User talk:ChrisGualtieri/Archive 9

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:50, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Your submissions
Alright, after discussing it with Casliber, if you want to win, you need to provide the amount of diffs to catch and surpass Snowmanradio, otherwise we cannot take any of the rerates. Mitch 32 (New digs, new life, same old stubborn.) 04:02, 2 January 2014 (UTC
 * How many is that? ChrisGualtieri (talk) 14:43, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * It would take 6,493 of them, but subtract that from your stubs. Mitch 32 (The man who renounces himself, comes to himself.) 15:04, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Alright. When's the deadline to the diff grab? Its going to be an all-day kind of thing at the minimum. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 15:28, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * As fast as you can, there is another user whose points are waiting on you. Mitch 32 (The man who renounces himself, comes to himself.) 00:49, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I've been checking and I can't see any requirement on the contest page for each one needing to be done via a diff. At this point, it'd take days to weeks to go through it. I've reported them and that was a massive and crazy effort as well just to verify that each one was done. This seems like an inordinate amount of time for this unless there is an easier way. I'm sure even the "most recent diff" on those pages would be alright, but lacking some clear method. I think it's a futile effort when I've already submitted them. Heck, I'd submit several times more than that if I have to do that because I did way way more. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 01:17, 3 January 2014 (UTC)


 * I'm asking for a script to be made to get the list and diffs together on a single page. It should not be too difficult and it won't take many many hours to grab each diff by hand through the history. I over exerted myself by a good amount for the contest, pulling many 8 and 16 hour days and waiting to slow periods to edit heavily while balancing content work and other issues. Though I'd like a bit more input about the matter from the judge's side. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 19:01, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, but even Snowmanradio posted 6,492 diffs. You need the diffs because you can't expect computers to load the histories of over 6500 articles and have to go find it. We're only human. And really, you should've considered that when you chose to rerate 34,040 articles. Mitch 32 (The man who renounces himself, comes to himself.) 04:19, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Chris, I do appreciate the hours you've put in, but checking them all has been time-consuming on our side too. For the expands, we can't accept unassessed articles as we didn't discuss about having them in the first place (I wish I had now but that is something for next time - it is not fair on other contestants), and 1,2, 5,6 and 7 were actually pretty large to begin with - I might have rated them a start but will give you the benefit of the doubt.


 * We need to wrap this up, the requirement is graphed out on the entries page at the top, right after "...start your engines.....". Who is doing the script? Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:10, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

GA Reviews

 * While I do commend you for taking on so many reviews, I'm not sure I see the benefit of "claiming" so many reviews at one time- obviously, once you've started the review page, others are less likely to pick it up. This is especially true considering you've chosen to take on some big articles, like meditation, which will naturally take a long time to review (unless they are quick-fails). Perhaps you could consider cutting back to only a the unstarted reviews, and instead take on reviews as-and-when? If you do choose to do that, perhaps consider tagging some of your pending reviews with db-self. J Milburn (talk) 22:29, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * When I take reviews, I am announcing them, that's all. I don't like to leave the page blank. Though the last part of your question confuses me. Though I assume you are saying "you've taken a lot of reviews that have not yet been completed perhaps you should db-self the others?" Well, that's what most normal people do, but when I review a GAN I am a bit...unique. First, I print out the article on paper and get a feel for its wording size and context - no links to explain - and I check for prose and other issues. It makes it much easier to catch unreliable sources as well. Then I put my content notes down on the back of the pages; only after marking up the front. From there I go and do the GAN tools and go through the issues, and check for other issues and then I provide the review. The process of reviewing and later re-reviewing makes it better to address the article's issues and it helps improve my own skills in the process. I typically go through about 50-60 pages of printed text per day. I try to take 2 days worth of reviews at once, and as a result - actually posting the reviews to Wikipedia is actually where I slacked off, I finished all the reviews before I took new ones on paper! Though I am rectifying that now. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:05, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Southern African Heritage Authorities
Chris, Thanks for recently assessing the article National Heritage Council of Namibia on which I have done a small amount of work over the past year. I have written a number of other similar articles on heritage authorities in South Africa all of which require assessment and thought you might be interested as no one else I have tried seems to be. If you are, I would be most grateful if you could look at the following:


 * Heritage Western Cape
 * Amafa aKwaZulu-Natali
 * Ngwao Boswa Kapa Bokone
 * National Monuments Council (South Africa and Namibia)
 * Historical Monuments Commission

Thanks

--Waitabout (talk) 12:25, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Elixir GAN
Hi. I wanted to notify that I have tried my best to address all issues you have pointed out in the review of Elixir. More details are available on the review page, please take a look. Thank you! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 18:25, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Don't want to come off as impatient, but the review seems to have got stuck. I'm waiting for your response and whether there is more to do before it is passed or failed. Thank you! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:11, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I got it in my pile, just wait about an hour okay? It looks good, I am going to pass it I think. I just need to check it through again. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 14:13, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Hopefully. Thanks for the response --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:19, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you for passing the article. By the way, whenever you have some time, please consider commenting at Featured topic candidates/She Wolf/archive1. Thank you again! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 15:29, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

No worries
No worries, Chris. All the best in the coming year! —Tim /// Carrite (talk) 06:42, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

You've got a new mail!
Mediran ( t  •  c ) 11:15, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Re: Review re
I was not mad in any way. I just wanted to point that out. In fact, I'm grateful that you took up the reviews. And I've seen pickier reviewers (not to say that your review was picky, I found it adequate). Come to think of it, I'm a very picky reviewer myself. A good day to you to, and have a nice 2014! Hopefully you make even more Anime GAs! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 16:32, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

A Dobos torte for you!

 * Yay thanks. *eats* ChrisGualtieri (talk) 17:27, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Enjoy! Off to Kalamazoo, Michigan now. Best regards  7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 17:29, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Apologies for an apparent misunderstanding
I didn't think it was sour grapes on your part at all. I thought the complaints about your entries by other people involved were sour grapes. I think you did a lot of work, and should be rewarded for it. Canada Hky (talk) 19:32, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't they are acting on "sour grapes" either. I got a lot of work to do and I just think if you take the "money" aspect out, the end result of improvement for Wikipedia is the same. I don't know what I'd be able to do with "Euros" because I have to use USD and the only thing it will do is purchase books for my wife. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 19:34, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Your help, please
I am learning my way round Wikipedia, so thought I would dip into a few subjects I know something about. I have been trying to fix Michael Poliza. Thank you for upgrading from a stub to a start. That was encouraging for this novice! If I have now added citations and backlinks, what would you suggest my next step be? Justdominique (talk) 02:13, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Find articles that mention him or are connected to his work to fix the "orphan" page to better integrate it. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 02:15, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited On Your Mark, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Toshio Suzuki (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

In Case You Missed It
My reply to your post on my talk page from the 6th, regarding the WCLG (AM) GAN: Sorry for the slow reply, been kinda busy today (ie: errands), but I am back now. :). -  Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 18:38, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I been busy myself, I am getting to it though. Sorry for the wait. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 18:40, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * No worries, just wanted to make sure. :) Take your time. -  Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 18:45, 9 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Just wanted to let you know that if you do get to the WCLG (AM) GAN today from about 3p to 5:30p EST (again, no worries if you don't), there might be a delay in my responses. Got a couple errands I have to run and a doc's appt.  Think I caught a damned cold. :(  No rush, just letting you know. :) -  Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 17:47, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Phineas Gage
To add something to your Gage article, a patient of the week on the House, MD episode entitled "The Social Contract" is likened to Gage. In the episode, the patient has frontal lobe disinhibition, Gage is mentioned several times throughout the episode, including mentions of the railroad spike injury. Not sure if that would be notable for the article, but thought I would mention it. -  Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 18:16, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Ah. Yes, for legacy. Which is really lacking details. Thanks! ChrisGualtieri (talk) 18:19, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * You're Welcome. :) -  Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 18:24, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I am so annoyed by all the inaccurate references and details that I am finding. So much of the notes that were reinserted is a problem. I want the article at GA, but its not going to be possible with this matter. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 18:27, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I wish I could help more, but the entirity of what I know about Gage comes from the "House" episode. -  Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 18:30, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of On Your Mark
The article On Your Mark you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:On Your Mark for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hmlarson -- 05:42, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Email
I've sent you an email, but you don't need to bother replying to it. I hadn't thought to check the relevant page here and now have my answer. - Purplewowies (talk) 05:45, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:18, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Shin Megami Tensei: Persona 4
The article Shin Megami Tensei: Persona 4 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Shin Megami Tensei: Persona 4 for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- 17:52, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I'm glad that it passed and has been able to re-meet the GA criteria. Thank you for the review and the assistance. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 17:54, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Ghost in the Shell (manga)
Due to the interaction ban you have been placed under and the editing that has taken place today, it is quite clear the interaction ban is not working. I am formally banning you from editing Ghost in the Shell (manga) indefinitely. Nick (talk) 17:50, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Please also be aware that this ban extends to requests for proxy editing. You must not ask any other editor to perform edits on your behalf to avoid the sanctions of the interaction ban or the prohibition on editing Ghost in the Shell (manga). Nick (talk) 18:06, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

GAR
Hi Chris. 8 days ago you 'claimed' a couple of articles I nominated for GA status, just wondering if you were going to look at them soon, as if not it might be a good idea for them to be renominated so someone else can have a look at reviewing them. Thanks, Samwalton9 (talk) 17:18, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I already did them, I just have to post them up. Sorry for the delay. I took a few that required in depth checking. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 17:24, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh ok thanks, disregard that message then :) Samwalton9 (talk) 17:25, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I had them printed out, and I lost my notes on it. I got Shangguan Yunzhu, Type 94 Nambu pistol and several others I just need to post up. I sorta put them into the wrong work paper pile and I just had to dig them up. I have a whole shoebox of them now. You reviews are up, but as you can tell, the content portions are where I had some issues, but I didn't get all the way through the Steam article yet. I've been trying to dig up the sources and I took a few that had over 400 references those are tough. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 18:58, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
Hello Chris, thanks for your message. I have my account set to receive e-mails from other users, and please resend again. Looking foward to the codes of Questia. :) Walter Grassroot   | talk  12:52, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Kyrgyzstan–Pakistan relations
Hi Chris, I just wanted to let you know that I've re-stubbed an article you de-stub-rated recently. Kyrgyzstan–Pakistan relations at the time you re-rated it was almost entirely a direct copy of this text. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 15:14, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
 * No worries and good catch. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 15:16, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Baconnaise
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Baconnaise you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Newyorkadam -- 07:01, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Baconnaise
The article Baconnaise you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Baconnaise for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Newyorkadam -- 22:22, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Beautiful Dreamer
Good news, I found my original japanese cinema program for this, as well as the 3rd and 4th UY movies. Intriguingly it has a 2 page interview with Mamoru Oshii, although I've no idea what it says... I guess I could slowly try and make an approximate translation, but it could take a while. Still, a good excuse to work on my Japanese.

If one of us starts a page in userspace, we can work on it as and when, until it's of a suitable standard before moving it to mainspace. Dandy Sephy (talk) 21:30, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't worry about such a notable entry being deleted if it had a few paragraphs of text. I can drum up something later today... I submitted 3 GANs yesterday and I got a few reviewed to get through. I've also been tidying up Monster some. My only real question is whether or not I want to play the DYK game with the article and nominate it for the main page. My Japanese is not great, but I can read more kanji then most people. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 21:37, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Well it was less about satisfying notability and more that I don't see the point in putting up a quick article when we are intending to make it one of quality. I'd rather develop it in user space first. Then again, if you think you can put together a good start in such a short time that I can simply add to I'm not going to stop you! Dandy Sephy (talk) 22:30, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Come on. That's like asking for a challenge to prove I can do this. Its hard to resist such a call, don't you agree? ChrisGualtieri (talk) 22:32, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Baconnaise
The article Baconnaise you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Baconnaise for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Newyorkadam -- 03:12, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 03:13, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

WCLG (AM) GAN
Sorry for the delay, I changed the date in the "Programming" section to 2014. Nothing has changed since 2013, but I thought it best to be up-to-date. I removed the Google StreetView links as the one of the tower really didn't add anything to the article, it's a tower. The other, of the studio, wasn't necessary anymore since we have that image. By the way, the image was taken by User:Bitmapped and released under CC 3.0. -  Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 23:08, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Just found some new information on the sale of WCLG-AM/FM, which apparently closed today (1/13). Waiting for another piece of information from the FCC, which should be loaded to their website sometime early tomorrow morning.  So, there might be a couple extra sentences for you to look over by tomorrow, but nothing major.  I will let you know.  Take Care... Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 02:36, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I did find one piece of information from the FCC, but I still need another. I expect that to be loaded to the FCC website sometime early tomorrow morning.  They normally do a website update (with new documents, etc.) in the early morning hours.  I will let you know when I am completely finished with adding the new information.  My apologizes for adding new information in the middle of the GAN, but this just broke today. -  Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 02:48, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * It's alright, I expect new info to be found and added after all. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:56, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Me too, I was just hoping it would have been before the GAN, not during. :) I can source the closing of the sale, but the FCC website is running a little slow on their updates and haven't updated the change in ownership, so I can't source that...yet.  But I will keep checking throughout the early morning.  Take Care... Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 05:35, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The FCC website is either a) updating much slower than usual (which wouldn't surprise me) or b) the update I have been waiting on isn't going to be added until tomorrow (which also wouldn't surprise me). Either way, I will check back later on, after some sleep, and hopefully we can finish out this GAN.  My apologizes for the delay.  Take Care... Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 12:34, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Turns out I was right. The update to the WCLG page on the FCC website didn't happen today.  So I'm hoping they do update early tomorrow morning.  That way I can finally correctly source the owner of the station. - <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #900;padding:1px;"> Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 02:27, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Until the FCC updates the WCLG page on their website, I can't update the owner of the station (no source). Currently it still says "Bowers Broadcasting Corporation", but the sale to AJG Corporation closed on the 10th.  Besides that, I have finished with all the updating changes. - <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #900;padding:1px;"> Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 14:25, 15 January 2014 (UTC)


 * OK, the sale has not closed. It was consummated on January 10, but apparently with the FCC looking into things it isn't official, just on paper, no money or licenses changing hands.  With that I have removed any mention of the sale closing on the page for now.  So, the GAN can continue.  Yay!  That was confusing, wasn't it? :) - <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #900;padding:1px;"> Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 19:44, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I take it there is a delay on the GAN? - <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #900;padding:1px;"> Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 03:19, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks. I couldn't believe that such articles were not already GA. Ones like Bacon and Hams are going to be tough though. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 06:12, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * You should take a break and watch the Epic Meal Time episode about lasagna: Fast Food Lasagna -- hilarious stuff! &mdash; Cirt (talk) 10:12, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Bloons TD GAR
Hi Chris, just wondering if you could give some pointers as to prose issues in the article, and what to do about the development section considering no sources cover it. Thanks, Samwalton9 (talk) 11:08, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Any idea when the GA review of "Saul (Handel)" might begin?
Hello - on 6 January you indicated you would be reviewing Saul (Handel), I was just wondering if you are still intending to do so?ThanksSmeat75 (talk) 20:11, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, I actually have it on paper. I'll do it tomorrow. Sorry, its been so busy as of late. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:51, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Angels on horseback
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Angels on horseback you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- 18:31, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:42, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks
Hi ChrisGualtieri. In Yeepsi's absence, just wanted to say a thank-you for your review of "Instant Karma!" I'm pleased it's passed, and I'm sure he'll be also. Cheers, JG66 (talk) 05:14, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Steam GAN
I just wanted to say that I appreciate that you are putting out the effort to review an article as large as Steam (software). I truly appreciate it and I look forward to hearing what you have to say. D ARTH B OTTO talk•cont 01:24, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I have implemented your suggestions with a new second paragraph in the intro section. Let me know what you think! D ARTH B OTTO talk•cont 23:20, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I've done some additional work on the page. I hope you like it. D ARTH B OTTO talk•cont 19:45, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

I have to admit, I kind of feel like the GAN is getting off-track with all the ridiculous side comments from people not involved in the review. D ARTH B OTTO talk•cont 05:37, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Type 94 Nambu Pistol
I do believe all issues have been addressed for the article if you could please continue with the review I would be most appreciative. --Molestash (talk) 00:43, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Legobot messages
Hi there. I noticed the comments you made at Talk:Third Battle of Gaza/GA1 and Talk:Battle of Rafa/GA1. I agree with what you said there, and I've left a message with RoslynSKP to ask her to stop her edits to reviews and talk pages in the topic area and seek clarification before going any further. One thing I did notice was that you said here that you held off and didn't respond on her talk page. That was absolutely the right thing to do, but when you put the reviews on hold, Legobot left messages on RoslynSKP's talk page and signed them on your behalf. I don't suppose there was any way to prevent that, but it is a bit unfortunate. Anyway, I'll leave you to sort out the reviews, thanks for taking those on. Carcharoth (talk) 01:43, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh darn, it does do that, I forgot. I can't stop them either. It was unavoidable given that their must not be code to avoid a nominator for the topic ban. I took them on, but I hope it is okay. It was the last in queue and the person was not under the topic ban for a period of time too. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:26, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bacon Explosion
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bacon Explosion you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- 05:31, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bacon Explosion
The article Bacon Explosion you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bacon Explosion for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- 17:12, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you. One more for Bacon! ChrisGualtieri (talk) 17:28, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Don't know if you got my ping...
On Talk:Mountain Grove Campground/GA1, the GA reviewer seems to have disappeared again. I know you volunteered to take over, but I don't know if you got my ping on the GA page, so I'm posting here. Thanks, --Jakob (talk) 00:30, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Okay, I'll do it later today. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 17:29, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Your comment wasn't showing up so I fixed it and timestamped it.
Your comment wasn't showing up because it was written between some coding parameters. I added a timestamp here and your comment is now showing up. You can take a look at it and see if I did it to your satisfaction or you can let me know. <span style="font-family:Futura, Helvetica, _sans;color:#01110f;font-size:66%;">__ E L A Q U E A T E  21:26, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=592129333 your edit] to List of movable bridges in Connecticut may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:36, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * ] ||Milford-Stratford || Housatonic River Bridge, Stratford, -Fairfield County, Connecticut .jpg || 1905  || YES ||

Disambiguation link notification for January 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Angels on horseback, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Armagnac (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

WCLG (AM) GAN (Part 2)
Just wanted to let you know that we are 3 days past the 7 day hold on the WCLG (AM) GAN (10 days total). No updates from the FCC Monday (because of MLK Day) or Tuesday on Wednesday (because of the snow, government closed), nor do I expect any anytime soon. - <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #900;padding:1px;"> Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 12:36, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I understand you are working on your own GAs and an FA, but could we please wrap this one up? Thanks in advance. - <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #900;padding:1px;"> Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 06:30, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Sir. I greatly appreciate your review on the article.  Take Care...<small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #900;padding:1px;"> Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 10:04, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Away for a while
Hi! I'd like to apologize for not responding to your reviews sooner. I had to go away on a business project which frankly leaves me no time to edit. I thought to drop you this note of apology and ask you if you could be patient for few more days - I expect to be back to normal editing times early next week. Cheers.--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:14, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * No worries. I have been busy as well! ChrisGualtieri (talk) 17:05, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I surmised from your answer here that you don't mind waiting until Monday. What caused you to change your mind?--Tomobe03 (talk) 22:02, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

SpongeBob GARs
Hi Chris! I emailed you like 5 days ago about the GARs. Yes, I'm still working on those. Also, thank you very much for passing the season 3 article! Thanks! :) <span style="color:blue; font-family:'Segoe UI', verdana, sans-serif, arial;">Mediran ( t  •  c ) 03:05, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Okay. Did you want me to reopen them? ChrisGualtieri (talk) 03:26, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
 * No. I was going to ask you to close "Dunces and Dragons" and "Legends of BB" but I saw you already have, so thanks for that. The articles I'm working on now are the seasons 5 and 8. Thanks. <span style="color:blue; font-family:'Segoe UI', verdana, sans-serif, arial;">Mediran ( t  •  c ) 05:11, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup/History/2014/Submissions/ChrisGualtieri
Hi Chris, great to see all those good article reviews. Just to let you know that I've removed those ones that are still open, as you can't claim points for reviews that are still open. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page. J Milburn (talk) 14:05, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I actually had to reopen them by request. No worries though! I still got a bunch of others open. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 14:13, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

SSF revisited
Mr. Gualtieri, I'm still looking for info on Sunni Students' Federation and it still just seems to be their own website and an article in The Hindu. Are you sure you wouldn't want an AfD to be opened? The notability seems shaky. MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:00, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I still believe such a large organization does meet N, though if you are worried, you could AFD it. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 17:28, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Alright, I could, and I'll leave a note here if and when I do. I just wanted to make sure that there are no hard feelings about the disagreement over the article's notability. MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:09, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:10, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Make Something Unreal/GA1
I noticed in this GAN that you're reviewing that the nominator is requesting for you to close it as failed. I'm just letting you know this in case you did not see this. Just want to get the backlog taken care of so other GANs over at the VG sector get reviewed. GamerPro64 04:50, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
 * OK. Hate to do it. But I will. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:05, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
 * So I noticed that you passed the Steam article. But I think you overlooked a part in it with there being a Citation Needed tag on it. Section. GamerPro64  06:17, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Fixed. :) ChrisGualtieri (talk) 06:25, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Good times to step back
One of the good times to step back and let others decide, is when a user who is banned from interacting with you, is under discussion at the admin noticeboard. Any comment you make is inherently provocative. We know your views, there really is no need to add fuel to the fire. Guy (Help!) 22:53, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

You have a new message!
<span style="color:blue; font-family:'Segoe UI', verdana, sans-serif, arial;">Mediran ( t  •  c ) 04:41, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 January newsletter
The 2014 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with, at time of writing, 138 participants. The is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2010. If you are yet to join the competition, don't worry- the judges have agreed to keep the signups open for a few more days. By a wide margin, our current leader is newcomer, whose set of 14 featured pictures, the first FPs of the competition, was worth 490 points. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:


 * and were the first people to score, for the good article Tropical Storm Bret (1981) and its good article review respectively. 12george1 was also the first person to score in 2012 and 2013.
 * scored the first ITN points for 2014 North American polar vortex.
 * scored points for an early good topic, finishing off Featured topics/She Wolf.
 * scored the first bonus points of the competition, for his work on Typhoon Vera.
 * has scored the highest number of bonus points for a single article, for the high-importance Jurassic Park (film).

Featured articles, featured lists, featured topics and featured portals are yet to play a part in the competition. The judges have removed a number of submissions which were deemed ineligible. Typically, we aim to see work on a project, followed by a nomination, followed by promotion, this year. We apologise for any disappointment caused by our strict enforcement this year; we're aiming to keep the competition as fair as possible.

Wikipedians interested in friendly competition may be interested to take part in The Core Contest; unlike the WikiCup, The Core Contest is not about audited content, but, like the WikiCup, it is about article improvement; specifically, The Core Contest is about contribution to some of Wikipedia's most important article. Of course, any work done for The Core Contest, if it leads to a DYK, GA or FA, can earn WikiCup points.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 19:54, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Angels on horseback
The article Angels on horseback you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Angels on horseback for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- 20:42, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:23, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Mountain Grove Campground/GA1
Don't know if you forgot or are just busy (I see you're creating lots of content ;-), but you made plans to review this GAN about a week ago... --Jakob (talk) 01:40, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Islamic Assembly of North America


The article Islamic Assembly of North America has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Defunct group centered in a small city. Tagged for notability for almost 6 years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sorry for the template. Bearian (talk) 22:25, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Singapore International School, Bandung


The article Singapore International School, Bandung has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable school. No sources. Tagged for notability for almost six years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Again, sorry for templating you. Bearian (talk) 23:24, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi! and a query about the "Function Space" article
Hi, Chris. I'm writing to you about the article "Function Space," which I came across in the course of reading about analysis. Did you write the article, or are you an editor who came across it, and like me was a bit puzzled by it? There seem to me to be two, or perhaps three problems with the article. The first is simply the writing; it is apparently by somebody whose native language is not English, given the odd use and occasional absence of "a" or "the" when one or the other is called for to make something clear. The first paragraph of the article seems incoherent to me; is the verb "maps" missing from the bit involving sets X and Y? Or am I wrong, through ignorance of some facet of set theory?

One does't talk about "cat air," the air breathed by cats, and "dog air," the air breathed by dogs. What is interesting about the spaces in which functions make their statements? It seems to me possible that "function space" is perhaps a false category, a non-existent thing.

However, if I am wrong about the artificiality or irrelevance or nonexistence of the notion, then problem two is the incoherent handling of the very great variety of functions. The article should either say less or say more. Possibly, e.g., "A function space is the space in which a function has relevance." Period. By contrast, perhaps, function spaces form a topic in which there are questions, problems, similarities and differences, and we can see that by considering, for example, the following functions and their spaces... I'd like to hear your thoughts. Best wishes, David Lloyd-Jones david.lloydjones@gmail.com

David Lloyd-Jones (talk) 17:17, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Buddhacarita
Hello Chris, perhaps you did not see the copyright violation - section on the talk page of Buddhacarita when you uprated this stub to start.JimRenge (talk) 11:30, 6 February 2014 (UTC) Best regards

Re: Question
Since the two GA reviews noted had not been started in a month's time, it didn't look like they were going to be. You clearly have a large number of reviews going that you're doing good work and actively working on, so perhaps having those two back in the queue is for the best. If you are able to jump back in and do them, then you can always go ahead and re-note. Just don't want you to spread yourself too thin, which it seemed like was happening in this case. Wizardman 02:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

SpongeBob GARs
Hi ChrisGualtieri! Thanks for reviewing my SpongeBob GA nominations. Anyway, the season 5 article is I think complete and I think you should check it out. If you found any issues that are not yet resolved, please post it in the review page. About the season 8 article, please fail it because there are still more issues to resolve. Thanks for working on this. :) <span style="color:blue; font-family:'Segoe UI', verdana, sans-serif, arial;">Mediran ( t  •  c ) 14:50, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I've changed my mind. Please see season 8 article if it's already OK for GA. Thanks. <span style="color:blue; font-family:'Segoe UI', verdana, sans-serif, arial;">Mediran ( t  •  c ) 06:44, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Thank you
Greetings, although my ban will likely be initiated soon (or sent up to Arbcom) I just wanted to take a moment in my last edits here to thank you for your oppose of my ban. Good luck and happy editing. Kumioko 108.45.104.158 (talk) 03:11, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Justin Bieber RfC
If you have time and the desire to re-engage in the  debate over legal issues and polls at the Justin Bieber article ....pls comment at  Talk:Justin Bieber Thank you for your time. -- Moxy (talk) 03:55, 10 February 2014 (UTC)