (talk) 08:14, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

hello
plz sir tallk me 2409:4060:2DC2:4537:3401:BD21:DD6E:B488 (talk) 09:27, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Uttarā (Mahabharata), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gandhari.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 2 July 2024 (UTC)