User talk:Avinesh/Archive 7

Thanks
Avinesh,

Just a word of appreciation, it appears you're doing good work clearing up some of the cruft that has accumulated in Kerala-related articles. Relata refero (talk) 19:11, 5 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much for your comments. I think this is the first time I get an appreciation since I’d been editing and doing all these general cleanups. -- Avinesh Jose  T  05:10, 6 February 2008 (UTC)


 * No problem. Could you do me a favour and have a look at T. U. Kuruvilla? And if there's anything else that's an obvious source, drop me a line? Relata refero (talk) 20:08, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

apologies
Please see my further comment at the deletion review. i was too cryptic. I think it was a perfectly reasonable nomination, and you did nothing at all wrong in nominating it, or in the way you nominated it. But see there for why I think there should be a relisting.DGG (talk) 19:11, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

The Working Man's Barnstar
I saw you nominated various Kerala-related non-notable genealogical articles for deletion. This is necessary, it helped to maintain wikipedia's quality standard.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 11:35, 14 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks. -- Avinesh Jose  T  04:17, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Government of Kerala
I had to revert your changes to Government of Kerala. Fair-use images require a detailed fair-use rationale, as per WP:IUP, for each use. --Yamla (talk) 04:37, 19 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I'd to revert your changes also since the image is back with proper copyright. -- Avinesh Jose  T  08:06, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Fr. Thomas Kuzhinapurath
I have the book Bhashathilakam published by the University of Kerala with me. If you are so keen to see it I will get it scanned send the pages which contain the article of Fr. Thomas Kuzhinapurath. About his work Daivajanam please try a google search for daivanam and see the website of carmel international publishing house add then 'find on this page' daivajanam. www.ciph.com/books Please try also www.omanmalankaracatholics.blogspot.com Please search in www.worldcat.or for daivajanam But the name of the author is transliterated.Simon Cheakkanal (talk) 08:04, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Scanned Pages
Please find the scanned pages of Bhashathilakam. Simon Cheakkanal (talk) 03:50, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Daivajanam
I would suggest that you put a tag on this article proposing that it be merged into the article on the author. I do not have a clear opinion on whether the article on the author should be kept although I am inclined towards Deletion (and I am an inclusionist!). In any event, if Daivajanam belongs in Wikipedia, it does not merit an article unto itself. If it belongs in Wikipedia at all, it should be as part of the article on the author.

--Richard (talk) 04:58, 29 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The latter one ([author]) is under AfD discussion. So it is better to wait and make a decision based on the result. -- Avinesh Jose   T  05:08, 29 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi Avinesh Jose,
 * Please find the scanned image of the review on Daivajanam. Simon Cheakkanal (talk) 04:19, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi Richard, I've placed merge tag & requesting your comment there. -- Avinesh Jose  T  06:32, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Santhosh George Kulangara and Sancharam
Hello, Can you please write about Santhosh George Kulangara and Sancharam in Malayalam Wikipedia also.Thanks in advance--Anoopan (talk) 06:34, 4 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi, I will try when I'm free. -- Avinesh Jose  T  06:51, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Courtesy notification
Just letting you know that Tinucherian has raised an incident here. Orderinchaos 07:50, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks orderinchaos. -- Avinesh Jose  T  10:25, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

DYK: Chelembra Bank Robbery

 * ...that the Chelembra Bank Robbery, one of the biggest bank robberies in Kerala, was quickly solved by the Kerala Police and the stolen goods recovered?

I agree
Your wordings were more proper to the context. Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashrafmedia (talk • contribs) 10:55, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Peer review feedback
Hi, I noticed you have a request in at peer review which has not yet received any response besides the semi-automated script. Have you tried requesting a peer review from the volunteers list? Another idea you might want to try is to review someone else's request (particularly one from the list of requests without responses), then ask that they look at your request. Hope these are helpful suggestions and help to get some feedback for your request soon, Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 21:49, 14 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi, Thanks for the suggestion. Actually, I ignored watchlisting it and checked the JavaScript result now. I will make the enhancement based on it. As you’d suggested, I will try other possible options also. -- Avinesh Jose  T  05:20, 15 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I keep track of peer review requests that have no responses yet here: Peer review/backlog. I do the peer review myself if no one else does and will get to yours in several days. Keep up the good work, Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 12:27, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

re to your message for removal of honda x11
I do think you were right on the suggestion made to remove the article on honda x11. The main purpose of my creating it was to prevent the title of this super bike left unanswered. In a short notice I would change the article into a more elaborate and meaningful one. Thankyou. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Realkarthik (talk • contribs) 04:48, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

To Mr Avinesh Jose
Hello, Mr. Avinesh Jose. To briefly introduce myself, my name is Sean Kim and I currently work in South Korea company related to researching and understanding India's government. I was searching for information about Kerala's government through the Internet and I have noticed that you were the last person to update information about Kerala in Wikipedia. If you can spare a little time of explaining the State Government of Kerala, I would be very pleased. I'm curious of how State Government of Kerala is organized. I would like to know who is in control of the departments (ranked position from top to bottom). So far, I understand that the governor is in charge of the state, the chief minister is the head of the Council of Ministers. What I would like to know is who is in charge of each departments. Is it the state council of ministers or the central government ministers or the secretary to departments? I am very confused of the ranked position of one particular state's government. To put this in order, first is governor, second is chief minister, third is Council of Ministers. I'm not sure after that; the lower ranked positions. If you can help me please reply to kim.hanseul@hotmail.com. Thank you for your time and consideration. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.76.164.201 (talk) 02:45, 16 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I'd updated Government of Kerala based on your query. Hope you get more info from here also. Thanks. -- Avinesh Jose  T  08:56, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Reply
The comment was mine to begin with, and I added it as an explanation for my initial opinion. So I'm not sure why you and Harjk are telling me to stop moving other people's comments. I haven't moved anyone's comments, just mine. -- vi5in [talk] 22:15, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Because, it was in my watchlist since I’d participated in the first AfD discussion. In the second AfD, I undid your edit to make it in a chronological order in order to taking the confusion out of closing admin. (because I noticed that you pushed your comments above Tomb’s comment after he commented as per recorded time & tomb wants it to be stay behind the same). Please check the time & see who edited first. Therefore, I think that my undo (tried resolving edit war?) was logical and reasonable. -- Avinesh Jose  T  04:32, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I understand that your intentions were good, but in future please don't move other people's comments. I didn't "push" my comments above Tomb's. He was complaining that I posted my vote because of JNN, so I added my comment as an explanation TO my vote. But when I did it the first time, I wrongly added it as a reply to Tomb, which wasn't what I intended. Chronological order doesn't necessarily mean "logical" ordering either. I really don't care what Tomb wants. He doesn't seem to understand edit histories well. If you look at the diff, you will see that I made the initial comment, and I moved it. Assuming you have the following ordering of comments:


 * A (time x)
 * B (time x + 1)
 * C (time x + 2)
 * D (time x + 3)


 * A person E can reply to any particular post above and you can end up with the following:


 * A (time x)
 * B (time x + 1)
 * E (time x + 4)
 * C (time x + 2)
 * D (time x + 3)
 * E (time x + 5)


 * So if you try to order everything chronologically, the thread would lose its meaning. -- vi5in [talk] 15:09, 28 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment by Tomb: Sorry User:Vivin, your logic was completely blundering and not acceptable by me or others. Let me just elaborate it:

1) A (time x) You commented this: Delete - Not notable enough... yet. --vi5in[talk] 16:29, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

2) B (time x + 1) I commented: WP:JNN, Possible bad faith comment by User:Vivin (NotableGuru per WP:JNN). He/she has a bad faith track of targetting my edit and falsely commenting. Check the contributions for more details. --Tomb of the Unknown Warrior tomb 04:28, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

3) Here the problem was. You should have commented to the B (time x + 1) instead of dragging my comment to the down (that was reverted by Avineshjose) and adding your comment. You did that because you knew that your comment was made by WP:ABF and trying to hide it.

So it is better, if you could take off some time and learn more about how to edit WP. In future, please don't move other people's comments. Hope this helps in your case. -- Tomb of the Unknown Warrior   tomb   05:15, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Stop asking me to "take time off". I'm more than aware of Wikipedia policies, and frankly it's quite amusing coming from someone who has barely any grasp of Wikipdia policies or the inevitable consequence of adding a line above another in a body of text (it drags it "to the down" as you so eloquently put it). I'm not going to bother with this anymore, especially with someone who can't understand something this simple. For the last time. I never moved your comment. I moved mine. Seriously... I thought I had seen everything. Avinesh, thanks for trying to help. -- vi5in [talk] 15:52, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Malankara church

 * Hi Avinesh, You definitely have no idea about the History of Christianity in India. Malankara Church is the original church established by St. Thomas in India. It was undivided until 15th century  - later it become different denominations Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church,Malankara Mar Thoma Syrian Church,Malankara Catholic Syrian Church,Syro-Malabar Catholic Church etc during the course of history. It is very clear understandable you are still continuing doing things in bad faith ...( The latest one is the merger proposal  ) . Let me know what is ur problem ? -- ₮inucherian  (Talk) - 09:45, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * No, no bad faith. I'd come across it & noticed the problem. Just see that both article looks almost same. If there are two articles created with same contents, don't you think that it should be merged. -- Avinesh Jose  T  13:11, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I am talking about Indian (Malankara) Orthodox Church & Malankara Church. Let me come out from the blocking, I will talk to you. Thanks. -- Avinesh Jose  T  13:34, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

unblock request moved here

 * You can simply decline/whatever u want since you are an admin. If you had ever worked in a shared computer nw, and more sense on ip related issues, you should not have commented in such a way. Thanks chaser on understanding the situation. -- Avinesh Jose  T  10:40, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Avineshjose, please also see Sock_puppetry. We have limited means of separating real people on the same network.--chaser - t 19:28, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * WP:AGF could considered to be that "limited means". -- Avinesh Jose  T  10:40, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Just to say hai


Tinucherian has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend or a new friend. Cheers, and happy editing! --  TinuCherian  (Wanna Talk?) - 09:27, 12 May 2008 (UTC) Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Labour India

 * See User talk:Anthony Appleyard. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:44, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

It brings out educational monthly journals in three different languages, ranging from the pre-primary level to Plus Two level and the entrance exams in every month. Uzhuthiran (talk) 05:54, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
 * If you don't find anything wrong with the following sentence, then leave out the business of copy editing or templating to others.


 * It is better if you could edit the article instead of simply talking about it/adding temps. It has been already edited by many and still you want to add the template. -- Avinesh Jose  T  05:57, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Your email to me
Hi mate I'm happy for you to email me via the "email this user" link... but no I won't be responding to an email from my wikipedia registered email address without a bit more knowledge of what it's about.

To be honest I thought it was spam but your talk page has you looking legit.

Garrie 02:49, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi, that was not spam. just gathering some info Talk:Rail transport in Australia. ok leave it. -- Avinesh Jose  T  06:52, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Reply
I've replied to your reply to my (deleted) post on your talk page. -- vi5in [talk] 06:23, 14 August 2008 (UTC)


 * For future reference. You might want to actually have evidence and not just a "suspicion" that someone is a sockpuppet. Making a sockpuppet accusation is serious so I suggest you don't frivolously hurl accusations around just because things don't go your way. -- vi5in [talk] 23:25, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The page itself is titled as "Suspected sock puppets". -- Avinesh Jose  T  04:04, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Please tell me you can read this
Okay. For some reason, your user and user talk pages were not moved to your new username, Avinesh. I moved them, and all should be well now, I hope. As they say, let me know if you didn't get this message. :)  W ODU P  05:53, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Its ok. but why did you add nowwiki, seems my user pg spoiled. -- Avinesh Jose  T  05:58, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * That website is on the global spam blacklist. You can't save the page with that as a link. Sorry.  W ODU P  06:01, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * No probs, I manually removed it. I didn't get the code (nowwiki) you added. -- Avinesh Jose  T  06:09, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: For your fine work


 Samuel  Tan  has given you  a happy sunflower! You see, these things somehow promote WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a happy sunflower! Enjoy!

Spread the goodness of a happy sunflower by adding to their talk page with a friendly message.
 * Hmmm this template looks odd on your talk page. Anyway, thanks. :) - Samuel  Tan  06:46, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for copyediting the article which I have started Akkamma Cherian recently. ( still keep watching my contribs, huh ? :) ). I hope you are kind enough of forgetting us crossing horns some time back. Really appreciated. Keep up the good work and have a gr8 day --  Tinu  Cherian  - 11:37, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

ANI
Filed at your request. -- vi5in [talk] 00:09, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * replied over there. -- Avinesh  T  04:42, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * ANI case regarding your alternate enforcer account here. -- vi5in [talk] 05:36, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

SSP
You have been accused of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Suspected sock puppets/Avineshjose (3rd). Thank you. vi5in [talk] 20:49, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Block
--Tznkai (talk) 04:17, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The issue is at unresolved ANI case. -- Avinesh  T  09:42, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

ANI
The issue is at ANI now: ANI archive page and discussion with the blocking admin also. Note that the case is not yet resolved. -- Avinesh  T  09:42, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Editing on behalf of banned users
Regarding this edit, it appears that the user for whom you were editing is currently indefinitely blocked. Please see Banning_policy for more information on why this is a problematic thing for you to do. Per policy, I have reverted your edit to the page. Thanks, and cheers. -- slakr \ talk / 11:11, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * OMG, I did not much aware of that tricky policy too. Anyway thanks for your note. However, I slightly edited my comment & restored it at the same talk page. -- Avinesh  T  05:19, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Re:BARN
--  Tinu  Cherian  - 11:45, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Lucinda Southworth
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Lucinda Southworth. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Lucinda Southworth. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * No more WP activities. Thanks. Avinesh  T  05:29, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

K M Mathew
--Rameshng (talk) 16:21, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Harold Son of Avineshjose.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Harold Son of Avineshjose.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:55, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

AfD Rahul Easwar
An article you have contributed is nominated for deletion. Rahul Easwar. Pls participate in the deletion discussion. Wikieditindia (talk) 11:48, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Requsting for my articel Jaishankar chigurula keep
hi sir my self teena my article Jaishankar Chigurla is in Deletion policy. please help me to keep the article or create Jaishankar Chigurla. Teena D&#39;souza (talk) 07:39, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Counterfeit money, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
 * It has been fixed, Thanks. Avinesh  T  12:09, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Murder of Michelle Bright
Hi Avinesh. You appear to have already seen this message on your 'other' talkpage. You need to fix the 'click here to start a new topic' link as it sent me to the wrong talkpage!

Thanks for creating this new article, but, while your source has the right info, it has the wrong title! William Tyrrell is a missing child. I would also strongly suggest that you add author, date, access date, and publisher of sources whenever possible. Regards, 220  of  Borg 06:00, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I fixed it. Avinesh  T  07:43, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Disappearance of William Tyrrell
Hello again, you actually made an edit I was going to do at Tyrell's page, about the reward issued on the 2nd anniversary of his disappearance.

Can you please explain your edit here though? I though you were updating info (number of suspects), and providing a new source, but that isn't what you did, or am I missing something? You appear to have changed the data in the text without a new source, which you should not do. That SMH source only supports the old info. If that info needs to be changed, than a new or additional source is required per WP:Verifiability.

There was no need to paste in the reference 'code' as that was already defined elsewhere, which made me think you were adding a new source. It also causes big like:

in the reflist. See ref #9 at the diff link above.

Regards, 220  of  Borg 07:34, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, the latest data updated today was properly sourced. It includes new suspects, poi's and other investigation data's etc. You can see the figure from [here]. If you still feel something wrong again, please reply. Avinesh  T  08:02, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
 * error ref message has been fixed already. Avinesh  T  08:11, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Miss Kerala


The article Miss Kerala has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Failed to meet WP:GNG. The article has not received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 14:05, 8 November 2016 (UTC)