User talk:AdrianWikiEditor

Welcome!
Hello, AdrianWikiEditor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Getting Over It with Bennett Foddy. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk &bull;&#32;contribs) 03:47, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Image rights
Hello Adrian. In your edit summaries for your recent edits to JoJo Siwa you stated that you were buying a photo of them for use in the article. Please ensure you read WP:IUP. Depending on the nature of the licence to the image thay you buy, you won't be able to use it on Wikipedia. To be used here, the photographer would have to licence it under creative commons, making it free and effectively waiving their rights to it, which doesn't sound like the case if you're having to buy it. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 18:48, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Hello, I'm L293D. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to IC 5332— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. L293D (☎ • ✎) 18:29, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry, you were right to add that image. I reverted your edit because it thought it was just vandalism like "kjb efoj evc gudc d s cgic", but actually it wasn't. L293D (☎ • ✎) 11:29, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

It's okay. I know sense you are very active you don't have time to check everything thoroughly. Also I am now apart of Wiki Project Astronomy. So yay. Go to my page to see my new userbox! AdrianWikiEditor (talk) 18:33, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NGC 128, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pisces ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/NGC_128 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/NGC_128?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Poppy birth place
Hey, I was wondering if you could please change Poppy's birth place to Whitman, Massachusetts. . And theres more refs when you search up Moriah Pereira Whitman. Thank you :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarsDy (talk • contribs) 22:42, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

An award for you
You have written about galaxies I would like to write my self (NGC 6621 and NGC 2936 with their weird shape, NGC 5529, a huge galaxy nearly three times larger than ours, and NGC 5395, a beautiful spiral.) but also there are a lot more galaxies that need an article and before expanding existing articles, I focus there. --C messier (talk) 13:16, 27 December 2018 (UTC)


 * I expanded NGC 6621. A few remarks to help you write longer articles. The first is that of galaxies, NED is a database with more information. I prefer the classic format because all the information you need to fill a infobox are in one page. It also has notes for many of the objects, where you can get an idea about some characteristics of the galaxy (shape, activity etc.) - don't forget to cite the original paper source. If the paper has a DOI it is easy; at the tool bar over the editing window you go to cite, choose journal, copy-paste DOI at the special place of DOI, click the search (magnifying glass) and it is autocompleted. Then press Insert and the citiation is ready. For even more citations check in the references. --C messier (talk) 17:06, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emma Chamberlain (January 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StraussInTheHouse was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emma Chamberlain and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Emma Chamberlain, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Emma_Chamberlain Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:StraussInTheHouse&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Emma_Chamberlain reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 SITH   (talk)   21:59, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kidnapping of Jayme Closs, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages KSTP and Fox 9 ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Kidnapping_of_Jayme_Closs check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Kidnapping_of_Jayme_Closs?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Meetup
Hello. Nice meeting you briefly on Saturday. I also love astronomy, though I'm definitely an amateur. I was lucky enough to see totality in Casper and go to Astrocon there in 2017. If there's ever anything I can do to help you here, let me know. Jonathunder (talk) 21:00, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for offering your help to me. I am surprisingly in need of it right now. I was busy editing NGC 2460 and am trying to reference an already cited portion of the site. I referenced Seligman's website in the caption section of the article but now I am trying to reference that cited article again at the beginning of the article. I just keeping getting the "not getting referenced in the article" tag. How do I get it to work. Every time I do this to different articles I use the "cite simbad" and just use SIMBAD as my ref name. AdrianWikiEditor (talk) 23:40, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I fixed it for you. The "ref name" tag can be tricky. The syntax has to be just right and the reference name has to be exactly the same each time. (It's a good introduction to how frustrating computer coding can be sometimes.) As far as what reference name to choose, that's up to you. I will often use the last name of the author or something else that will be clear to other editors and to myself later. Jonathunder (talk) 22:54, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Thank you! I was trying to figure out where to put the reference name and was considering putting it on top. Thanks for the help. AdrianWikiEditor (talk) 23:40, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Talk page experience in advanced contributions mode
Hey AdrianWikiEditor — we recently updated our Advanced mobile contributions project page, aiming to start a discussion with the community around which Talk page experience is preferable. I'm making the rounds and pinging folks who, like yourself, provided constructive feedback on our last round of explorations. If you have time, please head over to the page and respond with any thoughts on the project's talk page. We'd love to hear from you. Thanks AHollender (WMF) (talk) 20:37, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Google Podcasts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Google_Podcasts check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Google_Podcasts?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (NGC 4144) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating NGC 4144.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MainlyTwelve (talk) 16:58, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emma Chamberlain (March 27)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.


 * Draft:Emma Chamberlain may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:AdrianWikiEditor Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:StraussInTheHouse&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:AdrianWikiEditor reviewer's talk page] . or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 SITH   (talk)   17:49, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi,, just wanted to let you know that there's an archive of the draft here, in case you wanted to try again (alternatively, a nice admin could get a copy of the page source). I was surprised to see this was deleted due to copyright infringement, based on what looked like a number of reliable sources.
 * Anyway, if you decide to try again, feel free to reach out! = paul2520 (talk) 12:06, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, I just wanted to let you know that I did not put that copyrighted content. While I did want Emma Chamberlain to get out of Draft mode I worked hard using RELIBLE AND NON COPYRIGHTED sources. Then some new users with like 5 edits came in and stole the copyrighted work while I was not there.AdrianWikiEditor (talk) 12:42, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delay. I've been pretty busy, and won't be able to do much for the next few days. But maybe, the admin who deleted the page, could view the deleted page source and copy it to a userspace draft? We could remove the content that is copyrighted, clean up the article, and re-submit. I'd be happy to help. = paul2520 (talk) 00:56, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
 * My wife heard the sound of the copyvio Emma video and came into my room and said "who is this silly woman? turn it off". And I agree with her: Emma is one of the twittering classes and unworthy of a serious encyclopedia. I went back to your version of 2019-01-06t04:56:39‎ (7,080 bytes) and still got copyvios reported - email sent. Take it to DRV if you must. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:37, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If you don't want her on Wikipedia, that's fine. I am not angry at all. I didn't start the draft in the first place, I helped get it to submission level. I'll stick to what I am good at on here and that's astronomy. Have a good day RHaworth. AdrianWikiEditor (talk) 12:27, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi AdrianWikiEditor! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 13:28, Friday, April 26, 2019 (UTC)

Image of NGC 387
It is uploaded.

BR., --Fabian RRRR (talk) 09:24, 1 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Must of never saw it as it has PGC 3987 in the title and not NGC. AdrianWikiEditor (talk) 09:29, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (NGC 3928) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating NGC 3928.

User:Girth Summit while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Girth Summit  (blether) 18:09, 28 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Oh yeah, sorry about that. I like to copy and paste alot to save time. I guess you caught one of my errors. AdrianWikiEditor (talk) 18:14, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
 * No worries, they were easy enough to fix. Still - I appreciate that it saves you time to copy refs from another article, but we reviewers are lazy - if you quickly check your own sources next time, it would make life easier for us. ;). Cheers  Girth Summit  (blether)  18:23, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Don't worry, I'll triple check next time. Plus, I might get autopatrolled soon so you won't worry about at least me! AdrianWikiEditor (talk) 18:26, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Belle Delphine


The article Belle Delphine has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "insufficient evidencefor notability"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  DGG ( talk ) 12:15, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Escherian Stairwell
Hi there. I was just looking at your userpage and I came across Penrose stairs. I found this content interesting but it was a little difficult to understand, so I've edited the section to clarify that a) it's a video and b) the video does feature a staircase at RIT, but it's obviously not a Penrose staircase and the architect is fake. Let me know if you have any issues with my edit. :) Thanks, SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 17:46, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for that. I originally created Escherian Stairwell as an independent article. After having a discussion to move the article, we decided to transfer word-to-word. Also, it's really rare for me to have to go through the deletion process, I am always creating NGC stub articles, which is because of the project still has to do 7000+ and that a lot of other Wikipedia langauges have all them completed as mostly stubs too. AdrianWikiEditor (talk) 18:06, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

I remember you
I see you have created some more objects in my list (although I have been dormant the last mounths). Well, a complete infobox is quite a helpful start. Also, infoboxes are usually placed before the lead section. I have to notice that ADS isn't a journal it self, but an archive-library of astronomy related journal articles. So, this citation isn't completed correctly. In the title parametre you place the name of the article (VLBI observations of high-opacity HI gas in NGC 5793). This article was puplished in the journal New Astronomy Reviews. --C messier (talk) 20:35, 2 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Got it, also do you know the reasonable character size for a start article. Hard to judge because some articles you create are longer than others. Also I really don't know that many journals as I just use Google when necessary. It's really hard to expand articles if theres no information for it. I mostly expanded my stubs by describing the galaxies in detail. NGC 5395 and NGC 2936 were actually pretty easy since they are interacting and I can describe all galaxies. NGC 5529 and NGC 5793 are more difficult as they are stand-alone. AdrianWikiEditor (talk) 20:46, 2 July 2019 (UTC)


 * I have read somewhere that an article needs to be at least 10 sentences long so as not to be considered a stub. Google can help find some journal articles about the galaxy and start an article, but the full list of citations where an object is mentioned can be found at NED and SIMBAD. I prefer simbad because in one page mentions the full title and the number of objects named in a paper. That way, I can find a relevant article by control+F the NGC number of the object and find the papers where the object is mentioned in the title (and thus it is possible to be more specific). Check always the introduction section of these papers for information that were published in past papers. Also papers that consern a relatively small number of objects have more chances to mention somethinh more than the location and name of an object. Some other information, like the supernovae and nearby galaxies are based on databases. --C messier (talk) 16:17, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
 * . Thank you, I guessed I never noticed the sources there on SIMBAD. Do you think 4000 characters is a reasonable amount for a start article, or does it need to be higher, or lower. AdrianWikiEditor (talk) 18:58, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
 * The read you are requesting: WP:STUBDEF. --C messier (talk) 11:15, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Belle Delphine


A tag has been placed on Belle Delphine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gbawden (talk) 06:19, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adrian (disambiguation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adrian High School ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Adrian_%28disambiguation%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Adrian_%28disambiguation%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NGC 325, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SDSS ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/NGC_325 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/NGC_325?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:02, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Petit Tube for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Petit Tube is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Petit Tube until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 11:54, 30 October 2021 (UTC) FYI - I removed this nomination because my reasoning was incorrect. My apologies! PanydThe muffin is not subtle 12:13, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of G Fuel


A tag has been placed on G Fuel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. MaxnaCarter (talk) 00:53, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

September 2023
Hello, I'm BlueboyLINY. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Katz's Delicatessen, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BlueboyLINY (talk) 03:25, 16 September 2023 (UTC)