User talk:Canadian

Welcome!
'''This is not an automated message! This is a friendly hello from one Wikipedian to another.''' Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, ask a question on the New contributors' help page or ask me on my talk page. Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes, like this: ~. Again, welcome! -- Steel 21:36, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

RfA
You're never going to pass when you're so new. Contribute to the encyclopedia for a bit. -- Steel 21:36, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:N2203491590 37912.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:N2203491590 37912.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 04:13, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

The Hoof Beat
I have added a "" template to the article The Hoof Beat, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:The Hoof Beat. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Alvestrand 15:28, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Superdudes.nl
A tag has been placed on Superdudes.nl, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain web site, blog, forum, or other community of web users that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on Talk:Superdudes.nl. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. J0lt C0la 00:57, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Note about Signatures
Just a thought: In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! Thedreamdied 01:20, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

marijuana
There is already a page Health issues and the effects of cannabis, so you might want to merge in stuff from your new medical effects of marijuana page there. Squiddy | (squirt ink?)  16:15, 6 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Have redirected Effects of marijuana to Health issues and the effects of cannabis because the article preexisted yours and covers the same area. If you wish you may move content from your old article into Health issues and the effects of cannabis as long as you meet consensus. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 18:45, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Do not remove AfD tags
Please do not remove AfD tags from articles as you did here. This is not allowed, you may use the link in the AfD notice to participate in the discussion, be do not try to cancel the discussion by removing the tag. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 18:54, 6 January 2007 (UTC)


 * To contest the deletion you can give your opinion here: Articles for deletion/Superdudes.nl HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 19:07, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Deletions
Hello Canadian, Please don't take offence at the deletion requests of pages that you have started. It's just that Wikipedia has certain policies that have to be followed, and they include verifiability, no original research and neutral point of view. Remember, that each article should be an encyclopedia article, and not an essay. I have, however, saved your work in my own userspace User:Jeff3000/Sandbox, so that your work is available when you want it. I hope that you continue to contribute to Wikipedia, regards, -- Jeff3000 00:26, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of The Hoof Beat
The Hoof Beat, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that The Hoof Beat satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/The Hoof Beat and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of The Hoof Beat during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Fabrictramp 17:22, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Lunascape (web browser)
A tag has been placed on Lunascape (web browser) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. meshach (talk) 03:43, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

January 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Alexfusco5 02:53, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Playlist.com
A tag has been placed on Playlist.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 19:13, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of The Days (band)
A tag has been placed on The Days (band), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  Y ELEMENT  ( ¶ )  14:54, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

The Days (band) has been nominated for a Deletion Review
The article you wrote about The Days (band) has been nominated for a deletion review. The deleting administrator has been informed of this decision, and you are welcome to join in with the review as creator of the article.

I nominated it for review because I felt it was encyclopedic and would be happy to assist with expanding it if needed.

Please get in touch with me if you want further information. The review is here [Deletion Review]

Regards, Thor Malmjursson (talk) 15:21, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Note: You are most welcome,Canadian. If you care to look at the review, a comment has been made by the deleting admin. Please comment if you wish to do so. Thor Malmjursson (talk) 15:25, 18 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately, the article has been sent to deletion review, so it's out of my hands for now. jimfbleak. Incidentally being popular in part of one city is not in line with notability (music)  (talk) 16:33, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Islam in Russia
Hi, Would you please state your reasons as to why you have added the "Neutrality Check" tag on the article. Regards, Joyson Noel (talk) 03:47, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

First of all, the source used for reference to the statements regarding two million conversions, decreasing number of practising Muslims, and the preference of sects by ethnic Russians to Islam is Interfax, a Russian non-governmental news agency. These statements have been made by Roman Silantyev, former executive secretary of the Interreligious Council of Russia (IIRC) and have been referred to as his claims in the article, not actual undisputed facts.

The source, as a news agency, seems credible to me and the statement by Silantyev of mass Muslim conversions to Christianity is relevant and should be included in this article. As a former executive secretary of the Interreligious Council of Russia, he should be cited as an authority over this matter. The information of Muslim conversions in the Caucasus, especially Beslan, has also been backed up by another source Radio Free Europe. I believe that the information pertaining to the mass Muslim conversions to Christianity is necessary, as it helps in providing a more accurate picture of the situation of Islam in Russia and is in no way Islamophobic, since it was not added specifically to malign Muslims.

I believe that it has also been mentioned in the article that most observers believe that the majority of conversions to Christianity are insincere, and that some of those who convert quickly fall away from the faith. Therefore, how can you unjustly claim that this article lacks neutrality and is biased towards Muslims. Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia and all the positive and negative information about the situation of Islam in Russia, if backed with credible sources, must be mentioned in this article. If a bunch of Islamic fundamentalists or culturally oversensitive apologists choose to be offended by it, then thats their problem.

Moreover, Islam by its very nature, is political as well as religious. Therefore, how can you assert that the information regarding the actual economic, cultural and political situation of Muslims in Russia should be ignored in this article? You claim that this article makes Russian Muslims look extreme. This is an incorrect assumption on your part, since nowhere in this article are all Muslims portrayed as extremists or terrorist sympathizers. Also, as an article on Islam in Russia, i believe that it is vital to provide information pertaining to the fundamentalist Islamist activities in Russia, especially since their activities have a huge bearing on the situation of Muslims in general. Furthermore, i challenge you to cite a statement or a paragraph in the article espousing hatred towards Muslims or portraying them in a negative light. Information regarding growth of Islamophobia, Xenophobia, discrimination and persecution of Muslims by the Government and fellow non Muslim Russians have been repeatedly mentioned in this article. Would a prejudiced and biased article mention all this?

I suggest you lay off the accusations of Racism and Islamophobia towards me, since you have no proof of it, and assume good faith. Luckily, i am a person who is not easily offended on a personal level, but how would you like it, if i accuse you of being a Culturally oversensitive moral apologist, motivated by his own narrow minded personal agenda? Joyson Noel (talk) 17:27, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

My dear Canadian, if your intention was not to cause offense, then why did you state that i see Muslims as hateful in India at the end of the previous message. What was the actual purpose of this statement? This seriously irritated me, since i truly despise racism and bigotry, and have a lot of close Muslim friends. I personally do not care if you are rude or uncivil to me. I can tolerate rudeness and incivility. However, what i cant tolerate are lies? Accept responsibility for your mistakes and lets move on.

You also have not cited a proper statement about this article espousing bigotry, being biased, Islamophobic and promoting hatred. The article is by no means contradictory and the statement by Viktor Perevedentsev which you cited as a contradiction is not actually a contradiction in the first place. I have merely mentioned opposing views from various credible researchers. I mentioned the views of the American historian and political commentator, Daniel Pipes, who stated that Islam is growing more rapidly than Orthodox Christianity and former US government specialist on the Soviet Union, Paul Goble, Christianity, who has predicted a Muslim majority in Russia by mid century. On the other hand, i also mentioned the statements by Russian demographer, Viktor Perevedentsev, who dismisses the notion that Russia could become a majority Muslim nation, and says this is a spectre being deliberately whipped up by politicians with little understanding of demography. I have just mentioned their statements as views and not as actual undisputed facts. For goodness sake, let me inform you as to what exactly constitutes contradiction. For instance, if i mention in an article that Russia is a majority Muslim country, only to mention that Russia is a majority Christian country, then the article is contradictory. Simply mentioning opposing views in an article is not a contradiction.

Interfax is a Russian non-governmental news agency. I dont see any reason as to why it should not be used as a reliable source. Also, i believe that Roman Silantyev, as the former executive secretary of the Interreligious Council of Russia and a reputed Islamlogist in his own country should be cited as an authority in this subject. If you want me to believe that Interfax is a biased and an uncredible site, then you will have to provide me objective evidence of it from the site itself. Simply stating that "the Russian media is hateful" or that "Interfax is a biased source" is subjective and will not do, especially since you are not a reliable source. You cant simply dismiss the Russian media and the information coming from Russian news agencies as "filth".

I completely agree with Alexei Malashenko that Xenophobia is growing very quickly there, and Islamophobia is growing along with it and will continue to. Yet, this is not an appropriate reason to dismiss the entire Russian media and news agencies. Unless a general consensus on the alleged invalidity of Interfax and other Russian news sources is reached, information from the Russian media and news sources will continue to be included in Wikipedia articles such as this one.

Moreover, the article is not biased and does not read like an essay. It has been written impartially and with the utmost neutrality, and i believe that this has been mentioned enough in the previous message. These factors gives no proper reason to conclude that the article in itself is racist and Islamophobic. I believe that any reasonable person will understand this. Also, you state that i just copied and pasted it word for word and then rearranged a few words. So, what do you want me to do? Make things up. Furthermore, i suggest that you read more about Islam, Islamic history and current events in the Islamic world, before making the false assumption that Islam is not political by its very nature. If thats really the case, then how do you explain the existence of Fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence) and Sharia laws? How do you debate the fact that virtually every Islamic run country is a fascist state? Aren't the goals of Muslim terrorist groups to take over the world for Islam and dont they use the Qu'ran and Hadiths to justify their activities?

In your country, what exactly are the goals and objectives of CAIR, Hizb ut-Tahrir, Muslim Brotherhood, etc? Most of their demands and fake moral outrage over childish trifles such as the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy, Knighthood of Salman Rushdie, etc, are nothing but part of a cynical campaign to force unwanted Islamic values into Western society. Be skeptical, discover things for yourelf and do not just rely on polite words from your moderate Muslim friends. Just because your friends in the US are normal people who just want to get on with their own lives does not mean that Islam is not political in nature. As a non Muslim born and brought up in an Islamic country, i can confidently vouch for what i have said. Anyone who closely follows the news will agree with me.

Do you know what your exact problem is? You see things the way you want to see it, not as they actually are. Its true for this article and also true in the fact that nowhere in my previous message, have i called you a culturally oversensitive moral apologist. I humbly requested you to lay off your accusations of racism and Islamophobia against me and asked you how would you like it IF i accused you of being a culturally oversensitive moral apologist, with no evidence?

You finished your message by quoting Matin Luther King Jr. "Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." In your case, nothing could be farther from the truth. Most sincere regards, Joyson Noel (talk) 15:42, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Oh, wait a minute. I would like to know the reason as to why did you remove information of the persecution of Muslims by the Russian government, forced conversions, etc. which had BBC, ABC and other credible sources as its reference? Are they biased and Islamophobic as well? Joyson Noel (talk) 15:47, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Susie Feldman - Playboy
The discussion on the Playboy talk page came to a consensus of having only ten celebs per sub-section. Adding Feldman makes eleven. Could you please remove someone from the list if you want to add someone. Also keep in mind that it was agreed to represent as many decades as possible. So, we'd rather not have all the celebs be from just the last ten years. Thank you, Dismas |(talk) 21:31, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Spam links
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  17:29, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I've reverted all of your addition of your personal profiles, etc. Wikipedia is not a social networking site, nor is it a place to drive people to your profile. – xeno  ( talk ) 17:35, 31 July 2008 (UTC)


 * It would also be remiss of me not to mention there was a thread at AN/I on this here: Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, however, since I've already rolled back all the edits, no further discussion is required as far as I'm concerned. Just please keep this in mind for the future. – xeno  ( talk ) 17:38, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fazale Rana
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Fazale Rana, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. HrafnTalkStalk 05:16, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

WP:CHICAGO
You have been not signed up as an active member of WP:CHICAGO, but you have a userspace page linked to User WPChicago. If you consider yourself either an active or semi-active member of the project please sign up as such at WikiProject Chicago/members where you may currently be listed as inactive. Also, if you are a member, be aware of Meetup/Chicago 3 and be advised that the project is now trying to keep all the project's WP:PR, WP:FAC, WP:FAR, WP:GAR, WP:GAC WP:FLC, WP:FLRC, WP:FTC, WP:FPOC, WP:FPC, and WP:AFD discussion pages in one location at the new WikiProject Chicago/Review page. Please help add any discussion you are aware of at this location.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 18:54, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

WP:CHICAGO leadership
This month you have indicated new or continuing interest in WP:CHICAGO as either an active or semi-active member. The response to the project membership survey was strong enough that we should attempt to organize it in a more fully functional way. Please sign up at CHICAGO/leadership if you would be willing to serve as a leader of the project from September 1, 2008 to February 28, 2009. The various leadership responsibilities are listed there. The roles will be somewhat similar to the roles of WikiProject Military history/Coordinators. We are a less mature and developed project than WP:MILHIST however, so our division of roles will be slightly different. Please respond by the 23rd.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 18:58, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Diana Blaine
A tag has been placed on Diana Blaine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Unforgiven24 (talk) 14:45, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Diana Blaine
Since I was the one to tag the first attempt at the Diana Blaine article for deletion under WP:CSD, I thought I'd come by and compliment you on the revised article. If this was what you had submitted the first time, I don't see how anyone would have thought of tagging it at all. For future reference, your account does give you a Sandbox where you can start articles and work on them as you like, before moving them to the main namespace where they have to meet the Manual of Style, have references, and things like that.

Nice work on the article, I genuinely enjoyed reading it over, and I may even give you a hand fleshing it out a bit, if I can dig up more to put there. Unforgiven24 (talk) 18:28, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Suggested reading
I just went through a few of the articles that you've created and made several changes. To better your editing skills, I thought I'd give you a few tips and a suggested reading list:


 * The article title should be in bold type. You can do this by putting three single quotes on either end of the word/phrase to be bolded. See WP:LEAD
 * Individual years should not be linked. MOS:SYL
 * Section headings should only have the first word capitalized unless the title is also the title of a work of art/fiction/etc. WP:HEAD
 * How to make cleaner reference links: WP:CITE
 * Flag icons aren't to be used in infoboxes. WP:FLAGICON

I'm not trying to be nitpicky or anything but I thought I'd just try and help out... Dismas |(talk) 17:46, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice
Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 07:30, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Abbie Jane Swogger
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Abbie Jane Swogger, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://worshippingchristian.org/blog/?m=20080507. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:48, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Fazale Rana
A tag has been placed on Fazale Rana requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. [ roux  ] [ x ] 07:44, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of The Days (band)
A tag has been placed on The Days (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. [ roux  ] [ x ] 08:03, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. -Andrew c [talk] 18:10, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Category:Main pages with misplaced talk page templates
Greetings. I was hoping you might consider editing User:Canadian/templates i use as it currently transcludes templates that should only exist on talk pages, causing the page itself to be included in Category:Main pages with misplaced talk page templates. After months of cleanup, I have nearly emptied this category. As you have edited Wikipedia within the last 30 days, I have not edited said page itself, hoping that you might consider doing so. Thank you! JPG-GR (talk) 20:13, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of ‎Project playlsit
A tag has been placed on Project playlsit, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Guy0307 (talk) 12:59, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Extremists
Category:Extremists, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 14:01, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Redirects
Your seem to be creating redirects which point to other redirects. These do not work. You need to point the redirect at the article - in this case to Economy of the United Kingdom, not economy of the united kingdom (note case) --Tagishsimon (talk) 01:34, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Jihad Watch
Hi, I've reverted your type=Hate Site edit again. Could you have a look at Words_to_avoid and review WP:NPOV to see why your edit isn't neutral. You're labelling the site on the basis of the point of view of one person without attribution. His point of view is just one of many. It's better to stick to a neutral description because the label is presented in Wikipedia's narrative voice.  Sean.hoyland  - talk 02:44, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

 Sean.hoyland  - talk 03:26, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

sean hoyland
you are out of line with this edit. You should strike it immediately. Nableezy (talk) 00:51, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

 Sean.hoyland  - talk 04:46, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Cold store
Please read this note. Since cold store is a disambig page, why do we need cold store (disambiguation)? &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 17:30, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of clubs in Bahrain
An article that you have been involved in editing, List of clubs in Bahrain, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Pastor Theo (talk) 01:00, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Please do not remove AfD templates from ongoing discussions
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Pastor Theo (talk) 01:59, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of supermarket chains in Bahrain
An article that you have been involved in editing, List of supermarket chains in Bahrain, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Mohummy (talk) 00:34, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of movie theatres in Bahrain
I have nominated List of movie theatres in Bahrain, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/List of movie theatres in Bahrain. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Dougweller (talk) 13:10, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of National icon
A tag has been placed on National icon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 22:05, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Problem
Certainly. What seems to be the issue? Ironholds (talk) 22:11, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure. No need to add a new talkpage section each time, just tag your new comment onto the end like I've done here. Ironholds (talk) 22:15, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Alright, fixed; you need to add File: before the image name. Ironholds (talk) 22:17, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of National icon
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article National icon, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * can't find any example of official use

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ironholds (talk) 12:16, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of National icon
I have nominated National icon, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/National icon. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ironholds (talk) 18:35, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

An article you created maybe deleted soon: Tools which can help you
The article you created: National icon may be deleted from Wikipedia.

There is an ongoing debate about whether the article you created should be deleted here:
 * Articles for deletion/National icon.

The faster you respond on this page, the better chance the article you created can be saved.

Finding sources which mention the topic of the article you created is the very best way to avoid an article being deleted Findsources3:
 * Find sources for National icon: google news recent, google news old, google books, google scholar, NYT recent, NYT old, a9, msbooks, msacademic ...You can then cite these results in the Article for deletion discussion.

Also, there are several tools and helpful editors on Wikipedia who can help you:
 * 1. List the page on Article Rescue Squadron. You can get help listing your page on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.
 * 2. At any time, you can ask any administrator to move your article to a special page. (Called userfication)


 * 3. You can request a mentor to help you: Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond to you before responding on the article for deletion page.
 * 4. When trying to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. These acronyms don't need to intimidate you. Here is a list of acronyms you can use yourself: Deletion debate acronyms, which will help you argue that the article should be kept.

If the page you created is deleted, you also have many options available. Good luck! Ikip (talk) 03:07, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Three suggestions

 * 1) Always start your article is user space first. You can start your new article first.  You can get the article in shape, with less risk of deletion, ask other editors to help work on it, and only move it into the "live" Wikipedia once it is ready to go. See Userfication. So National icon would be User:Canadian/National icon
 * 2) Enable this cite tool: User:Ikip/ref. It is going to take hours of work to fix the cites you already have in national icons.
 * 3) Add the  tag to an article that you feel is worthy of being on wikipedia, nd siply needs to be cleaned up and sourced. Ikip (talk) 04:13, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Article Rescue Squadron: Welcome
{| style="border: 4px solid #CC0000; padding: 6px; width: 80%; min-width: 700px; background: #FFFAF0; line-height: 20px; cellpading=30" align=center Hi,, welcome to the Article Rescue Squadron! We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying and rescuing articles that have been tagged for deletion. Every day hundreds of articles are deleted, many rightfully so. But many concern notable subjects and are poorly written, ergo fixable and should not be deleted. We try to help these articles quickly improve and address the concerns of why they are proposed for deletion. This covers a lot of ground and your help is appreciated!
 * colspan="2" |

Iconic people listed at RfD
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Iconic people. Since you had some involvement with the Iconic people redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Cunard (talk) 23:06, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Fake Taj
Bangladesh and Dhaka are both featured articles. Please do not add irrelevant details such as the Fake Taj, to these articles.

As for the Fake Taj, there has been a lot of discussion in various places on how the owner perpetrated a big fraud by making the claims about the building. The building's cost of construction, building materials, all seem to be a big hoax, as people visiting it have found ceramic tiles in place of "Italian marbles" as claimed by Moni. This is not at all a notable tourist attraction in BD. --Ragib (talk) 03:59, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of hotels in Bahrain
I have nominated List of hotels in Bahrain, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not believe this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/List of movie theatres in Bahrain. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Mohummy (talk) 01:14, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Category:Top-importance Chicago articles
For the rest of this month we are looking for more candidates to be promoted to Category:Top-importance Chicago articles. We are hoping to bring the list of category members to a total of 50. Either you have participated in past votes and discussions or you have recently signed up to be a part of WP:CHICAGO. In either case, please come visit Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chicago/Assessment where we are determining who to add to the September 1st ballot. Some candidate debates have lingered, but there are many new ones from the project's top 50 according to the Wikipedia:Release Version 0.7. Help us determine which pages to add to the ballot.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 04:17, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

WP:CHICAGO voting for Top-importance Chicago articles
Your status has been changed to inactive at WikiProject Chicago/members since you did not respond to our confirmation of active status request. If this is an error please come update your status. Also feel free to come vote at WikiProject_Chicago/Assessment for our next Category:Top-importance Chicago articles. Voting continues until September 10 and nominations/discussions are ongoing for future ballot candidates at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chicago/Assessment.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 02:12, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

( ~ '-' )~ thanks ~( '-' ~ )
Thanks for letting me know about the vandalism at List of largest mosques page ~ Toushiro 「 話 」  22:31, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Pakistan (disambiguation)
I have nominated Pakistan (disambiguation), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Pakistan (disambiguation). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Arjun#talk 18:12, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
Content


 * News items and announcements
 * Contest


 * Featured editor: Teeninvestor
 * Featured administrator: WereSpielChequers


 * Want ads
 * Feature: FeydHuxtable: Search Techniques

Dhaka Airport
Please do NOT prematurely move articles. There is an ongoing discussion at the Zia Airport page, with general consensus to leave things be until the actual name is finalised. As it is, the name you're giving to the page does not match what the source you cited says. Please wait. Jasepl (talk) 16:25, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Page Talk:Shahjalal International Airport

 * In page Talk:Shahjalal International Airport, as shown in this compare between edits, please do not remove the move discussion tag, or please discuss why this is being removed. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:07, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Dacca
I reverted Dacca back to the original Rdr, and someone needs to do the same with any articles created with the same intent. Dacca is just another name for Dhaka, and with few exceptions WP articles are about things, events, processes, and so on, not about each of the various names for a single thing. Nevertheless, there may be a place for an article with a title like, i dunno, maybe Geonymy of Bangladesh, which would among other things describe the political process that culminated in the official renaming and give examples of institutions that still reflect the formerly official names, and maybe discuss factors that correlate with individuals' tendency to use the old or new name before and after the changeover -- reversion of an article doesn't imply that all the content is unsuitable, but just, in this case, my not being a suitable editor for the task of figuring out where some of it should be used. Talk with me about how to proceed if you like. And/or Naming conventions (geographic names) may be a starting place for useful reading on this subject. Thanks, --Jerzy•t 18:37, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Luigi del Riccio
A tag has been placed on Luigi del Riccio requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Elen of the Roads (talk) 10:54, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Febo di Poggio
A tag has been placed on Febo di Poggio requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Elen of the Roads (talk) 10:57, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Rescue
Articles for deletion/Armageddon theology WritersCramp (talk) 12:53, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of shopping malls in Bahrain


The article List of shopping malls in Bahrain has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unmaintainable and unencyclopedic list lacking in sourcing and consisting mainly of redlinks

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Divebomb is not British 19:36, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of List of shopping malls in Bahrain for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article List of shopping malls in Bahrain, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of shopping malls in Bahrain until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Divebomb is not British 19:38, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Wikimedia Stories Project
Aloha!

My name is Victor Grigas, I’m a storyteller at the Wikimedia Foundation in San Francisco working on collecting unique and interesting stories from Wikipedians that can be used to compel donations for the 2011 fundraiser.

I found your user name on this list: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedians_in_Chicago

If you are interested in participating, and would like to schedule a telephone or Skype interview with me, please send me an email (vgrigas@wikimedia.org) along with any questions you may have.

Thanks for your time!

Victor, User:Victorgrigas Victor Grigas (talk) 21:52, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

PS If you know of anyone with whom I should speak please let me know :)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aramco Services Company


A tag has been placed on Aramco Services Company requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. QU TalkQu 21:48, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jubii.com


The article Jubii.com has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Appears to be promotion for a defunct commercial website and existing version to which there is a direct link.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bjenks (talk) 04:07, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Internet services listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Internet services. Since you had some involvement with the Internet services redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Rezonansowy (talk &bull; contribs) 13:30, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ganges Barrage Project, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rajbari. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015
Hello, I'm AsceticRose. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Some of the sources you added are not reliable, and some you misrepresented. Besides, you made racist comment in edit summary.'' - Ascetic  Rosé   15:06, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dunathan Stereoelectronic Hypothesis


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Dunathan Stereoelectronic Hypothesis, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. John from Idegon (talk) 16:37, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Talkback
John from Idegon (talk) 17:35, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ziaur Rahman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Strongman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

List of restaurant chains in Bahrain listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of restaurant chains in Bahrain. Since you had some involvement with the List of restaurant chains in Bahrain redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ajf773 (talk) 06:20, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Remarkable Woman Award


A tag has been placed on Remarkable Woman Award requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.) that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Donaldd23 (talk) 01:00, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Remarkable Woman Award


A tag has been placed on Remarkable Woman Award requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"The topic is not significant enough for a Wikipedia article; I would suggest adding a section about this award to the Wikipedia article of the group that presents the award, which is in this case NAWBO"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Abu Al Adab (talk) 11:05, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

"Shahjalal" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Shahjalal. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 27 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. MB 22:15, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

"Tunome" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tunome. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 14 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:21, 14 February 2021 (UTC)





ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of GMX Multi Messenger


The article GMX Multi Messenger has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NSOFT"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)