User talk:East Anglian Regional

Hello! Let's talk!

Lemar (supermarket)
The problem here is not that anybody contests that this supermarket exists, but that it does not appear to meet our inclusion criteria (see also WP:CORP). The sources that you added do not establish anything. In fact, the reference to Wikimapia is a wiki and therefore not a reliable source. It should not even be used. As for your comments on the article's talk page, please assume good faith. Yelling won't help anybody. The problems with this article and your reaction to me placing an A7 tag on it only reinforce my remarks above about you not yet being ready to evaluate the work of other editors. --Randykitty (talk) 18:22, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

New Page Patrol
You reviewed Graduate School of Professional Psychology and marked it reviewed/curated/patrolled but missed...
 * its promotional tone, WP:CSD,
 * the text copied from http://www.du.edu/gspp/about/index.html in violation of copyright, WP:CSD, and
 * the author's username, User:GSPPDenver, which indicates WP:COI and shared-use & promotional username WP:UAA issues.

Please be careful with what you mark as reviewed. for (talk)  18:43, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Lemar (supermarket) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lemar (supermarket) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lemar (supermarket) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Appable (talk) 19:04, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Ayden Keenan Olson for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ayden Keenan Olson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ayden Keenan Olson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:06, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers
Hi ,

In order to better control the quality  of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

February 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Glasgow Airport, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 03:11, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Reply to Jetstreamer
Hi Jetstreamer,

I am having troubles for citing sources for all pages I recently made an edit to. If you search into Google "Loganair hubs" for example, Glasgow Airport shows as a hub but there is no URL to cite it, as using a Google URL is not particularly a "source"

Thanks, E.A.R
 * Well, if there is no source you probably should not make that change.--Jetstreamer $Talk$ 23:11, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Thrive Partnership Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Thrive Partnership Logo.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 21:00, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Danny Parish for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Danny Parish is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Danny Parish until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. OGLV (talk) 19:21, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

The WikiEagle - January 2022
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)