User talk:Another Believer/Archive 34

Administrators' newsletter – February 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2021).

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Hog Farm
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Mattflaschen • Nandesuka • Savidan • Wangi

CheckUser changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Berean Hunter • Xeno

Oversight changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Someguy1221 • Xeno

Arbitration
 * The standard discretionary sanctions authorized for American Politics were amended by motion to cover post-1992 politics of United States and closely related people, replacing the 1932 cutoff.

Miscellaneous
 * Voting in the 2021 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2021, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2021, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
 * Wikipedia has now been around for 20 years, and recently saw its billionth edit!

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

ArchiveSent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:08, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Love Is Here to Stay - Tony Bennett and Diana Krall.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Love Is Here to Stay - Tony Bennett and Diana Krall.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:59, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

You're invited! Coronavirus in New York City: Translate-A-Thon - ONLINE - February 6
--Wil540 art (talk) 22:55, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Freak (Lana Del Rey song)
I don't understand Russian, but a GA in another language Wiki does not mean the song itself is notable. Judging from the content of the Russian wiki, I believe the only notable thing about the song is the music video, which barely does anything to do with the song's significance/structure/lyrics etc. HĐ (talk) 01:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , I understand. I was fine with your other Lana Del Rey song redirects, but in this case I think a closer look is necessary. You're welcome to initiate a talk page discussion or post a notability tag, but I didn't think the redirect was obvious given the Russian-language entry. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:54, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Added a notability tag. If things stalled I may as well bring forth a discussion at AFD. Cheers, HĐ (talk) 01:57, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 02:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Liquor Store
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Liquor Store you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 06:42, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Liquor Store
The article The Liquor Store you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Liquor Store for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 08:42, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: January 2021
About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 07:37, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

GOCE copy edit of Delta Cafe

 * Thanks so much! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:00, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Equestrian statue of William Henry Harrison
Hey, as you know I just made the page List of public art in Cincinnati and in working on that page, I noticed the page Equestrian statue of William Henry Harrison (Cincinnati), which you created a few months ago. I recently moved it to Equestrian statue of William Henry Harrison, as it appears to be the only equestrian statue of the man I can find, and if not the only one, at least the most notable one. If I'm incorrect or there's an issue with this, please let me know. I'm going to try to significantly expand that page and just wanted to let you know and say good work on the public art pages! Regards, -JJonahJackalope (talk) 22:14, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , No problem! I'm not sure if there are other equestrian statues of Harrison, but seems to be the only one with a Wikipedia article, so works for now! Thanks for the heads up. Big fan of your work on public art articles -- keep it up! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:24, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

GOCE copy edit of Roman Candle (Portland, Oregon)



 * Thanks again! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:00, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * A couple of additional comments. I'm ambivalent about having removed "United States" from both this and "Delta Cafe" articles. I know where Portland is, but having the country name there might not hurt for others. However, having the present arrangement of locales in the lead is better, if US is put at the end (rather than, , ).
 * In this article only, I was tempted to move the "Closure" subsection of "History" to be its own section after "Reception", because it seemed odd to have reviews of the new menu coming before those of the old. I left it as it was, but, again, but with some ambivalence. Dhtwiki (talk) 19:57, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:WikiProject Björk articles


A tag has been placed on Category:WikiProject Björk articles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:23, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , Shouldn't this category be populated with articles associated with the WikiProject? --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:33, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Guess not! (shrug) --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:31, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

"2 Tuxedos" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 2 Tuxedos. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 11 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Ss  112   16:35, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , Thanks for the heads up --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:38, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge award (fourth year)

 * Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 19:25, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * You're welcome! About three months later than usual, but I finally got around to it. – Reidgreg (talk) 20:15, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Gigi Goode
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gigi Goode you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Benmite -- Benmite (talk) 09:01, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Congrats on this passing! Armadillo  pteryx  22:11, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , Thanks! And of course credit goes to User:Kbabej as well. I've enjoyed the collaborations lately, and expanding the WikiProject RPDR trophy case! --- Another Believer  ( Talk ) 22:13, 12 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Yes, congrats to as well! That was a big review, and you guys put together a really nice article! Definitely hope to see more collaborations in the future.  Armadillo  pteryx  03:59, 13 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks, much appreciated! —Kbabej (talk) 04:03, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Gigi Goode
The article Gigi Goode you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gigi Goode for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Benmite -- Benmite (talk) 23:40, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

April Fools (song)
Hello Jason, I hope all is well with you. I am curious to know if you had any plans to bring the above article to GA status. I see you are the primary contributor, and I am interested in assisting if you had any current intentions. "April Fools" is my favorite Rufus Wainwright song and the music video is a great one. Let me know and thanks, Carbrera (talk) 17:37, 20 February 2021 (UTC).
 * , I would love to collaborate here and co-nominate this article for Good status, if you're interested! There are a few sources on the Talk page to add, and I'm sure there are others as well. What do you say? --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:45, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the ping on the article talk page. Sounds like a plan! I am currently finishing off a future GAN in my sandbox, and then I must work on trying to save an active AfD discussion, but then I should be able to begin work on "April Fools". I'll try to seek out some additional sources in the meantime. I look forward to working with you, Carbrera (talk) 18:11, 20 February 2021 (UTC).
 * , Same! I'm a huge Rufus Wainwright fan, by the way, so open to collaborating on other related articles in the future as well. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:43, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Sounds good! I have started looking for additional sources this morning. Do you primarily work in the article space or a sandbox when expanding articles? Carbrera (talk) 17:02, 23 February 2021 (UTC).
 * , Main space, but feel free to do what works for you. If you prefer, I can let you have a go at updating as you see fit, then I can follow and tinker once you're done. Looking forward! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Also, User:Carbrera/Created articles looks awfully familiar! :p I love it! Good luck with your Good article project --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you, your user pages have definitely inspired me over the years. I typically work in my sandbox but I think this time around I will edit the article's main space. Carbrera (talk) 17:24, 23 February 2021 (UTC).
 * , Glad my pages can be used as a template for others. Feel free to do what works for you! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:26, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , Lemme know if/when you revisit this project and/or find any additional coverage. Still willing to help expand co-nom for GA status if you're interested. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:28, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
 * My apologies – I have a bad tendency of involving myself with too many things at once. However, I still am interested and hope to continue working on the article this month. Cheers, Carbrera (talk) 04:20, 9 March 2021 (UTC).
 * Great! No problem, just curious. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 05:38, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Good article drive notice
This message has been sent to users signed up for the Good articles newsletter. Add or remove your name from the list to subscribe or unsubscribe from future updates. Alternatively, to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. -- For the drive co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:27, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Wiki Loves Pride
Hello, Another Believer. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Wiki Loves Pride, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Writing Black History of the Pacific Northwest into Wikipedia - Editathon 2021
Cascadia Wikimedians placed this banner at 03:44, 24 February 2021 (UTC) by using the Meetup/Portland/Participants list. To subscribe to or unsubscribe from messages from Meetup/Portland, please add or remove your name here.

Publicity for April project
Hey, do you think we should try to get more people onboard for wp:420 this year? I didn't ask the EiC if this is suitable, but there's probably still time to write up a blurb for the March Signpost if you were in a mood. ☆ Bri (talk) 18:08, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , I'll give this some thought. I'd love to see much more participation, but my WikiProject outreach and even WMF blog blurb in the past haven't resulted in much interest, unfortunately. Considering WP:420 spans culture, geography, history, law, medicine, politics, sociology, etc, I'm always surprised more editors don't sign up. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:44, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2021
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:27, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Overlinks
Hi. We don't have to tell people what country a city is in when it is obvious, like San Francisco, California. Thanks. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 22:23, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, I know. Any particular reason you're sharing? --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 00:10, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bridges Cafe
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bridges Cafe you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 02:02, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2021). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg TJMSmith
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Boing! said Zebedee • Hiberniantears • Lear's Fool • Only • WGFinley

Interface administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg AmandaNP

Guideline and policy news
 * A request for comment is open that proposes a process for the community to revoke administrative permissions. This follows a 2019 RfC in favor of creating one such a policy.
 * A request for comment is in progress to remove F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a, which covers immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
 * A request for comment seeks to grant page movers the delete-redirect userright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target. The full proposal is at Page mover/delete-redirect.
 * A request for comment asks if sysops may place the General sanctions/Coronavirus disease 2019 editnotice template on pages in scope that do not have page-specific sanctions?
 * There is a discussion in progress concerning automatic protection of each day's featured article with Pending Changes protection.

Technical news
 * When blocking an IPv6 address with Twinkle, there is now a checkbox with the option to just block the /64 range. When doing so, you can still leave a block template on the initial, single IP address' talkpage.
 * When protecting a page with Twinkle, you can now add a note if doing so was in response to a request at WP:RfPP, and even link to the specific revision.
 * There have been a number of reported issues with Pending Changes. Most problems setting protection appear to have been resolved (T273317) but other issues with autoaccepting edits persist (T275322).

Arbitration
 * By motion, the discretionary sanctions originally authorized under the GamerGate case are now authorized under a new Gender and sexuality case, with sanctions authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, any gender-related dispute or controversy and associated people. Sanctions issued under GamerGate are now considered Gender and sexuality sanctions.
 * The Kurds and Kurdistan case was closed, authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed.

Miscellaneous
 * Following the 2021 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: AmandaNP, Operator873, Stanglavine, Teles, and Wiki13.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:13, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 March newsletter
Round 1 of the competition has finished; it was a high-scoring round with 21 contestants scoring more than 100 points. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 55 contestants qualifying. You will need to finish among the top thirty-two contestants in Round 2 if you are to qualify for Round 3. Our top scorers in Round 1 were:


 * Epicgenius led the field with a featured article, nine good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 945 points.
 * Bloom6132 was close behind with 896 points, largely gained from 71 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 ImaginesTigers, who has been editing Wikipedia for less than a year, was in third place with 711 points, much helped by bringing League of Legends to featured article status, exemplifying how bonus points can boost a contestant's score.
 * 🇷🇼 Amakuru came next with 708 points, Kigali being another featured article that scored maximum bonus points.
 * Flag of the United Nations.svg Ktin, new to the WikiCup, was in fifth place with 523 points, garnered from 15 DYKs and 34 "In the news" items.
 * 🇧🇼 The Rambling Man scored 511 points, many from featured article candidate reviews and from football related DYKs.
 * Standard of Oliver Cromwell (1653–1659).svg Gog the Mild, last year's runner-up, came next with 498 points, from a featured article and numerous featured article candidate reviews.
 * Bennington Flag.svg Hog Farm, at 452, scored for a featured article, four good articles and a number of reviews.
 * 🇺🇸 Le Panini, another newcomer to the WikiCup, scored 438 for a featured article and three good articles.
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski, last year's champion, scored 332 points, from a featured article and various other sport-related topics.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. In Round 1, contestants achieved eight featured articles, three featured lists and one featured picture, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. They completed 97 good article reviews, nearly double the 52 good articles they claimed. Contestants also claimed for 135 featured article and featured list candidate reviews. There is no longer a requirement to mention your WikiCup participation when undertaking these reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or something else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:25, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Improve Citing Sources in Articles
Hello, on 02:21, 2 March 2021, you added 2 sources to the article Age of Samurai: Battle for Japan. However, these are just plain links. Please also add the name of the author, the title, website (publisher), and date. Optionally, you can add an archive-url. See here for an example of citing sources. -Artanisen (talk) 00:51, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I added sources to an unsourced article. I'd call that an improvement. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:41, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Conversion. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:50, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bridges Cafe
The article Bridges Cafe you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bridges Cafe for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 07:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

XLB (Portland, Oregon)
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article XLB (Portland, Oregon) has been completed.

You'll notice I masked a lot of text in the "Reception" section. It's out-dated and made the article read like an entry in a travel guide. I feel it's inappropriate in a Wikipedia article, but it's easily restored if you disagree.

Regards,
 * Thank you! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:03, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Re. a Wikiproject you're involved in
You seem to be the most experienced editor in that, so I think your opinion on the discussion located at Talk:RuPaul%27s_Drag_Race_UK_(series_2) would be helpful. Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 15:40, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , Thanks for the heads up. I will try to take a look soon, but I've been avoiding the Series 2 article and talk page because I don't want to read any spoilers (as I am currently watching the season). --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:45, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , I would recommend posting a note at WikiProject RuPaul's Drag Race. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:45, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Shouldn't have to worry too much about spoilers. Anyway, I left a message there about a week ago, right here; but apparently very few people have seen it and it did not prevent yesterday's disruption. Thanks, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 15:50, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Reality Stars: The Musical for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reality Stars: The Musical is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reality Stars: The Musical until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ≫  Lil- Unique1  -{ Talk  }- 18:24, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Sigh 1... --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:35, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of PharmaRusical for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PharmaRusical is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/PharmaRusical until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ≫  Lil- Unique1  -{ Talk  }- 18:26, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Sigh 2... --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:35, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Social Media Kings Into Queens for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Social Media Kings Into Queens is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Social Media Kings Into Queens until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ≫  Lil- Unique1  -{ Talk  }- 18:30, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Madonna: The Unauthorized Rusical for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Madonna: The Unauthorized Rusical is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madonna: The Unauthorized Rusical until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ≫  Lil- Unique1  -{ Talk  }- 18:33, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Sigh 3... --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:35, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Divas Lip Sync Live for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Divas Lip Sync Live is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Divas Lip Sync Live& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ≫  Lil- Unique1  -{ Talk  }- 18:37, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , Can you please stop nominating so many similar articles at once? There's no way editors can work to expand all of these at once... --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:39, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Apologies but they shouldn't exist in the mainspace if they're not notable. That's what WP:DRAFT is for. ≫  Lil- Unique1  -{ Talk  }- 18:42, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , That's your opinion, but you are not giving editors time to consider by posting your concerns on article talk pages OR at WikiProject RuPaul's Drag Race. Also, by nominating so many pages at once, you're not allowing editors enough time to assess and expand appropriately. Please slow down. I am voting to KEEP all of these entries. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:44, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * To be fair, I had no idea you were involved in all of the I do apologise for that if you think its created a lot of work for you. It's not my opinion - WP:NEPISODE and WP:GNG clearly set the scene for when things are notable. It is also not my opinion that things should be drafted if you're unsure if they're notable or not. I get it it - you're a RPDR fan (I am too) however, page views clearly show these topics aren't searched for by readers and they border too much on WP:FANCRUFT. The parent season pages receive much more coverage and what information isn't already duplicated should be located there until people are ready to work on moving drafts to the mainspace. In the meantime, if there's non-notable articles in the mainspace then it is a risk that they'll get nominated for deletion or to be moved to the userspace until they're ready for creation (if they ever become ready). Wikipedia isn't a content farm... genuinely believe more people reach the information from the season page rather than specific episode page (as page views show). ≫  Lil- Unique1  -{ Talk  }- 18:55, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

to add, genuinely I'm sorry - I didn't realise were personally involved in all of them. I could have asked on the project page if there were plans to expand them first I suppose :/ ≫  Lil- Unique1  -{ Talk  }- 19:03, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , I appreciate your note, truly, but in the future I would recommend bundling nominations because now the same discussion has to be had in 6 different locations. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 19:45, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Also, page views have nothing to do with notability. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:21, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Davis Street Tavern
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Davis Street Tavern has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:04, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , Thank you! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:06, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: February 2021
About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 15:59, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Live at the World Cafe Volume 9 album cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Live at the World Cafe Volume 9 album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Live at the World Cafe Volume 15 album cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Live at the World Cafe Volume 15 album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Statue of Liberty replica (Oklahoma City)
Look at Commons:Category talk:Strengthen the Arm of Liberty. That image is not subject to copyright. --evrik (talk) 18:45, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , OK, so what are you suggesting? --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:04, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * ask an admin to restore the original file and move it to the commons. --evrik (talk) 20:06, 15 March 2021 (UTC)


 * , I don't know how/where to do that, but if you do, feel free! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:06, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay. --evrik (talk) 20:07, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Denali's college degree
Found a reference to his degree in a Program for a Christmas Ice Program he did at a Casino. It isn't directly accessible, but is downloadable. Let me know if you want more information on accessing it to improve the reference.Naraht (talk) 15:47, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:02, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Frock4Life
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Frock4Life you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:21, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Frock4Life
The article Frock4Life you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Frock4Life for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 11:41, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Frock4Life
The article Frock4Life you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Frock4Life for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 19:22, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 42
 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes

Issue 42, January – February 2021 
 * New partnerships: PNAS, De Gruyter, Nomos
 * 1Lib1Ref
 * Library Card

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:27, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

April editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Vance Monument
Have you heard the latest development? Sad.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  21:12, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , Sad? Not sure we need a monument commemorating Vance, considering his views. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:17, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm thinking about the obelisk. It's a big part of Asheville and I was hoping another meaning could be found for it.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  21:23, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , This is what museums are for. :p I, too, am a big fan of pubic art and monuments, but I'm glad we're reconsidering some of them. No need to be commemorating racists in public spaces. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:26, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Do you want to add anything? In addition to the final vote and one more detail, I included a Vance quote that has been in several stories and wasn't already there.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  22:22, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

RPDRDU
Hi AB, I've re-added the Television controversies category as the Guardian article discusses the fact that the contestants weren't dismissed from the show. Put a discussion on the talk page Talk:RuPaul%27s_Drag_Race_Down_Under if anyone disagrees.

Hope you're well ≫  Lil- Unique1  -{ Talk  }- 21:52, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , Thanks, but I don't think the categories should be applied. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:54, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Fair enough your notion of "I reverted therefore you have to build the consensus" isn't correct necessarily. But I'm not interested in arguing. ≫  Lil- Unique1  -{ Talk  }- 23:08, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , Yes, sorry, I do not wish to fight but I also think the category should be left off until more editors can weigh in and decide to add or not. Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:42, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of La Carreta Mexican Restaurant


Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article La Carreta Mexican Restaurant you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 06:21, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of La Carreta Mexican Restaurant
The article La Carreta Mexican Restaurant you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:La Carreta Mexican Restaurant for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 02:01, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:39, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

"Seeking Sister Wife" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Seeking Sister Wife. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 26 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mdewman6 (talk) 20:56, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , Just make a stub! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:59, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Hail to the Rhythm
I've just created In Performance at the White House, there seems to be so much scope for expansion, but I'm sure how to avoid it becoming a list article or just a block of performers names. I know you're the doyen of popular culture articles, and an editor I really admire, so any advice would be grateful! No Swan So Fine (talk) 11:21, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , Thanks! I think this entry is a great start. I notice you use "series" throughout. If sources use this term, that's no problem, but usually Americans use "season" over "series" for television programs. Otherwise, I think this is a good foundation for editors to build on moving forward. You might post notes at WikiProject Television and WikiProject United States to see if any other editors wish to leave some feedback. Thanks for the note, and happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:25, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 March 2021
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:42, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chi Chi DeVayne


Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Chi Chi DeVayne you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 08:01, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chi Chi DeVayne
The article Chi Chi DeVayne you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Chi Chi DeVayne for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 08:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chi Chi DeVayne
The article Chi Chi DeVayne you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Chi Chi DeVayne for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 19:01, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Congrats! Glad we could collaborate here. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 19:03, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, same! Congrats :-) Armadillo  pteryx  19:51, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Btw, do you mind if I nominate the article for DYK? Armadillo  pteryx  01:20, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , Not at all! Thanks, --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:50, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Bust of Vasil Levski for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bust of Vasil Levski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bust of Vasil Levski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia talk  17:02, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Serpent coaster article
Greetings! I noticed you reverted the recent changes I made to Serpent (roller coaster). It is basically a duplication of what already exists in the primary Six Flags AstroWorld article minus the coaster's specs, which are insignificant. This is a junior coaster, of which hundreds if not thousands exist around the world. Am I missing the justification for preserving the article as opposed to changing to a redirect? Many AfD discussions in the past have resulted in redirect or delete (in fact, there's a similar one now on the chopping block: Articles for deletion/The Branson Coaster, only that one doesn't have redirect as an option). Thanks. --GoneIn60 (talk) 19:08, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you

 * Thanks, and no problem! Happy to help, --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:58, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2021). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Alexandria • Happyme22 • RexxS

Guideline and policy news
 * Following a request for comment, F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a has been deprecated; it covered immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
 * Following a request for comment, page movers were granted the delete-redirect userright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target.

Technical news
 * When you move a page that many editors have on their watchlist the history can be split and it might also not be possible to move it again for a while. This is because of a job queue problem.
 * Code to support some very old web browsers is being removed. This could cause issues in those browsers.

Arbitration
 * A community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure is open until April 25.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:19, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Lesley Wolf
Hello, Another Believer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lesley Wolf, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

The Original Dinerant
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article The Original Dinerant has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

It's academic since the article was reviewed and promoted to GA but I find the "as of"s that are scattered throughout the article suggest that it needs updating. I tagged one quote in the Reception section because it was unclear what "prize" is being suggested. The Menu section is out-of-date and comes close to sounding like an advertisement. There were a lot of links to common terms that I removed because they were unnecessary in my opinion.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 19:15, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 19:16, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Lorna Breen for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lorna Breen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lorna Breen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Capt. Milokan (talk) 01:31, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

TFL notification
Hi, Another Believer. I'm just posting to let you know that Grammy Award for Best Jazz Fusion Performance – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for April 30. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008  ( Talk ) 20:20, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:01, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: March 2021
About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 22:52, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

See You in My Nightmares talk page
I moved the hip hop music WP to being in a different placement as you can see an explanation for in my edit, also shouldn't you have created a talk archive per the review being archived? --K. Peake 17:18, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , I order WikiProject banners alphabetically, not based on relevance, which is subjective. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 19:06, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , Also, no Talk archive is not necessary because there's a link to the archived review in the 'article history' template. But, no harm in adding Talk archive as well, which I've done! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:21, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Veronica Green
Sorry about that, I deleted the wrong tag... you knew what I was trying to do. They're definitely still alive though! Richard3120 (talk) 14:08, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , Yup!, no prob! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:10, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Republic Cafe and Ming Lounge
Hello:

The second GOCE copy edit of the article Republic Cafe and Ming Lounge has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Congratulations on the GA.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:35, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , Your edits look great. Thanks again! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:35, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Mass mss. request
Hello Another Believer, could you mass message members of WikiProject Wikipedia Awards, or at least the most active members about the discussion "Possibly splitting WP:BARN"? Thank you! Jerm (talk) 23:58, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , I'm really only comfortable using mass message for initiatives I'm spearheading or co-organizing. I don't follow WikiProject Awards closely or know which members are active, but hopefully your talk page comment gets participation. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 00:52, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I understand, thanks anyway, Happy editing & cheers! Jerm (talk) 00:56, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Masia (restaurant)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Masia (restaurant) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 02:41, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2021
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:30, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Statue of Christopher Columbus (Chula Vista, California) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Statue of Christopher Columbus (Chula Vista, California) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Statue of Christopher Columbus (Chula Vista, California) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:25, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Sigh... --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 13:28, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Queering Wikipedia 2021 User Group Working Days: May 14–16
The Wikimedia LGBTQ+ User Group is holding online working days in May. As a member of WikiProject LGBT studies, editing on LGBTQ+ issues or if you identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community, come help us set goals, develop our organisation and structures, consider how to respond to issues faced by Queer editors, and plan for the next 12 months.

We will be meeting online for 3 half-days, 14–16 May at 1400–1730 UTC. While our working language is English, we are looking to accommodate users who would prefer to participate in other languages, including translation facilities.

More information, and registration details, at QW2021 .--Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group 02:35, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Masia (restaurant)
The article Masia (restaurant) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Masia (restaurant) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 22:21, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , Thank you! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:46, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

DYK for Chi Chi DeVayne
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 May newsletter
The second round of the 2021 WikiCup has now finished; it was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 61 points to advance to Round 3. There were some impressive efforts in the round, with the top eight contestants all scoring more than 400 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 110 good articles achieved in total by contestants, as well as the 216 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.

Our top scorers in Round 2 were:


 * 🇧🇼 The Rambling Man, with 2963 points from three featured articles, 20 featured article reviews, 37 good articles, 73 good article reviews, as well as 22 DYKs.
 * Epicgenius, with 1718 points from one featured article, 29 good articles, 16 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
 * Bloom6132, with 990 points from 13 DYKs and 64 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
 * Bennington Flag.svg Hog Farm, with 834 points from two featured articles, five good articles, 14 featured article reviews and 15 good article reviews.
 * Standard of Oliver Cromwell (1653–1659).svg Gog the Mild, with 524 points from two featured articles and four featured article reviews.
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski, with 501 points from one featured article, three good articles, six featured article reviews and 25 good article reviews.
 * Transgender Pride flag.svg Sammi Brie, with 485 points from four good articles, eight good article reviews and 27 DYKs, on US radio and television stations.
 * Flag of the United Nations.svg Ktin, with 436 points from four good articles, seven DYKs and 11 "In the news" items.

Please remember that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of Round 2 but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in Round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (except for at the end of each round, when you must claim them before the cut-off date/time). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:27, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Gregory Gourdet for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gregory Gourdet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gregory Gourdet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 18:30, 3 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Eye roll... Try Google. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 19:55, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2021). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Enchanter • Carlossuarez46

Interface administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Ragesoss

Guideline and policy news
 * Following an RfC, consensus was found that third party appeals are allowed but discouraged.
 * The 2021 Desysop Policy RfC was closed with no consensus. Consensus was found in a previous RfC for a community based desysop procedure, though the procedure proposed in the 2021 RfC did not gain consensus.

Technical news
 * The user group  will be renamed to  . This is for technical reasons. You can comment at  if you have objections.

Arbitration
 * The community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure was closed, and an initial draft based on feedback from the now closed consultation is expected to be released in early June to early July for community review.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:51, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

GOCE Copy Edit of Papi Chulo's

 * Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:22, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Author Requesting a New Article
Hello User:Another Believer. I am a COI/paid editor, and I too live in Portland. Earlier this week, I received an email from an author who would like an article on herself. She has written 4 books, and from a cursory Google search, it appears to me she is notable. She identifies as Black, and I was thinking that rather than taking her on as a client, she may be better served by working with a volunteer editor or volunteer project group that is trying to broaden the representation on Wikipedia - more women, more POC, more LGBTQ, etc. I was wondering if you would be interested in working with her, or might know a group or volunteer who would. Then I could connect her with the appropriate people/person to discuss the project. I'm speaking to her on Tuesday and would love to be able to tell her that someone would like to help. Can you give me your thoughts on the above? I'd greatly appreciate it. Best LeepKendall (talk) 22:18, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
 * , Hello! The first group which comes to mind is WikiProject Women in Red. While there's no guarantee someone would help, I think you and/or her introducing this idea at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women in Red might result in some offers. I'd start by collecting the very best sources with the most in-depth coverage, in order to clearly demonstrate her notability from the start. Another option is to produce a very quick entry in the draft space, something short and simple but which can easily be expanded on by other editors. Other WikiProjects which come to mind: WikiProject LGBT studies, WikiProject Women, and WikiProject Women writers. I'm not sure I want to volunteer to take on a project about an unfamiliar subject, but I hope these spaces are helpful in some way. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:57, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Good Morning : Thank you for these recommendations. I appreciate it, and will definitely check them out. Best LeepKendall (talk) 14:40, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Teddi Mellencamp Arroyave


A tag has been placed on Teddi Mellencamp Arroyave requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.

(Side note: I mentioned in my edit summary the source was unreliable. I mistakenly misread the IMDb external link as a citation instead of the Entertainment Tonight article, which is a reliable source. I can't alter edit summaries, but I would have nominated the article regardless of that. ) 51.37.97.190 (talk) 21:06, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 43
 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes

Issue 43, March – April 2021 
 * New Library Card designs
 * 1Lib1Ref May

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:11, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

"Lost and Found" (Chris Brown song)
No, there shouldn't, because all the chart positions are fake – check them yourself. Most of the other sources don't mention this song at all. The sock keeps restoring this article full of fake information. Richard3120 (talk) 14:33, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
 * , Ah, ok, then feel free to re-redirect. I was not aware. Based on your edit summary I assumed the page was redirect for editor behavior, not content. Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:35, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
 * No problem, perhaps I should have been clearer in my edit summary. But feel free to check it out for yourself – the chart positions are all for another Chris Brown song, "Zero", the composition and lyrics section is largely original research based on two reviews of the album (not the song), and one of the reviews only has one line mentioning the song. And the critical reception section is also fictional – it says Rolling Stone and HipHopDX praised the song but there's no sources from them, the AllMusic review doesn't mention the song at all, and The Boombox just briefly describes the song in an album review... it certainly doesn't make any comment about Brown's vocal abilities or the depth of the lyrics. The one positive quotation comes from a blog that is now inactive. Richard3120 (talk) 14:52, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
 * , I won't bother reading the content and I've already restored the redirect. Thanks again! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:01, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: April 2021
About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 04:54, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

List of accolades received by Avatar
Hey Jason, how are you? Can you help with this article, please? An IP keeps reverting my edits for no reason. I am not sure what to do. Gaga Nutella talk 17:13, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
 * , I'm not interested in getting involved, but I have request a temporary page protection on the page. We'll see what an admin does, if anything. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:16, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the inconvenience, thanks a lot! Gaga Nutella talk 17:24, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
 * , No prob! I'm not an admin, so that's the only way I know how to get help sooner than later. Good luck! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) -- Another Believer  ( Talk ) 17:25, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of East Portland Community Center


The article East Portland Community Center has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Portland has 14 community centers, no indication why this generic local center sourced to non-independent city site is notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 01:29, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Oregon Humanities logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Oregon Humanities logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Radiant Fountains for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Radiant Fountains is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Radiant Fountains until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. User:力 (power~enwiki, π,  ν ) 02:49, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Southeast Grind
Hello: The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Southeast Grind has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:09, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 13:11, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Sia articles
Should Category:Sia articles by importance and its subcategories be deleted since the importance levels are being categorized under Category:Sia Furler articles by importance? Thanks. Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 00:33, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
 * , Sure! Not sure when or why this changed or was not fixed at the time. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 00:34, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Sia articles by importance


A tag has been placed on Category:Sia articles by importance indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:48, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
 * , Thanks! Not sure if you saw the above discussion or not, but I've got no problem with deletion. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:52, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Statue of Billie Holiday
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Statue of Jeff Goldblum


The article Statue of Jeff Goldblum has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "A silly season publicity stunt that was in place for all of eight days, in 2018. No WP:LASTING significance, the statue doesn't seem to have been exhibited anywhere else since, or have been mentioned again except a couple of times in passing."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lord Belbury (talk) 17:54, 28 May 2021 (UTC)