User talk:ElijahPepe/Archives/1

Yo
nicely done —blz 2049 ➠ ❏ 09:42, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Neutrality on a edit I wrote
Hello would you be able to tell me if my edit is neutral and if there are any improvement that could be made etc?Ive had a few responses in the forums but they all seem to have political bias behind them, Heres what I wrote:

In October 2018,the Secret Service were involved in a incident,where a .38 Revolver belonging to to Biden was discarded into a dumpster close to a high school .The firearm in question was reportedly discarded into the dumpster by Hallie Biden,Beau Biden's widow.When she tried to return to retrieve the firearm it had been removed from the dumpster by an elderly man who regularly rummaged through dumpsters and was eventually returned to Hunter who handed it over to law enforcement According to Politico, When Biden filled out a Form 4473 during the purchase of the firearm, answered “no” to a question about unlawful use or addiction to “marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance”,Despite his prior usage of drugs. If he answered "yes" it would make him unable to purchase the firearm. Two Secret Service agents went to StarQuest Shooters & Survival Supply in Wilmington, Delaware,where they tried to take possession of the Firearms Transaction Record,however the owner, Ron Palmieri refused later turning over the papers to the ATF.


 * Four unrelated things before I get into bias:


 * Some editors like to use curly quotations, like “ instead of ". " (straight quotations) should always be used to keep search predictable in certain situations and to keep quotation marks in general consistent, see MOS:CURLY.


 * Duplicate references can have a name assigned to them so duplicate references aren't used. You can use a ref like, and then call upon the ref later as


 * In English, punctuation marks (commas, semicolons, question marks, exclamation marks, periods) typically have a space after them, so ".The" becomes ". The". Occasionally, some people will use two spaces so ".The" becomes ". The", but two spaces is rendered as one in wikitext (MOS:DOUBLESPACE).


 * The double link .38 Revolver is used; avoid a sea of blue.


 * As for bias, I would start by analyzing the quality of sources used in your edit, which happens to be the two institutions Politico and The Guardian. Both are reputable perennial sources, so any bias issues probably stem from how the sources are used.


 * I usually then analyze if such an event is newsworthy or if its inclusion would cause undue weight to the person in question. The context of this section is probably on Hunter Biden's article. Seeing as no arrests were made and this is pretty much how the story ends, it would be undue weight to mention it on their article, and the incident isn't a large enough issue to be noteworthy.


 * I would suggest finding more sources that do genuinely make this a much larger issue than it is, but two sources saying, "Beau Biden's wife put a gun in a trashbin. Someone found it." really isn't that much of a noteworthy event. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 23:14, 26 April 2022 (UTC)


 * CNN also reported on it as well (https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/30/politics/hunter-biden-federal-investigation-heats-up/index.html) as some other news networks and writers (https://jonathanturley.org/2021/04/08/president-biden-announces-new-red-flag-rule-fit-for-hunter-biden/ ).There are many other articles but some of the others arent considered neutral by wikipedia. Even though no arrests have been made that is also the case with the Biden laptop story.It is reported that there is a case that may be formed against Biden as stated in one of the articles. Conservative cheese ball (talk) 10:43, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * WP:BEBOLD if you believe the edits would be constructive, but to me, it's not a large enough story to warrant such a large section. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 14:15, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I did originally post the edit but it got taken down in under 2 minutes by someone for being "undue".The edit was only an extension to the criticisms/controversies section of Mr Biden's Wikipedia page.The article main focus is the media's coverage of Biden illegal purchase of a weapon and dangerous attempt at discarding it.In my opinion I see this a wikipedia/news worthy. Conservative cheese ball (talk) 15:16, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Use of opinion piece to define a organisation
Hello ElijahPepe,

Would you say from your experience that this article is an opinion piece? From what I can see it seems very much so.However, I'm looking to see what other people think.The way in which the source is being used to make the statement is extremely subjective and is an opinion, the article should instead say something along the lines of at most "some see the organisation as being affiliated with the far-right". The consensus is that TheConversation can be used,however articles that are opinion pieces from the TheConversation should not be used.Meaning it should be looked at on a case by case basis-Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#The Conversation. The claim is one that would be considered very extraordinary and I think it needs alot of really strong sourcing to back it up.

Intrested to here your thoughts

Basedosaurus (talk) 21:56, 3 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Oops forgot to add the link lol
 * https://theconversation.com/turning-point-uk-new-conservative-youth-group-doesnt-fit-traditional-understandings-of-the-far-right-111669 Basedosaurus (talk) 23:48, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Your recent edits at Section.80
There's no reason to remove the italics off the album's title. All titles of works must be italicized (MOS:ITALICTITLE). TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 05:31, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Also, don't not remove quotation marks in song titles such as this edit, if you want to edit album articles in the future, I suggest you follow the guidelines like everyone else here (see WP:ALBUMSTYLE). TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 02:47, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

ITN
Just noting that there is no requirement that nominations to ITN be global in scope, if there was, very little would be posted. 331dot (talk) 09:54, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Talk:Robb Elementary School shooting discussion closure
Hello. I noticed that you closed this discussion. On a technical level, this was inappropriate for you to do. A discussion's consensus can only be assessed by an uninvolved editor. As you !voted in your own proposal, that restricts you from closing it. I am not suggesting that your assessment is incorrect, just that you should not have closed it. See WP:Closing discussions and WP:RFC. In future, please avoid closing a discussion that you have participated in or that you started. I am not sure whether it is necessary in this instance for you to revert your close. Mr rnddude (talk) 16:12, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Well, hey, I didn't know. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 16:45, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Hey. Yeah, I just came here to say the same. It's not appropriate for an editor who has been involved in a discussion to close it and assess the consensus from it. I'd strongly recommend that you self revert that closure please. Sideswipe9th (talk) 17:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

US bias
Don't ever post on my talkpage or ping me ever again. Your support of a US article at WP:ITNC whilst opposing a similar non-US article is a clear US bias in my opinion, and I refuse to tolerate it. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:15, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Hunter Biden iCloud leak for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hunter Biden iCloud leak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hunter Biden iCloud leak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. soibangla (talk) 20:57, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

by any chance do you have another account
beginning with Elijah (can't remember the full name) which created another Hunter Biden article? just wonderin' soibangla (talk) 20:59, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I believe you're referencing Elijahandskip, whom I do not have any relation with. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 21:00, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Six Flags Great America shooting for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Six Flags Great America shooting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Six Flags Great America shooting until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 04:52, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
Hello. I have noticed that you edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 02:32, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Blåhaj, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ;;  Maddy  ♥︎(they/she)♥︎ ::  talk   16:31, 21 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Sorry for WP:DTTR, muscle memory got me. ;;  Maddy  ♥︎(they/she)♥︎ ::  talk   16:32, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Edits to Blåhaj
Hello, thank you very much for your contributions to the Blåhaj article, and providing a better and high quality photo of the toy to be displayed in the infobox. I would like to ask, however, if you saw my edit where I changed references to Blåhaj to be in the singular, as well as this one where I removed some redundant information from the lede, and explained why in the edit summaries? And if you have, could you explain why you are reverting those? I'd like to understand your logic on that and come to an agreement on those issues if possible, in lieu of reverting each other repeatedly without communication. Thanks again for your contribution! Joyce-stick (talk) 16:19, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I added the physical properties of the Blåhaj because it pertains to the article's topic and there's a section for it in the article (a lede should be a summary of the article itself). As for the plurality of Blåhaj, plenty of RSes use Blåhajs to refer to the toy. The article doesn't flow well with Blåhaj being singular because Blåhaj, despite being a proper noun, is a Swedish word, and there are multiple Blåhajs in the world. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 16:26, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Alright, adding that information to the lede makes sense then, and I've reverted my own edit on that front. However, I'd like to politely disagree that the article does not flow well with the singular "Blåhaj" being predominantly used? Often in discussion and coverage, at least in the English language, Blåhaj is generally referred to in the singular, either as "Blåhaj" or otherwise as "The IKEA shark" or a similar term, conveying not the idea of a mass-produced product, but a character, meme, and symbol. You would not, for instance, say "the Statues of Liberty" because there may be multiple such statues extant as replicas, or "the Nintendo Switches" because there are millions of Nintendo Switches. This is not just my opinion, it's common practice in sources such as this, this, and this, (and yes all three of these are cited in the article) among many others, where Blåhaj is called "Blåhaj" in the singular. Thus it's justified to call Blåhaj by its WP:COMMONNAME, at least in English coverage. Joyce-stick (talk) 16:38, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Take a look at this sentence:
 * "In 2018, Blåhaj grew to prominence as an internet meme, with social media users posting humorous photos of it in their homes."


 * The usage of Blåhaj seems to imply that there is only one Blåhaj, but there is no "one Blåhaj". "Blåhajs" would work better here, because it explicitly states plurality. In cases where there is only one Blåhaj, like the Japanese marketing campaign, then "a Blåhaj" would work better. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 16:49, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * The subject has been raised on the talk page of the article. For now the consensus is in favor of using Blåhaj in the singular, and the article has been edited in line with this. If you wish to oppose that consensus, I recommend you reply to the discussion there. Joyce-stick (talk) 20:49, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

2022 Oakland shooting moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2022 Oakland shooting, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 21:26, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Death of Mikhail Gorbachev for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article  Death of Mikhail Gorbachev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Mikhail Gorbachev until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Willsteve2000 (talk) 02:38, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Your stress
I'm sorry to read about your stress. I hope u feel better soon! Stephanie921 (talk) 05:37, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 06:14, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Old days
Hey, i saw your username while browsing on Wikipedia today, and a ton of nostalgia hit me. I used to be a really annoying kid on one of the discords you used to moderate back in 2020. I want to apologize for the very stupid shit i did, and i hope you get over your stress. that discord really meant a lot to me, and even though everyone hated me it made the last year of my childhood special.

-ReemaThePresident. FREETP4ALL (talk) 11:43, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Timeline of the death and state funeral of Elizabeth II
Hi. Hope you are doing well. I just wanted to ask a few questions regarding the timeline article that you created yesterday. What were your plans when setting it up? Is it meant to cover only the day of her death and her state funeral in detail, or is it supposed to cover everything in between as well? And, are you planning on further expanding it? I'd be glad if you could provide some answers, as that would help us avoid creating a duplicate of the timeline already included in the main article. Regards. Keivan.f Talk 16:10, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for asking! My plan was to set up a general article for the timeline of the death and state funeral of Elizabeth II, as aptly named in the title, so every detail that's relevant to that topic would be listed. I have plans to expand it, but I need to get the date and times organized first. If someone were to read that article, my hope is that they'd get a general overview of the times that the events surrounding the death and state funeral of Elizabeth II happened, but not exact details (kind of like Timeline of Opportunity).


 * I have no requirement for how the article should be laid out, but I would much prefer if the article kept that bullet point format seen in the background and the 8 September sections. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 16:29, 11 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Perfect. Thanks for the quick response. A user copy pasted the entire summary from the main article into the page on the timeline, which I thought was unnecessary. I think if they were to be added back, they need to have all the details and be laid out in the list format (bullet points, etc. as you mentioned). I'm busy working on the main article at the moment, but I'll try to help with this one as well. Again, thanks for the clarification. Keivan.f  Talk 16:36, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Timeline of the death and state funeral of Elizabeth II for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timeline of the death and state funeral of Elizabeth II is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Timeline of the death and state funeral of Elizabeth II until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.  Sandstein  12:01, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

2022 Northeastern University bombing moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 2022 Northeastern University bombing, is not suitable as written to remain published. One sentence is not enough for an article. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:07, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Top25reportbot
Hi, when it adds it to User talk:Top25ReportBot could you have it sign its posts? We need to archive the page to stop it getting to big, and the archiving won't work if there is no time stamp. Thanks. SSSB (talk) 08:38, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Sure. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 15:33, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Automatically assessed Russian invasion of Ukraine articles


A tag has been placed on Category:Automatically assessed Russian invasion of Ukraine articles indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 05:41, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Russian invasion of Ukraine articles needing attention


A tag has been placed on Category:Russian invasion of Ukraine articles needing attention indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 05:44, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Russian invasion of Ukraine articles needing infoboxes


A tag has been placed on Category:Russian invasion of Ukraine articles needing infoboxes indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 05:47, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Automatically assessed Russian invasion of Ukraine articles


A tag has been placed on Category:Automatically assessed Russian invasion of Ukraine articles indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 05:34, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Russian invasion of Ukraine articles needing attention


A tag has been placed on Category:Russian invasion of Ukraine articles needing attention indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 05:41, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Russian invasion of Ukraine articles needing infoboxes


A tag has been placed on Category:Russian invasion of Ukraine articles needing infoboxes indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 05:41, 13 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello, ElijahPepe,
 * If these are WikiProject categories that will be empty from time to time, you need to tag them appropriately or they will show up on our Database list of Empty categories and they will continue to be tagged for CSD C1 speedy deletion by me or another editor who reviews the list.
 * Just add the tag on the relevant category pages so they will be marked to not delete the categories even if they are empty. Thanks. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 05:57, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, ElijahPepe. Thank you for your work on Murders of Jeffrey Dahmer. User:Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 02:26, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve 2022 Las Vegas Strip stabbing spree
Hello, ElijahPepe,

Thank you for creating 2022 Las Vegas Strip stabbing spree.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Please use citations for attribution."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bruxton (talk) 17:14, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Not my fault if people add content to that page and it's not sourced. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 22:54, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Attempted assassination of Nancy Pelosi moved to draftspace
Too soon. Title is problematic. Most sources mention an "unclear motive".

Nomination of Attempted assassination of Nancy Pelosi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Attempted assassination of Nancy Pelosi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Attempted assassination of Nancy Pelosi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Mooonswimmer 17:40, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Murders of Jeffrey Dahmer for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murders of Jeffrey Dahmer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Murders of Jeffrey Dahmer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Mooonswimmer 17:59, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Fancy creating a new page?
There appears to be some news re. a hacker group Opera1er. Per the work we did on Lapsus$, do you fancy creating the page this time? Chumpih t 01:00, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I'll create the page once they hit more organizations. IMO, it's premature right now. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 06:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Cool. Ping us near the time if you like.  Chumpih  t 19:39, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello, I'm Love of Corey. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Colorado Springs nightclub shooting, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Love of Corey (talk) 16:06, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Arrest of Brittney Griner for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arrest of Brittney Griner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Arrest of Brittney Griner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Saucysalsa30 (talk) 04:36, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Jeff Winger
Assuming you gain consensus for keeping the stand-alone page, please don't forget the cleanup you need to do when you split out a section into its own page. If the stand-alone page becomes stable, the info on the List of Community characters is far too detailed, and should be pruned. Add a template to the Jeff Winger entry in the list, and condense the text there to a summary of the new page's content, avoiding needless repetition. Please see step 6 of WP:SPLIT. Good luck CapnZapp (talk) 10:59, 2 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Now that you have achieved consensus, please don't forget to clean up after your split. Regards CapnZapp (talk) 13:27, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Skydance Taskforce
How do i open a task force on Skydance Media? I looked though the instructions and i have to make a subpage for some reason. Any ideas on how i would make one? BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 19:15, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Find a WikiProject, like WikiProject Animation, and create a subpage, in your case, WikiProject Animation/Skydance Media task force. The WikiProject status template should help you get started. If WikiProject Animation has a list of task forces, add it to the list. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 20:19, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
 * is there an example i can use to make it? I mean, Skydance has Television, Video Games, and sports. that's a lot to take by. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 23:20, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Take a look at WikiProject Current events/Monkeypox outbreak task force. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 23:39, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
 * hmm... interesting. Well, it's a company page but should i change it to Wikipedia:WikiProject Companies/Skydance Media task force or just leave it for Animation? BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 00:14, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Leave it in animation. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 00:26, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * alright, i got the page set up anyhow. you really think this could work? i'm a little nervous and anxious for this. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 00:34, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I suggest you ask on WikiProject Animation if you need someone else to run it or need more members. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 02:03, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * So far so good on the task force. i've gotten everything set up. you think it could work on the other skydance films? Like Terminator Genisys or The Greatest Beer Run Ever? BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 02:01, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 02:03, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Cool! Would that be for WikiProject:Film? BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 06:19, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * If you intend to branch out beyond animation, I would suggest moving the WikiProject to another one, or create two at the same time. I would not recommend the latter, though. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 06:36, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I’ll keep it in animation til i decide if i can move it to film. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 06:47, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I've managed to add WikiProject Film in the task force since they already got a category based on it. Hope this will boost enough for Skydance Media. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 22:24, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

History of Twitter (October 2022–present) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, History of Twitter (October 2022–present), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AngusW🐶🐶F ( bark  •  sniff ) 23:20, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hawaiian Airlines Flight 35


The article Hawaiian Airlines Flight 35 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "WP:NOTNEWS"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 11:28, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Hawaiian Airlines Flight 35 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hawaiian Airlines Flight 35 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hawaiian Airlines Flight 35 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. ZLEA T \ C 00:56, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

AfroCreatives WikiProject
Thanks so much for swiftly reviewing and approving our proposal. We're very grateful. ~ LavenderDemo (talk) 12:00, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy Holidays
Merry Christmas, ElijahPepe! Have a prosperous new year! InfiniteNexus (talk) 06:59, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Category: History of Islam
In your comment at WikiProject Council/Proposals/Islamic History, you mentioned that Category:Islamic History contained 100s of articles, but when I open it I can only find 66. How is that? The ⬡ Bestagon [t] [c] 06:29, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
 * The root category may only have 66 pages, but Category:History of Islam has several subcategories with hundreds of pages. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 18:58, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Top 50
You might've seen I called you for the annual report, in gratitude for all you helped through the year in the Top 25. If you ever find the time, you can do any of the remaining write-ups, just one would be more than enough. igordebraga ≠ 20:48, 27 December 2022 (UTC)