User talk:Equendil

where you want it to appear, though you would likely want to indicate how you want it to appear (size, which side of the text, caption and more). For instance, I used  to display the picture on the right side of my reply. See Extended image syntax for details. Equendil Talk 01:57, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

vos interventions
Equentil, moi, je commence à vous trouver bien sympathique... Frania W. (talk) 04:08, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merci! Je viens de passer un long moment à tracer et inverser les modifications de ce qui semble être une seule et même personne qui édite depuis son IP (User:167.206.29.162) et deux comptes (User:Qqtacpn et User:Niaps) et qui a apparement décidé d'ajouter sa section "Napoleon = Hitler" à un maximum d'articles, je vais continuer à surveiller et surement demander un checkuser. Equendil Talk 04:22, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Request
Can you please stop [|this user]? He has only made disruptive edits to Wikipedia. When I reverted his vandalism and left a warning on his talk page he then decided to attack me. -- The Legendary   Sky Attacker  08:32, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi, I'm not an admin myself, but I reported that user on Administrator intervention against vandalism for attention of an admin. Equendil Talk 08:39, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * And he's gone. Equendil Talk 08:42, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. -- The Legendary   Sky Attacker  09:14, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

On Niaps
Hi i am Willski72 and i have been trying to get Niaps to see sense just like you. How about forming an Entente Cordiale to get him to understand that he has to create his own articles if he is serious about this, and not change others that should either be left as they are or have one neutral sentence mentioning atrocities on both sides (both French Army AND Spanish Guerrillas.Willski72 (talk) 12:02, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

It also seems that [167.206.29.162], Niaps and Qqtacon are allied on this issue, they have all worked together to create an article on the murdered man.Willski72 (talk) 12:12, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The whole thing is currently under scrutiny at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, for a serie of articles around a Don Manuel Joseph Martín López de Prado Rodríguez Díaz de Armesto y Varela, X Baron of Lemavia who claims was killed as part of a massacre ordered by Marshal Ney. Articles under AfD ended up deleted after he himself tagged them for speedy deletion, he got himself blocked for a legal threat, and most likely would have for sockpuppetry otherwise. I'll just let the dust settle at this point. Equendil Talk 17:56, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Also at Administrators' noticeboard for his behaviour on the AfD discussions. Equendil Talk 18:02, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Yes i read an article about the death of the Don and others which was very one sided to say the least. I think waiting to see what the administrators do is a good idea. I expect they will put up stiff resistance as they are very passionate on the issue, but they will have to be good to get out of this one.Willski72 (talk) 18:08, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

SNUSP
SNUSP a brainf**k derivative? What? Have you ever programmed in SNUSP? I wonder why you agreed in the deletion of the article, if you are not able to distinguish between brainf**k and SNUSP. By the way, C++ is a derivative of C. And LOLCODE exists still! --Ittakezou0 (talk) 17:35, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * No I have not "programmed" in SNUSP, the reason being esoteric programming languages such as this are merely designed to be amusing Turing-complete languages, not for actual development. That's not relevant to my delete !vote anyhow.
 * Stating something is a derivative of something else does not imply they are the same.
 * From Esolangs.org "Core SNUSP is essentially Brainfuck with a two-dimensional control flow"
 * Yes C++ is most definitively a derivative of C. A *notable* derivative.
 * I have never edited LOLCODE or otherwise taken part in its AfD's or DRV's as far as I remember.
 * The proper venue to get articles restored is at Deletion Review Equendil Talk 18:01, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Mentioned it above, but please note there is a perfectly fine "wiki" for esoteric languages out there: Esolangs Equendil Talk 18:09, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * There should exist a wiki for every material rejected by this one; and at the end, for both material that is here, and the one taht was rejected... For any of the content of this wiki, it is possible to find another source (it is a requirements for articles, isn't it?), so what this wiki is for? Maybe for the lazy one who can't learn searching but in a unique index... sad future for the humanity I see. --Ittakezou0 (talk) 13:16, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Dolmen deity
You commented on the talk page of this article. I can find the phrase in a late 19th century work by T Peet and something around 1950 by a Bruce Dickens. The reference just added about mother goddess is not only by someone who I'm dubious about, he doesn't actually use the phrase. I'm tempted to take it to AfD. What do you think? Dougweller (talk) 18:22, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Broken Coord
Hi. In order to clean up Category:Coord template needing repair, would you mind if I changed an instance of in User:Equendil/Paris timeline? There's an extra pipe in ; it needs to be.

There's also a typo:  for , but that one doesn't seem to matter! —WWoods (talk) 15:48, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you! I fixed them. Equendil Talk 19:43, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Kapitop's message
EU

Hi stop quoting incorrect numbers from biased sources about religious minorities in France and EU. By doing that, you are the one that is vandalizing ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kapitop (talk • contribs)
 * I am not quoting anything, I'm reverting your edits. *You* are altering referenced material in contradiction with said references, with no justification whatsoever. Equendil Talk 02:20, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Stop vandalizing wikipedia with your false lies. Go educate & get fact & then edit. STOP using dubious & your self invented "so-called" reference materials ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kapitop (talk • contribs) 00:13, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Kaolin (band)
Hello Equendil, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, Kaolin (band), has been marked for speedy deletion by User:Koavf. This has been done because the page seems to be about a person, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add " " to the page text, and edit the to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:Koavf. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of 09:40, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Courtesy note
You are receiving this note because you participated in this TFD. Some of these have been re-nominated here, where you may wish to comment. Thanks, –xeno talk  14:27, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Traduction ?
 Hello Equendil, Lebrouillard has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Tu gères en anglais dis moi ! Tu ne voudrais pas traduire quelques articles avec le projet traduction ?! Lebrouillard (talk) 21:18, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Science in the Middle Ages
Hello. You are invited to take part in the discussion on Science in the Middle Ages. The question is should we keep or remove the section on the Islamic world. Regards Gun Powder Ma (talk) 08:29, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

List of current French Navy ships
Equendil you have done a great job on List of current French Navy ships. I have some queries on the classification of the Aviso's and also the matter of re-listing the Porte-hélicoptères Jeanne d'Arc (R 97). Perhaps you could have a look at the articles discussion page as I have outlined it in full there. Thanks. Felix505 (talk) 04:49, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I have inserted the text [Aviso class. A sloop, (or light frigate) tasked for coastal anti-submarine warfare, patrol and defence including strategic submarine support and off-shore deployments.]. I hope you find this appropriate.
 * A more detailed response is on the talk page. Thanks Felix505 (talk) 20:45, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

There has been some section heading renaming going on recently at List of current French Navy ships with frigates getting tagged destroyer and aviso's getting attention both as frigates and corvettes. I have returned the section headers to the earlier descriptions but it may need some monitoring and maybe some (Talk) discussions on the talk page if the problem does not go away. I found the Aviso's described as "Aviso (corvette) (light frigate)" earlier today. "==Guided missile frigates/destroyers== ...The French Navy has three frigates currently active in an anti-aircraft role with a fourth currently on sea trials...." was the other instance I reverted today. As we engaged in some degree of discussion on this matter on the Talk page we would have a reasonable argument to put forward that the matter has been discussed and consensus on the matter agreed to in regard to this article. Knowing the way these things can go I thought it best to seek your engagement sooner rather than later.

Regarding Jeanne d'Arc (R 97) some recent citable info turned up on the net so the article on the ship has been updated to some effect. Have a look over it if you have the time. It could still use some decent documentation of the actual life of the ship but at least the end days have a bit more resoulution now. Felix 01:59, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Grammar
It's either "hundreds of meters" or "a hundred meters", but not "a hundred of meters". Which are you trying to convey? Fences &amp;  Windows  20:32, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * A hundred meters, fixed it, thanks. Equendil Talk 21:09, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Geo coordinates on Paris timeline
Hi, Equendil. Just so you know, I went ahead and fixed a few minor errors with the geographic coordinate metadata. By the way, good work on that page. -happy5214 16:11, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Maupiti Island (game) Titlescreen .jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Maupiti Island (game) Titlescreen .jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 18:37, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Superskweek.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Superskweek.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 22 May 2021 (UTC)